Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > sci.physics.electromag > #21735
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.electromag |
| Subject | Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law |
| Date | 2023-12-16 14:03 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <2ej15k-ugka.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <mFrCfaqo6aWnVrgoVBO1pIgLrUk@jntp> <hq815k-8j6a.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <k7pwHo87r8fuxdssCNMtr9Vglx4@jntp> <g2b15k-sl9a.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <RSReee5O2NJzfCUpHbLivgMCESk@jntp> |
Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 16/12/2023 à 20:40, Jim Pennino a écrit : >> >> This is just a pile of arm waving. >> >> How would it "revolutionize electromagnetism"? >> >> What difference would it make in the real world? >> >> What new technology would it enable? >> > > My experiment shows that a magnetic force that is parallel to the test > current rotates the coil, so parallel-to-current magnetic force exists. > But it is not described by Lorentz force law because Lorentz force is > perpendicular to the test current. > > In consequence, parallel-to-current magnetic force cannot be described > with magnetic field because Lorentz force equal the vectorial product of > current I and magnetic field B. Then electromagnetism need a field that is > more then B. This is a radical change in the theory of electromagnetism > and a revolution. Yet more arm waving. > > As for practical applications, they will come later as technique evolves. > Even Faraday did not know what would be the applications of electricity. > However, I have in mind an ionic propeller for spacecraft. Ion flow is an > electric current which can be pushed by parallel-to-current magnetic > force. What you describe is NOT a propeller but a rocket, and ion rockets have been around for many decades. So what would change? > > Also, the magnetic confinement of plasma in Tokamak is designed with > Lorentz force law which does not work with parallel-to-current magnetic > force. But this force really matters for high temperature ions which bite > into the wall. So, parallel-to-current magnetic force will surely improve > the design and the work of nuclear fusion apparatus > Ions which bite?
Back to sci.physics.electromag | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 18:25 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 10:40 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 21:49 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 14:55 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 16:43 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 10:46 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 08:24 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 18:43 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 11:02 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 19:27 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 11:40 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 21:18 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 14:03 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 23:45 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-17 08:56 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-18 20:14 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-18 13:08 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-19 16:37 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-19 09:07 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-20 23:09 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-20 15:33 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-21 00:39 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-20 18:48 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-21 15:01 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-21 07:48 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-22 19:29 +0000
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-22 11:46 -0800
Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 14:32 +0000
csiph-web