Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > sci.physics.electromag > #21735

Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law

From Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics.electromag
Subject Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law
Date 2023-12-16 14:03 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <2ej15k-ugka.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <mFrCfaqo6aWnVrgoVBO1pIgLrUk@jntp> <hq815k-8j6a.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <k7pwHo87r8fuxdssCNMtr9Vglx4@jntp> <g2b15k-sl9a.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <RSReee5O2NJzfCUpHbLivgMCESk@jntp>

Show all headers | View raw


Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 16/12/2023 à 20:40, Jim Pennino a écrit :
>> 
>> This is just a pile of arm waving.
>> 
>> How would it "revolutionize electromagnetism"?
>> 
>> What difference would it make in the real world?
>> 
>> What new technology would it enable?
>> 
> 
> My experiment shows that a magnetic force that is parallel to the test 
> current rotates the coil, so parallel-to-current magnetic force exists. 
> But it is not described by Lorentz force law because Lorentz force is 
> perpendicular to the test current. 
> 
> In consequence, parallel-to-current magnetic force cannot be described 
> with magnetic field because Lorentz force equal the vectorial product of 
> current I and magnetic field B. Then electromagnetism need a field that is 
> more then B. This is a radical change in the theory of electromagnetism 
> and a revolution.

Yet more arm waving.

> 
> As for practical applications, they will come later as technique evolves. 
> Even Faraday did not know what would be the applications of electricity. 
> However, I have in mind an ionic propeller for spacecraft. Ion flow is an 
> electric current which can be pushed by parallel-to-current magnetic 
> force.

What you describe is NOT a propeller but a rocket, and ion rockets have
been around for many decades.

So what would change?

> 
> Also, the magnetic confinement of plasma in Tokamak is designed with 
> Lorentz force law which does not work with parallel-to-current magnetic 
> force. But this force really matters for high temperature ions which bite 
> into the wall. So, parallel-to-current magnetic force will surely improve 
> the design and the work of nuclear fusion apparatus
> 

Ions which bite?

Back to sci.physics.electromag | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 18:25 +0000
  Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 10:40 -0800
    Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 21:49 +0000
      Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 14:55 -0800
        Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-15 23:03 +0000
          Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-15 16:43 -0800
            Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 10:46 +0000
              Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 08:24 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 18:43 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 11:02 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 19:27 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 11:40 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 21:18 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-16 14:03 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-16 23:45 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-17 08:56 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-18 20:14 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-18 13:08 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-19 16:37 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-19 09:07 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-20 23:09 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-20 15:33 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-21 00:39 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-20 18:48 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-21 15:01 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-21 07:48 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2023-12-22 19:29 +0000
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-12-22 11:46 -0800
                Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 14:32 +0000

csiph-web