Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > sci.physics.electromag

sci.physics.electromag

3280 articles, 610 threads (numbers 18351 – 21814) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Guides on electromagnetic spectrum (1 reply) aruns@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet (aruns) 2025-06-12 13:36 +1200
   → Re: Guides on electromagnetic spectrum Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> 2026-04-20 01:45 +0200
 
So weird! (1 reply) "Santiago Rojas" <santyrojasprieto9@yahoo.com> 2025-02-22 21:37 -0500
   → Re: So weird! ProfIJM <x@x.x> 2026-03-03 00:06 +0000
 
[ANN] Standard Ground Plane Antenna in Two Environments : Simulation and Measurements without Error Estimation "pez.-" <pez.usenet@gmail.com> 2026-02-24 15:57 +0100
 
A Conceptual Model for the Reflection Measurements of a Vector Network Analyzer System and its Practical Application "pez.-" <pez.usenet@gmail.com> 2026-02-05 04:32 +0100
 
Axiomatic Formulation of «A Derivation of Faraday's law from Coulomb's Law and Relativity» Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2026-01-22 13:37 +0000
 
A Derivation of Faraday's law from Coulomb's Law and Relativity Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2026-01-14 22:46 +0000
 
Democrat dies after chain necklace pulls him into MRI machine, wife recounts harrowing scene Negro Removal Services <mri@nyc.biz> 2025-07-23 04:52 +0200
 
Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law (28 replies) Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-15 18:25 +0000
   → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-15 10:40 -0800
     → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-15 21:49 +0000
       → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-15 14:55 -0800
         → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-15 23:03 +0000
           → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-15 16:43 -0800
             → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-16 10:46 +0000
               → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-16 08:24 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-16 18:43 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-16 11:02 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-16 19:27 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-16 11:40 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-16 21:18 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-16 14:03 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-16 23:45 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-17 08:56 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-18 20:14 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-18 13:08 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-19 16:37 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-19 09:07 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-20 23:09 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-20 15:33 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-21 00:39 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-20 18:48 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-21 15:01 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-21 07:48 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-12-22 19:29 +0000
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2023-12-22 11:46 -0800
                 → Re: Letter to readers for the new magnetic force law Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2024-06-07 14:32 +0000
 
Dendera Zodiac - parts 1-5 D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-23 16:59 +0100
 
Chess D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-23 17:24 +0100
 
Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. (17 replies) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-25 00:29 +0000
   → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-24 17:51 -0700
     → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-04-25 04:05 +0000
   → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-25 08:05 +0000
     → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-25 07:23 -0700
     → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2024-04-25 08:22 -0700
       → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-04-28 10:26 +0000
         → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-28 08:29 -0700
           → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2024-04-28 10:48 -0700
           → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-04-28 23:55 +0000
             → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-28 17:31 -0700
               → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-04-29 03:24 +0000
                 → Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-29 07:02 +0000
                 → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-29 07:10 -0700
                 → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-29 07:06 -0700
               → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-05-01 22:12 +0000
                 → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-05-01 17:09 -0700
                 → Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners. bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) 2024-05-02 07:51 +0000
 
The MMI bungle Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-26 08:45 +0000
 
Edgar Allan Poe's Omega Point Cosmology (2 replies) Jamie Michelle <femmejamie@yahoo.com> 2024-04-23 20:54 -0400
   → Re: Edgar Allan Poe's Omega Point Cosmology David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> 2024-04-24 01:06 -0230
     → Re: Edgar Allan Poe's Omega Point Cosmology Jamie Michelle <femmejamie@yahoo.com> 2024-04-24 18:28 -0400
 
How Arindam reconciled Newtonian and Maxwellian electrodynamics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-19 00:46 +0000
 
Tesla on Einstein's theories of relativity (4 replies) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-05 03:09 +0000
   → Re: Tesla on Einstein's theories of relativity Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> 2024-04-05 06:22 -0700
   → Re: Tesla on Einstein's theories of relativity film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) 2024-04-10 20:20 +0000
     → Re: Tesla on Einstein's theories of relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> 2024-04-10 22:54 -0700
     → Re: Tesla on Einstein's theories of relativity Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-11 12:49 +0000
 
Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? (5 replies) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-02 00:50 +0000
   → Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> 2024-04-02 01:14 +0000
     → Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2024-04-01 20:11 -0700
   → Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> 2024-04-02 09:39 +0000
     → Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-02 12:08 +0000
     → Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> 2024-04-02 12:36 +0000
 
From Coulomb’s force to magnetic force and experiments that show magnetic force parallel to current (2 replies) PengKuan Em <titang78@gmail.com> 2023-09-26 09:09 -0700
   → Re: From Coulomb’s force to magnetic force and experiments that show magnetic force parallel to current Aether Regained <AetherRegaind@invalid.com> 2024-01-24 18:50 +0000
     → Re: From Coulomb’s force to magnetic force and experiments that show magnetic force parallel to current Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2024-03-16 11:39 +0000
 
Erosion protection of Tokamak and magnetic force on single charge Kuan Peng <titang78@gmail.com> 2024-03-13 15:40 +0000
 
Re: 2460362.80155 Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> 2024-02-23 10:02 +0100
 
God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics (2 replies) James Redford <jrredford@yahoo.com> 2024-02-13 15:38 -0500
   → Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics James Redford <jrredford@yahoo.com> 2024-02-21 00:27 -0500
     → Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> 2024-02-23 09:59 +0100

~Page 1 of ~31 (articles 21765–21814) Older →


csiph-web