Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #396723
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? |
| Date | 2026-03-02 10:24 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20260302102440.00004a5c@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <8734n5fjtq.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qvc62h7.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87a5fssb70.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86tsuzeze4.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87zf4q99sh.fsf@example.invalid> |
On Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:42:38 -0800 Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > > Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > >> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> The more C is changed to resemble C++ the worse it becomes. It > >>>>> isn't surprising that you like it. > >>>> I presume that was intended as a personal insult. > >>> It wasn't. > >> > >> Then you need to work on knowing when you've insulted someone. > > > > I see no reason to feel an obligation to know whether someone > > might feel insulted by something I say. Feeling insulted is a > > subjective reaction, not an objective truth. If someone said > > to me "it isn't surprising that you dislike C++" I might agree > > (or not) with them, but I don't feel insulted by it; all they > > are doing is giving their subjective reaction to my behavior. > > > > On the contrary, it seems presumptuous of you to judge that it > > was my intention to insult you. In cases where I'm not sure > > about what someone meant by something, I try to ask them what > > they meant rather than jump to a conclusion. Admittedly, I > > don't always succeed, but I do try to follow that policy. > > That's three times today that you've replied to a post I made a > long time ago (about a year and a half in this case). > > I get the impression that you're stalking me. It is appreciation. > Please note that > I have not asked whether that's your intent. I find it extremely > annoying, for reasons I don't intend to explain further. I again > encourage you to knock it off. >
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-03-01 18:30 -0800
Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-03-01 19:42 -0800
Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-02 10:24 +0200
Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-03-02 04:43 -0800
csiph-web