Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.c > #388535

Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault?

From Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault?
Date 2024-09-27 17:33 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <868qvc62h7.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <v8j808$2us0r$1@dont-email.me> <864j7oszhu.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87o75vg9ot.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86ikw1o0h8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <8734n5fjtq.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

>> The more C is changed to resemble C++ the worse it becomes.  It
>> isn't surprising that you like it.
>
> I presume that was intended as a personal insult.

It wasn't.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-09-27 17:33 -0700
  Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-27 20:34 -0700
    Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-09-28 07:22 +0200
      Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-09-28 17:57 +0000
        Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-28 13:42 -0700
          Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-09-28 22:05 +0000
            Re: relearning C: why does an in-place change to a char* segfault? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-09-28 15:17 -0700

csiph-web