Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #71763

Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:46:24 -0400
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

> In any case, there has been VAST VAST investment in this tech - but
> it's returning almost NOTHING for all the investment.
> 
> NOT a good business model.
> 
> The evil GOAL ... disemploy almost all of the very annoying Humans.
> 
> BUT ... WHO then has the money to Buy Your Stuff ???

This is the end result of decades of business culture that promotes
idiots who make impressive-sounding noises over people with actual
line-of-business knowledge and/or real management savvy - a bunch of
billionaire morons lighting money on fire in hopes of obsoleting the
workers they've already mostly reduced to wage-slaves out of pure
greed, with no consideration for whether the thing they're burning it
on will ever do the thing they hope it will* or whether their lunatic
gamble doesn't stand a real chance of cratering the very economy that
gives their billions any real-world value** in the first place.

* (It won't, at least not the particular technology that all their
  moron AI-startup CEO friends are all-in on.)
** (It does.)

Just *beyond* insane - reckless, irresponsible squandering for the sake
of nothing at all beyond sociopathic contempt for everyone they
consider beneath them. Sadly, we're not likely to get the "investors
jumping from windows" phase of the crash - that'd require a level of
basic self-awareness that these flesh-suit simulacra are simply not
capable of - but we can hope that in the fallout they might at least be
eaten alive by starving peasants.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 02:46 -0400
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns JJenssen <joemajen@arcor.de> - 2025-08-20 12:09 +0200
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:49 +0200
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:23 +0100
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 08:54 -0700
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:20 +0100
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-21 17:54 +0000
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 13:59 -0700
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-22 00:19 +0000
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-22 11:14 +0100
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-21 00:05 +0000
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 23:39 -0400
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:21 +0100
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-22 09:29 -0400
          Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-22 19:49 +0100
            Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-23 00:11 -0400
              Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 10:56 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-23 18:38 +0000
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 20:06 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-24 03:36 +0000
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-24 11:31 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-24 18:51 +0000
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-21 10:44 +0200
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:22 +0100
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-21 14:12 +0200

csiph-web