Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #72054

Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns

From	rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns
Date	2025-08-23 18:38 +0000
Message-ID	<mgug5nFj3tqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <1086of0$rgpt$4@dont-email.me> <4f6dnWnSHNY07TX1nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <108ae2u$1n7i9$6@dont-email.me> <d7ydnVvwaYwdojT1nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <108c398$234t5$4@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 10:56:56 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 23/08/2025 05:11, c186282 wrote:
> 
> 
>>    I see it all ... vast vast ghettos full of crap govt apt blocks,
>>    warehousing for the unemployable.
>>    Stand in line every day for your food ration.
>> 
> I see you have been to Russia.

No need.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Taylor_Homes

The waiting in line for food was streamlined by EBT cards. The previous 
paper food stamps were cumbersome. RFK Jr. is making waves by suggesting 
SNAP benefits should be used to buy junk food.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-5429651/rfk-jr-s-snap-changes-have-
people-worried-about-losing-benefits-altogether

He has an uphill fight. Some people have been raised on junk food for 
generations. That's what they eat. 

Robert Taylor and Cabrini-Green are the notorious examples but most of the 
'60s era high rises have been demolished. Most of them were quite nice 
before the tenants moved it.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 02:46 -0400
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns JJenssen <joemajen@arcor.de> - 2025-08-20 12:09 +0200
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:49 +0200
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-20 12:23 +0100
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 08:54 -0700
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:20 +0100
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-21 17:54 +0000
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 13:59 -0700
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-22 00:19 +0000
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-22 11:14 +0100
  Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-21 00:05 +0000
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-20 23:39 -0400
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:21 +0100
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-22 09:29 -0400
          Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-22 19:49 +0100
            Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-08-23 00:11 -0400
              Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 10:56 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-23 18:38 +0000
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-23 20:06 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-24 03:36 +0000
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-24 11:31 +0100
                Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-24 18:51 +0000
    Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-21 10:44 +0200
      Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-21 10:22 +0100
        Re: Umpteen BILLIONS, Maybe a TRILLION, invested in "AI' - but Almost NO Returns 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-21 14:12 +0200

csiph-web