Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268795
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! |
| Date | 2014-11-25 02:43 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20141125024352.5a83142b@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <nmhcz4bx010q$.mp3b6i9pf5am.dlg@40tude.net> <20141125011001.2af8f5f4@maxa-pc> <m50jnp$ji1$1@dont-email.me> <20141125015847.5ebe84a8@maxa-pc> <m50kn3$m9l$1@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:07:03 -0500 "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message > news:20141125015847.5ebe84a8@maxa-pc... > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:50:22 -0500 > > "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote: > > > >> "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote in message > >> news:20141125011001.2af8f5f4@maxa-pc... > >> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:04:48 -0500 > >> > flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Because things work better than on Windows. > >> >> > >> >> No they don't. > >> >> Unless you prefer sitting at the CLI. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Particularly Windows is > >> >> > heavy on drives... > >> >> > >> >> Storage is cheap. > >> > > >> > I mean load heavy. Bunch of useless services roaring > >> > constantly... > >> > >> You either don't know what you're talking about or you're lying - > >> which is it? > >> > >> Right now there are more services running in a CLI console on my > >> Linux box than there are on my Windows laptop with a full GUI. > >> Despite your nonsense - there are MORE services running on Linux. > > > > Except that you compare apples to oranges... > > I know what Im talking about. No normal Linux service eats CPU > > and disk like on Windows. > > And you didn't mention a single Windows service that "eats CPU and > disk" - why is that? Because I didn't remember name and I wont turn on laptop and boot into Windows just because of that. Simple... > > > > On Linux you see kernel threads, > > On Linux I see more services running than on Windows. Period. You see. Exactly. > > hint... "ps aux" shows processes. Not threads. If a process had 10 > threads it will only appear once. I didn't run "ps -eLf " So what? Like on Windows you see threads... > > > > while on Windows they are not shown. > > The same way they were not shown on Linux with the ps switches I used. No no. Kernel processes are not shown in Windows. But as I said, number does not matter. > > > > You can have few services on Windows but they are *resource heavy*. > > And once again you make general claims without anything specific. > Exactly which Windows services are "resource heavy" like you claim? You know it. > >
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 12:42 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 12:48 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 12:57 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 13:05 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-24 19:31 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-24 14:51 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-24 14:30 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 13:58 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 18:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:59 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:04 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:10 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:17 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:24 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:22 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:47 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 21:17 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:33 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:16 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 10:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:15 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:03 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 08:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:58 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:07 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:15 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:43 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:56 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:04 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:09 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:25 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:33 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:39 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:40 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:49 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:55 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:03 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:10 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 07:16 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:15 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 09:39 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 22:14 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 21:30 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:07 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:13 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:22 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:32 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:45 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:00 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 07:04 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:05 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:29 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:06 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0000
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:06 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 19:52 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:00 +0100
csiph-web