Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268731
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! |
| Date | 2014-11-25 01:24 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20141125012412.103cb2a4@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <wbhga8f05mof$.uk77mee2hzmy$.dlg@40tude.net> <20141125005936.7582b3a2@maxa-pc> <nmhcz4bx010q$.mp3b6i9pf5am.dlg@40tude.net> <20141125011001.2af8f5f4@maxa-pc> <bctzk2vy4oeh.ctftry40a52o.dlg@40tude.net> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:17:18 -0500 flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 01:10:01 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:04:48 -0500 > > flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:59:36 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 18:50:59 -0500 > >>> flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> The top tier ones are available for other platforms, so why use > >>>> Linux in the first place? > >>> > >>> Because things work better than on Windows. > >> > >> No they don't. > >> Unless you prefer sitting at the CLI. > >> > >> > >>> Particularly Windows is > >>> heavy on drives... > >> > >> Storage is cheap. > > > > I mean load heavy. Bunch of useless services roaring constantly... > > Yet I am able to stream 64 tracks of audio, apply FX etc without even > a click or crackle. And all at very low latency. > > Now with XP I did have to disable quite a few non essential services > to get the best performance. > Win7 and Win 8 work right out of the box and no tweaking needed. Then you must have pretty fast computer. On my wifes laptop(1.8Ghz 2GB) win 8 works like a dog. > > >>> Windows is slow... > >> > >> Huh? > >> Not on my boxes it isn't. > > So you don't have anti virus/malware/adware software slowing > > down everything constantly ? Not to mention all other crapware > > that is running ... > > Nope. > I use the built in MS Essentials or whatever it's called these days. > Zero impact. You think so ;))))))) Now you got riddled with crapware... > > > >> Under Linux? > >> The console is a must, which is one reason people dislike Linux. > >> Huh? > > > > I don't like IDE's at all. I finish everything in command line... > > No matter language/tools. > > And doing it under Windows is *pain*. > > Well that explains why Linux is the OS for you. > I would venture that 95+ percent of the computer using people will > disagree with you. Sure. > And that's one reason why desktop Linux has gone nowhere in 20 years. I am glad for that. Had to abandon Ubuntu because it started to look like Windows , mess of services and unwanted bloat, so that beginners doesn't have to do nothing but somewhat experienced users have lot to do to disable unnecessary bloat. > >
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 12:42 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 12:48 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 12:57 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 13:05 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-24 19:31 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-24 14:51 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-24 14:30 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 13:58 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 18:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:59 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:04 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:10 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:17 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:24 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:22 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:47 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 21:17 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:33 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:16 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 10:01 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:15 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:03 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 08:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 19:50 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:58 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:07 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:15 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:43 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 20:56 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:04 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:09 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:25 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:33 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:39 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:40 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:49 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 03:55 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:03 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:10 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 07:16 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:15 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 09:39 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:41 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 22:14 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 21:30 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 23:53 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:07 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:13 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:22 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:32 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:45 +0100
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:29 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:00 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 07:04 -0600
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:05 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:29 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:06 -0700
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 00:11 +0000
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:06 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 19:52 -0500
Re: Kubuntu 14.10 review: Buggy but looking good! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:00 +0100
csiph-web