Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.math > #644242

Re: Cardinalities of sets

Show all headers | View raw

Am 22.03.2026 um 01:19 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
> WM wrote:
>> Am 17.03.2026 um 15:57 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
>>> WM wrote:
>>>> Am 28.02.2026 um 00:39 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:
>>>>> WM wrote:
>>>>>> By the way, closed formula or not: The fractioons are not countable.
>>>>>> Every intelligent mathematician can understand my proof:
>>>>
>>>>>> According to Cantor all positive fractions
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ...
>>>>>>         2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, ...
>>>>>>         3/1, 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, ...
>>>>>>         4/1, 4/2, 4/3, 4/4, ...
>>>>>>         ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can be indexed by the Cantor function k = (m + n - 1)(m + n - 2)/2 + m
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, that is your claim, not Cantor's.
>>>>
>>>> Es hat nämlich die Funktion  =  + (- 1)(- 2)/2, wie
>>>> leicht zu zeigen, die bemerkenswerte Eigenschaft, daß sie alle positiven
>>>> ganzen Zahlen und jede nur einmal darstellt, wenn in ihr 
>>>> undunabhängig voneinander ebenfalls jeden positiven, ganzzahligen
>>>> Wert erhalten [1]. [Cantor, Collected Works p. 132]
>>>
>>> This purported quote is horribly broken,
>>
>> Look it up yourself.
> 
> IOW, you are unable to substantiate your claim, and you do not even care to.
> Why should you be taken seriously at all?
> 
>>> and "Collected Works p. 132" is not a valid reference.
>>
>> It is a reference for every mathematician.
> 
> "Collected Works" can mean anything.

Find a second volume of that name.

Aüßerdem bist Du einer der verlogensten Teilnehmer hier:

From: wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: de.sci.mathematik
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:01:21 +0100

Am 11.03.2026 um 18:59 schrieb Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn:

 > Für Deine Formel hast Du keinen Beleg geliefert, dass sie von Cantor 
stammt.

Das ist nicht meine Formel. Ich habe die Quelle mehrfach angegeben. Du 
hast sie wieder gelöscht:
E. Zermelo: ”Georg Cantor– Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und 
philosophischen Inhalts”, Springer, Berlin (1932) p. 132.

Regards, WM

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Cardinalities of sets Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-28 00:39 +0100
  Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 20:03 -0800
    Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 20:12 -0800
    Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-01 08:12 -0800
      Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-04 10:15 -0800
  Re: Cardinalities of sets WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-02-28 19:29 +0100
    Re: Cardinalities of sets Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-17 15:57 +0100
      Re: Cardinalities of sets WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-17 18:11 +0100
        Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 14:54 -0700
        Re: Cardinalities of sets Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-22 01:19 +0100
          Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 18:24 -0700
          Re: Cardinalities of sets wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-22 15:42 +0100
            Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-22 15:10 -0700
              Re: Cardinalities of sets Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 09:32 -0700
            Re: Cardinalities of sets Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-23 23:24 +0100
              Re: Cardinalities of sets wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-24 20:44 +0100
          Re: Cardinalities of sets Maximilian Takashita <atiia@kiimia.jp> - 2026-03-23 20:18 +0000

csiph-web