Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #737105
| From | Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: RF power combiner |
| Date | 2025-10-24 18:17 +1100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10df97e$2dr0m$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <10da59f$gcuu$1@dont-email.me> <9e7603ff-39e9-bfc5-612c-c30bb27679eb@electrooptical.net> |
On 24/10/2025 7:48 am, Phil Hobbs wrote: > On 2025-10-22 04:40, Jeroen Belleman wrote: >> While musing over a text about transmission line transformers, >> combiners, splitters and so on, I came up with a power combiner >> that promises a bandwidth spanning from some kHz well into the >> GHz domain, with good isolation between input ports, and that >> does _not_ have a null where its transmission lines are half a >> wavelength long. >> >> I could find no other examples of this arrangement. The usual >> combiners are wire- or coax- wound transformers, with 3 decade >> bandwidths in the 100kHz-100MHz ballpark, or Wilkinson things >> that only begin to work above half a GHz. >> >> This design should be able to work from a few kHz up to well >> into the GHz domain. Anyway, for what it's worth, here it is. >> >> Jeroen Belleman >> >> ========================= >> >> Version 4 > <snip> > > That is one weird-ass combiner, for sure. Looks like it has to be made > out of coax, on account of the switcheroo in the grounds. Why not go the whole hog and wind it with semi-rigid coax - RG405 - and use SMA soldered coax sockets. Even RG405 is 2.2mm OD so you might not be able to get in enough turns to get down to 100KHz, but it would look serious. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
RF power combiner Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2025-10-22 10:40 +0200
Re: RF power combiner Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2025-10-23 16:48 -0400
Re: RF power combiner Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2025-10-24 00:39 +0200
Re: RF power combiner Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-10-24 08:51 -0400
Re: RF power combiner Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2025-10-24 19:21 +0200
Re: RF power combiner Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-25 04:22 +1100
Re: RF power combiner Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2025-10-24 13:17 +0000
Re: RF power combiner Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2025-10-24 19:15 +0200
Re: RF power combiner Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-25 14:49 +1100
Re: RF power combiner Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-10-24 15:33 -0400
Re: RF power combiner john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-24 12:48 -0700
Re: RF power combiner Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-10-24 18:17 +1100
csiph-web