Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #734862
| From | Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.fpga |
| Subject | Re: AI for FPGA design |
| Date | 2025-08-11 13:58 +1000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <107bpou$2aa9j$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <64le9k1vou92tug582k53qhfijm118r68k@4ax.com> <ff700ae7-08a7-bf40-f29a-69c44bd31ae7@irrt.De> <hd0i9kdsmqu8eb2k2vht0j55bd5ipgvn8h@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 11/08/2025 6:32 am, john larkin wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 21:20:33 +0200, Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir > <Spamassassin@irrt.De> wrote: > >> Dear Mister Larkin: >> >> Ben Cohen posts many LinkedIn posts via which he promotes Perplexity AI >> for helps with Verilog - not to avoid Verilog. >> >> A lady claims via LinkedIn that an AI service produced a bad Verilog code, >> so she concluded that an AI is not going to threaten her job, and I wrote >> to her that she deserves a refund. > > Then why produce Verilog code? True. Programmers should write everything in hex code, rather than using the crutch of assembler or some even higher level language. It wouldn't help their productivity, and it would make it even harder for the people maintaining the product to work out which segment of code or chunk of logic was actually doing what, but at least you know what's actually going on, even if you can't work out what it was intended to be doing, or why. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
AI for FPGA design john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-09 07:09 -0700
Re: AI for FPGA design Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-10 21:20 +0200
Re: AI for FPGA design john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-10 13:32 -0700
Re: AI for FPGA design Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-11 01:06 +0200
Re: AI for FPGA design Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-08-11 13:58 +1000
Re: AI for FPGA design Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-11 11:25 +0200
Re: AI for FPGA design Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-08-12 16:32 +1000
Re: AI for FPGA design john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-12 07:51 -0700
Re: AI for FPGA design "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-11 00:36 -0400
Re: AI for FPGA design Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-11 11:17 +0200
Re: AI for FPGA design Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-11 12:29 +0200
Re: AI for FPGA design legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2025-08-11 16:57 +0000
csiph-web