Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.atheism > #3436512
| Subject | Re: Blasphemy Day |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.agnosticism, talk.philosophy.humanism, sci.skeptic |
| References | (11 earlier) <m3hgjrF7vr4U2@mid.individual.net> <77900ff9-31e7-d363-a418-7e4b6f0e84dd@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> <DpOdndAOW86g-0n6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com> <cd1da7e8-a703-59f6-a7ec-220fda0ba264@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> <9nudnVlPEInxKUn6nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| From | jojo <f00@0f0.00f> |
| Organization | jieigyou |
| Message-ID | <01d5c6c0-6eb0-e179-caed-5344c1b40224@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> (permalink) |
| Date | 2025-03-14 23:15 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
% wrote: > jojo wrote: >> % wrote: >>> jojo wrote: >>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote: >>>>> Dawn Flood wrote: >>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <f00@0f0.00f> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of religion which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ago is no longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled world, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> circle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere". >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already >>>>>>>>>>>>> knew I >>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my >>>>>>>>>>> comment either way. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and >>>>>>>>>> want to know >>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of >>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that's a nice dream. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Isn't it, though? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism >>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to >>>>>>> your social circle. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey Bob, >>>>>> >>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) >>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is advised. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think a ban is necessary. He is fixed in his >>>>> atheism. Utter sacrilege and blasphemy. Blasphemy is a >>>>> victimless crime. >>>> >>>> >>>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!! >>>> >>> because you're a mouthy little dick face >> >> you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go mad >> without net. >> > she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too , > she don't think much of me either but she doesn't , > say the things to me she says to you yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the gulag and telling others to guard the gate.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Blasphemy Day Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 17:05 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 22:58 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:10 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:23 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:24 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:30 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:38 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:49 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 17:30 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 20:57 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 02:17 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 19:24 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 02:39 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 19:47 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 03:05 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:21 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 22:55 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:07 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 23:18 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:00 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-14 02:06 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 20:55 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 08:49 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:24 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:59 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-15 00:19 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:26 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2025-03-13 21:32 -0700
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 06:39 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:30 -0700
csiph-web