Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > alt.atheism > #3436529

Re: Blasphemy Day

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

% wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> % wrote:
>>> jojo wrote:
>>>> % wrote:
>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun <f00@0f0.00f>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun <f00@0f0.00f> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <f00@0f0.00f>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and defends freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago is no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2020s and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it provides no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> want to know
>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the facts of
>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your parochialism
>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't identical to
>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Bob,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?) 
>>>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion is 
>>>>>>>> advised.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't think a ban is necessary.  He is fixed in his 
>>>>>>> atheism. Utter sacrilege and blasphemy.   Blasphemy is a 
>>>>>>> victimless crime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i dont understand why dawn insists on oppressing me!!
>>>>>>
>>>>> because you're a mouthy little dick face
>>>>
>>>> you dont think she is being totally unfair to me? i will go 
>>>> mad without net.
>>>>
>>> she doesn't support your theories and it's her right not too ,
>>> she don't think much of me either but she doesn't ,
>>> say the things to me she says to you
>>
>> yeah, she is acting like a dictator with me, throwing me in the 
>> gulag and telling others to guard the gate.
>>
> she has that option there's nothing in the faq's about liking 
> someone

wrong is wrong.

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Blasphemy Day Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 17:05 -0500
  Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 22:58 +0000
    Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:10 -0700
      Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:23 +0000
        Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:24 -0700
          Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:30 +0000
            Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:38 -0700
              Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 23:49 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 17:30 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 20:57 -0500
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 02:17 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 19:24 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 02:39 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 19:47 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 03:05 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:21 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 22:55 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:07 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 23:18 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:00 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-14 02:06 -0500
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:23 -0700
  Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 20:55 -0500
    Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 08:49 +0000
      Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:24 -0700
        Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 22:53 +0000
          Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:57 -0700
            Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 23:15 +0000
              Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:59 -0700
                Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-15 00:19 +0000
                Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:26 -0700
  Re: Blasphemy Day Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2025-03-13 21:32 -0700
    Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 06:39 +0000
    Re: Blasphemy Day % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 10:30 -0700

csiph-web