Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > uk.telecom.voip > #9176
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> |
| Newsgroups | uk.telecom, uk.telecom.voip |
| Subject | Re: Interconnection with POTS |
| Date | Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:49:06 +0000 |
| Organization | Frantic |
| Message-ID | <827bscwpd9.fsf@example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <82v7g2uk0q.fsf@example.com> <ytg*xO3yA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <82ms1eugqr.fsf@example.com> <10ml102$1kgul$1@dont-email.me> <10mlvmo$1hfpc$4@dont-email.me> <fe7a97aa5c.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM> <10mo38f$2l38u$1@dont-email.me> <82cy28uyuy.fsf@example.com> <10mvi0f$11sl6$1@dont-email.me> <82bjhowrqs.fsf@example.com> <10mvk6o$12ouj$1@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | solani.org; logging-data="331293"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:TDjNtPC0wkOyc+3HlBrdPjWaKEs= sha1:T9otzB/40ZHr9tmlkwheeWL5MEw= |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLpUBI5TAe/xJ25wpBhcFhvr4dk3zTfRrr108LWSanwOFHqpjurconsZM/Jp8Rbg== |
| Xref | csiph.com uk.telecom:38953 uk.telecom.voip:9176 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> writes: > On 16/02/2026 16:57, Richmond wrote: >> Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> writes: >> >>> On 13/02/2026 21:17, Richmond wrote: >>>> David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> writes: >>>> >>>>>> specialise dinfrastructure to be maintained. Increasing numbers of >>>>>> people (me included) have ditched land lines, since mobile phones >>>>>> do the job better. Those who want to retain a service equivalent >>>>>> to POTS can use VoIP, which uses the same infrastructure as >>>>>> everything else that moves our data around. >>>>> >>>>> So true, why would any one want a phone that only works when plugged >>>>> in to a wall socket... >>>>> >>>> Because you can have a mobile phone aswell, but the landline is >>>> better, because mobile phones are crap. >>> >>> Yes, you're right, they've been a total and utter consumer failure, so >>> few people worldwide bother with one. >> What you've done there is distorted what I said into something else, >> and >> then responding to that. >> I can have an opinion about mobile phones which is different from >> yours. I base my opinion on my own experience of the quality of mobile >> phone calls. > > I've distorted nothing, you stated, quote "mobile phones are crap", > it's there above in black and white !. > > What you should have said is mobile phones, in your house, are crap, YMMV You've equated 'crap' with not a commercial success. You'll be telling me Windows isn't crap next.
Back to uk.telecom.voip | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Interconnection with POTS (was: Re: Virgin Media's Digital Voice system) "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-13 01:44 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS (was: Re: Virgin Media's Digital Voice system) David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2026-02-13 16:54 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-02-13 20:57 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-13 21:17 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2026-02-13 22:38 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-14 09:27 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> - 2026-02-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-16 16:57 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com> - 2026-02-16 17:29 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-16 17:49 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 08:42 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-02-17 08:58 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-17 10:07 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-02-17 10:11 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 13:24 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-02-17 13:55 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 14:35 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-17 21:39 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Tim+ <timdownieuk@yahoo.co.youkay> - 2026-02-17 21:46 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 10:47 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-18 13:19 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-18 13:25 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 15:34 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Julian Macassey <julian@n6are.com> - 2026-02-25 12:56 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-25 13:20 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2026-02-25 19:55 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2026-02-26 13:16 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2026-02-26 17:11 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-16 19:28 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 08:39 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> - 2026-02-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 10:33 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 10:38 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Roger Mills <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> - 2026-02-13 23:09 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-14 03:12 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-14 10:13 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-14 15:28 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-02-14 16:51 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-14 19:14 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-14 22:05 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-02-15 09:25 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-15 12:31 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-15 20:29 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-14 19:11 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-02-15 12:00 +0100
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-15 20:34 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS (was: Re: Virgin Media's Digital Voice system) Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-02-15 11:58 +0100
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-15 12:39 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Mike Humphrey <mail@michaelhumphrey.me.uk> - 2026-02-15 18:24 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-16 16:35 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Mike Humphrey <mail@michaelhumphrey.me.uk> - 2026-02-16 19:35 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2026-02-17 09:28 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 10:44 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-02-24 11:15 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-02-24 12:45 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> - 2026-02-18 10:28 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-15 20:33 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-02-15 20:43 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-02-16 16:45 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-02-16 19:15 +0000
Re: Interconnection with POTS The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-02-17 08:36 +0000
csiph-web