Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > uk.comp.security > #116
| From | David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.computer.workshop, uk.comp.security, uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Subject | Re: Last chance for Windows |
| Date | 2025-02-04 22:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0fjkkF4n6fU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <vnj3a8$3k7in$1@dont-email.me> <m04to1FbmpkU1@mid.individual.net> <m05713FdbhdU1@mid.individual.net> <679d772c$1$2873008$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <m0641cFhe8sU3@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 01/02/2025 08:24, David wrote: [....] > Have you ever reviewed the work of Patrick Wardle? > > Do you read articles like this? > https://9to5mac.com/2025/01/02/what-malware-your-mac-can-remove/ > > Patrick Wardle is a well-respected security researcher with extensive > experience in macOS security. His research has demonstrated that Macs > **can** be vulnerable to malware, particularly through social > engineering, supply chain attacks, and unpatched vulnerabilities. While > macOS has strong built-in security features (such as Gatekeeper, > XProtect, and System Integrity Protection), these defenses are *not > foolproof* > > The Apple Support Communities View > > Many contributors to the Apple Support Communities forums believe that > third-party antivirus (AV) software is unnecessary for macOS, often > arguing that: > 1. **macOS has built-in security** that is sufficient for most users. > 2. **AV software can cause system slowdowns** and compatibility issues. > 3. **Mac malware is rare compared to Windows malware** and is usually > preventable by practicing good security hygiene. > 4. **Some AV software itself can be invasive** and may create more > security risks than it mitigates. > > My View > > Both perspectives have merit. Whether a Mac user *needs* additional > anti-malware software depends on their use case. > > - **If you only download software from the Mac App Store or trusted > sources, avoid shady websites, and practice good security habits, > Apple's built-in defenses may be sufficient.** > - **If you frequently install third-party software, open email > attachments from unknown sources, or engage in high-risk activities > (e.g., software development, cybersecurity research), additional > security layers may be justified.** > > For *everyday users*, I think using tools like Malwarebytes (free for > manual scans) or Patrick Wardle’s free security tools (e.g., LuLu, > KnockKnock, and RansomWhere?) can add lightweight protection without > causing system slowdowns. > > For power users or businesses, tools like Objective-See’s security > suite, ClamXAV, or even a full-fledged enterprise solution might be > warranted. > > *Would you agree with this balanced approach*? I really would welcome your further thoughts!
Back to uk.comp.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Last chance for Windows David <David@example.net> - 2025-01-31 21:30 +0000
Re: Last chance for Windows David <David@example.net> - 2025-02-01 00:09 +0000
Re: Last chance for Windows Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 01:21 +0000
Re: Last chance for Windows David <David@example.net> - 2025-02-01 08:24 +0000
Re: Last chance for Windows David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-02-04 22:45 +0000
Re: Last chance for Windows Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2025-02-01 14:00 +0100
Re: Last chance for Windows Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK> - 2025-02-03 18:06 +0100
csiph-web