Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.stat.math

sci.stat.math

870 articles, 234 threads (numbers 10044 – 10946) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
If 2024 polling errors mirror those in 2020 election, Trump 'wins in a blowout,' CNN data guru says (4 replies) useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> 2024-10-09 07:34 +0000
   → Re: If 2024 polling errors mirror those in 2020 election, Trump 'wins in a blowout,' CNN data guru says pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> 2024-10-09 12:20 +0000
     → Re: If 2024 polling errors mirror those in 2020 election, Trump 'wins in a blowout,' CNN data guru says "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2024-10-09 13:09 +0000
       → Re: If 2024 polling errors mirror those in 2020 election, Trump 'wins in a blowout,' CNN data guru says B Woodward <bwoodward@trump.com> 2024-10-09 20:03 +0000
         → Re: If 2024 polling errors mirror those in 2020 election, Trump 'wins in a blowout,' CNN data guru says Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-10-09 17:58 -0400
 
What the Polls Are Really Saying useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> 2024-10-09 07:34 +0000
 
EXCLUSIVE Donald Trump extends his lead over Kamala Harris in Daily Mail election model as key battleground state of Michigan moves his way useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> 2024-10-09 07:33 +0000
 
Kamala Harris Is Losing Support With This Key Demographic. It Could Cost Her Georgia. useapen <yourdime@outlook.com> 2024-10-09 07:32 +0000
 
Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? (21 replies) Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2024-06-17 18:02 +0300
   → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2024-06-18 17:59 +0000
   → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2024-06-19 06:48 +0000
     → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> 2024-06-19 10:12 +0100
       → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> 2024-06-19 16:36 +0100
         → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2024-06-19 19:41 +0200
           → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> 2024-06-19 22:24 +0100
       → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2024-06-20 01:53 +0300
         → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2024-07-08 19:34 +0300
     → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2024-06-19 15:20 +0300
   → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-07-02 00:51 -0400
     → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> 2024-07-01 22:10 -0700
       → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-07-02 11:45 -0400
         → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2024-07-08 20:01 +0300
           → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-07-21 19:40 -0400
             → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2024-07-23 16:47 +0300
     → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2024-07-02 03:02 -0400
       → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-07-02 11:52 -0400
         → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-07-02 11:58 -0400
           → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2024-07-02 15:09 -0400
             → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> 2024-07-02 16:54 -0400
             → Re: realloc() - frequency, conditions, or experiences about relocation? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> 2024-07-02 16:58 -0400
 
Senet parts 1-3 D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-24 18:10 +0100
 
Chess D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-24 16:47 +0100
 
Dendera Zodiac - parts 1-5 D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-24 15:50 +0100
 
Vitruvian Man - parts 7-11a D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-24 14:45 +0100
 
Vitruvian Man - parts 1-6 D <noreply@mixmin.net> 2024-05-24 14:17 +0100
 
Google Groups will close in two days Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2024-02-20 11:10 -0500
 
Q differences between these two ways of comparisons (7 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-08-11 18:28 -0700
   → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-08-12 00:09 -0400
     → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-08-11 23:31 -0700
       → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-08-12 15:24 -0400
         → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-08-12 16:03 -0700
           → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-08-14 19:03 -0400
             → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-08-15 08:10 -0700
               → Re: Q differences between these two ways of comparisons Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-08-19 00:25 -0400
 
Q multi-comparison and deLong test (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-08-08 07:56 -0700
   → Re: Q multi-comparison and deLong test Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-08-08 19:51 -0400
 
Q predicting the direction of change due to the change of input (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-07-16 01:55 -0700
   → Re: Q predicting the direction of change due to the change of input Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-07-16 17:16 -0400
 
Download Element Pack – Addon for Elementor Florencia Ferrero <volmanual@gmail.com> 2023-07-12 06:53 -0700
 
Q direct observation of statistical comparison (6 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-06-12 08:40 -0700
   → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-06-12 12:24 -0400
     → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-06-14 00:43 -0400
       → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> 2023-06-28 11:27 -0700
         → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-06-29 00:15 -0400
           → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-06-29 11:56 +0000
             → Re: Q direct observation of statistical comparison Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-06-30 14:09 -0400
 
Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions (5 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-04-16 15:06 -0700
   → Re: Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2023-04-17 17:42 +0000
   → Re: Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-04-17 20:45 -0700
     → Re: Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-04-18 00:54 -0400
       → Re: Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-04-18 08:33 +0000
         → Re: Q confidence intervals for model parameters and future predictions Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-04-18 18:13 -0400
 
Q how to maintain the same characteristic of validation unit (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-04-17 03:50 -0700
   → Re: Q how to maintain the same characteristic of validation unit "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2023-04-17 18:19 +0000
 
statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format (74 replies) Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-02-27 16:00 -0500
   → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2023-02-28 07:47 +0000
     → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2023-02-28 09:12 +0000
       → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2023-03-13 01:23 +0000
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-13 10:32 +0300
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-13 10:58 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2023-03-14 04:13 +0000
   → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-02-28 12:42 +0000
     → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-02-28 14:22 +0100
       → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-02-28 14:01 +0000
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-02-28 15:12 +0100
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-02-28 14:57 +0000
             → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-02-28 21:36 +0100
     → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-04 00:46 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-03 23:40 +0100
     → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-09 17:07 +0000
     → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-19 00:41 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 00:08 +0000
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-20 01:08 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 23:14 +0000
             → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 23:48 +0000
             → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-20 11:58 +0300
               → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-20 17:23 +0000
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-24 00:11 +0300
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2023-03-23 23:59 +0000
       → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-19 14:22 -0500
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-20 14:07 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-20 14:35 +0100
             → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-20 17:01 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-20 16:20 -0500
         → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-20 14:35 +0100
           → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-20 17:33 +0300
   → Re: statistics in Roberts. Was: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-03 23:33 +0300
   → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-05 12:48 -0600
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-05 21:47 +0100
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-08 21:26 -0600
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-03-06 23:08 -0500
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-08 21:40 -0600
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-08 15:33 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-08 23:11 -0600
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-10 01:04 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-11 12:54 -0600
             → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-12 14:25 +0300
               → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-17 13:27 -0500
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-19 00:32 +0300
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-19 14:45 -0500
             → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-20 16:06 -0500
               → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-21 13:00 +0300
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-08 19:11 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-09 11:48 +0300
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-09 11:57 +0300
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-08 21:09 -0600
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-09 17:13 +0000
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-09 23:26 +0300
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-10 01:37 +0000
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-10 11:25 +0100
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-11 00:13 +0300
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-10 15:42 -0600
             → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-11 01:32 +0300
               → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller - Data Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-11 12:18 -0600
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller - Data Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-12 00:13 +0300
                 → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller - Data Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-20 00:38 +0300
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-10 15:25 -0600
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-12 00:01 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-10 15:10 -0600
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-11 01:14 +0300
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-11 13:08 -0600
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> 2023-03-12 01:51 +0300
     → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-15 17:10 +0000
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-15 22:36 +0100
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2023-03-15 22:18 +0000
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2023-03-15 23:28 +0100
       → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> 2023-03-19 13:46 -0500
         → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 22:57 +0000
           → Re: statistics in Roberts' paper on Miller Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> 2023-03-20 12:05 +0300
 
Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics (5 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-03-17 17:47 -0700
   → Re: Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-18 01:25 +0000
     → Re: Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-03-18 14:48 -0400
       → Re: Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 10:58 +0000
         → Re: Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-03-19 20:48 -0400
       → Re: Q right way to interpret a test with multiple metrics "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-03-19 11:26 +0000
 
Q interpretations for different types of comparisons (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-02-11 08:07 -0800
   → Re: Q interpretations for different types of comparisons Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-02-11 14:43 -0500
 
Q power for the analysis of the results (5 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-02-01 23:05 -0800
   → Re: Q power for the analysis of the results "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-02-02 08:18 +0000
     → Re: Q power for the analysis of the results davidd02@tpg.com.au (David Duffy) 2023-02-02 23:38 +0000
   → Re: Q power for the analysis of the results Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-02-03 16:00 -0500
     → Re: Q power for the analysis of the results Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> 2023-02-04 11:02 -0800
       → Re: Q power for the analysis of the results Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-02-05 14:52 -0500
 
Q sources of, identification of and remedial for insignificance (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-01-27 10:01 -0800
   → Re: Q sources of, identification of and remedial for insignificance Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-01-27 15:26 -0500
 
Q test of significance of the trend of the data (7 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-01-06 03:14 -0800
   → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data "David Jones" <dajhawk18xx@@nowhere.com> 2023-01-06 14:17 +0000
     → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-01-06 17:11 -0500
       → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2023-01-07 17:48 -0800
         → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-01-08 04:36 +0000
           → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-01-08 01:36 -0500
             → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data "David Jones" <dajhawkxx@nowherel.com> 2023-01-08 10:48 +0000
               → Re: Q test of significance of the trend of the data Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2023-01-10 00:45 -0500
 
Q interpretation of statistically negative values (3 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2022-09-24 00:29 -0700
   → Re: Q interpretation of statistically negative values Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-09-24 13:47 -0400
     → Re: Q interpretation of statistically negative values Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2022-09-24 16:11 -0700
       → Re: Q interpretation of statistically negative values Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-09-24 23:00 -0400
 
Q number of samples and metrics (5 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2022-08-02 15:00 -0700
   → Re: Q number of samples and metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-08-02 23:11 -0400
   → Re: Q number of samples and metrics Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> 2022-09-06 12:56 -0700
     → Re: Q number of samples and metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-09-07 13:26 -0400
       → Re: Q number of samples and metrics Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> 2022-09-07 13:25 -0700
         → Re: Q number of samples and metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-09-07 18:49 -0400
 
random walk computation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2022-06-25 14:23 -0700
 
Google and people want to destroy academical Analyst! Tomas Ukkonen <tomasukkonen1000@gmail.com> 2022-05-28 22:24 -0700
 
Data Quality Assessment Questions Mike Dwell <mike.dwellsiegmund@gmail.com> 2022-01-28 21:45 -0800
 
Reinforcement Learning course at ASU has just started (1 reply) Dimitri Bertsekas <dpbertsekas@gmail.com> 2022-01-16 21:24 -0800
   → Re: Reinforcement Learning course at ASU has just started Scott Hemphill <hemphill@hemphills.net> 2022-01-17 10:21 -0500
 
Q lower p-value or narrower CI the better (3 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2022-01-11 10:22 -0800
   → Re: Q lower p-value or narrower CI the better Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-01-11 14:34 -0500
   → Re: Q lower p-value or narrower CI the better Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2022-01-11 19:10 -0800
     → Re: Q lower p-value or narrower CI the better Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2022-01-13 20:24 -0500
 
Q influence of statistics on scientific discoveries (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2021-12-10 13:25 -0800
   → Re: Q influence of statistics on scientific discoveries Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-12-12 15:37 -0500
 
Q use of multiple metrics (2 replies) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2021-11-25 12:36 -0800
   → Re: Q use of multiple metrics Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-11-26 13:55 -0500
     → Re: Q use of multiple metrics Bruce Weaver <bweaver@lakeheadu.ca> 2021-11-28 07:43 -0800
 
Q the least number of samples (1 reply) Cosine <asecant@gmail.com> 2021-11-15 22:51 -0800
   → Re: Q the least number of samples Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-11-16 13:45 -0500
 
unemployment stats (8 replies) RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2021-10-03 16:35 -0700
   → Re: unemployment stats Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-10-04 14:35 -0400
     → Re: unemployment stats RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2021-10-04 19:37 -0700
       → Re: unemployment stats Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-10-05 20:40 -0400
         → Re: unemployment stats RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2021-10-08 12:04 -0700
           → Re: unemployment stats RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2021-10-08 12:10 -0700
           → Re: unemployment stats Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-10-09 19:10 -0400
             → Re: unemployment stats RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> 2021-10-23 17:18 -0700
               → Re: unemployment stats Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> 2021-10-24 13:39 -0400

~Page 1 of ~5 (articles 10757–10946) Older →


csiph-web