Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #890488 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800 |
| Last post | 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 199 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-15 10:14 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-15 03:06 -0800
Re: ww2 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-16 06:50 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-16 21:24 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-18 13:42 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:34 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 17:16 -0600
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:48 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 10:08 -0800
Re: ww3 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 11:32 -0700
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-24 00:38 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-27 11:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 00:14 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:58 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 04:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-02 06:43 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 22:52 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-01 15:05 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-03 09:12 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-04 07:38 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-03 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-05 09:05 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:38 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 12:26 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:45 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 00:05 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:09 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:55 +0100
Re: ww3 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-09 08:02 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-09 10:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:20 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:05 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 08:57 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:57 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 21:35 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 17:17 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 16:28 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:15 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:53 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:25 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:27 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 10:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:29 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-20 08:38 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-20 09:58 +0000
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-18 15:58 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-19 07:40 +0100
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:35 -0600
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 23:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:32 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:08 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:51 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:25 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:29 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:26 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 14:32 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 16:16 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:18 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:22 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:12 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 12:14 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:50 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:51 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:22 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:13 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:39 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:39 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:33 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:37 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:02 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:28 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:34 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:00 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:44 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:01 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-03 08:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-06 23:59 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:30 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:04 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 16:07 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:17 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:18 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:20 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:54 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 18:41 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 20:32 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:00 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 17:52 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:55 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:39 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:45 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 23:02 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:03 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:08 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:11 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:13 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:41 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-20 07:04 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 13:27 -0600
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 13:34 -0600
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-21 04:52 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 23:59 -0600
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-22 06:44 +0000
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 11:57 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-20 13:41 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:55 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:51 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 13:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:05 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 20:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-19 20:49 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:36 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:41 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 22:46 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:18 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:56 -0500
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-07 11:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 13:24 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:48 +0100
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:56 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:35 -0500
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0700
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-12 23:06 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-13 10:46 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 02:23 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:09 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 03:15 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 21:27 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:26 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:25 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 15:32 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:57 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 02:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:24 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 16:36 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 19:08 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 05:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 21:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 02:28 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:40 -0500
Re: ww3 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 00:49 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 22:02 -0800
Re: ww3 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-20 00:10 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:36 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 14:50 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:49 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:11 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:12 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 12:53 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:10 -0700
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:15 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:45 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:58 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-21 05:48 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 14:35 -0600
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-22 05:39 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-22 02:50 -0600
Re: ww3 patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) - 2025-01-19 03:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <361dnj13lmcntg24d923tt5e0an0tdvsh7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890555 |
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 15:05:18 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) wrote: >Chaps are too stupid to know when they are licked. Russia? I agree. NP: Go West - Never Let Them See You Sweat -- Been saying since last spring, "let the voters decide." Well, they did. Get over it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-03 09:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b76cdc0f0bd886cd0b053322a028539b@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #890562 |
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:21:56 +0000, Governor Swill wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 15:05:18 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com > (Bertietaylor) > wrote: > >>Chaps are too stupid to know when they are licked. > > Russia? > > I agree. Because Zelensky has driven them out of Donetsk and is now going to liberate Crimea with F16, Himars, Abrams, and many billions? Only the terminally stupid can believe that. Crows have more sense than apes. > > NP: Go West - Never Let Them See You Sweat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-04 07:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lts3a1Fgih9U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #890568 |
Am Freitag000003, 03.01.2025 um 10:12 schrieb Bertietaylor: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:21:56 +0000, Governor Swill wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 15:05:18 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com >> (Bertietaylor) >> wrote: >> >>> Chaps are too stupid to know when they are licked. >> >> Russia? >> >> I agree. > > Because Zelensky has driven them out of Donetsk and is now going to > liberate Crimea with F16, Himars, Abrams, and many billions? > > Only the terminally stupid can believe that. The Russians have a good strategic position in that conflict and the Nato has a terrible one. The Russians have dug defense lines all over the place and can support them from their home territory easily, while Nato troops had to walk all the way from Poland to eastern Ukraine, which is more then 1000 km. Ships were usually preferred by the west, especially aircraft carriers. But since the Black Sea is entirely in the reach of Russian missiles, the USA cannot send their precious fleet there. Flight is also not recommended, since Russia has state of the art air defense. This would leave only land transport as feasible. Unfortunately Ukraine is very large and VERY flat, hence Nato-troops walking in from Poland had no protection whatsoever. To make matters worse: Russia was the main part of a country formerly known as 'USSR'. And that country was a little paranoid about western invaders. So Stalin and others left (most likely) some hidden facilities in the Ukraine, for which (most likely) Russia has still the keys. The entire country Ukraine is (most likely) full of Russian spies, because Russian is and was a common language there and the FSB could simply send anybody there with nothing more than a false passport. My bet would be, that huge numbers of Russian spies are actually part of the Ukrainian military. This makes everything really dangerous for Western troops, while the Russians could simply sit and wait. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-03 23:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlaolg$cahb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #890569 |
Thomas Heger wrote: >> Because Zelensky has driven them out of Donetsk and is now going to >> liberate Crimea with F16, Himars, Abrams, and many billions? >> >> Only the terminally stupid can believe that. And the American colonies were laughed off the continent at the silly idea of defeating the world's super power. > The Russians have a good strategic position in that conflict and > the Nato has a terrible one. NATO has no position. It is not fighting. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 09:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ltusp5Fu9fjU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #890570 |
Am Samstag000004, 04.01.2025 um 08:40 schrieb Siri Cruise: > Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Because Zelensky has driven them out of Donetsk and is now going to >>> liberate Crimea with F16, Himars, Abrams, and many billions? >>> >>> Only the terminally stupid can believe that. > > And the American colonies were laughed off the continent at the silly > idea of defeating the world's super power. > >> The Russians have a good strategic position in that conflict and the >> Nato has a terrible one. > > NATO has no position. It is not fighting. > Well, we have actually a 'proxy war', which is seemingly financed by western powers and maintained by Ukrainians and Russians (plus solders of fortune from various countries). Now the Russians are the dominant power in this conflict, because Russian military is many times stronger that the Ukrainian. This will not change in the immediate future, if no Nato troops would engage into that conflict, too. I was writing about the hypothetical possibility, that this could happen. In THAT case Nato forces would need to reach the front line in the eastern Ukraine somehow. I meant, that Russian missiles, submarines, mines and other weapons could easily destroy US carriers and other ships, once they try to come through the Bosporous. The only alternative to the Black Sea would be the Baltic Sea. But that is too narrow, too shallow and in the reach of Russian missiles in the Kaliningrad district. It is also too far away. This would exclude support of Nato troops by ships, what would leave only land and air-transport. Flight is fast, but would be VERY dangerous, since Russia has very good anti-aircraft missiles, jet-fighters and other means. This would leave only land transport and marching infantry, supported by tanks. But: the Ukraine is VERY large and VERY flat. This would make walking there really dangerous, too, because the landscape provides no protection at all. The Russians have also an insane amount of tanks (and other armored vehicles) and are essentially a 'land-fighting-nation'. So: there is actually no feasible way to bring Nato troops to the front, supposed that is wanted. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 14:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vpllnj13e9i93j5e1ldvv2t6g4ph0m1vet@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890571 |
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:05:20 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Samstag000004, 04.01.2025 um 08:40 schrieb Siri Cruise: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> Because Zelensky has driven them out of Donetsk and is now going to >>>> liberate Crimea with F16, Himars, Abrams, and many billions? >>>> >>>> Only the terminally stupid can believe that. >> >> And the American colonies were laughed off the continent at the silly >> idea of defeating the world's super power. >> >>> The Russians have a good strategic position in that conflict and the >>> Nato has a terrible one. >> >> NATO has no position. It is not fighting. >> > >Well, we have actually a 'proxy war', which is seemingly financed by >western powers and maintained by Ukrainians and Russians (plus solders >of fortune from various countries). > >Now the Russians are the dominant power in this conflict, because >Russian military is many times stronger that the Ukrainian. BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is that why Putin's two week 'speshul operashun' has been dragging in for three years? Is that why he's reinforcing his lines with North Korean troops who barely know which end of the gun to hold let alone what to aim at? "Russian paramilitary soldiers killed in friendly fire attack by North Koreans after enlisting DPRK help" <https://nypost.com/2024/12/16/world-news/russian-paramilitary-soldiers-killed-in-friendly-fire-attack-by-north-koreans-after-enlisting-dprk-help/> >This will not change in the immediate future, if no Nato troops would >engage into that conflict, too. Ukraine is proving you don't need NATO troops, you just need superior western weapons. >I was writing about the hypothetical possibility, that this could happen. > >In THAT case Nato forces would need to reach the front line in the >eastern Ukraine somehow. Airplanes, trains, trucks or they could just open a few new fronts in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Embargo all Russian sea traffic from the Baltic to the Pacific. The French Navy alone is stronger than Russia's! Only an idiot would expect NATO to lose to Russia. >I meant, that Russian missiles, submarines, You mean their convertibles? LOL! The Russian Navy is another joke. Perhaps the biggest military joke on the planet. And their missiles don't work. >mines and other weapons >could easily destroy US carriers and other ships, once they try to come >through the Bosporous. LOL! The Russian Navy is hiding in the Sea of Azov and dares not come into the Black Sea. Turkey and Romania have already neutralized Russians attempts to mine Ukraine's trade routes. Then there is the efficacy of Russian weapons. *laugh, laugh, laugh* Russia has already proved their best weapons are easily dealt with using western countermeasures. Meanwhile, Russian air defense can't stop Ukraine from striking Moscow, blowing up oil refineries all over western Russia, barracks and military headquarters building throughout the south and S-400 systems in Crimea, Belgorod and Rostov-on-Don using their OWN weapons. Turns out they didn't need the ATACMS after all. >The only alternative to the Black Sea would be the Baltic Sea. ... which is a NATO lake which, in the event of a NATO conflict, would be quickly swept clean of Russian traffic. >But that is too narrow, too shallow and in the reach of Russian missiles >in the Kaliningrad district. It is also too far away. Putin has stripped Kaliningrad of it's defense systems to shore up his failures in Ukraine. A NATO war with Russia would result in an independent Kaliningrad joining NATO in a few years as "Konigsburg". And you seem to be unaware that NATO is already moving troops into the Baltic and Polish fronts. >This would exclude support of Nato troops by ships, what would leave >only land and air-transport. The west has plenty of planes and trucks. Western navies could easily deliver troops via the Baltic to the new war fronts in Finland and the Baltics. >Flight is fast, but would be VERY dangerous, since Russia has very good >anti-aircraft missiles, jet-fighters and other means. *laugh, laugh, laugh* Yeah, their anti aircraft defenses are so good they can't handle all Ukraine's homemade drones, even the ones over flying Moscow. Their jets and other planes are so vulnerable, Putin doesn't allow them to over fly Ukrainian airspace. Putin has 32 "stealth" fighters, ten of which are prototypes. NATO has hundreds of F-35s out of the 1000 that have been built and that doesn't count the US fleet of F-22s, B-2s and B-1s. The US has obsoleted more models of stealth aircraft than Russia has ever possessed. >This would leave only land transport and marching infantry, supported by >tanks. > >But: the Ukraine is VERY large and VERY flat. > >This would make walking there really dangerous, too, because the >landscape provides no protection at all. A fact the Russians are very aware of. LOL! >The Russians have also an insane amount of tanks (and other armored >vehicles) Not anymore, they don't. > and are essentially a 'land-fighting-nation'. They're essentially a bunch of corrupt yellow bellies. >So: there is actually no feasible way to bring Nato troops to the front, >supposed that is wanted. Is this Mighty, poking his head up to spout his Russian propaganda bullshit again? -- Been saying since last spring, "let the voters decide." Well, they did. Get over it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 12:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlepu8$16o98$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #890575 |
Governor Swill wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:05:20 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is that why Putin's two week 'speshul operashun' > has been dragging in for three years? Is that why he's reinforcing his lines > with North Korean troops who barely know which end of the gun to hold let alone > what to aim at? If it comes down to trading body for body, Russia has more future cadavers. The question is how many dead sons and husbands will Russia tolerate. The next tsar has no incentive to continue Putin's folly. > "Russian paramilitary soldiers killed in friendly fire attack by North Koreans > after enlisting DPRK help" I wonder if Kim thought this out. Outside DPRK the soldiers are being exposed to the wonders of the West. Like internet porn. Their families are held hostage, but even if they come home, they are going to talk about the wonders they beheld, like electric lights at night and 3000 calorie meals. >> In THAT case Nato forces would need to reach the front line in the >> eastern Ukraine somehow. > > Airplanes, trains, trucks or they could just open a few new fronts in Finland, > Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Embargo all Russian sea traffic from the > Baltic to the Pacific. The French Navy alone is stronger than Russia's! NATO has plans to move French and German armies to the Baltic states and Poland. I think Ukraine is in reach. > You mean their convertibles? LOL! The Russian Navy is another joke. Perhaps > the biggest military joke on the planet. And their missiles don't work. Drachinifel made two videos about the Russian Baltic fleet attacking Japan (Voyage of the Damned). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Mdi_Fh9_Ag https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXpj6nK5ylo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95oBKLODE0 The Russian Navy Sucks Supercut (Parts 1-6) History of Everything 'And then it got worse.' >> This would exclude support of Nato troops by ships, what would leave >> only land and air-transport. > > The west has plenty of planes and trucks. Western navies could easily deliver > troops via the Baltic to the new war fronts in Finland and the Baltics. NATO has always assumed that in war reinforcements would come from the USA, Canada, Norway, France, etc. It has had sixty years to worry the details. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-07 06:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lu3tb8FphgoU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #890575 |
Am Sonntag000005, 05.01.2025 um 20:38 schrieb Governor Swill: >>>> The Russians have a good strategic position in that conflict and the >>>> Nato has a terrible one. >>> >>> NATO has no position. It is not fighting. >>> >> >> Well, we have actually a 'proxy war', which is seemingly financed by >> western powers and maintained by Ukrainians and Russians (plus solders >> of fortune from various countries). >> >> Now the Russians are the dominant power in this conflict, because >> Russian military is many times stronger that the Ukrainian. > > BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Is that why Putin's two week 'speshul operashun' > has been dragging in for three years? Is that why he's reinforcing his lines > with North Korean troops who barely know which end of the gun to hold let alone > what to aim at? > > "Russian paramilitary soldiers killed in friendly fire attack by North Koreans > after enlisting DPRK help" > <https://nypost.com/2024/12/16/world-news/russian-paramilitary-soldiers-killed-in-friendly-fire-attack-by-north-koreans-after-enlisting-dprk-help/> > >> This will not change in the immediate future, if no Nato troops would >> engage into that conflict, too. > > Ukraine is proving you don't need NATO troops, you just need superior western > weapons. > >> I was writing about the hypothetical possibility, that this could happen. >> >> In THAT case Nato forces would need to reach the front line in the >> eastern Ukraine somehow. > > Airplanes, trains, trucks or they could just open a few new fronts in Finland, > Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Embargo all Russian sea traffic from the > Baltic to the Pacific. The French Navy alone is stronger than Russia's! > > Only an idiot would expect NATO to lose to Russia. The Russians are not attacking the NATO. Now the Russians have dug defense lines and wait there for western troops. Such western troops would need to attack these entrenched forces, hence Russians defend and Nato had to win an attack, supposed they wanted to do that. But the expectacions are rather chilling, since the Russians are already there and have dug themselves in and wait. This is a VERY unfortunate situation, supposed the Nato wanted to push the Russians out of weatern Ukraine. Difficult is, that Russia has all sorts of armour already in place, while Nato had to bring its gear half around the globe. This is extremely dangerous, because Russian controlled territory surrounds the possible 'arena' in the eastern Ukraine. This would enable the Russians to encircle large parts of a western chorps there (kind of 'New Stalingrad'). The only real advantage of the west are far reaching drones and missiles. But these cannot conquer a country, only damage it. That's why ground forces are necessary. >> I meant, that Russian missiles, submarines, > > You mean their convertibles? LOL! The Russian Navy is another joke. Perhaps > the biggest military joke on the planet. And their missiles don't work. > >> mines and other weapons >> could easily destroy US carriers and other ships, once they try to come >> through the Bosporous. > > LOL! The Russian Navy is hiding in the Sea of Azov and dares not come into the > Black Sea. Turkey and Romania have already neutralized Russians attempts to > mine Ukraine's trade routes. Sure. But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-07 00:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlin83$242rt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #890583 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in > case there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-08 08:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lu6o31F90rcU11@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #890586 |
Am Dienstag000007, 07.01.2025 um 09:05 schrieb Siri Cruise: > Thomas Heger wrote: >> But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case >> there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. > > NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. > Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. I would guess, that Russia has enough missiles already positioned on the Crimean peninsula to sink all western boats with the push on a single button. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-08 15:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vpmtnj9hfdcmfc76ejlfiq60cf8g8p3aqo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890599 |
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:33:58 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Dienstag000007, 07.01.2025 um 09:05 schrieb Siri Cruise: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case >>> there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. >> >> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >> > >Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. > >Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass kicked now. >I would guess, that Russia has enough missiles already positioned on the >Crimean peninsula to sink all western boats with the push on a single >button. More likely they'll explode in their silos - if anybody can remember which button to push.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 07:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lu9a6pFm4jfU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #890607 |
Am Mittwoch000008, 08.01.2025 um 21:09 schrieb Governor Swill: >>>> But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case >>>> there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. >>> >>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>> >> >> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >> >> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. > > Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass kicked now. Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war with Russia- mostly very miserably. Germans are essentially scared by the bare possibility, that anything similar might happen again. Actually German have more a tendency to cooperate with Russia if possible and do not really want to 'kick asses'. The country most Germans dislike in this conflict is actually the Ukraine. This is so, because the Ukraine was regarded as one of the most corrupt countries on this planet and essentially ruled by the mob. At least I think so. The reason is, that I have lived some time together with a lady from Lvow, who was sold by the mob to a German for several thousand dollars. This why I think about this country as the pinnacle of failure of states. > >> I would guess, that Russia has enough missiles already positioned on the >> Crimean peninsula to sink all western boats with the push on a single >> button. > > More likely they'll explode in their silos - if anybody can remember which > button to push. Possible, but highly unlikely. As far as I can tell, the Russians know how to handle their arms. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 08:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1818f42e15c46bfc$78366$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #890620 |
W dniu 09.01.2025 o 07:55, Thomas Heger pisze: > Am Mittwoch000008, 08.01.2025 um 21:09 schrieb Governor Swill: > >>>>> But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case >>>>> there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. >>>> >>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>> >>> >>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>> >>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >> >> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >> kicked now. > > Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war > with Russia- mostly very miserably. Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced to a separate peace.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 10:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8e3887dbf2adfb5b5bce0dae06bbd3c1@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #890621 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 7:02:16 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > W dniu 09.01.2025 o 07:55, Thomas Heger pisze: >> Am Mittwoch000008, 08.01.2025 um 21:09 schrieb Governor Swill: >> >>>>>> But I would bet, the Russians send submarines or drop mines in case >>>>>> there are Nato ships coming into the Black Sea. >>>>> >>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>> >>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>> >>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>> kicked now. >> >> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >> with Russia- mostly very miserably. > > > Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced > to a separate peace. True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in power.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 01:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <31f1oj585tk2ou401s7bh2gjeqkmp6hhf7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890623 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:25 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) wrote: >True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands >from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and >Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and >getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success >is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in >power. And where are all those gains now?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 19:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <lo16oj595hkf93trmjpo0uhjdh0rldv55a@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890629 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:20:53 -0500, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:25 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) >wrote: > >>True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands >>from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and >>Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and >>getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success >>is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in >>power. > >And where are all those gains now? <crickets>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-14 08:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <913fcf6fe29082741b66980a7fe8dedf@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #890629 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 6:20:53 +0000, Governor Swill wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:25 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com > (Bertietaylor) > wrote: > >>True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands >>from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and >>Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and >>getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success >>is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in >>power. > > And where are all those gains now? See the current map of Ukraine and that before the reoccupation of Crimea. Some 12 trillion dollars of prime real estate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-15 08:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7affojdfm6ai2rvh94rl093b9c8blv10uq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #890679 |
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:35:49 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) wrote: >On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 6:20:53 +0000, Governor Swill wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:25 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com >> (Bertietaylor) >> wrote: >> >>>True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands >>>from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and >>>Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and >>>getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success >>>is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in >>>power. >> >> And where are all those gains now? >See the current map of Ukraine and that before the reoccupation of >Crimea. Some 12 trillion dollars of prime real estate. Their Navy, such as it now is, can't use the Sevastopol port because Ukraine has cowed it. The cities and industrial centers in the east that Putin wanted, have been, in many cases, 100% destroyed and will have to be rebuilt from scratch. He expended 200,000 Russian men taking Bakhmut and Avdiivka. Another 50,000 failing to retake Kharkiv. Three quarters of a million Russia dead and maimed so far to steal a wasteland. Ukraine controls Crimea's water supply. Without it, Crimea is useless. Putin is still refusing to accept Trump's offer for talks. He hasn't been hurt enough yet. NP: Carly Simon - That's The Way I've Always Heard It Should Be
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-15 10:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67880503.130@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #890682 |
Governor Swill wrote: > Putin is still refusing to accept Trump's offer for talks. At the present time, Trump is not the president of the united states of america yet... Only Biden can accept or refuse talks with Putin. Biden is President of the United States. Kamala Harris, is the Vice President. I don't don't what state Governor Swill is of... i need to google googala it! git wit da program! It's not Monday...yet. not soon enough for you...GOV-VEE-NOOOOOR? who da fuck voted for you any way??? AOC? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-15 21:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67889A93.128@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #890689 |
i don't see any indication that Russia will ever use nucluer weapons on anyone... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web