Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #885209

Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:23:24 -0600, Physfitfreak
<Physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2/11/2024 2:56 PM, James Redford wrote:
>> Physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point
>> cosmology is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) demonstrating that
>> sapient life (in the form of, e.g., immortal superintelligent
>> human-mind computer-uploads and artificial intelligences) is required
>> by the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
>> General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) to take control over all
>> matter in the universe, for said life to eventually force the collapse
>> of the universe, and for the computational resources of the universe
>> (in terms of both processor speed and memory storage) to diverge to
>> infinity as the universe collapses into a final singularity, termed
>> the Omega Point. Said Omega Point cosmology is also an intrinsic
>> component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard
>> Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all
>> the forces in physics, of which TOE is itself mathematically forced by
>> the aforesaid known physical laws.
>> 
>> Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively
>> peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics
>> and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the
>> leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main
>> professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the
>> Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics
>> journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal
>> that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in),
>> and Physics Letters, among other journals.
>> 
>> Prof. Tipler's Ph.D. is in the field of Global General Relativity,
>> which is the field created by Profs. Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose
>> during the formulation of their Singularity Theorems in the 1960s.
>> Global General Relativity is General Relativity applied on the scale
>> of the entire universe as a whole, and is the most elite and rarefied
>> field of physics. Tipler is also an expert in quantum field theory
>> (i.e., Quantum Mechanics combined with special-relativistic particle
>> physics) and computer theory. Moreover, to here point out, said
>> Singularity Theorems are themselves completely valid proofs of God's
>> existence in the First Cause aspect of God.
>> 
>> The Omega Point final singularity has all the unique properties
>> (quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions. For much
>> more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it
>> uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described
>> in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses
>> the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:
>> 
>> * James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
>> Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012
>> (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708,
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20150927090439/http://theophysics.host56.com/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
>> ,
>> https://archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf
>> , https://purl.org/redford/physics-of-god .
>> 
>> Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which
>> contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to
>> multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and
>> the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE.
>> 
>> * James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's
>> Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", God and
>> Physics Wiki, May 12, 2019 (orig. pub. Apr. 3, 2013),
>> https://megalodon.jp/2019-0512-1524-14/godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Tipler-Krauss_2007_Debate
>> ,
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20190512062421/https://godandphysics.fandom.com/wiki/Video_of_Profs._Frank_Tipler_and_Lawrence_Krauss%27s_Debate_at_Caltech:_Can_Physics_Prove_God_and_Christianity%3F
>> , https://archive.is/V9njw .
>> 
>> As said, Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology is a mathematical
>> theorem per the aforementioned known laws of physics, of which have
>> been confirmed by every experiment to date. Hence, the only way to
>> avoid the Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof.
>> Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem."
>> (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of
>> Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)
>> 
>> Indeed, in the Feynman path integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics
>> (i.e., sum-over-paths; sum-over-histories) a singularity is even more
>> inevitable than in the Penrose-Hawking-Geroch Singularity Theorems,
>> since the Singularity Theorems assume attractive gravity, whereas the
>> Feynman sum-over-histories get arbitrarily close to infinite
>> curvature. In other words, the multiverse has its own singularity.
>> 
>> Further, due to Liouville's Theorem in complex analysis, it doesn't
>> matter what form of physics one resorts to, as any
>> physically-realistic cosmology (e.g., one capable of incorporating
>> Quantum Mechanics, since the complex number field is intrinsic to the
>> mathematical formulations of Quantum Mechanics) must begin at an
>> initial singularity and end at a final singularity. (As Barrow and
>> Tipler wrote, "Initial and final cosmological curvature singularities
>> are required to avoid a universal action singularity." See John D.
>> Barrow and Frank J. Tipler, "Action principles in nature", Nature,
>> Vol. 331, No. 6151 [Jan. 7, 1988], pp. 31-34; see also Frank J.
>> Tipler, "The Structure of the Classical Cosmological Singularity", in
>> Origin and Early History of the Universe: Proceedings of the 26th
>> Liège International Astrophyscial Colloquium, July 1-4, 1986
>> [Cointe-Ougree, Belgium: Universite de Liege, Institut
>> d'Astrophysique, 1987], pp. 339-359; "Discussion", pp. 360-361.)
>> 
>> * * * * *
>> 
>> Unfortunately, most modern physicists have been all too willing to
>> abandon the laws of physics if it produces results that they're
>> uncomfortable with, i.e., in reference to religion. It's the
>> antagonism for religion on the part of the scientific community which
>> greatly held up the acceptance of the Big Bang (for some 40 years),
>> due to said scientific community's displeasure with it confirming the
>> traditional theological position of *creatio ex nihilo*, and also
>> because no laws of physics can apply to the singularity itself: i.e.,
>> quite literally, the singularity is supernatural, in the sense that no
>> form of physics can apply to it, since physical values are at infinity
>> at the singularity, and so it is not possible to perform arithmetical
>> operations on them; and in the sense that the singularity is beyond
>> creation, as it is not a part of spacetime, but rather is the boundary
>> of space and time.
>> 
>> In Prof. Stephen Hawking's book The Grand Design (New York, NY: Bantam
>> Books) coauthored with physicist Dr. Leonard Mlodinow and published in
>> 2010, Hawking uses the String Theory extension M-Theory to argue that
>> God's existence isn't necessary, although M-Theory has no
>> observational evidence confirming it.
>> 
>> With String Theory and other nonempirical physics, the physics
>> community is reverting back to the epistemological methodology of
>> Aristotelianism, which held to physical theories based upon *a priori*
>> philosophical ideals. One of the *a priori* ideals held by many
>> present-day physicists is that God cannot exist, and so if rejecting
>> the existence of God requires rejecting empirical science, then so be
>> it.
>> 
>> For details on this rejection of physical law by physicists if it
>> conflicts with their distaste for religion, see Sec. 5: "The Big
>> Bang", pp. 28-33 of my "Physics of God" article cited above.
>> 
>> The evolutionary psychological reason for the above-described bizarre
>> behavior of physicists rejecting physical law when it demonstrates
>> God's existence is due to the naturally-evolved Jaynesian gods of
>> old--i.e., the demons--seeking to distance people from genuine
>> knowledge of God so that the demons may instead falsely present
>> themselves as God. Among many permutations of this, it often manifests
>> as various forms of etatism: the state becomes God. Demons are quite
>> real, they however exist as naturally-evolved Minskian agent subset
>> programs operating on the wet-computer of the human brain. For more on
>> this, see my following article:
>> 
>> * James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Social Science Research
>> Network (SSRN), July 4, 2021 (orig. pub. May 29, 2018), 4 pp.,
>> doi:10.2139/ssrn.4500656,
>> https://megalodon.jp/2023-0720-0523-07/archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
>> ,
>> https://archive.org/download/Societal-Sadomasochism/Redford-Societal-Sadomasochism.pdf
>> , https://www.freezepage.com/1689798200YQSGMQCYTZ .
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------
>> 
>> James Redford
>> 
>> Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
>> Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press,
>> 2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my
>> curriculum vitæ (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
>> https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
>> https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf
>
>
>Fuck off.

I'm always fucking off. That, and screwing off. But you should take
your own advice, that way you'll be less uptight. My following article
can be a great benefit in that endeavor:

* James Redford, "How to Last During Lovemaking Like a True Sex-God
Stud", Internet Archive, May 12, 2019, 6 pp., ark:/13960/t0tr3j398,
https://megalodon.jp/2019-0513-0846-26/archive.org/download/InfiniLastSex/Redford-InfiniLast-Sex-Technique.pdf
, https://webcitation.org/78KGCK1s4 ,
https://www.freezepage.com/1557704775GXQCMMUNJE .

I didn't invent sex; I simply perfected it.

Why be a lousy fucker, when one can be a superb fucker?

----------------------------------------

James Redford

Author of The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of
Everything: And Other Selected Works (Chisinau, Moldova: Eliva Press,
2021), 268 pp., ISBN-10: 1636482775, ISBN-13: 9781636482774. See my
curriculum vitæ (ark:/13960/t6g19878v):
https://jamesredford.github.io/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf ,
https://archive.org/download/JamesRedford/Redford-Curriculum-Vitae.pdf

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics James Redford <jrredford@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-11 15:56 -0500
  Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-02-12 16:23 -0600
    Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics Abdel Peña Cuéllar <didpbai@bapaj.es> - 2024-02-12 23:14 +0000
    Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics James Redford <jrredford@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-13 00:33 -0500
    Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 08:52 -0800
  Re: God's Existence Is Proven by Several Mathematical Theorems within Standard Physics James Redford <jrredford@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-21 00:11 -0500

csiph-web