Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #894127

Re: The Apollo moon landings

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Samstag000019, 19.07.2025 um 10:01 schrieb Hibou:
> > Le 19/07/2025 à 01:00, Bertitaylor a écrit :
> >>
> >> As lies to make money as do physicists, professors, politicians,
> >> plutocrats, pimps, presstitutes and prostitutes. [...]
> >
> > That's just content-free insults and abuse. It's what contributors to
> > Usenet resort to when they have no evidence. It makes their case look
> > limp and false.
> >
> > It's a dog barking at the caravan as it passes. Woof.
> >
> > If you want to convince, then I suggest you review your rhetoric - or,
> > better still, align your position with the evidence.
> >
> > 'Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings' -
> > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-
> > party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings>
> >
> > 'How do we know that we went to the Moon?' -
> > <https://www.iop.org/explore-physics/moon/how-do-we-know-we-went-to-the-
> > moon>
> >
> 
> Actually I assume, that people went to the Moon.
> 
> The question was NOT 'if' but 'how'.
> 
> I assume, that the Nazis had already so called 'Haunebus', which were
> incorrectly named 'Ufos'.
> 
> Those could actually fly to the Moon and most likely did.
> 
> The problem:
> 
> the Haunebus were powered by a 'Hans-Kohler-Generator', which belongs
> into a class called 'free-energy-devices'.
> 
> This knowledge had to suppressed at all costs.
> 
> That's why the entire thing was filmed with cheap props in a studio and
> somewhere in the desert.
> 
> You can actually see this in certain pictures.
> 
> E.g. there exists a photo of the crew of Apollo 17 (afaik), where the
> astronauts pose without helmet (but with their lunar 'dune-buggy').
> 
> Also suspicious is the sandy landscape on the Moon, because to create
> sand you usually need water.
> 
> I actually calculated the amount of fuel needed to land the 'Eagle' and
> restart to orbit.
> 
> The fuel would be imho enough to bring the lander to a halt upon the
> Moon, but not enough for a restart.
> 
> (and so forth)
> ...
> 
> TH

I don't understand, if you simply want proof of "The Apollo moon
landings", can you just not use a telescope to see the stuff left
behind?


i mean, the moon ain't that far...it ain't at the end of the universe...

it's right up there!

FUCKING BIG AS LIFE!!!!

don't they sell telescopes on Amazon????


Look! Look at what I see!!!! 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Charlie_Duke%27s_family_portrait_left_on_the_surface_of_the_moon.jpg





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:00 +0000
  Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 09:01 +0100
    Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 08:45 +0000
      Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 12:00 +0100
        Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 14:20 +0000
          Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 07:58 -0700
          Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-20 06:05 +0100
            Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 06:51 +0000
              Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 12:27 +0000
      Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 13:39 +0200
        Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 13:27 +0000
          Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 07:09 -0700
          Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 22:34 +0200
          Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 22:11 +0000
            Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:10 -0700
            Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 12:42 +0200
    Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-21 09:16 +0200
      Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 07:33 +0000
        Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:09 +0200
      Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 05:44 -0700
        Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:30 +0200
          Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-22 06:41 -0700
      Re: The Apollo moon landings The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 10:41 -0700
        Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:39 +0200
          Re: The Apollo moon landings squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-22 20:45 +0100

csiph-web