Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #890721

Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?

Message-ID <678B4DD7.730F@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?
References (22 earlier) <6787F84E.28CE@ix.netcom.com> <6789566E.389B@ix.netcom.com> <vmc1s4$3mjna$1@dont-email.me> <69f2d18d-0195-495c-afb8-9af3273fe4bd@gmail.com> <vmekt9$8ju2$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> On 1/17/2025 2:05 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > On 1/16/2025 5:40 PM, x wrote:
> >> On 1/16/25 10:56, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> I am not sure but I think that it was 'Faust' that pointed
> >> to a degree on a wall and said something like - 'Look at the
> >> degree on the wall, I am something like a deity because I
> >> can point to a degree on the wall.'
> >>
> >> It is difficult to say what a 'deity' is but if that is
> >> true than it is difficult to claim to be an 'atheist' if
> >> there are so many degrees on so many different walls.
> >>
> >>> ...
> >>
> > .
> > [George Hammond] MS Physics, Cape Cod 1/17/2025
> > .
> > Well STARMAKER, there is no doubt that Goethe predicted
> > Germany's "Deal with the Devil" (Hitler) in his legend of
> > Faust,  that much is clear to me  !
> > .
> > On the other hand, I must totally DISAGREE with your
> > statement that: ---
> > .
> > "It is difficult to say what a 'deity' is"
> > .
> > THIS STATEMENT USED TO BE TRUE;
> > BUT IT IS NO LONGER TRUE TODAYÂ  !
> > .
> > It is no longer true since HAMMOND discovered exactly
> > what the historical "gods" (deities) are; scientifically !
> > .
> > The ancient Greeks tried to guess how many "gods"
> > there were... and their guests was 12 --- 12 Olympian gods !
> > .
> > But a few years ago, an unknown US physicist named HAMMOND
> > published a paper in which he demonstrated that the human brain
> > is actually "cubically cleaved" along the 3 axes of space X-Y-Z
> > .
> > And that therefore, since a  CUBE has 13 rotational symmetry axes,
> > there are therefore "13 gods (a.k.a. personalities) of man"
> > .
> > So NOW WE NOW, that the 2500 year old "Greek guesstimate"
> > of 12 Olympian gods, was off by one, there are actually 13Â  !
> > .
> > 12 out of 13 is 92% accuracy, so the ancient Greek guess at how
> > many gods there are, was very close to the  SCIENTIFIC FACT
> > recently discovered by US physicist Hammond !
> > .
> > So we certainly DO KNOW WHAT A "DEITY " IS TODAY !.
> >
> > Geo. Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod MA USA 1/17/25
> > .
> 
> https://youtu.be/vNefwlE1oCg
> 
> Except you are venturing very deep into the heart of KookVille?
> 
> ;^o



it's seems to me all you people eventually are venturing very deep into
the heart of KookVille...

A town nested at the 
crossroads of reality and ridiculourness,
and every resident has a PhD...in Kooky Theories..

your next stop...Kookville.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500

csiph-web