Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #887349
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: What clocks indicate |
| Date | Thu, 09 May 2024 13:07:30 -0700 |
| Organization | To protect and to server |
| Message-ID | <663D2D02.E19@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <17cd8f09e692fbec$238032$261710$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <01069d7cded015e415044a1b683df09f@www.novabbs.com> <1qt9j05.n09qr85td1gcN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <663C1553.63B9@ix.netcom.com> <1qtam18.48xwml1clxaj5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="741005"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 240509-4, 05/09/2024), Outbound message |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:653540 sci.physics:887349 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
J. J. Lodder wrote: > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > is a matter of ergonomy. Not a mater > > > > > of some delusional "Law of Nature" invented > > > > > by an insane crazie. > > > > > You can gedanke/imagine "perfect", "proper", > > > > > "correct" clocks perfectly obedient to you. > > > > > But you can't enforce your madness on real > > > > > clocks. Anyone can check GPS, sorry, poor > > > > > halfbrains, you're - simply - not important > > > > > enough. > > > > > > > > The first satellite went up with an accurate clock. > > > > It didn't work right. A switch was thrown to change > > > > the timebase to agree with the "insane crazy" -- and > > > > lo and behold, it worked. > > > > > > > > "If it's stupid but it works, it isn't stupid." > > > > -- Naval Ops Manual > > > > > > > > Wozzie keeps repeating the same misinformation, hoping > > > > for emotional support for his derangement. > > > > > > > > "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and > > > > expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein > > > > > > Do you have a real source for Einstein ever having said > > > anything like this? > > > Beyond the internet forever repeating itself? > > > > > > Jan > > > (doubting it) > > > > > > He concludes his letter, ironically: "I am now completely ripe for the insane > asylum‰ > > https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol13-doc/38 > > Certainly, but this is not the phrase wanted. > I Had the opportunity to look it up in the meantime. > It is in the 'ultimate quotable Einstein', > in the 'attributed to' part. > This is an error, it should be in the 'not by Einstein' section. > > ====== > *Insanity is doing the same thing over and over > again and expecting different results. > By Rita Mae Brown, in Sudden Death (New York: Bantam, > 1983), 68. Thanks to Barbara Wolff for the source. > ===== > So an invention from well after Einstein's death, > by someone without any connection to either physics or Einstein. > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rita_Mae_Brown> > > And looking that up, in that book, > I find that there isn't any real Einstein in the book. > The phrase is there, in the dialogue, > but it is said by a character in the book who is nicknamed 'Einstein', > presumably because she is supposed to have brains. > > So it is all bunk, and it has nothing to do with the real Einstein, > > Jan But it is not what you wrote. You wrote: "Do you have a real source for Einstein ever having said anything like this? Beyond the internet forever repeating itself?" ever having said anything like this? anything like this? "anything" in any degree; to any extent; in any way; at all: any thing whatever; something, no matter what: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/anything You didn't say "exactly that", you said..."anything". I posted anything. I don't know what the 'year 1983' has to do with Einstein. Didn't he died before the year 1983??? Why are yous people looking for quotes AFTER he died??? dats dumb. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: What clocks indicate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-09 13:07 -0700
Re: What clocks indicate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-10 10:34 -0700
Re: What clocks indicate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-10 15:49 -0700
Re: What clocks indicate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-10 19:43 -0700
Re: What clocks indicate The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-11 13:13 -0700
Re: What clocks indicate Bruno Gyöngyösi <gru@tf.hu> - 2024-05-11 21:03 +0000
csiph-web