Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #869871
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD |
| Date | 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <63EFCC83.55E5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tsbb76$1rdgl$1@dont-email.me> <e3ab12a3-6967-49a7-861c-42ff79fb844fn@googlegroups.com> <tsgedn$2iqdh$1@dont-email.me> <b2f9c56f-7ea0-446c-b5b2-9ee41bd7487dn@googlegroups.com> <tsj1ha$2uadd$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
worm food wrote: > > On 2/15/2023 5:40 AM, George Hammond wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:55:21 AM UTC-5, worm food wrote: > >> [worm food] wrote: > >> You, and he, (Hans Geesink) and others, have > >> clearly "seen something" and you are utilizing > >> what you consider the best and most relevant > >> known language to describe that "something". > >> -wf > > . > > (hmm... Notice the perfect typographical > > "justification" of that paragraph... g.e.h.) > > . > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > > HISTORIC discoveries can be > > described in a few words. > > Hammond's Scientific Proof of God > > is a HISTORIC discovery. > > . > > ROUTINE scientific research discoveries > > requires dozens of pages. of explanation. > > Hans Geesink's QM/EM/BIO discoveries > > require voluminous description. > > . > > The SPOG can be understood by a High > > School student – assuming that he: > > WANTS TO UNDERSTAND IT ! > > . > > Frankly, I'm more interested in YOUR > > opinion of the SPOG then I am in > > Hans Geesink's opinion. > > . > > That is, assuming you are actually > > CURIOUS as to what "God" actually is! > > BECAUSE if you are actually interested > > in what God is – that would make you > > the 2nd most interested person in the > > world; – after ME ! > > . > > George > > George, > I cannot comment on the mathematical accuracy of your theory, nor on the > scientific rigor. I can only comment that I believe you are earnest. > -wf yeahhh, when you say the word "earnest"...you make it sound like an insult! (which is your M.O.) -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-18 14:40 -0500
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:02 -0800
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:29 -0600
Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-19 12:22 -0800
csiph-web