Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #869871

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD
Date 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63EFCC83.55E5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <tsbb76$1rdgl$1@dont-email.me> <e3ab12a3-6967-49a7-861c-42ff79fb844fn@googlegroups.com> <tsgedn$2iqdh$1@dont-email.me> <b2f9c56f-7ea0-446c-b5b2-9ee41bd7487dn@googlegroups.com> <tsj1ha$2uadd$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


worm food wrote:
> 
> On 2/15/2023 5:40 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 11:55:21 AM UTC-5, worm food wrote:
> >> [worm food] wrote:
> >> You, and he, (Hans Geesink) and others, have
> >> clearly "seen something" and you are utilizing
> >> what you consider the best and most relevant
> >> known language to describe that "something".
> >> -wf
> > .
> >   (hmm... Notice the perfect typographical
> > "justification" of that paragraph... g.e.h.)
> > .
> > [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> > HISTORIC discoveries can be
> > described in a few words.
> > Hammond's Scientific Proof of God
> > is a HISTORIC discovery.
> > .
> > ROUTINE scientific research discoveries
> > requires dozens of pages. of explanation.
> > Hans Geesink's QM/EM/BIO discoveries
> > require voluminous description.
> > .
> > The SPOG can be understood by a High
> > School student – assuming that he:
> >   WANTS TO UNDERSTAND IT !
> > .
> > Frankly, I'm more interested in YOUR
> > opinion of the SPOG then I am in
> > Hans Geesink's opinion.
> > .
> > That is, assuming you are actually
> > CURIOUS as to what "God" actually is!
> > BECAUSE if you are actually interested
> > in what God is – that would make you
> > the 2nd most interested person in the
> > world; – after ME !
> > .
> > George
> 
> George,
> I cannot comment on the mathematical accuracy of your theory, nor on the
> scientific rigor. I can only comment that I believe you are earnest.
> -wf


yeahhh, when you say the word "earnest"...you make it sound like an
insult! (which is your M.O.)







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-17 10:50 -0800
  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD worm food <wormfood@compostpunk.com> - 2023-02-18 14:40 -0500
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-18 12:02 -0800
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-18 14:29 -0600
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-19 12:22 -0800

csiph-web