Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #869173

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 2:50:19 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 2/3/23 1:24 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> > > On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 4:43:00 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 2/1/23 7:57 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > >>> a 2nd rank tensor CAN and USUALLY IS written as a MATRIX
> > >> [Tom Roberts] wrote: This is not true. It is the COMPONENTS of the
> > >> rank-2 tensor, relative to a specified basis, that can be written
> > >> as a matrix; the basis is usually, but not always, a local set of
> > >> coordinate axes.
> > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] You conveniently failed to quote the
> > > 2nd sentence following the one you quoted above – in which I say: –
> > > .
> > >> "In particular, In Relativity the 4 x 4 METRIC TENSOR is
> > >> universally written as a 4 x 4 MATRIX"
> > > . So CLEARLY – I am talking SPECIFICALLY about the COMPONENTS of the
> > > 4 x 4 metric tensor...
> > Yes -- all too many authors, including yourself, discuss tensor
> > components while calling them "the tensor". My point was that the
> > distinction is important: the tensor is independent of basis and
> > coordinates, but its components explicitly depend on the basis
> > (coordinates).
> >
> > [That basis/coordinate independence is one of the primary
> > reasons for using tensors in physical theories.]
> > > FURTHERMORE this entire thread is a discussion of this 4 x 4
> > > COMPONENT metric/matrix expressed in Cartesian coordinates
> > That's your problem -- you are discussing a matrix that is EXPLICITLY
> > coordinate dependent. Note that coordinates are arbitrary human
> > constructs, and nature never uses them, so no coordinate-dependent
> > quantity can accurately model any phenomenon of nature. But here that's
> > OK, as "GOD" is not any phenomenon of nature -- both "GOD" and those
> > metric components are figments of your imagination.
> >
> > [Of course the whole thing is useless to anyone who does
> > not share your imaginary figments, which is why I am
> > normally absent from this thread).
> >
> > Tom Roberts
> .
> [George E Hammond MS Physics]
> .... Look Tom –
> The Einstein Metric of objective space-time
> The Friedmann Metric Of Astrophysics
> The Hammond God Metric of Subjective Space-Time
> .
> Are by definition
> ALL COORDINATE INDEPENDENT: –
> .
> | 1 o o o. |
> | o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
> | o o 1 o. |
> | o o o -1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
> |o o a² o. |
> |o o o..-1.|
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> .
> You can write them in Cartesian coordinates,
> spherical coordinates, or any coordinate system
> you choose – because they are tensor equations.
> .
> ====================================
> So you are WRONG when you say that the
> "God Metric" is "Coordinate Dependent"
> it is just as "coordinate INDEPENDENT"
> as the FL RW metric of Astrophysics is !!
> ====================================
> .
> The problem is that you do not understand the
> difference between:
> OBJECTIVE space-time
> and
> SUBJECTIVE space-time
> .
> You don't even NEED to understand the
> DIFFERENCE – just consider them 2 separate
> and independent space times with different
> METRICS .
> .
> But for the more Scientifically Inquisitive
> reader let me explain that OBJECTIVE
> space-time is measured with clocks and rulers,
> while SUBJECTIVE space-time is the reality
> that you actually SEE – – for instance a
> 6 month old kid SEES a world that is
> 4 TIMES LARGER AND 4 TIMES FASTER
> THEN AN ADULT
> .
> And this is WHY a "Friedman type Scale Factor"
> a{t} appears in the GOD METRIC !
> ..
> NOW OBVIOUSLY "subjective" space-time is
> what is commonly called "Psychological Reality.
> Whereas "objective" space-time is psychologically
> independent "objective (scientifically measurable)
> reality".
> .
> THIS IS WHY it is called the "GOD METRIC".
> .
> Now I don't expect you to understand or even CARE
> about all that – but let me remind you that there are
> billions of people in the world who DO !.
> .
> And the reason is this is – for 2023 years we have had
> to suffer the disgusting experience of sitting in a
> Christian church facing a dead body hanging from a
> Cross in the front of the Church – because that was
> the only way they could "explain what God is".
> .
> Well guess what Tom – your SPR buddy George has
> discovered A SCIENTIFIC Proof of God – that does not
> require a dead body hanging from a Cross to scientifically
> proof that there is a "REAL GOD".
> .
> You may not think that's important or significant,
> but I think it's so important that we should RESTART
> THE JULIAN CALENDAR at year 01 starting in 2024 !
> I'm here to tell you that the "Age of Jesus" is over !
> We now have a scientific Proof of God !
> .
> Please don't go away mad–  if you have any further
> comments about the "God Metric" I would certainly like
> to hear about them!
> .
> George
> .

There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time. 

and have Never been proven to be a reality.

go back to the drawing board....


call tech support..
error, error, error.


There is no reality in SUBJECTIVE space-time. 

and have Never been proven to be a reality.

go back to the drawing board....


call tech support..
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
error, error, error.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzerror, error, error.
error, error, error.
call tech support..
in India.

you got a billion people who will take your call.

or any 7/11 store can help you.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 19:26 +0000
  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:01 +0000
  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 23:36 +0000
  Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-09 21:01 -0800
    Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 12:56 -0800
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 13:11 -0800
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 14:41 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:31 -0800
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2023-01-10 22:36 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 00:23 -0800
      Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-10 22:42 -0800
        Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 00:17 -0800
          Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 09:55 -0800
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-11 12:15 -0800
            Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Otto Fiscella <tfit@tiselelc.it> - 2023-01-13 16:41 +0000
              Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 12:47 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 00:02 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:20 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Ciro Di pietro <pide@rioied.ao> - 2023-01-20 23:30 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-21 14:47 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 01:35 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Giovanne Bologna <gnoy@ninvo.ln> - 2023-01-22 22:21 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:03 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Faustino Biondo <uinn@bfotboia.nt> - 2023-01-25 17:21 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 00:58 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Alexander Basso <axsd@daoadnbl.ba> - 2023-02-02 20:25 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-03 21:58 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Estaban Alduino <tosd@teabnnai.ou> - 2023-02-06 23:20 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-07 01:39 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:43 -0600
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-11 00:03 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 10:57 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-08 12:46 -0800
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:25 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-12 02:14 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 21:50 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Walton Esposito <nsoi@ipstoonl.ns> - 2023-02-11 19:12 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:05 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Northstream 2 and 1 <sdfasf@sdfgdg.sd> - 2023-02-16 04:04 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-13 23:14 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Nicholes Di pasqua <ncau@caliuail.ie> - 2023-02-10 23:14 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Rusbel Confortola <fnbo@orfolcec.tl> - 2023-02-07 21:10 +0000
                Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 15:25 -0600

csiph-web