Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #667597 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:54 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:55 +0100
What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 11:25 +0100
Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding (Re: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:01 +0100
BB(745) is independent of ZFC (Was: Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:07 +0100
Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine) (Re: BB(745) is independent of ZFC ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:18 +0100
Turing machines have neurons (Re: Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:19 +0100
A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943] (Re: Turing machines have neurons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:20 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:39 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:43 +0100
Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:18 +0100
Re: What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 12:09 +0100
parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 13:23 +0100
Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:12 +0100
Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Was: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:31 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Was: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:02 +0100
Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 17:59 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:05 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:08 +0100
Physics more difficult than Rasperry LED cube? (Was: PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc..) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:17 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-03 06:46 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-03 08:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-04 09:57 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Telly Missiakos <siy@ioet.gr> - 2025-12-05 14:26 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 17:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:39 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:46 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-07 11:42 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-07 16:26 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 04:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-08 13:58 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:21 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 09:06 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Yunior Molokanov <ukan@amuyao.ru> - 2025-12-14 17:18 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 10:03 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Salvado Gorbikov <abdrvvg@lgadi.ru> - 2025-12-15 22:01 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800
I have a great idea The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800
Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100
Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:00 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lemuel Agababov <uamv@oaabao.ru> - 2025-12-17 16:58 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:33 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Eniel Habalov <ia@anael.ru> - 2025-12-18 16:22 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 10:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 11:23 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lynn Dobronos <rlbs@ddn.ru> - 2025-12-17 16:51 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 05:30 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Pascual Sokolsky <aoa@ssppsc.pl> - 2025-12-01 19:58 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 21:17 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Blending Molostvov <noo@biiooe.ru> - 2025-12-01 20:44 +0000
Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:06 +0100
Linux kernel's RCU-protected hash tables (Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:26 +0100
String interning is HashSet and not HashMap (Was: Linux kernel's RCU-protected hash tables) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:40 +0100
Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Bosephis Otlesnov <ooiv@th.ru> - 2025-12-01 21:42 +0000
POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM (Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011)) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:12 +0100
Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:37 +0100
Sputnik Schock: Academia is Disposable [I. J. Good Ultraintelligence] (Was: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:53 +0100
Re: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Josbanne Balagula <ajbn@oll.ru> - 2025-12-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:08 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-11-30 14:06 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Dong Shamahov <hhh@dvgshv.ru> - 2025-11-30 15:46 +0000
You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:27 +0100
Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:33 +0100
What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:45 +0100
newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:00 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-02 03:10 +0000
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 11:51 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:36 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 21:42 -0800
Orbits of planets in the Sol System (was: newsreader where you can see the message source) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:29 +0100
Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:30 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 14:56 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 15:22 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:57 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 11:03 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-07 16:17 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 17:59 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 18:07 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 18:16 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 21:39 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-08 12:14 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 12:41 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 13:11 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 04:49 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 17:33 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-08 18:39 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 12:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 04:41 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 21:41 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:56 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 12:15 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:35 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 02:17 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 12:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 13:25 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 05:45 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 05:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-09 06:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 11:50 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 02:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-11 03:20 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-11 10:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 09:04 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-12 01:20 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-12 10:20 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 17:46 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-13 11:44 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 23:26 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-13 15:28 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:52 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 22:35 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 22:45 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:52 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-17 17:39 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-18 04:23 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-18 02:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 23:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 23:27 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Jonas Zhashkov <snos@kook.ru> - 2025-12-09 19:35 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:44 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System "D.J. Papadopulos" <sn@sppodd.gr> - 2025-12-10 15:34 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-11 03:29 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Erwin Shimanouchi <sicor@rinn.jp> - 2025-12-11 21:04 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-06 14:57 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:36 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:36 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:42 -0800
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:35 +0100
Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: newsreader where you can see the message source) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:22 +0100
Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:28 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:22 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-03 08:27 -0800
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:57 +0100
Re: Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-30 23:14 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Sebastian Zolotdinov <eso@iz.ru> - 2025-11-30 23:42 +0000
Putin payed trolls are usually name shifters [ethernal september morons] (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 11:19 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:23 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:05 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:29 +0100
Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:25 +0100
Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:29 +0100
What Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn missed (Was: Different Hubble Theories: de Sitter Energy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 01:09 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
Attacking the Busy Beaver 5 [1989] (Re: The size of a Gödel sentence G) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <n11vjkd61p5kt68grvc1kj5epo6k28tnnm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667839 |
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 03:00:03 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >> Den 14.12.2025 19:25, skrev The Starmaker: >>> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" >>> <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >>>> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>>>> >>>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>>> >>>> The very first statement in the application: >>>> "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly >>>> to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." >>>> >>>> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >>>> is a refrigerator? >>>> >>>> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >>> >>> I understand English is your second language. > >LOL; it's the proverbial pot calling the kettle black: > >>> Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in >>> Capitol letters > >in _capital_ (uppercase) letters > >[The Capitol is a building in Washington, D.C., the capitol (primary city) >of the U.S.A., instead.] > >>> REFRIDERATION (meaning all caps) > >No, it reads (correctly) _REFRIGERATION_. > > [If would be just a typo on "The Starmaker"'s part, it would be a very > strange one: on a U.S. keyboard layout, the key for "D" is two keys away > from that for "G". So much for "English as second language".] > >>> REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine. > >From this repetition of the mistake we can surmise that it was not just a >typo by "The Starmaker", but that it is due to a missing ability to read or >write properly. They might be dyslexic; but then it would be hilarious that >they would lecture others about language. > >> You are right! >> "An apparatus for producing refrigeration" >> does not produce a machine. >> >> It _is_ a machine which is called a refrigerator. > >Exactly. The patent application begins with > >| Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly to an >| apparatus and method for producing refrigeration [...] > >(So much for "The Starmaker"'s understanding of English.) > >It is interesting to note that Einstein and Szilárd are called "ASSIGNORS TO >ELECTROLUX SERVEL CORPORATION, of NEW YORK, N.Y., A. CORPORATION OF >DELAWARE" there already. (You mentioned that the refrigerator that was used >in your parent's home was manufactured by Electrolux and based on this design.) > >Also: "Application filed December 16, 1927, Serial No. 240,566 [in the >U.S.A.], and in Germany December 16, 1926." > >F'up2 sci.physics The speling police in back in town!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <p90ujk9vc55i03n0r95bb0eb7algt76g68@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667822 |
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >>> doesn't contain the fruad) >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >Well done to dig up the real patent application of December 19. 1926. > >So it's settled now, it is a refrigerator. > >> >> Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, >> you won't find the word "refrigerator". >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >The very first statement in the application: > "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly > to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." > >Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >is a refrigerator? > >The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. > >At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia >which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen. > >> >> Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system >> process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... >> >> (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's >> cooling system fails.) >> >> Here is what a Reactor looks like today: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 >> >> and here is a cut-out out of both: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 >> >> But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >> Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has >> tested Positive for Stupid. > >:-D > >Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux. > >In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. > >Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had >a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. Now, do yous actually believe this is a BLOUSE that Albert Einstein filed a patent for in 1936???? https://patents.google.com/patent/USD101756?oq=USD101756-0 Of course not. Albert Einstein was tooo busy building his atomic bombs. He had to come up with a way to protect others from being exposed to URANIUM RADIATION. So he simply designed a Radiation Vest Jacket: It's not a blouse, it's a radiation vest! http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US5274851-2.png https://patents.google.com/patent/US5274851A/en?oq=US5274851+ https://patents.google.com/patent/US8067759?oq=radiation+vest https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/20160923_EOS_0467.jpg don't forget, he spoke german..that means the word "blouse" might have a different meaning.. meaning not having to do with 'women'. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <9n1ujkpiqvu40q5969rggf04gvik3q3cns@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667827 |
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 10:27:30 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" ><relativity@paulba.no> wrote: > >>Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >>>> doesn't contain the fruad) >>>> >>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >>Well done to dig up the real patent application of December 19. 1926. >> >>So it's settled now, it is a refrigerator. >> >>> >>> Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, >>> you won't find the word "refrigerator". >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >>The very first statement in the application: >> "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly >> to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." >> >>Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >>is a refrigerator? >> >>The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >> >>At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia >>which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen. >> >>> >>> Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system >>> process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... >>> >>> (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's >>> cooling system fails.) >>> >>> Here is what a Reactor looks like today: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 >>> >>> and here is a cut-out out of both: >>> >>> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 >>> >>> But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>> >>> Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has >>> tested Positive for Stupid. >> >>:-D >> >>Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux. >> >>In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >> >>Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had >>a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. > > >Now, do yous actually believe this is a BLOUSE that Albert Einstein >filed a patent for in 1936???? > > >https://patents.google.com/patent/USD101756?oq=USD101756-0 > > > > >Of course not. Albert Einstein was tooo busy building his atomic >bombs. > >He had to come up with a way to protect others from being exposed to >URANIUM RADIATION. > >So he simply designed a Radiation Vest Jacket: > >It's not a blouse, it's a radiation vest! > > >http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US5274851-2.png > >https://patents.google.com/patent/US5274851A/en?oq=US5274851+ > >https://patents.google.com/patent/US8067759?oq=radiation+vest > >https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/20160923_EOS_0467.jpg > > > >don't forget, he spoke german..that means the word "blouse" might have >a >different meaning.. >meaning not having to do with 'women'. I would like to add.. nobody, but nobody wore a radation jacket at the Manhattan Project. Richard Feynman died from exposure, and countless others. I guess Albert Einstein decided NOT to tell anyone about the dangerous raidation exposure...he didn't want anyone scared off from finishing his atomic bomb. He even joked about it..he said: 'I been exposed by so much radium, I should be dead by now!' Of course, Albert Einstein died from radium exposure. (but you are not suppose to know that) -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mq9p1nFrmp6U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667822 |
Am Sonntag000014, 14.12.2025 um 14:27 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: ... >> Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, >> you won't find the word "refrigerator". >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/ >> US1781541.pdf > > The very first statement in the application: > "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly > to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." > > Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" > is a refrigerator? > > The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. > > At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia > which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen. > >> >> Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system >> process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... >> >> (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's >> cooling system fails.) >> >> Here is what a Reactor looks like today: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 >> >> and here is a cut-out out of both: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 >> >> But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/ >> US1781541.pdf >> >> Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has >> tested Positive for Stupid. > > :-D > > Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux. > > In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought > an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. > > Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had > a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. > The only known use of Einstein's fridge is as a part of a fast breeding reactor. Therefore, my guess was: 'fridge' was a misnomer, to hide the real purpose and the device was actually meant as a part of a fast breeder. If otherwise, there is a need to show a working fridge, which is based on Einstein's design. But I read, that a group of students tried to replicate the 'fride' and found out, that it didn't cool. But as patent it wouldn't make much difference, if the 'inert gas' is actually molten Natrium (or some other molten metal). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hp0vl$1tfqi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667850 |
Den 15.12.2025 07:50, skrev Thomas Heger: > Am Sonntag000014, 14.12.2025 um 14:27 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >> >> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >> Electrolux. >> >> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >> >> Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had >> a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. >> > The only known use of Einstein's fridge is as a part of a fast breeding > reactor. > > Therefore, my guess was: 'fridge' was a misnomer, to hide the real > purpose and the device was actually meant as a part of a fast breeder. > > If otherwise, there is a need to show a working fridge, which is based > on Einstein's design. Do you never read the posts you are responding to? Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. > > But I read, that a group of students tried to replicate the 'fride' and > found out, that it didn't cool. Why would they do that when they could buy a working version of Einstein and Szilard's absorption refrigerator from Electrolux? That was what my parents did, and I can assure that it worked for many years. > > But as patent it wouldn't make much difference, if the 'inert gas' is > actually molten Natrium (or some other molten metal). > Here is Einstein and Szilard's patent application: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf I quote from it: "A suitable refrigerant, for instance butane, in liquid form is contained within evaporator 1. An inert gas, for instance ammonia, is introduced into evaporator 1 through conduit 30 and distributor head 31. The refrigerant evaporates in the evaporator.." The "inert gas" is ammonia, so from whence have you got the idiotic idea that the "inert gas" is molten metal? There is no way you can read the patent application without understanding that it is a description of a refrigerator with no moving parts. So you have not read it. Do you not understand how stupid it is to think that a patent application which you haven't read, really is a description of a fast breading reactor? But why have you not read it? Can't you read? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mqcgjbFb8enU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667853 |
Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: > Den 15.12.2025 07:50, skrev Thomas Heger: >> Am Sonntag000014, 14.12.2025 um 14:27 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> >>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>> Electrolux. >>> >>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>> >>> Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had >>> a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. >>> > >> The only known use of Einstein's fridge is as a part of a fast >> breeding reactor. >> >> Therefore, my guess was: 'fridge' was a misnomer, to hide the real >> purpose and the device was actually meant as a part of a fast breeder. >> >> If otherwise, there is a need to show a working fridge, which is based >> on Einstein's design. > > Do you never read the posts you are responding to? > > Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company > Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. > > In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought > an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. > > I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges > based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. Sure! But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were based upon Einstein's patent? My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. So, we have a few facts: Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money Electrolux sold tons of fridges But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent? You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money. But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hskjb$32r95$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667859 |
Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: > Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >> >> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >> >> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >> >> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >> >> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. > > > No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. > > Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. > > Sure! > > But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were > based upon Einstein's patent? > > My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? > > So, we have a few facts: > > Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge > Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money > Electrolux sold tons of fridges ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. > > But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's > and Szillard's patent? The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf The refigerator is described in detail. Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read? No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator. > > You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money. > > But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company > would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents. > So why do you think that Electrolux gave Einstein money? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mqf598Fosv3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667865 |
Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: > Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> >>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>> >>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>> >>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>> >>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >> >> >> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >> >> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >> >> Sure! >> >> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >> based upon Einstein's patent? >> >> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. > > Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. But that's all we could safely assume. Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but wanted to keep that secret. But how could we today possibly know???? >> >> So, we have a few facts: >> >> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >> Electrolux sold tons of fridges > > ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. THAT was actually the question. Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part needed for a fast breeding reactor???? We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's patent and check whether or not it cools. But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did NOT cool. Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast breeding reactors. The endresult: two points for fast breeding reactor zero points for 'fridge'. TH ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 14:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hu9df$3gcja$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667872 |
Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger: > Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>> >>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>> >>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>> >>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>> >>> >>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >>> >>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >>> >>> Sure! >>> >>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >>> based upon Einstein's patent? >>> >>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. >> >> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? > > > This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. > > I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this > fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. > > Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. > > But that's all we could safely assume. > > Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but > wanted to keep that secret. > > But how could we today possibly know???? > > >>> >>> So, we have a few facts: >>> >>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges >> >> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. >>> >>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent? >> >> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of >> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with >> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here: >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >> The refrigerator is described in detail. >> >> Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read? >> >> No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator >> and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator. > Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part > needed for a fast breeding reactor??? You didn't answer my question. The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail in the patent application. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand. An engineer should be qualified to read it. Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is? > > We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's > patent and check whether or not it cools.> > But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering > students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did > NOT cool. > > Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast > breeding reactors. SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL > > The endresult: > > two points for fast breeding reactor > > zero points for 'fridge'. > Can you point out where in the detailed description it is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor? https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to the relevant section. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lemuel Agababov <uamv@oaabao.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 16:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hunfv$3mg08$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667874 |
Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger: >> Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >> needed for a fast breeding reactor??? > > You didn't answer my question. > > The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail in > the patent application. still in error. A lot of moving parts in that patent, the coolant fluid, the electric current, the buoyancy of the molecules etc the Einstine misundrestood the patent he "applied" for. He was busy with his cosine, who was a man. It was allowed to be a man. A man to marry another man
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 18:33 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10huphd$2faag$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #667878 |
The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their mindbogging stupidity once again: > the Einstine misundrestood the patent he "applied" for. He was busy with > his cosine, who was a man. It was allowed to be a man. A man to marry > another man *facepalm* -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eniel Habalov <ia@anael.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-18 16:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10i19op$e5ld$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667880 |
bag of dog shit Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their mindbogging stupidity once > again: >> the Einstine misundrestood the patent he "applied" for. He was busy >> with his cosine, who was a man. It was allowed to be a man. A man to >> marry another man > > *facepalm* do it again, you stupid mazafaka, until you cry uncle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 10:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <abt5kkptsmstokufvk95a4pcvu6ochagvg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667874 |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:00:00 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger: >> Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >>>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>>> >>>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>>>> >>>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>>> >>>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>>> >>>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >>>> >>>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >>>> >>>> Sure! >>>> >>>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >>>> based upon Einstein's patent? >>>> >>>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. >>> >>> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? >> >> >> This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. >> >> I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this >> fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. >> >> Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. >> >> But that's all we could safely assume. >> >> Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >> wanted to keep that secret. >> >> But how could we today possibly know???? >> >> >>>> >>>> So, we have a few facts: >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >>>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >>>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges >>> >>> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. > >>>> >>>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent? >>> >>> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of >>> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with >>> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here: >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>> >>> The refrigerator is described in detail. >>> >>> Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read? >>> >>> No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator >>> and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator. > >> Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >> needed for a fast breeding reactor??? > >You didn't answer my question. > >The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail >in the patent application. > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand. >An engineer should be qualified to read it. > >Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is? > > > > We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's >> patent and check whether or not it cools.> >> But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >> students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did >> NOT cool. >> >> Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >> breeding reactors. > >SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL > >> >> The endresult: >> >> two points for fast breeding reactor >> >> zero points for 'fridge'. >> > >Can you point out where in the detailed description it >is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor? > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to >the relevant section. "apparatus for producing refrigeration" An apparatus for producing refrigeration is a device or system engineered to actively extract heat from a specific, enclosed space or substance and transfer it to a warmer environment, thereby lowering the temperature within that enclosed space below the ambient temperature. The primary function is to create and maintain a cool or cold environment. Common examples range from small household refrigerators and air conditioning units to large-scale industrial chilling systems used for food storage facilities or data centers. https://www.google.com/search?q=define++%22apparatus+for+producing+refrigeration%22 You have to be naive to not know by now that Albert Einstein made every effort not to get 'blood on his hands'. Atomic bombs are Top Secret then, so he had to disguise his atomic bomb manufacturing business. But here is another Albert Einstein patent for the 'same design', but back then in 1928 he called his patent..."The CHILLER"!!!! Notice, if you will... that the VERY first sentence reads:" The invention relates to a refrigeration machine..." "relates" is the operative word. (having shared characteristics ) https://patents.google.com/patent/CH140217A/en?inventor=Einstein+Albert&sort=old Somebody please, turn on the air conditioner...it's so hot here. Maybe I should stick my head inside a refridgerator... Dollar Tree has a freezer! CHILLY in here, isn't it? https://www.foxnews.com/us/doctor-mysteriously-found-dead-inside-dollar-tree-freezer-reportedly-naked -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 11:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <2p06kktvt7cpdkeuq2o1bdi670atcvfuqv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667874 |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 14:00:00 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger: >> Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >>>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>>> >>>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>>>> >>>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>>> >>>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>>> >>>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >>>> >>>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >>>> >>>> Sure! >>>> >>>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >>>> based upon Einstein's patent? >>>> >>>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. >>> >>> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? >> >> >> This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. >> >> I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this >> fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. >> >> Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. >> >> But that's all we could safely assume. >> >> Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >> wanted to keep that secret. >> >> But how could we today possibly know???? >> >> >>>> >>>> So, we have a few facts: >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >>>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >>>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges >>> >>> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. > >>>> >>>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's and Szillard's patent? >>> >>> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of >>> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with >>> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here: >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>> >>> The refrigerator is described in detail. >>> >>> Why don't you read it and see for yourself? Can't you read? >>> >>> No sane person can read a detailed descripion of a refrigerator >>> and believe that it is anything but a refrigerator. > >> Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >> needed for a fast breeding reactor??? > >You didn't answer my question. > >The "apparatus for producing refrigeration" is described in detail >in the patent application. > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >This isn't a scientific text you have to be a physicist to understand. >An engineer should be qualified to read it. > >Why can't you read it an see for yourself what kind of apparatus its is? > > > > We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's >> patent and check whether or not it cools.> >> But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >> students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did >> NOT cool. >> >> Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >> breeding reactors. > >SIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D and ROFL > >> >> The endresult: >> >> two points for fast breeding reactor >> >> zero points for 'fridge'. >> > >Can you point out where in the detailed description it >is clear that the apparatus is a part of a fast breeding reactor? > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >The lines in the text are numbered, so it should be easy to refer to >the relevant section Einstein and Szilárd's invention, patented in 1930, was a pump system for safer, compressor-free refrigeration, later finding use in nuclear reactors, while the AquaMotion "Einstein" pump is a highly efficient HVAC circulator for heating/cooling systems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10huarq$3gcja$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667872 |
Den 17.12.2025 08:50, skrev Thomas Heger: >>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>> >>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>> >>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>> > I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this > fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. > > Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. > > But that's all we could safely assume. > > Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but > wanted to keep that secret. > > But how could we today possibly know???? Maybe we today could read the patent application and see what kind of apparatus it is? https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <t3r9kkppbesh7hjrc1h98ad0tnkgp3sipi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667872 |
On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:50:10 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>> >>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>> >>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>> >>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>> >>> >>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >>> >>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >>> >>> Sure! >>> >>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >>> based upon Einstein's patent? >>> >>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. >> >> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? > > >This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. > >I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this >fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. > >Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. > >But that's all we could safely assume. > >Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >wanted to keep that secret. > >But how could we today possibly know???? > > >>> >>> So, we have a few facts: >>> >>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges >> >> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. > > >THAT was actually the question. > >Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >needed for a fast breeding reactor???? > >We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's >patent and check whether or not it cools. > >But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did >NOT cool. > >Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >breeding reactors. > >The endresult: > >two points for fast breeding reactor > >zero points for 'fridge'. > > >TH > >... "common knowledge"??? that is lacking with these people... "Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear reactor—“an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard.” (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)" -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <m7bbkk54ko3b3823fbaio7d32tnvvqquie@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667897 |
On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 22:13:22 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:50:10 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >wrote: > >>Am Dienstag000016, 16.12.2025 um 22:58 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >>>> Am Montag000015, 15.12.2025 um 14:05 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>>> >>>>> Do you never read the posts you are responding to? >>>>> >>>>> Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company >>>>> Electrolux, which built and sold a lot of absorption refrigerators. >>>>> >>>>> In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >>>>> an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. >>>>> >>>>> I and thousands of other people have seen working fridges >>>>> based on Einstein and Szilard's patent. >>>> >>>> >>>> No, because this is a 'non sequitur'. >>>> >>>> Thousands of people baught absorption fridges from Electrolux. >>>> >>>> Sure! >>>> >>>> But how many of them investigated, whether or not these fridges were >>>> based upon Einstein's patent? >>>> >>>> My guess: not a single buyer did that, because nobody cared. >>> >>> Why are you stating this irrelevant obvious triviality? >> >> >>This was a reply to 'my parents bougth an Electrolux refridgerator'. >> >>I wanted to express, that buying a fridge does not prove, that this >>fridge was build according to Einstein's patent. >> >>Sure, Electrolux gave Einstein money. >> >>But that's all we could safely assume. >> >>Possibly Electrolux was involved in building fast breeding reactors, but >>wanted to keep that secret. >> >>But how could we today possibly know???? >> >> >>>> >>>> So, we have a few facts: >>>> >>>> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge >>>> Electrolux gave them (a lot of) money >>>> Electrolux sold tons of fridges >>> >>> ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. >> >> >>THAT was actually the question. >> >>Iow: was that patented device actually an absorption fridge or a part >>needed for a fast breeding reactor???? >> >>We could check that by building a 'fridge' according to Einstein's >>patent and check whether or not it cools. >> >>But we actually don't need to do that, because a group of engineering >>students did that already and found out, that Einstein's 'fridge' did >>NOT cool. >> >>Instead it is common knowledge, that Einstein's 'fridge' is used in fast >>breeding reactors. >> >>The endresult: >> >>two points for fast breeding reactor >> >>zero points for 'fridge'. >> >> >>TH >> >>... > >"common knowledge"??? that is lacking with these people... > >"Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the >circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear >reactor—“an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or >Szilard.” (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and >Elkana, p. 391.)" Looks to me like EVERYBODY has a patent on a Refridgerator! https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=f6c74f9de523a440&sxsrf=AE3TifPNUc33Lgs_q5P7-XN0_4gmLM5k7Q:1766173780459&udm=2&fbs=&q=Pressurized+Water+Reactor Where can I buy one? https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lynn Dobronos <rlbs@ddn.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 16:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hun2u$3mg08$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667865 |
Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger: >> So, we have a few facts: >> >> Einstein and Szillard patented a fridge Electrolux gave them (a lot of) >> money Electrolux sold tons of fridges > > ... some of which were based on on Einstein and Szillard's patent. nonsense, that patent was stolen. The man was working deep into the patents, for fuck sake. Should I draw a picture to ya??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10huovi$2f9ov$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #667865 |
Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> Den 16.12.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
>> But where is the proof, that these fridges were based upon Einstein's
>> and Szillard's patent?
>
> The simple fact that the Electrolux fridge my parents and a lot of
> other people bought in 1953 was an absorption refrigerator with
> no moving parts which had the same machinery as described here:
>
> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf
>
> The refigerator is described in detail.
Moreover, the patent application ("filed December 16, 1927, Serial No.
240,566, and in Germany December 16, 1926") reads
"ALBERT EINSTEIN, OF BERLIN, AND LEO SZILARD, of BERLIN-WILMERSDORF,
GERMANY, ASSIGNORS TO ELECTROLUX SERVEL CORPORATION OF NEW YORK, N.Y., A.
CORPORATION OF DELAWARE"
In law, an assignor is a person who "transfers rights or benefits to
another, the assignee":
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_(law)>
,-<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servel>
|
| "Servel was an American manufacturer of heating and cooling appliances,
| founded in 1922. [...] In 1925, the company bought American rights to a
| Swedish patent for a continuous absorption refrigerator and started
| to focus on the gas refrigeration market. [...] In 1939, Servel (then
| Electrolux-Servel) exhibited its residential gas air conditioner at the
| New York World's Fair.[3]"
IOW, Einstein and Szilárd filed the patent *so that* Electrolux-Servel could
use it to build absorption refrigerators based on their invention. In
return, they received royalty payments from Electrolux-Servel.
>> You only think they did, because Electrolux spent money.
>>
>> But actually there are all sorts of reasons thinkable, why some company
>> would like to give somebody money and declare that as spending for patents.
>
> So why do you think that Electrolux gave Einstein money?
Exactly. As usual, Thomas Heger makes a ludicrous claim to make up a
conspiracy theory.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10i085p$40fb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667765 |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:19:04 +0100, Thomas Heger wrote: > Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called > 'Einstein's fridge'. He also tried to design an airplane wing that operated according to the Bernoulli principle (lift created by faster airflow over the upper surface than the lower one). It didn’t work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web