Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #667597 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100 |
| Last post | 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:38 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:54 +0100
An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 13:55 +0100
What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 11:25 +0100
Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding (Re: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:01 +0100
BB(745) is independent of ZFC (Was: Wake-up call until everybody gets ear-bleeding) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:07 +0100
Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine) (Re: BB(745) is independent of ZFC ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:18 +0100
Turing machines have neurons (Re: Write ZFC formulas on a tape (of a Turing machine)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:19 +0100
A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943] (Re: Turing machines have neurons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:20 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:39 +0100
Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 17:43 +0100
Re: Busy Beaver and Theory Consistency (Was: A logical calculus in nervous activity [McCulloch & Pitts 1943]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:18 +0100
Re: What is analog computing nowadays? (Re: An old Busy Beaver ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 12:09 +0100
parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 12:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 13:23 +0100
Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:12 +0100
Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Was: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 17:31 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Was: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:02 +0100
Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction (Was: parallel random-access machine) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-01 17:59 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:05 +0100
PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc.. (Re: Nope, you can't, because of the CRCW instuction) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:08 +0100
Physics more difficult than Rasperry LED cube? (Was: PRAMs might be closer to physics: Boltzman machines, etc..) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 18:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:17 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-03 06:46 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-03 08:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-04 09:57 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Telly Missiakos <siy@ioet.gr> - 2025-12-05 14:26 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 17:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:39 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:46 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-07 11:42 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-07 16:26 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 04:25 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-08 13:58 +0200
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:15 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-08 08:21 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-08 09:06 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Yunior Molokanov <ukan@amuyao.ru> - 2025-12-14 17:18 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 10:03 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Salvado Gorbikov <abdrvvg@lgadi.ru> - 2025-12-15 22:01 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800
I have a great idea The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800
Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100
Re: Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 19:46 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:27 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-14 10:58 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-15 07:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-15 14:05 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-16 08:44 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-16 22:58 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-17 08:50 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:00 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lemuel Agababov <uamv@oaabao.ru> - 2025-12-17 16:58 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:33 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Eniel Habalov <ia@anael.ru> - 2025-12-18 16:22 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 10:49 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-17 11:23 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-12-17 14:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-18 22:13 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-19 12:02 -0800
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lynn Dobronos <rlbs@ddn.ru> - 2025-12-17 16:51 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:24 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-18 06:49 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-06 05:30 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Pascual Sokolsky <aoa@ssppsc.pl> - 2025-12-01 19:58 +0000
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 21:17 +0100
Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM (Was: What is analog computing nowadays?) Blending Molostvov <noo@biiooe.ru> - 2025-12-01 20:44 +0000
Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:06 +0100
Linux kernel's RCU-protected hash tables (Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:26 +0100
String interning is HashSet and not HashMap (Was: Linux kernel's RCU-protected hash tables) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 22:40 +0100
Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Bosephis Otlesnov <ooiv@th.ru> - 2025-12-01 21:42 +0000
POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM (Re: Algorithm introduced in Hogwild! SGD (Niu et al., 2011)) (Re: parallel random-access machine) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:12 +0100
Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:37 +0100
Sputnik Schock: Academia is Disposable [I. J. Good Ultraintelligence] (Was: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 23:53 +0100
Re: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Josbanne Balagula <ajbn@oll.ru> - 2025-12-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Introduction to AMBA® 4 ACE™ (2011) (Was: POINT OF VIEW OF AN ALGORITHM) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:08 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-11-30 14:06 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Dong Shamahov <hhh@dvgshv.ru> - 2025-11-30 15:46 +0000
You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:27 +0100
Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:33 +0100
What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-30 22:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? (Was: Its a subconscious hypothesis) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:43 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:45 +0100
newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:00 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Python <python@cccp.invalid> - 2025-12-02 03:10 +0000
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 11:51 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:36 +0100
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-01 21:42 -0800
Orbits of planets in the Sol System (was: newsreader where you can see the message source) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:29 +0100
Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-04 03:30 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 14:56 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 15:22 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 10:57 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-07 11:03 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-07 16:17 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 17:59 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 18:07 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 18:16 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 21:39 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-08 12:14 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 12:41 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 13:11 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 04:49 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-08 17:33 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-08 18:39 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 12:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 04:41 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-08 21:41 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-09 11:56 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 12:15 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:35 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 02:17 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 12:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 13:25 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 05:45 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 05:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-12-09 06:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 11:50 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:47 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 02:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-11 03:20 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-11 10:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-12 09:04 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-12 01:20 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-12 10:20 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 17:46 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-13 11:44 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 23:26 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-13 15:28 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-15 03:52 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 22:35 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 22:45 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-17 18:52 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-17 17:39 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-18 04:23 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-18 02:29 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-14 23:01 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-13 23:27 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Jonas Zhashkov <snos@kook.ru> - 2025-12-09 19:35 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-09 23:44 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System "D.J. Papadopulos" <sn@sppodd.gr> - 2025-12-10 15:34 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-11 03:29 +0100
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System Erwin Shimanouchi <sicor@rinn.jp> - 2025-12-11 21:04 +0000
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-06 14:57 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:36 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:36 -0800
Re: Orbits of planets in the Sol System The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-07 12:42 -0800
Re: newsreader where you can see the message source (Was: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:35 +0100
Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: newsreader where you can see the message source) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:22 +0100
Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:28 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-03 07:22 +0100
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-12-03 08:27 -0800
Re: What if of the cosmos does a BB dance? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-12-04 07:57 +0100
Re: Its a subconscious hypothesis (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-30 23:14 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Sebastian Zolotdinov <eso@iz.ru> - 2025-11-30 23:42 +0000
Putin payed trolls are usually name shifters [ethernal september morons] (Was: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-01 11:19 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-01 23:23 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services (Was: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 00:05 +0100
Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2025-12-02 20:29 +0100
Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish (Re: You shouldn't use NPM hacked services) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:25 +0100
Is it like "Wirres Mückengelaber" ? (Was: Spock thinks I am interested in his gibberish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-02 23:29 +0100
What Spock aka Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn missed (Was: Different Hubble Theories: de Sitter Energy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 01:09 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
The size of a Gödel sentence G (Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:00 +0100
Attacking the Busy Beaver 5 [1989] (Re: The size of a Gödel sentence G) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-12-03 09:10 +0100
Re: Could AlphaEvolve find the sixth busy beaver ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-12-04 12:59 +0800
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-09 09:19 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mpq3vqF8qlmU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667725 |
Am Montag000008, 08.12.2025 um 09:06 schrieb Janis Papanagnou: > On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. > > Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or > otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. > >> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >> Germany. > > In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous > inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials > could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future > relevance and usefulness. > > (My point was the [non-existing] reach of a German patent in the Sure, but what is already invented in Germany ins't new in the USA neither. 'New' means really new. If something is already published anywhere, the 'newness' is missing. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-09 11:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <q1ugjkpb1np6a4tu4aau6p8fa56c2de6s0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667725 |
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. > >Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or >otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. > >> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >> Germany. > >In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous >inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials >could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future >relevance and usefulness. Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy who bribed him. https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ Did you see the boat they gave him for it? Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents! (at least they got a patent on something) https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/ Only an Einstein can think of fake patents. (he approves it himself) > >(My point was the [non-existing] reach of a German patent in the >USA.) > >> >> The US-patent office is based upon a slightly different principle. >> >> The main principle is that of a 'claim', which is occupied by some company. > >With a granted patent in Germany you can exploit the commercial >gains yourself or with companies licensing the patents during >the first years after getting the patent. > >Besides the commercial aspects the primary point of a patent can >probably be derived from the meaning of its name; Latin "patere", >to be open [for the society], to provide gain for mankind. > >(Semantics in popular recognition may have changed given the >prevalence of commercial thinking worldwide.) > >> [snip digressions to 'US copyright' and 'Urheberrecht'] > >Janis -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-10 08:19 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mpskr8FllfcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667754 |
Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou > <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> >>> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. >> >> Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or >> otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. >> >>> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >>> Germany. >> >> In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous >> inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials >> could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future >> relevance and usefulness. > > > Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets > the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy > who bribed him. > > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ > > > Did you see the boat they gave him for it? > > > Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents! > (at least they got a patent on something) > > https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/ > > > > Only an Einstein can think of fake patents. > (he approves it himself) > Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called 'Einstein's fridge'. But that device has only one known use as part of a fast breeding reactor. And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out, that it didn't cool. So, a plausible guess would be: the 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast breeding reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact. But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion: to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence of a fast breeding reactor in the first place. And that would require the need of Plutonium, because that's the stuff which thoese reactors 'breed'. And as Plutonium is among the most toxic substances on the planet, it requires good reason to want Plutonium. That could actually be the existence of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th/early 1930th in Germany. And that would suggest, that all stories related to the creation of the bomb were fake, too. That would mean, that the so called 'Manhattan project' didn't invent the bomb, but had other objectives (like e.g. placing a 'secrecy gag' upon theoretical physics). Also chilling would be, that in such a scenario the Germans were in possesion of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-10 09:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <5610fb65-2068-4cca-8d26-095ea5e97809@web.de> |
| In reply to | #667765 |
[posted & mailed; to be read with a fixed-width font]
Thomas Heger amok-crossposted across 3 newsgroups without Followup-To:
> Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker:
,'.
,' `.
,'__ __'.
: :
: :
: :
: :
When are you going to fix this?
> [...]
> And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out,
> that it didn't cool.
>
> So, a plausible guess would be:
No, that would not be plausible. Ockham's razor suggests instead that those
students -- if the story is even true -- made a mistake *because* they were
just *students* and thus inexperienced. But, of course, this simple thought
never occurs first to a *diseased* mind:
> the [Einstein] 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast
> breeding reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact.
>
> But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion:
>
> to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence
> of a fast breeding reactor in the first place.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia>
<https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia>
> [developing a conspiracy theory while going down the rabbit hole
> they digged for themselves]
You should see a psychologist, maybe even a psychiatrist.
Get well soon.
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-10 10:01 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <0qcjjkl56cgau74e7m4soi9hk9s5e9ces7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667765 |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:19:04 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker: >> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou >> <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> >>>> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. >>> >>> Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or >>> otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. >>> >>>> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >>>> Germany. >>> >>> In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous >>> inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials >>> could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future >>> relevance and usefulness. >> >> >> Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets >> the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy >> who bribed him. >> >> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ >> >> >> Did you see the boat they gave him for it? >> >> >> Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents! >> (at least they got a patent on something) >> >> https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/ >> >> >> >> Only an Einstein can think of fake patents. >> (he approves it himself) >> > >Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called >'Einstein's fridge'. > >But that device has only one known use as part of a fast breeding reactor. > >And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out, >that it didn't cool. > >So, a plausible guess would be: > >the 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast breeding >reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact. > > >But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion: > >to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence >of a fast breeding reactor in the first place. > >And that would require the need of Plutonium, because that's the stuff >which thoese reactors 'breed'. > >And as Plutonium is among the most toxic substances on the planet, it >requires good reason to want Plutonium. > >That could actually be the existence of atomic bombs already in the late >1920th/early 1930th in Germany. And that would suggest, that all stories >related to the creation of the bomb were fake, too. > >That would mean, that the so called 'Manhattan project' didn't invent >the bomb, but had other objectives (like e.g. placing a 'secrecy gag' >upon theoretical physics). > >Also chilling would be, that in such a scenario the Germans were in >possesion of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th. > >TH > I lost count how many times I posted here... that which you call "a fast breeding reactor" is what you see in the diagram here.. https://www.google.com/search?q=fast+breeding+reactor.&oq=fast+breeding+reactor In other words, Albert Einstein himself took out a patent on a fast breeding reactor, but called it something else: When Albert Einstein first took out a patent on his/the first nuclear reactor system in 1927 Here is what a Reactor looks like today: https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 and here is a cut-out out of both: https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 Now, I don't know if he stole the idea from Germany... But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf none are so blind... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-11 09:02 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <mpvbpeF4vjhU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #667787 |
Am Mittwoch000010, 10.12.2025 um 19:01 schrieb The Starmaker: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:19:04 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > wrote: > >> Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker: >>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou >>> <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>> >>>>> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. >>>> >>>> Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or >>>> otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. >>>> >>>>> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >>>>> Germany. >>>> >>>> In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous >>>> inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials >>>> could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future >>>> relevance and usefulness. >>> >>> >>> Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets >>> the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy >>> who bribed him. >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ >>> >>> >>> Did you see the boat they gave him for it? >>> >>> >>> Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents! >>> (at least they got a patent on something) >>> >>> https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Only an Einstein can think of fake patents. >>> (he approves it himself) >>> >> >> Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called >> 'Einstein's fridge'. >> >> But that device has only one known use as part of a fast breeding reactor. >> >> And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out, >> that it didn't cool. >> >> So, a plausible guess would be: >> >> the 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast breeding >> reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact. >> >> >> But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion: >> >> to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence >> of a fast breeding reactor in the first place. >> >> And that would require the need of Plutonium, because that's the stuff >> which thoese reactors 'breed'. >> >> And as Plutonium is among the most toxic substances on the planet, it >> requires good reason to want Plutonium. >> >> That could actually be the existence of atomic bombs already in the late >> 1920th/early 1930th in Germany. And that would suggest, that all stories >> related to the creation of the bomb were fake, too. >> >> That would mean, that the so called 'Manhattan project' didn't invent >> the bomb, but had other objectives (like e.g. placing a 'secrecy gag' >> upon theoretical physics). >> >> Also chilling would be, that in such a scenario the Germans were in >> possesion of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th. >> >> TH >> > > I lost count how many times I posted here... > > that which you call "a fast breeding reactor" > > is what you see in the diagram here.. > > https://www.google.com/search?q=fast+breeding+reactor.&oq=fast+breeding+reactor > This is a good paper about the subject: https://fissilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf Quote: " Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status Overview: The Rise and Fall of Plutonium Breeder Reactors Frank von Hippel 1 The possibility of a plutonium‑fueled nuclear reactor that could produce more fuel than it consumed (a “breeder reactor”) was first raised during World War II in the United States by scientists in the atomic bomb program." But this was seemingly a lie, because if the first fast breeding reactors were invented and built in Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how could Einstein invent and patent a part of that reactor already in 1930 in Berlin? ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-11 08:48 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <nksljk5108lr7auglj60uqda5bbbmlef5n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667799 |
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:02:56 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Mittwoch000010, 10.12.2025 um 19:01 schrieb The Starmaker: >> On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 08:19:04 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Am Dienstag000009, 09.12.2025 um 20:43 schrieb The Starmaker: >>>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:06:46 +0100, Janis Papanagnou >>>> <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2025-12-08 08:21, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> An invention needs to be new. Otherwise it is not an invention. >>>>> >>>>> Not only new, but also not being something considered trivial or >>>>> otherwise not "worthy" of being a patent. >>>>> >>>>>> At least this is the main principle upon which patents are granted in >>>>>> Germany. >>>>> >>>>> In the German patent history we can observe that even marvellous >>>>> inventions have not been granted a patent because the officials >>>>> could neither understand nor see the actual or potential future >>>>> relevance and usefulness. >>>> >>>> >>>> Albert Einstein worked at a patent office and even decided WHO gets >>>> the patent. Albert Einstein was bribred to give the patent to the guy >>>> who bribed him. >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/WhZcPHah3Dc/m/QaT6MFBIAAAJ >>>> >>>> >>>> Did you see the boat they gave him for it? >>>> >>>> >>>> Albert Einstein told his friends to create FAKE patents! >>>> (at least they got a patent on something) >>>> >>>> https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/05/16/szilards-chain-reaction/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Only an Einstein can think of fake patents. >>>> (he approves it himself) >>>> >>> >>> Einstein and Szillard patented a device, which is commonly called >>> 'Einstein's fridge'. >>> >>> But that device has only one known use as part of a fast breeding reactor. >>> >>> And a group of students who wanted to replicate the device found out, >>> that it didn't cool. >>> >>> So, a plausible guess would be: >>> >>> the 'fridge' was actually meant to become a part of a fast breeding >>> reactor, but named 'fridge' to hide this fact. >>> >>> >>> But that would lead to a very unpleasant conclusion: >>> >>> to patent a part of a fast breeding reactor would require the existence >>> of a fast breeding reactor in the first place. >>> >>> And that would require the need of Plutonium, because that's the stuff >>> which thoese reactors 'breed'. >>> >>> And as Plutonium is among the most toxic substances on the planet, it >>> requires good reason to want Plutonium. >>> >>> That could actually be the existence of atomic bombs already in the late >>> 1920th/early 1930th in Germany. And that would suggest, that all stories >>> related to the creation of the bomb were fake, too. >>> >>> That would mean, that the so called 'Manhattan project' didn't invent >>> the bomb, but had other objectives (like e.g. placing a 'secrecy gag' >>> upon theoretical physics). >>> >>> Also chilling would be, that in such a scenario the Germans were in >>> possesion of atomic bombs already in the late 1920th. >>> >>> TH >>> >> >> I lost count how many times I posted here... >> >> that which you call "a fast breeding reactor" >> >> is what you see in the diagram here.. >> >> https://www.google.com/search?q=fast+breeding+reactor.&oq=fast+breeding+reactor >> > > >This is a good paper about the subject: > >https://fissilematerials.org/library/rr08.pdf > >Quote: > >" >Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status >Overview: The Rise and Fall of Plutonium Breeder Reactors >Frank von Hippel >1 >The possibility of a plutonium?fueled nuclear reactor that could produce >more fuel than it consumed (a “breeder reactor”) was first raised during >World War II in the United States by scientists in the atomic bomb program." > >But this was seemingly a lie, because if the first fast breeding >reactors were invented and built in Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how >could Einstein invent and patent a part of that reactor already in 1930 >in Berlin? > >... > > >TH Albert Einstein and his gang of friends were busy building an atomic bomb before the Manhattan Project... here is FERMI, Enrico patent in 1935 https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/fine-printed-books-manuscripts-including-americana/patent-method-producing-nuclear-reactions-139/270604?ldp_breadcrumb=back&sc_lang=zh Some recent work by E.Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been com- municated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uran- ium may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- mediate future. b) to speed up the experimental work,which is at present being car- ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first The "University laboratories" is in fact the Manhattan Project. They got the money, right? They finish the experiment... they dropped the bomb. https://content.time.com/time/magazine/archive/covers/1946/1101460701_400.jpg -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-12 01:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hfpbu$15ikv$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #667799 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > [...] if the first fast breeding reactors were invented and built in > Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how could Einstein invent and patent > a part of that reactor already in 1930 in Berlin? Very simple: He hasn't. He designed, together with Szilard, _a refrigerator_, in 1926. Szilárd, not Einstein, patented it in the U.S. in 1930. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator> You just went from a self-built slippery slope down a rabbit hole, guided by your paranoia. (Is your mind still sane enough for you to accept your mistake?) -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-11 20:45 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <ta6njkpnj7qeb1mrn35jpd9luqpi0ps693@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667810 |
On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 01:58:37 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >Thomas Heger wrote: >> [...] if the first fast breeding reactors were invented and built in >> Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how could Einstein invent and patent >> a part of that reactor already in 1930 in Berlin? > >Very simple: He hasn't. He designed, together with Szilard, _a >refrigerator_, in 1926. Szilárd, not Einstein, patented it in the U.S. in 1930. > ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator> > >You just went from a self-built slippery slope down a rabbit hole, guided by >your paranoia. (Is your mind still sane enough for you to accept your mistake?) That link ' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn' posted is a FRAUDULENT webpage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator Anyone can see the fruad by looking at the picture on the right: "Einstein's and Szilárd's patent application" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png They inserted a fruad hand drawn calligraphy fonts that reads at the bottom "Einstein Refridegerator" (patent number, date and signatures are also fraud) is all hand drawn calligraphy fonts ans script writing. Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that doesn't contain the fruad) https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf You cannot trust an African BushPig with 'PointedEars'. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn is an 'off-the cuff' ' guy who lacks ...knowledge. I don't know how he manages to get out of bed everyday... i bet he doesn't know how the can-opener works. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-11 23:07 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <k1fnjk1fco2e1tm177fdbalp7n6lalj93e@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667811 |
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 01:58:37 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ><PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >>Thomas Heger wrote: >>> [...] if the first fast breeding reactors were invented and built in >>> Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how could Einstein invent and patent >>> a part of that reactor already in 1930 in Berlin? >> >>Very simple: He hasn't. He designed, together with Szilard, _a >>refrigerator_, in 1926. Szilárd, not Einstein, patented it in the U.S. in 1930. >> >><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator> >> >>You just went from a self-built slippery slope down a rabbit hole, guided by >>your paranoia. (Is your mind still sane enough for you to accept your mistake?) > > >That link ' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn' posted is a FRAUDULENT webpage. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator > >Anyone can see the fruad by looking at the picture on the right: >"Einstein's and Szilárd's patent application" > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png > >They inserted a fruad hand drawn calligraphy fonts that reads at the >bottom > "Einstein Refridegerator" >(patent number, date and signatures are also fraud) is all hand drawn >calligraphy fonts ans script writing. > >Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >doesn't contain the fruad) > >https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > > > >You cannot trust an African BushPig with 'PointedEars'. > > > > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn is an 'off-the cuff' ' guy who >lacks ...knowledge. > >I don't know how he manages to get out of bed everyday... > >i bet he doesn't know how the can-opener works. Also, you have to watch out for Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn posting tactics... if you respond to his post you need to check your Headers first before you press the send button...he doesn't want you here..so your post might end up in alt.panties. He follows-up to crazy places because that is how he censors free speech. He uses his keyboard like a ...machine gun. You cannot trust an African BushPig with 'PointedEars'. Oh, one other thing...if information is not in his head, he thinks it must not exist anywhere else. and one other thing...he falls on the floor alot and make a noise that sounds like a plonk. So, everytime you respond to his post, check the Newgroups: heading and add three more newgroups to the Headers. (including the newsgroup you are posting from) -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-12 00:49 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <dtknjk1njc8ftah0b2atiuudil5f17dvog@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667811 |
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 01:58:37 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ><PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >>Thomas Heger wrote: >>> [...] if the first fast breeding reactors were invented and built in >>> Los Alamos in WWII, then why and how could Einstein invent and patent >>> a part of that reactor already in 1930 in Berlin? >> >>Very simple: He hasn't. He designed, together with Szilard, _a >>refrigerator_, in 1926. Szilárd, not Einstein, patented it in the U.S. in 1930. >> >><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator> >> >>You just went from a self-built slippery slope down a rabbit hole, guided by >>your paranoia. (Is your mind still sane enough for you to accept your mistake?) > > >That link ' Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn' posted is a FRAUDULENT webpage. > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator > >Anyone can see the fruad by looking at the picture on the right: >"Einstein's and Szilárd's patent application" > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator#/media/File:Einstein_Refrigerator.png > >They inserted a fruad hand drawn calligraphy fonts that reads at the >bottom > "Einstein Refridegerator" >(patent number, date and signatures are also fraud) is all hand drawn >calligraphy fonts ans script writing. > >Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >doesn't contain the fruad) > >https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, you won't find the word "refrigerator". https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's cooling system fails.) Here is what a Reactor looks like today: https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 and here is a cut-out out of both: https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has tested Positive for Stupid. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 14:27 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hmdsq$12gki$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667814 |
Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >> doesn't contain the fruad) >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf Well done to dig up the real patent application of December 19. 1926. So it's settled now, it is a refrigerator. > > Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, > you won't find the word "refrigerator". > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf The very first statement in the application: "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" is a refrigerator? The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen. > > Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system > process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... > > (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's > cooling system fails.) > > Here is what a Reactor looks like today: > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 > > and here is a cut-out out of both: > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 > > But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! > > https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > > Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has > tested Positive for Stupid. :-D Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux. In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yunior Molokanov <ukan@amuyao.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 17:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hmrgt$19i8s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667822 |
Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >>> doesn't contain the fruad) > > Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" is > a refrigerator? > > The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. thanks, you are great, I could invent something like that in sleep
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 10:03 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <MQqdnVKkMIZpZqP0nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #667824 |
On 12/14/2025 09:18 AM, Yunior Molokanov wrote: > Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > >> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker >>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >>>> doesn't contain the fruad) >> >> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" is >> a refrigerator? >> >> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. > > thanks, you are great, I could invent something like that in sleep > You mean content-associative-memory?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvado Gorbikov <abdrvvg@lgadi.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-15 22:01 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hq0fe$27k5l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667825 |
Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 12/14/2025 09:18 AM, Yunior Molokanov wrote: >> Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >>> is a refrigerator? >>> >>> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >> >> thanks, you are great, I could invent something like that in sleep > > You mean content-associative-memory? hey, I did replied to you, but didn't shows up. I forgot what I said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 10:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <meutjk5dbdkumltftc863acnqfhredn18u@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667822 |
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >> On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:45:30 -0800, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>> >>> Here is the REAL Einstein patent on Google Patent Website. (that >>> doesn't contain the fruad) >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >Well done to dig up the real patent application of December 19. 1926. > >So it's settled now, it is a refrigerator. > >> >> Furthermore, if you search The Real Einstein patent on Goggle patents, >> you won't find the word "refrigerator". >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf > >The very first statement in the application: > "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly > to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." > >Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >is a refrigerator? > >The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. > >At that time all refrigerators were based on the refrigerant ammonia >which is a very toxic gas which is not nice to have in your kitchen. > >> >> Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system >> process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... >> >> (The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's >> cooling system fails.) >> >> Here is what a Reactor looks like today: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1 >> >> and here is a cut-out out of both: >> >> https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 >> >> But, this is Albert Einstein's patent on a "fast breeding reactor"! >> >> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >> Anyone today who still thinks the patent is for cooling food has >> tested Positive for Stupid. > >:-D > >Einstein and Szilard's patent was bought by the Swedish company Electrolux. > >In 1953 (when I was a kid) my parents bought >an Electrolux absorption refrigerator. > >Fortunately, we were so Stupid that we didn't realise that we had >a fast breading reactor in the kitchen. I understand English is your second language. Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in Capitol letters REFRIDERATION (meaning all caps) refrigeration refrigeration, the process of removing heat from an enclosed space or from a substance for the purpose of lowering the temperature. https://www.google.com/search?q=define+refrigeration REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine. It is a process. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/refrigeration You probably need an understanding also of what the word "process" means... define process a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end. perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something) in order to change or preserve it. a series of actions that produce something or that lead to a particular result Now, if you take REFRIDERATION and add a process Albert Einstein's patent is simply a Refrideration cooling system process to keep it from having a China Syndrome... The China syndrome is when a nuclear power plant's radioactive core's cooling system fails. Albert Einstein is all 'about' Atomic Bombs. That's all he thinks of.. building an atomic bomb. It is Albert Einstein's 'responsibility' that an atomic bomb gets built properly. It's his baby. His life goal was to build an atomic bomb. It's all he talked about. "...I showed (39 years ago already) that according to the special theory of relativity, there exists an equivalence between the mass and energy of a system, that is, that the two are only different manifestations of the same thing. Also I noted that the energies released by radioactive decay are great enough to be emitted in a nuclear reaction when there is an imbalance of mass...." -Albert Einstein Atomic Bomb School. As everyone knows by now... if you went to a class given by Albert Einstein.. you became a student in Albert Einstein's How To Build an Atomic Bomb. Most of yous already know the names of the students who attended Albert Einstein's Atomic Bomb School. Should I list them all? Or one by one?? From 1905 Albert Einstein drew a straight line to 1939. To build an atomic bomb. First he had to assemble a team. He did that in the 1920's by teaching his students How to build an atomic bomb. Enrico Fermi when he was 21 years old: Enrico Fermi was intensively involved with Einstein's theory of relativity and traced the hidden power of atomic nuclei. In 1923, he wrote that it would probably not be possible to release this energy in the near future, "because the first effect would be an explosion so terrible that it would tear the physicist who tried it to pieces". His first was a paper on electrodynamics of a rigid, charged body. The second and third papers focused on his first love, relativity theory; the third presented an important theorem about how the theory works within very small distances and proposed a system of coordinates to make the analysis of these small distances easier to compute. The fourth was a highly successful effort to reconcile the different ways that the electromagnetic mass of a rigid spherical charged body—that is, the mass measured by application of force in an electromagnetic field—is measured in classical electrodynamic theory and in relativity. A fifth paper, apparently commissioned for a German publication while he was still at Pisa but published after graduation, was an appreciation of relativity. This essay was one of the very few published by an Italian physicist to evince any enthusiasm for Einstein and his outlandish theories of space, time, and gravity. Fermi’s main purpose was, characteristically, to call attention not to the puzzling philosophical and metaphysical consequences of the theory but rather to one of the theory’s most compelling physical predictions: If we could liberate the energy contained in one gram of matter we would get more energy than exerted by a thousand horses working continuously over three years. (Comments seem superfluous!) It will be said, with good reason, that in the near future at least that it does not appear possible to find a way to liberate this awesome amount of energy. This is indeed as one can only hope; an explosion of such an awesome amount of energy would blow to pieces the physicist who had the misfortune of finding a way to produce it. He may not have been the first person to notice this consequence of Einstein’s work, but he was certainly one of the very few at the time who emphasized its importance. In light of what life had in store for him, his words are particularly prophetic. Years later, as he witnessed the first test of in Einstein's own words: An Elementary Derivation of the Equivalence of Mass and Energy THE FOLLOWING DERIVATION of the law of equivalence, which has not been published before, has two advantages. Although it makes use of the principle of special relativity, it does not presume the formal machinery of the theory but uses only three previously known laws: (1) The law of the conservation of momentum. (2) The expression for the pressure of radiation; that is, the momentum of a complex of radiation moving in a fixed direction. (3) The well known expression for the aberration of light (influence of the motion of the earth on the apparent location of the fixed stars-Bradley). We now consider the following system. Let the body B rest freely in space with respect to the system Ko. Two complexes of radiation S, S'each of energy E/2 move in the positive and negative xo direction respectively and are eventually absorbed by B. With this absorption the energy of B increases by E. The body B stays at rest with respect to Ko by reasons of symmetry. an atomic bomb and considered his role in making that test possible, he certainly thought back to these words, written when he was just twenty-one years old. Albert Einstein in 1905 who first 'hinted' of "a very interesting conclusion" https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/186 (Now, "a very interesting conclusion" is also known as ...the aha! moment.) "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium). -- Albert Einstein (1905) https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol2-trans/188 "... it will prove possible to test this theory" "That weapon has a direct link to Einstein's three-page paper. In a nuclear fission reaction, an atomic nucleus splits, resulting in a reduced overall mass of matter, which is emitted in the form of released energy." that no one in the United States 'picked up' on Albert Einstein's "a very interesting conclusion" except from some guiena named Enrico Fermi. "because the first effect would be an explosion so terrible that it would tear the physicist who tried it to pieces". --Enrico Fermi 1923 Now, do yous actually believe this is a BLOUSE that Albert Einstein file a patent for in 1936???? https://patents.google.com/patent/USD101756?oq=USD101756-0 Of course not. Albert Einstein was tooo busy building his atomic bombs. He had to come up with a way to protect others from being exposed to URANIUM RADIATION. So he simply designed a Radiation Vest Jacket: It's not a blouse, it's a radiation vest! http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pages/US5274851-2.png https://patents.google.com/patent/US5274851A/en?oq=US5274851+ https://patents.google.com/patent/US8067759?oq=radiation+vest https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/20160923_EOS_0467.jpg don't forget, he spoke german..that means the word "blouse" might have a different meaning.. meaning not having to do with 'women'. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 21:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hn67j$1d77f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #667826 |
Den 14.12.2025 19:25, skrev The Starmaker: > On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" > <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: > >> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>> >>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >> >> The very first statement in the application: >> "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly >> to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." >> >> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >> is a refrigerator? >> >> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >> > > I understand English is your second language. > > Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in > Capitol letters REFRIDERATION (meaning all caps) > > REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine. You are right! "An apparatus for producing refrigeration" does not produce a machine. It _is_ a machine which is called a refrigerator. > > It is a process. > > You probably need an understanding also of what the word "process" > means... > > define process > > a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular > end. > > perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something) > in order to change or preserve it. > > a series of actions that produce something or that lead to a > particular result Do you mean that an apparatus that is performing the process REFRIDERATION must be fast breading reactor? :-D -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 12:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <ro8ujktpej3c8cmfargbl5oc5duf7r3ea3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667832 |
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 21:22:38 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >Den 14.12.2025 19:25, skrev The Starmaker: >> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" >> <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >> >>> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>>> >>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>> >>> The very first statement in the application: >>> "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly >>> to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." >>> >>> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >>> is a refrigerator? >>> >>> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >>> >> >> I understand English is your second language. >> >> Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in >> Capitol letters REFRIDERATION (meaning all caps) >> >> REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine. > >You are right! >"An apparatus for producing refrigeration" >does not produce a machine. > >It _is_ a machine which is called a refrigerator. > >> >> It is a process. >> >> You probably need an understanding also of what the word "process" >> means... >> >> define process >> >> a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular >> end. >> >> perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something) >> in order to change or preserve it. >> >> a series of actions that produce something or that lead to a >> particular result > >Do you mean that an apparatus that is performing the process >REFRIDERATION must be fast breading reactor? > >:-D You would have to be an Einstein to think of that! Luckly, you are powerless to prevent others from drawing their own conclusions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-14 13:11 -0800 |
| Subject | I have a great idea |
| Message-ID | <4t8ujk53d47jckaa561gp080e9hmpv10vh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #667832 |
I have a great idea that just occurred to me! I can dump all the information I have.. on Albert Einstein's atomic bomb career.. into a Podcast! Coming soon to.. Amazon, Youtube, Spotify, Rumble, etc., near you. I just dump it here: https://notebooklm.google/ and a few seconds I'll have hours of two people discussing how Albert Einstein built the Atomic Bomb in a audio and video Podcast! Here is a sample my Library I have stored... https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/search?q=Albert%20Einstein%20%20author%3AThe%20author%3AStarmaker%20subject%3AEinstein https://x.com/Starmaker111 I might as well make a Netflix movie! Fuck Paramount! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-15 03:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Einstein refrigerator (was: parallel random-access machine (parallel RAM or PRAM) |
| Message-ID | <10hnq34$1r1i1$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> |
| In reply to | #667832 |
Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > Den 14.12.2025 19:25, skrev The Starmaker: >> On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:27:17 +0100, "Paul.B.Andersen" >> <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >>> Den 12.12.2025 09:49, skrev The Starmaker: >>>> >>>> https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf >>> >>> The very first statement in the application: >>> "Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly >>> to an apparatus and method for producing refrigeration .." >>> >>> Didn't you understand that "an apparatus for producing refrigeration" >>> is a refrigerator? >>> >>> The new invention was an absorption refrigerator with no moving parts. >> >> I understand English is your second language. LOL; it's the proverbial pot calling the kettle black: >> Under Einstein's name you can clearly see the Heading of the word in >> Capitol letters in _capital_ (uppercase) letters [The Capitol is a building in Washington, D.C., the capitol (primary city) of the U.S.A., instead.] >> REFRIDERATION (meaning all caps) No, it reads (correctly) _REFRIGERATION_. [If would be just a typo on "The Starmaker"'s part, it would be a very strange one: on a U.S. keyboard layout, the key for "D" is two keys away from that for "G". So much for "English as second language".] >> REFRIDERATION is a process, it is not a machine. From this repetition of the mistake we can surmise that it was not just a typo by "The Starmaker", but that it is due to a missing ability to read or write properly. They might be dyslexic; but then it would be hilarious that they would lecture others about language. > You are right! > "An apparatus for producing refrigeration" > does not produce a machine. > > It _is_ a machine which is called a refrigerator. Exactly. The patent application begins with | Our invention relates to the art of refrigeration and particularly to an | apparatus and method for producing refrigeration [...] (So much for "The Starmaker"'s understanding of English.) It is interesting to note that Einstein and Szilárd are called "ASSIGNORS TO ELECTROLUX SERVEL CORPORATION, of NEW YORK, N.Y., A. CORPORATION OF DELAWARE" there already. (You mentioned that the refrigerator that was used in your parent's home was manufactured by Electrolux and based on this design.) Also: "Application filed December 16, 1927, Serial No. 240,566 [in the U.S.A.], and in Germany December 16, 1926." F'up2 sci.physics -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web