Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #665543 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-21 06:58 +0200 |
| Last post | 2025-08-24 08:13 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 201 — 33 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-21 06:58 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-21 21:36 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-21 19:39 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 11:06 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-22 16:07 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 18:43 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-22 16:50 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 18:55 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-21 23:32 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-22 20:20 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 20:58 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 21:22 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-23 22:33 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-24 00:26 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-24 23:18 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 06:19 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-25 21:36 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 22:03 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-26 10:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-26 11:51 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-27 12:00 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-27 14:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-28 19:54 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-28 21:22 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-28 20:09 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-28 22:35 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-28 20:44 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-28 23:24 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-29 20:41 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-29 19:06 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 08:30 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 08:45 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-29 14:52 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-29 15:16 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-30 11:56 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 12:14 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Tharon Turlapov <pv@llh.ru> - 2025-08-30 10:28 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 12:49 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Micha Wojewódka <iaek@oahdfewd.pl> - 2025-08-30 11:04 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 14:23 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-30 12:37 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Joshawa Lécuyer <ucyr@asaa.fr> - 2025-08-30 12:51 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-30 12:54 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Daryel Chevalier <elri@rrdird.fr> - 2025-08-30 19:46 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-30 15:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Ulisez Walentowicz <at@letlizs.pl> - 2025-08-30 20:00 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-31 14:14 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Richard Hachel <rh@tiscali.fr> - 2025-08-31 12:46 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Zackee Dovlatov <ozdvzc@taaddd.ru> - 2025-08-31 15:52 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Richard Hachel <rh@tiscali.fr> - 2025-08-31 17:09 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-31 14:50 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Harless Eli Sokolowski <wklo@asslo.pl> - 2025-08-31 15:55 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Richard Hachel <rh@tiscali.fr> - 2025-08-31 17:14 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-31 20:37 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-31 21:11 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 12:02 -0700
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Orren Halapkhaev <vla@vnara.ru> - 2025-08-31 19:11 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 12:16 -0700
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-31 12:54 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-31 13:38 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-31 19:49 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-31 20:06 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-31 21:03 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-31 21:17 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-01 08:54 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-01 21:13 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-01 22:40 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-02 07:40 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-02 08:03 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-02 10:15 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-02 19:27 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-02 22:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Eudaldo Kabaloev <kouu@oeoev.ru> - 2025-09-02 20:22 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-02 23:07 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-03 15:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-03 16:45 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-04 22:31 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-04 23:11 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-04 22:02 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-05 07:06 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-05 11:25 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-05 12:38 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-06 21:59 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Wilber Mihalev <wilva@birli.ru> - 2025-09-06 21:06 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 23:12 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-07 20:26 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-09-03 14:10 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-03 14:33 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-03 14:47 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Alan Zdunowski <lzwski@uduawwi.pl> - 2025-09-03 12:52 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-09-03 21:03 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Bernabe Jaskulski <ae@ae.pl> - 2025-09-03 20:10 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-09-04 22:38 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-04 20:03 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Douglas Bazhaev <lughv@ao.ru> - 2025-09-04 18:15 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-04 20:32 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-05 10:16 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-05 11:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-06 20:07 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 20:35 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-06 18:46 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 21:00 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-06 19:07 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 21:24 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-06 19:25 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Jhon Kabulov <hv@jvlnuu.ru> - 2025-09-06 20:48 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 23:15 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-07 08:19 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-07 11:00 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-07 10:55 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Teobaldo Szczepanski <aznpic@lndsisde.pl> - 2025-09-07 11:27 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-07 12:01 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Javier Poingdestre <vjdjra@ned.fr> - 2025-09-08 07:36 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-08 09:13 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Merlin Lebeau <bemnla@reera.fr> - 2025-09-08 10:14 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-08 17:04 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Kalob Lévêque <lk@vujl.fr> - 2025-09-09 15:50 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-07 14:46 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-06 22:21 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-06 23:18 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-07 20:26 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-07 21:30 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-07 20:15 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-07 22:34 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-07 20:38 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-07 22:58 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-08 14:44 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 14:51 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-08 14:03 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 17:01 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-08 16:23 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 19:13 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-08 17:18 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 19:44 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-08 22:27 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 22:31 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-09-07 13:30 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-09-09 09:07 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-09 09:49 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-09-10 11:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-10 10:38 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-10 12:48 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-09-12 07:59 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-12 05:58 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-09-13 08:41 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Eniel Babadei <aali@eeid.ru> - 2025-09-09 09:01 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2025-09-08 11:05 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-08 14:19 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-08 21:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2025-09-08 23:49 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-09 10:37 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-09 10:39 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2025-09-09 11:22 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-09 22:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-10 06:45 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-10 22:09 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-09-10 20:38 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-11 07:10 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-11 07:09 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-11 19:16 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-11 19:58 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-12 11:31 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-12 12:44 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-12 14:00 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-12 14:13 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-09-13 12:51 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-09-13 12:57 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Jamie Kabisha <jsbaj@jiaaa.ru> - 2025-09-10 12:26 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-09-08 23:32 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> - 2025-09-08 23:55 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Simei Wojewódzki <ze@zeizy.pl> - 2025-08-31 19:07 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Evan Marchuk <va@ar.ru> - 2025-08-28 21:02 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 22:24 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 22:31 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-23 22:15 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-24 00:29 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-24 23:44 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-08-24 22:41 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 06:33 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-25 06:37 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-25 22:05 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-08-22 08:56 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-22 10:13 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-22 19:28 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 19:44 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-22 20:41 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 20:55 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-23 20:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-24 00:08 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-22 20:53 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-08-22 21:10 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-23 20:30 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-26 21:02 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-27 14:28 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-27 21:14 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Lazaro Wojewódka <jole@lqae.pl> - 2025-08-27 19:37 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-08-28 09:57 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-08-28 22:55 +0200
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Chadwick Wojewódzki <ik@zwij.pl> - 2025-08-28 21:16 +0000
Re: The real measurements deny The Shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-08-24 08:13 +0200
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | Python <jp@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-10 10:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <DBv8E469DDW4RbjBmzhvVbU9-Ig@jntp> |
| In reply to | #665899 |
Le 10/09/2025 à 10:57, Thomas Heger a écrit : .. > Something will remain in the 'dragnet' and in my approach 'structured > spacetime' was the final remainder. > > Then I took this as valid and tried to replicate all sort of phenomena, > but based upon this concept. > > And as far as I can tell, it always worked well. Any single quantitative result or prediction?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-10 12:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1863e61b74e49775$3124901$2361132$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665900 |
On 9/10/2025 12:38 PM, Python wrote: > Le 10/09/2025 à 10:57, Thomas Heger a écrit : > .. >> Something will remain in the 'dragnet' and in my approach 'structured >> spacetime' was the final remainder. >> >> Then I took this as valid and tried to replicate all sort of >> phenomena, but based upon this concept. >> >> And as far as I can tell, it always worked well. > > Any single quantitative result or prediction? > > Sure, quantitive predictions are very important. Take a look at The Shit. It says that clocks should indicate time dilation and gives the numbers. The clocks indicate t'=t (anyone can check GPS), but they should indicate time dilation, so The Shit is correct.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-12 07:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mihqu5F8bv4U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #665900 |
Am Mittwoch000010, 10.09.2025 um 12:38 schrieb Python: > Le 10/09/2025 à 10:57, Thomas Heger a écrit : > .. >> Something will remain in the 'dragnet' and in my approach 'structured >> spacetime' was the final remainder. >> >> Then I took this as valid and tried to replicate all sort of >> phenomena, but based upon this concept. >> >> And as far as I can tell, it always worked well. > > Any single quantitative result or prediction? > I regard my paper: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing as strictly conceptual. My main problem with biquaternion math: it is not particularly easy to use and I still haven't found appropriate tools. There are some closely related things in 'geometric algebra' like e.g. by Heestenes. But I would need something slightly different, which I had not found and couldn't create myself. That part was 'postponed' in 2008, but never continued. Sorry... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <jp@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-12 05:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <FWfbNNy2ha5GiDKt5eut-MABkZI@jntp> |
| In reply to | #665966 |
Le 12/09/2025 à 07:55, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am Mittwoch000010, 10.09.2025 um 12:38 schrieb Python: >> Le 10/09/2025 à 10:57, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> .. >>> Something will remain in the 'dragnet' and in my approach 'structured >>> spacetime' was the final remainder. >>> >>> Then I took this as valid and tried to replicate all sort of >>> phenomena, but based upon this concept. >>> >>> And as far as I can tell, it always worked well. >> >> Any single quantitative result or prediction? >> > > I regard my paper: > > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing > > as strictly conceptual. I regard you paper as absolute bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-13 08:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mikhp7Fm89fU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #665968 |
Am Freitag000012, 12.09.2025 um 07:58 schrieb Python: > Le 12/09/2025 à 07:55, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Mittwoch000010, 10.09.2025 um 12:38 schrieb Python: >>> Le 10/09/2025 à 10:57, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>> .. >>>> Something will remain in the 'dragnet' and in my approach >>>> 'structured spacetime' was the final remainder. >>>> >>>> Then I took this as valid and tried to replicate all sort of >>>> phenomena, but based upon this concept. >>>> >>>> And as far as I can tell, it always worked well. >>> >>> Any single quantitative result or prediction? >>> >> >> I regard my paper: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/ >> d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing >> >> as strictly conceptual. > > I regard you paper as absolute bullshit. Could you be a litte more specific and tell me, what actually you didn't like. I made an attempt to solve one of the most prominent riddles in physics and tried to unite GR and QM 'under a single roof'. The main difference to other approaches to the same problem was, that I wanted to start at the 'GR side'. This means, that my aim wasn't to create something like 'quantum gravity', but my aim was to create particles out of spacetime. Gravity is a non-topic in my 'book', because that was already covered by GR. My aim was to create 'all things quantum' out of spacetime. The idea behind this concept was rather simple: if the other way round (from QM->GR) didn't work, then the other way (from GR->QM) could eventually function. This was my relatively simple approach to this problem. And as far as I can tell, this way is possible. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eniel Babadei <aali@eeid.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-09 09:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <109oqe2$srnt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #665862 |
Thomas Heger wrote: >> Therefore I think it is best to keep pure geometry, >> (as given by general relativity) >> and the physics that plays out in that geometry as separate as >> possible, > > My own approach to this problem was: > > assume that spacetime of GR is real and make particles (and 'all things > quantum') out of that. you cant assume that, please assume something else. Assume exactly the opposite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-08 11:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <186349eab076c2fa$5635$2283398$4286dcd3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #665747 |
On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 21:13:06 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 01.09.2025 08:54, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >> On 8/31/2025 9:17 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Now, when you have explained the difference, I am not so stupid that I > accept GR's prediction for the deflection of space. > GR is nonsense! "deflection of space" doesn't even make sense! > > It is hoverer strange that real measurements show that light is > deflected exactly as much as GR predicts that space should be deflected. > An accidental coincidence, of course. > > >> You're an idiot, Paul. They may show you a sheep, scream "this shark is >> some unbeatable EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE that sharks eat grass!!!!" - and >> you will buy it as a hard proof. And that's generally how relativistic >> physics works. >> >> > That a sheep eats grass even if you call it a shark is obviously some > unbeatable EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE that falsifies GR! > > You have won. GR is nonsense! > > Well done! I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to know that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts in the transverse direction why is it not also deflected (accelerated or decelerated) in its direction of travel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-08 14:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <18634decbc850f66$34666$2472716$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665838 |
On 9/8/2025 1:05 PM, HenryWilson wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 21:13:06 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 01.09.2025 08:54, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >>> On 8/31/2025 9:17 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > >> >> Now, when you have explained the difference, I am not so stupid that I >> accept GR's prediction for the deflection of space. >> GR is nonsense! "deflection of space" doesn't even make sense! >> >> It is hoverer strange that real measurements show that light is >> deflected exactly as much as GR predicts that space should be deflected. >> An accidental coincidence, of course. >> >> >>> You're an idiot, Paul. They may show you a sheep, scream "this shark is >>> some unbeatable EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE that sharks eat grass!!!!" - and >>> you will buy it as a hard proof. And that's generally how relativistic >>> physics works. >>> >>> >> That a sheep eats grass even if you call it a shark is obviously some >> unbeatable EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE that falsifies GR! >> >> You have won. GR is nonsense! >> >> Well done! > > I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to know > that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. > > If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts GR shit predicts no deflection of light, according to it light paths in vacuum are always straight/geodesic lines.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-08 21:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <StGvQ.20163$%XC7.11224@fx07.ams4> |
| In reply to | #665838 |
Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: > > I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to know > that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. Welcome back! I have missed the old quality crackpots! :-) > > If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts in the transverse direction > why is it not also deflected (accelerated or decelerated) in its direction > of travel. > Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. Exactly as GR predicts. So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. https://paulba.no/Deflection.html -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-08 23:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1863739bf23e4e55$6732$2283398$4286dcd3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #665853 |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >> >> I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to >> know that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. > > Welcome back! > I have missed the old quality crackpots! :-) > > >> If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts in the transverse >> direction why is it not also deflected (accelerated or decelerated) in >> its direction of travel. >> >> > Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. > Exactly as GR predicts. Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. > So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. > > https://paulba.no/Deflection.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-09 10:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <SFRvQ.40120$qPGe.20511@fx16.ams4> |
| In reply to | #665858 |
Den 09.09.2025 01:49, skrev HenryWilson: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >>> >>> I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to >>> know that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. >> >> Welcome back! >> I have missed the old quality crackpots! :-) >> >> >>> If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts in the transverse >>> direction why is it not also deflected (accelerated or decelerated) in >>> its direction of travel. >>> >>> >> Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. >> Exactly as GR predicts. > > Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. > > Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would > work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. > >> So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. >> >> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html > What GR predicts is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact. https://paulba.no/pdf/GravitationalDeflection.pdf GR's prediction of gravitational deflection of EM-radiation is so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that it can be considered a fact. Some of the experimental evidence: https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-09 10:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <18639088bba0c80d$2950377$2911792$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665864 |
On 9/9/2025 10:37 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 09.09.2025 01:49, skrev HenryWilson: >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >>> Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >>>> >>>> I see nothing has changed here in my absence. You will be pleased to >>>> know that I am alive and well. I have also made great progress. >>> >>> Welcome back! >>> I have missed the old quality crackpots! :-) >>> >>> >>>> If light is deflected exactly as GR predicts in the transverse >>>> direction why is it not also deflected (accelerated or decelerated) in >>>> its direction of travel. >>>> >>>> >>> Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. >>> Exactly as GR predicts. >> >> Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. >> >> Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would >> work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. >> >>> So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html >> > > What GR predicts is not a matter of opinion, > it is a matter of fact. And the fact is that it predicts NO light deflection, the path of light in vacuum is according to it a straight line by definition. An incompetent idiot asserting otherwise is just an incompetent idiot asserting otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HenryWilson <Hgw@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-09 11:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <186399638559ca45$6089$2283398$4286dcd3@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #665864 |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:37:20 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 09.09.2025 01:49, skrev HenryWilson: >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >>> Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >>>> > >>> Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. >>> Exactly as GR predicts. >> >> Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. >> >> Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would >> work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. >> >>> So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html >> >> > What GR predicts is not a matter of opinion, > it is a matter of fact. > > https://paulba.no/pdf/GravitationalDeflection.pdf > > GR's prediction of gravitational deflection of EM-radiation is so > thoroughly experimentally confirmed that it can be considered a fact. Like Einstein's hilarious gravitational redshift. When light is sent vertically upawards it slows down like anything else and each wavelength shrinks proportionaly. That sounds like a blue shift to me. But the joker Einstein says, "NO it cannot change speed and it has no mass so it can only lose energy by lowering its frequency." Hahahaahaa! Two problems Paul.. 1. Light does not have a frequency and 2. Large stars like Vega are strongly BLUE shifted. > Some of the experimental evidence: > https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf > https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf ...all full of assumptions. .easy to get the answer you want. Paul, if light's deflection is really double the Newtonian prediction....which has never been convincingly proved...it would merely tell us that light's gravitational mass is twice its inertial mass. So it deflects twice as much as ordinary matter. An analogy might be the deflection of a singly and a doubly ionized helium atom by an electric field. After all, what is 'mass' anyway? ..You can certainly learn a lot from Newton.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-09 22:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Br0wQ.8581$Cw0f.7012@fx06.ams4> |
| In reply to | #665867 |
Den 09.09.2025 13:22, skrev HenryWilson: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:37:20 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 09.09.2025 01:49, skrev HenryWilson: >>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >>>>> >> >>>> Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. >>>> Exactly as GR predicts. >>> >>> Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. >>> >>> Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would >>> work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. >>> >>>> So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. >>>> >>>> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html >>> >>> >> What GR predicts is not a matter of opinion, >> it is a matter of fact. >> >> https://paulba.no/pdf/GravitationalDeflection.pdf >> >> GR's prediction of gravitational deflection of EM-radiation is so >> thoroughly experimentally confirmed that it can be considered a fact. > > Like Einstein's hilarious gravitational redshift. When light is sent > vertically upawards it slows down like anything else and each wavelength > shrinks proportionaly. That sounds like a blue shift to me. But the joker > Einstein says, "NO it cannot change speed and it has no mass so it can > only lose energy by lowering its frequency." Hahahaahaa! Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf https://paulba.no/pdf/PoundRebka.pdf > > Two problems Paul.. 1. Light does not have a frequency and 2. Large stars > like Vega are strongly BLUE shifted. The gravitational red shift of light from Vega when it hits the Sun is: ≈ 1 - G⋅(Mᵥ − Mₛ)/c²⋅r = 1 - 7.17e-15 where G = gravitational constant c = speed of light in vacuum Mₛ = solar mass Mᵥ = mass of Vega = 2.135 Mₛ r = distance Vega - Sun = 25.05 ly Vega is moving towards Sun at v = 13.9 km/s The blue shift caused by Doppler is: ≈ 1 + v/c = 1 + 4.64e-5 The gravitational red shift is negligible compared to the Doppler shift- So the blue shift of the light from Vega is ≈ 1 + 4.64e-5, a very moderate blue shift indeed. From whence did you get the idea that Vega is "strongly BLUE shifted"? I know, of course. You are confusing a blue star with a blue shifted star. Blunder! :-D The surface temperature of Vega is ~10,000⁰K. The spectrum of a star is a black-body spectrum with absorption lines. A 10,000⁰K black body spectrum will peak in the blue part of the visible spectrum, the Vega will appear blue. The surface temperature of the Sun is 5772⁰K. A 5,772⁰K black body spectrum will peak in somewhere in the middle of the visible spectrum, so the Sun will appear yellow/white. > >> Some of the experimental evidence: >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf > > ...all full of assumptions. .easy to get the answer you want. Don't pretend you have read them. > > Paul, if light's deflection is really double the Newtonian > prediction....which has never been convincingly proved...it would merely > tell us that light's gravitational mass is twice its inertial mass. So it > deflects twice as much as ordinary matter. An analogy might be the > deflection of a singly and a doubly ionized helium atom by an electric > field. > After all, what is 'mass' anyway? > ..You can certainly learn a lot from Newton. This is nonsense. Experimental evidence trumps your fantasies. GR's prediction of gravitational deflection of EM-radiation is so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that it can be considered a fact. It's settled. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-10 06:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1863d2526cadace8$2904050$2361132$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665888 |
On 9/9/2025 10:53 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 09.09.2025 13:22, skrev HenryWilson: >> On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:37:20 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >>> Den 09.09.2025 01:49, skrev HenryWilson: >>>> On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 21:53:34 +0200, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Den 08.09.2025 13:05, skrev HenryWilson: >>>>>> >>> >>>>> Because a photon is massless so its speed in vacuum is always c. >>>>> Exactly as GR predicts. >>>> >>>> Gr does not predict that. It states it as a postulate. >>>> >>>> Light is assumed massless because if it wasn't, neither GR nor SR would >>>> work. Light certainly behaves as though it possesses mass. >>>> >>>>> So it's only the direction of the photon velocity that changes. >>>>> >>>>> https://paulba.no/Deflection.html >>>> >>>> >>> What GR predicts is not a matter of opinion, >>> it is a matter of fact. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/pdf/GravitationalDeflection.pdf >>> >>> GR's prediction of gravitational deflection of EM-radiation is so >>> thoroughly experimentally confirmed that it can be considered a fact. >> >> Like Einstein's hilarious gravitational redshift. When light is sent >> vertically upawards it slows down like anything else and each wavelength >> shrinks proportionaly. That sounds like a blue shift to me. But the joker >> Einstein says, "NO it cannot change speed and it has no mass so it can >> only lose energy by lowering its frequency." Hahahaahaa! > > Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. It's not any experimental evidence, it's just some assertions of a bunch of brainwashed religious maniacs, unfortunately.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-10 22:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uUkwQ.23665$mHcd.621@fx15.ams4> |
| In reply to | #665896 |
Den 10.09.2025 06:45, skrev Maciej Woźniak: > On 9/9/2025 10:53 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >> >> Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. >> >> https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf >> https://paulba.no/pdf/PoundRebka.pdf > > It's not any experimental evidence, it's > just some assertions of a bunch of brainwashed > religious maniacs, unfortunately. > According to Maciej Woźniak, Professor Robert Vivian Pound, receiver of the National Medal of Science in 1990, is a brainwashed religious maniac. Do you think calling famous scientists "brainwashed religious maniacs" will make you look smart, Maciej? 😂 -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <jp@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-10 20:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3ysEDLDfVN20QOcJ2V44a1SJXYQ@jntp> |
| In reply to | #665910 |
Le 10/09/2025 à 22:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit : > Den 10.09.2025 06:45, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >> On 9/9/2025 10:53 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf >>> https://paulba.no/pdf/PoundRebka.pdf > > >> >> It's not any experimental evidence, it's >> just some assertions of a bunch of brainwashed >> religious maniacs, unfortunately. >> > > > According to Maciej Woźniak, Professor Robert Vivian Pound, > receiver of the National Medal of Science in 1990, > is a brainwashed religious maniac. > > Do you think calling famous scientists "brainwashed religious maniacs" > will make you look smart, Maciej? > > 😂 I don't think that Maciej want to look smart. This is definitely a goal he couldn't reach. As a matter of fact I asked him numerous times what his goals are. I got no answers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-11 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1864224164ccdbf0$9837649$2360894$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665912 |
On 9/10/2025 10:38 PM, Python wrote: > Le 10/09/2025 à 22:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit : >> Den 10.09.2025 06:45, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >>> On 9/9/2025 10:53 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. >>>> >>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf >>>> https://paulba.no/pdf/PoundRebka.pdf >> >> >>> >>> It's not any experimental evidence, it's >>> just some assertions of a bunch of brainwashed >>> religious maniacs, unfortunately. >>> >> >> >> According to Maciej Woźniak, Professor Robert Vivian Pound, >> receiver of the National Medal of Science in 1990, >> is a brainwashed religious maniac. >> >> Do you think calling famous scientists "brainwashed religious maniacs" >> will make you look smart, Maciej? >> >> 😂 > > I don't think that Maciej want to look smart. This is definitely a goal > he couldn't reach. > > As a matter of fact I asked him numerous times what his goals are. I got > no answers. > And I've got no answer to - a or b.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-11 07:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <18642233df3b118e$9837648$2360894$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #665910 |
On 9/10/2025 10:09 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 10.09.2025 06:45, skrev Maciej Woźniak: >> On 9/9/2025 10:53 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>> >>> >>> Experimental evidence trumps your opinion. >>> >>> https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf >>> https://paulba.no/pdf/PoundRebka.pdf > > >> >> It's not any experimental evidence, it's >> just some assertions of a bunch of brainwashed >> religious maniacs, unfortunately. >> > > > According to Maciej Woźniak, Professor Robert Vivian Pound, > receiver of the National Medal of Science in 1990, > is a brainwashed religious maniac. Yes, he was. Just like you. Sorry, trash. Any experiments falsyfying my hypothesis, Paul?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-09-11 19:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <gsDwQ.36238$gKi6.8087@fx13.ams4> |
| In reply to | #665915 |
Den 11.09.2025 07:09, skrev Maciej Woźniak: > On 9/10/2025 10:09 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >> According to Maciej Woźniak, Professor Robert Vivian Pound, >> receiver of the National Medal of Science in 1990, >> is a brainwashed religious maniac. > > Yes, he was. Just like you. Sorry, trash. > Any experiments falsyfying my hypothesis, > Paul? > These papers falsify your hypothesis that Robert Vivian Pound is a brainwashed religious maniac: https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Rebka.pdf https://paulba.no/paper/Pound&Snider.pdf You haven't read any paper by Pound, have you? You know you wouldn't understand them, don't you? And any paper you don't understand must be written by a brainwashed religious maniac, right? :-D >> Do you think calling famous scientists >> "brainwashed religious maniacs" >> will make you look smart, Maciej? >> >> :-D >> No answer, Maciej? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web