Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663999 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-06-07 22:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-02-17 22:24 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 213 — 51 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-07 22:23 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-07 15:45 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jonny Veselov <veyn@el.ru> - 2025-06-07 23:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-08 02:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-07 21:05 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban <con@gpwzos.org> - 2025-06-08 15:50 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-09 00:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:31 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 01:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-14 04:17 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:02 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 10:25 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-10 07:25 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 05:49 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 02:43 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 23:05 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 17:55 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-13 11:51 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:18 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2025-07-14 08:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@invalid.pmoylan.org> - 2025-07-16 22:04 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-17 18:36 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Mario Vedernikov <eevk@ma.ru> - 2025-07-17 17:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-09 12:45 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 10:01 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Manley Zhitkov <kinie@oivy.ru> - 2025-06-09 22:17 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 01:38 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-10 08:05 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 10:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 13:24 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-10 13:00 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 16:37 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 22:10 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 15:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 00:29 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 19:49 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 10:42 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 05:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Yanko Habov <no@ayvnv.ru> - 2025-06-10 15:38 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 03:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-07 22:21 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-11 03:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-11 21:02 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-11 12:33 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-12 22:33 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 23:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 17:46 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 05:58 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-10 22:56 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 07:48 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-06-11 16:01 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-06-11 07:54 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-11 09:22 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Shay Bagaev <svhs@agyass.ru> - 2025-06-11 20:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-09 19:21 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-06-10 09:48 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 00:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 14:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 05:08 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 03:37 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 03:54 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 05:13 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 01:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-16 06:17 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 07:41 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-10 13:30 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 14:56 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 23:04 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 17:13 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 03:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 20:39 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-11 03:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-10 20:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 01:52 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 21:11 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 05:52 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2025-07-19 13:48 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Bobauk Pechkurov <caev@uvevubb.ru> - 2025-06-12 18:19 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 02:54 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-12 20:47 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-13 12:21 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 22:41 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 00:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 06:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-21 19:00 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-21 23:48 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-18 00:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 09:01 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 08:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 12:00 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 14:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 07:58 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-20 06:05 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 06:51 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 12:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 13:39 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 13:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 07:09 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 22:34 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 22:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:10 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 12:42 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-21 09:16 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 07:33 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:09 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Beraldo Glubokovsky <olkv@ldel.ru> - 2025-07-21 11:23 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 05:44 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 10:41 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:39 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-22 20:45 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 05:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-22 18:01 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-22 23:34 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-22 17:23 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 06:10 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-24 06:22 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-25 02:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-24 19:29 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 22:07 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-25 11:42 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-23 13:24 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-23 23:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 07:32 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 05:55 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Lucus Shalabanov <vuvsa@uouluos.ru> - 2025-06-27 09:07 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 00:28 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Oleg Tzeboev <vze@vovob.ru> - 2025-06-28 12:31 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 00:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Tyller Maksimchikov <il@yiil.ru> - 2025-07-02 18:01 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 22:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Luther Makhmutov <mkrm@tvml.ru> - 2025-07-03 19:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-03 14:28 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-03 23:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 11:55 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 21:32 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Anderw Bakadorov <aakwk@wdorn.ru> - 2025-07-04 21:31 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 15:02 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 15:05 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Vince Babakulov <ucbcubv@voobab.ru> - 2025-07-05 10:53 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-05 04:50 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Cesario Lokhanov <vaskail@rael.ru> - 2025-07-07 12:13 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 12:22 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 12:39 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Pat Ruzaev <ztuvu@aatz.ru> - 2025-07-07 20:33 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 13:42 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:18 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 23:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-28 17:58 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 05:19 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 08:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-15 20:48 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 22:16 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 15:53 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 14:50 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-23 10:44 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-23 10:47 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 05:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 14:40 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-16 15:23 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-17 21:43 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 06:22 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:32 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 15:35 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 15:43 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 16:11 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 14:14 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 16:20 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Johathan Bahmatoff <ohbj@toah.ru> - 2025-07-18 19:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 21:14 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 15:01 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2025-06-10 22:51 -0600
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 10:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Fonzie Mocharov <reovo@ainc.ru> - 2025-07-05 15:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings John Armstrong <jja@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-07-06 08:51 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 05:26 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-07-14 13:08 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-14 11:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 12:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 12:57 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 13:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 06:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 00:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 18:19 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-17 14:00 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-19 23:01 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 00:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 18:08 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 12:36 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 07:17 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Lenoy Balanowski <onloan@wyik.ru> - 2025-07-20 16:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-20 19:37 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 22:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:15 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 13:38 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 20:58 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-01-18 09:06 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-02-16 09:28 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jarvis Dobrov <vibba@vvdrbiorvd.ru> - 2026-02-16 17:02 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 00:28 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-16 17:06 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-16 22:06 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 17:34 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 18:45 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 10:15 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 10:29 -0800
Light (was: The Apollo moon landings) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 16:32 +0100
Re: Light Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 09:47 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Rayford Bakhmetov <hfeo@re.ru> - 2026-02-17 22:24 +0000
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
| From | Peter Moylan <peter@invalid.pmoylan.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-16 22:04 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <10584fi$nd7j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #665020 |
On 14/07/2025 4:18 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 11:51 schrieb Thomas Heger: >> It's not easy to see color. But e.g. there was a red ring around the >> legs of the astronauts and that was actually red after transmission. >> >> Also the ribbon towards that 'tech device' was red and was transmitted >> in red. > > Also the golden foil around the lander shines reddish. > > This can be seen at 3:27, for instance. > > This is rather strange, because if a color camera was actually used, > than it would be rather logic, to turn the others color channels (green > and blue) up, too. > > But the pictures look like composed from a luminosity channel and a red > channel, while green and blue were missing. Over such a long distance, bandwidth is a problem. You can deal with this by deliberately cutting out some of the information, e.g. some of the colour information. Alternatively, you can try to transmit a full-colour picture, and let the gods of information theory degrade your signal. -- Peter Moylan Newcastle NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-17 18:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mdsmvaF75n4U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #665078 |
Am Mittwoch000016, 16.07.2025 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Moylan: > On 14/07/2025 4:18 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 11:51 schrieb Thomas Heger: > >>> It's not easy to see color. But e.g. there was a red ring around the >>> legs of the astronauts and that was actually red after transmission. >>> >>> Also the ribbon towards that 'tech device' was red and was >>> transmitted in red. >> >> Also the golden foil around the lander shines reddish. >> >> This can be seen at 3:27, for instance. >> >> This is rather strange, because if a color camera was actually used, >> than it would be rather logic, to turn the others color channels >> (green and blue) up, too. >> >> But the pictures look like composed from a luminosity channel and a >> red channel, while green and blue were missing. > > Over such a long distance, bandwidth is a problem. You can deal with > this by deliberately cutting out some of the information, e.g. some of > the colour information. Alternatively, you can try to transmit a full- > colour picture, and let the gods of information theory degrade your signal. Sure, but why did they use a color camera on the Moon in the first place, if the broadcasted pictures are not in color??? Color cameras were bulky, heavy and expensive in the late 60th and early 70th. You can see that NASA used a color camera, because the videos from the Moon contained red areas. But why did NASA send a color camera to the Moon and made the color almost invisible? Usually you would use some electronic tricks to enhance all color information as much as possible, because that would make the already astonishing pictures much more impressive. But the pictures from the Moon look like being created from a full scale color image by turning down saturation in all color channels, but with the exception of red, which was not turned down entirely, but almost. An explanation for this strange behavior would be required, because that is not at all 'natural'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mario Vedernikov <eevk@ma.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-17 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <105bap5$1fee0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #665105 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Mittwoch000016, 16.07.2025 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Moylan: >> Over such a long distance, bandwidth is a problem. You can deal with >> this by deliberately cutting out some of the information, e.g. some of >> the colour information. Alternatively, you can try to transmit a full- >> colour picture, and let the gods of information theory degrade your >> signal. > > Sure, but why did they use a color camera on the Moon in the first > place, > if the broadcasted pictures are not in color??? > > Color cameras were bulky, heavy and expensive in the late 60th and early > 70th. absolutely, thank you my friend. Anothrt correct observation. I start believe in gearmon people. They are not stupid, just stupid when i cares. You take thr "germann war machine" from cacamerica to kill russia, and dont care... what a shame, destroying your energy pipelines from russia; fuck youuuuu..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 12:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <102733o$3ddat$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #663999 |
On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote:
> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
> falling slowly.
When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is
determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you
measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height,
you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with
the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface.
--
David Canzi | "Custom will reconcile people to any atrocity; and fashion
| will drive them to acquire any custom." -- G. B. Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 10:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qjgjhl-is9m.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664021 |
In sci.physics David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >> falling slowly. > > When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is > determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you > measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, > you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with > the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. > True enough. However, all their time, and especially during the first mission, was tightly scheduled and there was no item on the schedule to perform hijinks. -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Manley Zhitkov <kinie@oivy.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 22:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1027mhi$ob3m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #664022 |
William Hyde wrote: > Given the tens of thousands who built the vehicle, the tens of thousands > who saw its takeoff with their own eyes, the tracking of the vehicle by > various countries and even amateurs, the thought that people would be > crazy enough to say "this didn't happen", simply didn't occur. yet another imbecile.. talking about what the others saw. With their own eyes.. go figure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 01:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7ff4ea0f9841c9992118ff67f84ae71e@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664022 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 0:04:23 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 6/9/25 3:15 PM, William Hyde wrote: >> Jim Pennino wrote: >>> In sci.physics David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus >>>>> show it >>>>> falling slowly. >>>> >>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>>> >>> >>> True enough. However, all their time, and especially during the first >>> mission, was tightly scheduled and there was no item on the schedule to >>> perform hijinks. >>> >> Also, I don't recall anyone at the time worrying that people would not >> believe this was happening. >> >> Given the tens of thousands who built the vehicle, the tens of thousands >> who saw its takeoff with their own eyes, the tracking of the vehicle by >> various countries and even amateurs, the thought that people would be >> crazy enough to say "this didn't happen", simply didn't occur. >> >> Not that we didn't have crazy people in those days. But in that distant >> past they confined their gibbering to communist conspiracies, >> demon-infested politicians, and being Napoleon. >> >> Any day now I expect to hear of a "D-day" didn't happen conspiracy. >> >> William Hyde >> > > > > No, you're missing the main point. The tragedy. What ho, Roachie. Your life is one unending tragedy entirely of your making. Being Einsteinian is a pain unless you are aligned with the ruling fatcats who give visions of crumbs and then kick you out of sight. > > The tragedy isn't if Moon landing was real, but the fact that you're not > those people and this country isn't the country that achieved Moon > landing. No fear, Roachie, the footprints were on Earth and they merely littered the Moon with rubbish, not being content with polluting just the Earth > > Those people and that system and that government that did that don't > exist anymore. They so do, Roachie. They are as evil as ever. They stole the money made from Arindam's great book, the unsurpassed crown of English literature. Thieves! Lying is their forte. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor > > Their achievements have nothing to do with you. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 08:05 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20250610080508.3a9a2d9fd277c7fa36ea8c8d@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #664031 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:38:12 +0000 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 0:04:23 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > > > On 6/9/25 3:15 PM, William Hyde wrote: > >> Jim Pennino wrote: > >>> In sci.physics David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > >>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: > >>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon > >>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He > >>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus > >>>>> show it > >>>>> falling slowly. > >>>> > >>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is > >>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you > >>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, > >>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with > >>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. > >>>> > >>> > >>> True enough. However, all their time, and especially during the first > >>> mission, was tightly scheduled and there was no item on the schedule to > >>> perform hijinks. > >>> > >> Also, I don't recall anyone at the time worrying that people would not > >> believe this was happening. > >> > >> Given the tens of thousands who built the vehicle, the tens of thousands > >> who saw its takeoff with their own eyes, the tracking of the vehicle by > >> various countries and even amateurs, the thought that people would be > >> crazy enough to say "this didn't happen", simply didn't occur. > >> > >> Not that we didn't have crazy people in those days. But in that distant > >> past they confined their gibbering to communist conspiracies, > >> demon-infested politicians, and being Napoleon. > >> > >> Any day now I expect to hear of a "D-day" didn't happen conspiracy. > >> > >> William Hyde > >> > > > > > > > > No, you're missing the main point. The tragedy. > > What ho, Roachie. Your life is one unending tragedy entirely of your > making. Being Einsteinian is a pain unless you are aligned with the > ruling fatcats who give visions of crumbs and then kick you out of > sight. > > > > The tragedy isn't if Moon landing was real, but the fact that you're not > > those people and this country isn't the country that achieved Moon > > landing. > > No fear, Roachie, the footprints were on Earth and they merely littered > the Moon with rubbish, not being content with polluting just the Earth > > > > Those people and that system and that government that did that don't > > exist anymore. > > They so do, Roachie. They are as evil as ever. They stole the money made > from Arindam's great book, the unsurpassed crown of English literature. > Thieves! Lying is their forte. > > WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor > > > > Their achievements have nothing to do with you. > > -- Please stop xposting this crackpot's broken physics to aue. Or better still KF to avoid the temptation to reply. fu to aue ONLY. -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 10:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d7e306d2d8375ed05ebf527e3a5afad2@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664037 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 7:05:08 +0000, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:38:12 +0000 > bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 0:04:23 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: >> >>> On 6/9/25 3:15 PM, William Hyde wrote: >>>> Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote: >>>>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet.. He >>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus >>>>>>> show it >>>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>>> >>>>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> True enough. However, all their time, and especially during the first >>>>> mission, was tightly scheduled and there was no item on the schedule to >>>>> perform hijinks. >>>>> >>>> Also, I don't recall anyone at the time worrying that people would not >>>> believe this was happening. >>>> >>>> Given the tens of thousands who built the vehicle, the tens of thousands >>>> who saw its takeoff with their own eyes, the tracking of the vehicle by >>>> various countries and even amateurs, the thought that people would be >>>> crazy enough to say "this didn't happen", simply didn't occur. >>>> >>>> Not that we didn't have crazy people in those days. But in that distant >>>> past they confined their gibbering to communist conspiracies, >>>> demon-infested politicians, and being Napoleon. >>>> >>>> Any day now I expect to hear of a "D-day" didn't happen conspiracy. >>>> >>>> William Hyde >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> No, you're missing the main point. The tragedy. >> >> What ho, Roachie. Your life is one unending tragedy entirely of your >> making. Being Einsteinian is a pain unless you are aligned with the >> ruling fatcats who give visions of crumbs and then kick you out of >> sight. >>> >>> The tragedy isn't if Moon landing was real, but the fact that you're not >>> those people and this country isn't the country that achieved Moon >>> landing. >> >> No fear, Roachie, the footprints were on Earth and they merely littered >> the Moon with rubbish, not being content with polluting just the Earth >>> >>> Those people and that system and that government that did that don't >>> exist anymore. >> >> They so do, Roachie. They are as evil as ever. They stole the money made >> from Arindam's great book, the unsurpassed crown of English literature. >> Thieves! Lying is their forte. >> >> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor >>> >>> Their achievements have nothing to do with you. >> >> -- > > Please stop xposting this crackpot's broken physics to aue. > Or better still KF to avoid the temptation to reply. Cowardly killfiling scum, quod erat demonstrandum. > > fu to aue ONLY. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | occam <occam@nowhere.nix> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 13:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <maqj07Fk55pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664037 |
On 10/06/2025 09:05, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > > Please stop xposting this crackpot's broken physics to aue. > Or better still KF to avoid the temptation to reply. > Oh, the irony! (It is not the first time you have been tempted to make this request, John.) > fu to aue ONLY.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 13:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20250610130049.8850ca1202c9e7202c8a4d5d@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #664042 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:24:56 +0200 occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote: > On 10/06/2025 09:05, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > > > > > Please stop xposting this crackpot's broken physics to aue. > > Or better still KF to avoid the temptation to reply. > > > > Oh, the irony! (It is not the first time you have been tempted to make > this request, John.) > Only after it's being going on for a while. > > fu to aue ONLY. > > > Hmm. I see you didn't respect my fu either. Have I upset you recently? -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | occam <occam@nowhere.nix> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 16:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <maqu9sFm1g0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664043 |
On 10/06/2025 14:00, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:24:56 +0200 > occam <occam@nowhere.nix> wrote: > >> On 10/06/2025 09:05, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: >> >>> >>> Please stop xposting this crackpot's broken physics to aue. >>> Or better still KF to avoid the temptation to reply. >>> >> >> Oh, the irony! (It is not the first time you have been tempted to make >> this request, John.) >> > > Only after it's being going on for a while. > >>> fu to aue ONLY. >> >> >> > > Hmm. I see you didn't respect my fu either. Have I upset you recently? > > Not at all. I just didn't realise the significance of the 'fu'. For me 'fu' (or FU) stands for 'fuck you', which I ignored.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 22:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7ff1379c6fe15337b196f378c47b9ae8@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664021 |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: > On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >> falling slowly. > > When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is > determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you > measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, > you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with > the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. Woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 15:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g65khl-c94n.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664023 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: > >> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>> falling slowly. >> >> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. > > As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. > > Woof woof > > Bertietaylor > > -- -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 00:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a631d0086640b703ad945fdb68808ae5@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664025 |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: >> >>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>> falling slowly. >>> >>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >> >> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. > > Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier > to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits - wow just look at their bent posture before the merrily waving flag - and the hopping was due to suspension from cranes using piano wires. With later "flights" there was better camera work so Apollo 11 is the most instructive about the US character, then under the leadership of "Tricky Dick" Nixon. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof What a gullible penisnino we have here! Bertietaylor > >> >> Woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 19:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <r1jkhl-iemn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664028 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>> falling slowly. >>>> >>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>> >>> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. >> >> Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier >> to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. > > The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits It was actually hopping that was seen by everyone except for you and of course they were ALWAYS in their suits when outside the lander. You are getting more insane every day, crackpot. <insane babble deleted> -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 10:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1bb2b3f3fa179c4b088bced0c630eb01@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664032 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 2:49:01 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>> >>>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>>> >>>> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. >>> >>> Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier >>> to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. >> >> The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits > > It was actually hopping that was seen by everyone except for you and of > course they were ALWAYS in their suits when outside the lander. > Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969. Camerawork got better after Apollo 11. They learnt to slow the video speed to try to make it look authentic. Still, the deficiencies are pretty stark. Waving flags, strange shadows, terrifc photos taken with fat gloves, who took the picture of one guy showing up another not taking his picture, C Rock, no stars, no sweepout from blast, big fat footprints, bent posture as if of heavy weight, shuffling around instead of prancing lightheartedly... does the evidence of fraud build up colossally! Now with AI and graphics anything can be "proved". > You are getting more insane every day, crackpot. Big Bang wallahs swallow no end of bullshit. Pathetic. Still, their arrogance keeps them blissfully unaware of how silly they are, woof woof. Works as anodyne and calling Arindam names seems to soothe pain. Those with sense make terrific cartoons and jokes about the whole Apollo 11 propaganda trickery. woof woof woof woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 05:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vdmlhl-9scp.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664039 |
In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 2:49:01 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>>> >>>>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>>>> >>>>> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. >>>> >>>> Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier >>>> to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. >>> >>> The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits >> >> It was actually hopping that was seen by everyone except for you and of >> course they were ALWAYS in their suits when outside the lander. >> > > Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six > feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969. All crackpot nonsense. The people that built Apollo used real science so of course it all worked, unlike crackpot, pipe roller science. <snip delusional crackpot ravings> -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Yanko Habov <no@ayvnv.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 15:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1029jgv$1apok$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #664045 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six >> feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969. > > All crackpot nonsense. > > The people that built Apollo used real science so of course it all > worked, unlike crackpot, pipe roller science. you don't need science to build a primitive rocket, you deplorable fool. That's metal workers and technicians.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-04 03:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4eaed5049f5023ae85aabb51e5e76c32@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664045 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:52:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 2:49:01 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is >>>>>>> determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you >>>>>>> measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height, >>>>>>> you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with >>>>>>> the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface. >>>>>> >>>>>> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints. >>>>> >>>>> Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier >>>>> to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot. >>>> >>>> The shuffling seen was mostly done in their bulky suits >>> >>> It was actually hopping that was seen by everyone except for you and of >>> course they were ALWAYS in their suits when outside the lander. >>> >> >> Hopping was possible with cranes, piano wires, etc. Jumping up say six >> feet and coming down slowly would have not been easy, back in 1969. > > All crackpot nonsense. > > The people that built Apollo used real science so of course it all > worked, unlike crackpot, pipe roller science. Rockets are for fireworks. Arindam's sparkling experiments will take humanity to the stars. > > <snip delusional crackpot ravings> Natural Idiots cannot grasp new ideas. Nor can Artificial Idiots. Woof woof but we celestial cyberdogs can. Bertietaylor > --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web