Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #664365 > unrolled thread

Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Dark  matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-19 12:15 +0000
    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-19 21:01 +0200
      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-20 08:01 +0200
        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Patric Wojewódzki <jiid@oei.pl> - 2025-06-20 17:24 +0000
        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2025-06-21 18:36 -0600
          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-22 12:12 +0200
        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-23 03:47 +0000
          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-23 20:54 +0200
            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-23 23:37 +0000
              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-25 19:14 +0200
              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-25 10:30 -0700
                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-26 07:15 +0000
                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-26 06:06 -0700
                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-26 15:23 +0200
                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Lon Mahankov <mklanh@amolmank.ru> - 2025-06-26 20:47 +0000
                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 03:47 +0000
                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-26 22:37 -0700
                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-26 22:44 -0700
                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-26 22:47 -0700
                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 06:40 +0000
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-26 23:54 -0700
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 12:27 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 06:32 -0700
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-26 23:56 -0700
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 00:13 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 19:04 -0700
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 02:49 +0000
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-28 21:21 -0700
                                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 10:16 +0000
                                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 15:19 -0700
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 06:25 -0700
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 00:18 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 18:45 -0700
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 21:36 +0200
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-01 10:44 +0000
                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-27 06:19 -0700
                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-27 21:57 +0200
                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Dekota Hamaev <te@etat.ru> - 2025-06-27 22:31 +0000
                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 23:49 +0000
                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-28 03:28 +0000
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 06:29 +0000
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 13:19 +0200
                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 14:44 +0200
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-29 05:58 +0200
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 13:37 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 07:31 -0700
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-29 18:30 +0200
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Martino Krakowski <wwkoo@iiir.pl> - 2025-06-29 17:27 +0000
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 23:10 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-29 22:22 +0200
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 22:20 +0000
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 15:58 -0700
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-30 20:18 +0200
                                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 23:52 +0000
                                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 18:23 -0700
                                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-02 19:20 +0200
                                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-02 19:46 +0200
                                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-03 00:13 +0000
                                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-03 10:43 +0200
                                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-03 12:30 +0000
                                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-05 11:16 +0200
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Kerwin Baklanov <oanwan@waoanro.ru> - 2025-06-30 13:49 +0000
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-01 00:55 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-01 01:42 +0000
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-02 20:34 +0200
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 22:20 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 18:31 -0700
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-01 02:27 +0000
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 20:39 -0700
                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 14:47 +0200
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-29 06:01 +0200
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:20 +0000
                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:18 +0000
                                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-29 14:41 +0200
                                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 23:57 +0000
                                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-04 08:22 +0200
                                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 21:51 +0000
                                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Truman Agamov <rruaau@ar.ru> - 2025-07-04 22:00 +0000
                                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-05 09:44 +0200
                                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 09:32 +0000
                                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-08 09:30 +0200
                                              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-10 23:32 +0000
                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-03 14:06 +0000
            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-06-24 10:48 +1000
              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 01:41 +0000
            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 06:20 +0000
              Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-06-24 08:51 +0100
                Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-24 08:41 +0000
                  Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-06-24 11:26 +0100
                    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-24 10:43 +0000
                      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Krishna Abdulaev <la@vadalibh.ru> - 2025-06-24 17:55 +0000
                        Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-25 00:22 +0000
                          Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Reed Kawashima <ahhsa@kasir.jp> - 2025-06-25 13:28 +0000
                            Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 23:46 +0000
    Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-06-29 12:26 +0800
      Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:42 +0000

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

#664891 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Am Samstag000005, 05.07.2025 um 11:32 schrieb Bertietaylor:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 7:44:30 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> Am Freitag000004, 04.07.2025 um 23:51 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 6:22:13 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am Donnerstag000003, 03.07.2025 um 01:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>> Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
>>>>>>>>> Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One question:
>>>>>>>>>>> What created the elements you and I and everything around us
>>>>>>>>>>> consist of?
>>>>>>>>>>> The Devine Arindam?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
>>>>>>> nuclei.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
>>>>>> all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
>>>>> aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and
>>>>> e=mcc stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually it has...
>>>>
>>>> I have invented this concept, which I called 'structured spacetime':
>>>
>>> What is that?
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/
>>>> d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
>>>> matter should be 'relative'.
>>>
>>> Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.
>>
>> 'mass' is an attribute of material objects and is measured in kilograms.
>>
>> This measure measures the amount of resistance against acceleration.
> 
> It is about the force F required to give it an a acceleration. M=F/a
>>
>> To call this measure 'matter' is insanely stupid.
> 
> True, mass is an attribute of matter -which could exist in many states -
> and in the statics and dynamics of physics only that counts. So it is
> not stupid.

Sure it is! It is REALY stupid!


See:


'Matter' is mant as 'stuff'.

Let's take a lump of that stuff and call that 'an object'.

This object has now an attribut 'mass', but other attributes, too, which 
are not mass.

For instance that object could have a form or a chemical composition.

Now it would be a REALLY bad idea, if you would 'materialize' mass and 
treat mass like a synonym for a material object, because such objects 
have way more attributes than mass.

And you must not confuse attributes with the objects themselves.

TH

...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664924 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 7:30:02 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am Samstag000005, 05.07.2025 um 11:32 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>> On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 7:44:30 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Freitag000004, 04.07.2025 um 23:51 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 6:22:13 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am Donnerstag000003, 03.07.2025 um 01:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>>> Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
>>>>>>>>>> Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> One question:
>>>>>>>>>>>> What created the elements you and I and everything around us
>>>>>>>>>>>> consist of?
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Devine Arindam?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
>>>>>>>> nuclei.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
>>>>>>> all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
>>>>>> aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and
>>>>>> e=mcc stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually it has...
>>>>>
>>>>> I have invented this concept, which I called 'structured spacetime':
>>>>
>>>> What is that?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/
>>>>> d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
>>>>> matter should be 'relative'.
>>>>
>>>> Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.
>>>
>>> 'mass' is an attribute of material objects and is measured in kilograms.
>>>
>>> This measure measures the amount of resistance against acceleration.
>>
>> It is about the force F required to give it an a acceleration. M=F/a
>>>
>>> To call this measure 'matter' is insanely stupid.
>>
>> True, mass is an attribute of matter -which could exist in many states -
>> and in the statics and dynamics of physics only that counts. So it is
>> not stupid.
>
> Sure it is! It is REALY stupid!
>
>
> See:
>
>
> 'Matter' is mant as 'stuff'.
>
> Let's take a lump of that stuff and call that 'an object'.
>
> This object has now an attribut 'mass', but other attributes, too, which
> are not mass.
>
> For instance that object could have a form or a chemical composition.
>
> Now it would be a REALLY bad idea, if you would 'materialize' mass and
> treat mass like a synonym for a material object, because such objects
> have way more attributes than mass.
>
> And you must not confuse attributes with the objects themselves.

And you must not confuse physics with religion and politics unless you
are a career pseudoscientific fraud.

Woof
>
> TH
>
> ....

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664811 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
>>>>>> bang
>>>>>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
>>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
>>>>
>>>>> Where does the radiated energy come from?
>>>>
>>>> Deuterium fission.
>>>
>
>>> Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot
>>> undergo fission, crackpot.
>>
>> Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation,
>> charged particles, very dense there.
>
> And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
> to Helium.

No there is no such thing as fusion creating energy. A most ridiculous
dogmatic notion sanctified as top doctrine.
>
>> It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs
>> on Earth.
>
> Good grief, what a gigantic blunder! :-D
>
> It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
>
>> Same thing happens in the Sun and the stars.
>
> Indeed, fusion of hydrogen and deuterium.
>
>>
>> Once we throw out the bollocks of e=mcc, and follow Arindam's physics,
>> the whole universe becomes straight and clear. And simple in its
>> eternity and infinity.
>
> Ah. So it is Arindam who have told you that there is
> fission of deuterium in a H-bomb,

Yes


and you are to ignorant
> and stupid to understand how ridiculous it is!

No we doggies follow Arindam and are saying that you who do not are
frauds or fools. At least get this much into your heads.
>
> BTW, didn't you know that according to Arindam it is
> "free energy" that heat the Sun?

Deuterium fission and gravity cause solar energies. Read Arindam's
essays on that - but we doubt if you can understand.

WOOF woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664520 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On 24/06/25 04:54, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
>>
>> Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
>> pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium,
>> this great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
>>
>> When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
>> bang phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
>>
>
> Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
>
> Where does the radiated energy come from?

We in AUE have had so many explanations of Arindam's theories that we
have almost universally killfiled him. When discussing his crackpot
theories, could you please refrain from crossposting to alt.usage.english?

[Followups set]

-- 
Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664521 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 0:48:43 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:

> On 24/06/25 04:54, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>> Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
>>>
>>> Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
>>> pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium,
>>> this great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
>>>
>>> When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
>>> bang phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
>>>
>>
>> Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
>>
>> Where does the radiated energy come from?
>
> We in AUE have had so many explanations of Arindam's theories that we
> have almost universally killfiled him. When discussing his crackpot
> theories, could you please refrain from crossposting to
> alt.usage.english?

Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
smart.
Annoying them is fun.
woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor
>
> [Followups set]

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664524 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
>>
>> Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
>> pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this
>> great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
>>
>> When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang
>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
>>
>
> Can you please explain Arindam's theory?

****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****


> Where does the radiated energy come from?

From internal force, basically, as is shown by Arindam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSMjOJ27iRM

Classic song, maybe singing and dancing with gusto will help in
disturbed conditions.
My translation:

Where lips utter the words of truth,
Where hearts are free of filth and fear,
We are the natives of the land
We are the natives of the land
The land through which the Ganga flows.

The learned ones who know too much
Understand humans far too less.
This is the East; we in the East
Know the worth of every life.

The guest we invite as ours
Is dearer to us than our lives.
We do not have greed for much.
With very little we can manage
With very little we can manage.

As for children this land our mother
For all of time endures everything -
We are the natives of the land
We are the natives of the land
The land through which the Ganga flows.

Live together in peace and love!
Finally this is what matters!
Such is the call of the land
Such is the call of the land
The land through which the Ganga flows.
 ***
the same tune should work, more or less, I think!
(Arindam)

Woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664529 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
> 
> This is the East; we in the East
> Know the worth of every life. [...]

<Snigger>


And in another post:

> Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
> smart.

« Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin 
gourmet » - Courteline.

> Annoying them is fun.
> woof woof woof woof
> Bertietaylor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664530 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 7:51:23 +0000, Hibou wrote:

> Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
>>
>> This is the East; we in the East
>> Know the worth of every life. [...]
>
> <Snigger>

Population of India: 1,400,000,000 give or take a few million.

Not eating cows leads to better manners than shown by cow eaters which
leads to greater populations as women appreciate loving attitudes.

>
>
> And in another post:
>
>> Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
>> smart.
>
> « Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin
> gourmet » - Courteline.

This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.

WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor
>
>> Annoying them is fun.
>> woof woof woof woof
>> Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664541 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Le 24/06/2025 à 09:41, Bertitaylor a écrit :
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 7:51:23 +0000, Hibou wrote:
>> Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
>>>
>>> Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
>>> smart.
>>
>> « Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin
>> gourmet » - Courteline.
> 
> This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.

aue is, though we often digress.

I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled 
'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has that 
to do with English usage?

> WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof

Or that?

aue removed from follow-up.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664543 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:

> Le 24/06/2025 à 09:41, Bertitaylor a écrit :
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 7:51:23 +0000, Hibou wrote:
>>> Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
>>>> smart.
>>>
>>> « Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin
>>> gourmet » - Courteline.
>>
>> This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.
>
> aue is, though we often digress.
>
> I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
> 'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has that
> to do with English usage?

It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
the English language.
>
>> WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
>
> Or that?

That could be considered third person dog voice, an original feat in the
English language by the greatest genius Arindam; when not accepting our
vociferous cyberdog state barking for Arindam from low Heaven.

Bertietaylor
>
> aue removed from follow-up.

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664548 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Bertitaylor wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:
>> I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
>> 'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has
>> that to do with English usage?
> 
> It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
> the English language.

joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his mother 
was a whore. 

you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It 
looks like fags and gays.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664554 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 17:55:19 +0000, Krishna Abdulaev wrote:

> Bertitaylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:
>>> I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
>>> 'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has
>>> that to do with English usage?
>>
>> It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
>> the English language.
>
> joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
> mother
> was a whore.
>
> you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
> looks like fags and gays.

Whatever you may think, we are against bad ideas and bad habits, not
groups.

Woof woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664562 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

Bertitaylor wrote:

>> joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
>> mother was a whore.
>>
>> you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
>> looks like fags and gays.
> 
> Whatever you may think, we are against bad ideas and bad habits, not
> groups.
> 
> Woof woof

but that's joos only oriented. You are a lying bitch. A wanker.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664618 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:28:12 +0000, Reed Kawashima wrote:

> Bertitaylor wrote:
>
>>> joos declares publicly that Jesus boils in human excrement, and his
>>> mother was a whore.
>>>
>>> you are not a friend of joos, for certain. I cant explain america. It
>>> looks like fags and gays.
>>
>> Whatever you may think, we are against bad ideas and bad habits, not
>> groups.
>>
>> Woof woof
>
> but that's joos only oriented. You are a lying bitch. A wanker.

We are heavenhounds and you are evidently a worthless piece of shit,
even worse than the Einsteinian frauds and fools. Fuck off, hellhound.
Go back to hell.

Woof woof - some apes are worse than others.

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664670 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On 19-June-25 8:15 pm, bertietaylor wrote:
> Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).

If this were true, then it would show up in our expectation of stellar 
brightness versus mass, and there would be no mystery about there 
appearing to be missing mass.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664673 — Re: Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)

On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:26:17 +0000, Sylvia Else wrote:

> On 19-June-25 8:15 pm, bertietaylor wrote:
>> Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
>
> If this were true, then it would show up in our expectation of stellar
> brightness versus mass,

Which is the case for there is mass without light.



and there would be no mystery about there
> appearing to be missing mass.


No mystery at all when seen as a star sized rock.

Woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor
>
> Sylvia.

--

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web