Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663812 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-06-01 10:03 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-06-29 07:18 -0700 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 272 — 62 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-01 10:03 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 12:46 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 12:51 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-01 14:08 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-01 14:35 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-01 13:29 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:16 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 20:45 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-03 13:22 +0200
Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-03 11:48 +0000
Re: What is a photon Lowen Makhurov Pan <aokek@hvvohala.ru> - 2025-06-03 17:24 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 15:10 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-04 15:37 +0200
Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-04 15:45 +0000
Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-04 12:22 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 23:29 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-06 05:33 +0000
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-06 08:20 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 07:29 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-06 10:36 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 09:22 +0000
Re: What is a photon Rexford Mozharov <xvo@zhef.ru> - 2025-06-07 00:15 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 05:41 +0000
Re: What is a photon Rudolph Babetov <plpeu@pbhrher.ru> - 2025-06-06 16:54 +0000
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-06 11:31 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-06 11:37 +0200
Re: What is a photon Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 21:58 -0700
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-13 13:43 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-13 14:23 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 11:49 +0000
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-03 14:52 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-03 15:31 +0200
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 21:22 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-03 22:11 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-04 08:39 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-04 14:32 +0200
Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-04 11:50 -0700
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-04 12:12 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 13:41 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-13 19:50 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 09:47 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 22:23 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 13:40 -0700
Re: What is a photon Benaventura Méndez <nqeveae@vetv.es> - 2025-06-14 21:49 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 12:37 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 13:21 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:12 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-14 15:27 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 11:51 +0000
Re: What is a photon Limuel Teterichev <mi@lv.ru> - 2025-06-05 21:56 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 23:24 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-06 12:40 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-06 22:51 +0000
Re: What is a photon Arnulfo Balanovsky <vlnor@aurl.ru> - 2025-06-06 23:34 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 12:42 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 21:21 +0000
Re: What is a photon Cash Matzuev <hsc@emaa.ru> - 2025-06-12 23:04 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-12 19:10 -0700
Re: What is a photon Jerimya Bereznevich <zaiiijr@re.ru> - 2025-06-13 13:27 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-14 13:18 -0700
Re: What is a photon Octavio Vassilopulos <vpss@vslcp.gr> - 2025-06-14 21:42 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 12:29 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 12:38 -0700
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 06:46 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 05:33 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 07:50 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 07:30 +0200
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-11 11:35 +0200
Re: What is a photon Jeon Tomanov <ma@nojn.ru> - 2025-06-11 21:52 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-12 13:18 +0200
Re: What is a photon Chon Won <cnwww@nooochcc.cn> - 2025-06-12 13:35 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-13 10:07 +0200
Re: What is a photon Harry Jdakaev <haha@rrhavv.ru> - 2025-06-13 13:02 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-14 13:32 +0200
Re: What is a photon Mariano Talkov <aon@ovt.ru> - 2025-06-14 12:29 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-14 22:31 +0200
Re: What is a photon Omee Szatmári <emzoae@tt.hu> - 2025-06-14 21:44 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-15 11:51 +0200
Re: What is a photon Rosalino Kalakos <kisa@nall.gr> - 2025-06-15 10:13 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-12 06:12 +0200
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-12 13:18 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 14:22 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-12 21:38 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 09:55 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 11:33 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:35 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-15 14:56 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-15 15:14 +0200
Re: What is a photon Farris Numerov <ovros@vmvmo.ru> - 2025-06-15 19:01 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:32 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 03:11 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 06:44 -0700
Re: What is a photon Taber Turkestanov <tktvov@erat.ru> - 2025-06-12 13:39 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-12 21:11 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 10:13 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-13 20:27 +0200
Re: What is a photon Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-06-13 18:52 +0000
Re: What is a photon Levi Avanesyan <avaal@ynanan.ru> - 2025-06-13 21:38 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:07 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 11:09 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:14 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-15 15:13 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-13 13:25 +0200
Re: What is a photon Laurence Vassilikos <elsi@oeo.gr> - 2025-06-11 22:19 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-12 06:26 +0200
Re: What is a photon Afif Lew <lalf@felf.cn> - 2025-06-12 13:33 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 10:03 +0200
Re: What is a photon Ladd Hudoleev <vdluov@uveuha.ru> - 2025-06-13 13:21 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 08:54 +0200
Re: What is a photon Nico Baburkin <ibno@iribk.ru> - 2025-06-14 12:34 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 09:50 +0200
Re: What is a photon Chas Balakhovski <blhhski@khvoabs.ru> - 2025-06-15 10:18 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 02:01 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-12 06:29 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 11:05 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 09:45 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 03:19 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-10 20:59 +0200
Re: What is a photon Riley Baboshin <ihonb@yirrb.ru> - 2025-06-10 21:07 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:11 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 15:45 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 04:27 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-11 20:50 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-11 21:43 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-12 00:04 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-23 05:53 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jestin Manoukarakis <tskoa@eaajsa.gr> - 2025-06-23 11:04 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-23 22:40 +0200
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-24 09:27 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 07:26 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 01:06 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 12:55 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-28 16:25 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 20:36 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-28 21:24 +0200
Re: What is a photon Teal Sebestyén <lee@asntebtt.hu> - 2025-06-28 16:20 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:40 +0200
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-11 13:20 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-05 11:24 +0200
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-05 12:08 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-07 14:20 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-07 21:33 +0000
Re: What is a photon Larkin Bakhmat <mak@aab.ru> - 2025-06-07 22:25 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 12:41 +0000
Re: What is a photon Hug Paramoshkin <nkkr@saiokahk.ru> - 2025-06-06 23:43 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-07 22:35 +0000
Re: What is a photon Michael/Vin Paraschenko Gou <havcc@lariao.ru> - 2025-06-07 23:05 +0000
Re: What is a photon Webster Vaginov <eoewv@rbgsstv.ru> - 2025-06-05 22:14 +0000
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-11 14:16 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 14:13 -0700
Re: What is a photon Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-01 13:22 +0000
Re: What is a photon Kamron Maçon Coté <ommma@darnor.fr> - 2025-06-01 13:41 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:08 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 20:47 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-18 01:21 -0700
Re: What is a photon Fausto Tzagunov <azu@ououagnt.ru> - 2025-06-18 11:04 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 13:35 -0700
Re: What is a photon Chadrick Speziale <idc@aii.it> - 2025-06-22 17:30 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-22 12:42 -0700
Re: What is a photon Kiefer Tuganaev <eraut@efr.ru> - 2025-06-23 09:56 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 09:48 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 09:50 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 09:52 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-22 13:32 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-23 10:07 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 00:28 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:33 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-15 20:33 +0200
Re: What is a photon Hewitt Agababov <tgw@iavbt.ru> - 2025-06-15 18:47 +0000
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-15 21:00 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-16 23:14 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-16 23:35 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-17 22:41 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 22:28 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-18 01:29 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-19 18:04 +0200
Re: What is a photon August Babkov <sbask@gaobu.ru> - 2025-06-19 18:06 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-19 20:01 +0200
Re: What is a photon Harlie Antonakos <hhnh@atliahhi.gr> - 2025-06-19 22:38 +0000
Re: What is a photon Vladimir Csordás Han <vcod@mciliral.hu> - 2025-06-01 12:36 +0000
Re: What is a photon Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-06-01 13:20 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-01 13:49 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-01 08:07 -0700
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-02 12:47 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 15:55 +0200
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:45 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-03 14:30 +0200
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-04 05:23 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 04:27 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-03 10:45 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 11:39 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-01 13:07 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 00:44 +0000
Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-02 01:07 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-02 03:14 +0000
Re: What is a photon hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-02 10:52 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 14:09 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-02 23:16 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-02 14:36 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 00:18 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-02 17:38 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 03:29 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 05:24 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 13:35 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 07:30 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-03 11:55 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-05 01:16 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-08 11:28 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-08 22:31 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 12:09 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-11 13:51 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 02:26 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-13 13:25 -0700
Re: What is a photon "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-15 16:49 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 01:54 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 01:31 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 03:12 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 01:12 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 19:31 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 04:58 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-30 06:52 -0700
Re: What is a photon Jonah Hatagov Balabuev <oago@oj.ru> - 2025-06-02 12:44 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-02 19:03 +0200
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-02 20:21 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:23 +0000
Re: What is a photon x <x@x.org> - 2025-06-02 04:50 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-03 03:28 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 22:17 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:56 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 09:52 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-17 07:16 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 06:01 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-18 10:15 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-18 08:24 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 07:39 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 23:20 +0000
Re: What is a photon nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-15 14:36 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 22:56 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-16 22:35 +0200
Re: What is a photon Fag Pope <hli@yvidv.ru> - 2025-06-16 21:25 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-16 23:02 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-19 20:33 +0200
Re: What is a photon Rowdy Baichorov <boo@whahioidv.ru> - 2025-06-19 20:18 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-19 23:00 +0000
Re: What is a photon Adolfo Tzeizik <dz@aatko.ru> - 2025-06-20 08:55 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-20 15:10 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-20 14:54 +0200
Re: What is a photon Adolf Göbel <adolfgoebel@aol.com> - 2025-06-20 21:13 +0200
Re: What is a photon Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-20 21:19 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-20 22:38 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-21 22:03 +0200
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-22 21:14 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-22 22:56 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-23 20:46 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 02:08 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-24 22:07 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-24 22:42 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-25 18:51 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 04:01 +0000
Re: What is a photon "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-28 19:14 +0200
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-29 06:09 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:28 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 10:20 +0000
Re: What is a photon Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-30 14:12 +0200
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-30 14:02 +0000
Re: What is a photon Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-17 07:48 +0200
Re: What is a photon Roger Babintsev <gnr@geibrrgv.ru> - 2025-06-17 10:15 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 02:38 +0000
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 23:15 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-28 17:54 -0700
Re: What is a photon bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-29 04:37 +0000
Re: What is a photon Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-29 07:18 -0700
Page 14 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-29 06:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mcbsevF1d3oU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664644 |
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: > Den 27.06.2025 06:01, skrev Bertitaylor: >> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:51:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >> >>> Den 25.06.2025 00:42, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>> You are an ass, Paul. >>>> Now, fuck off. >>>> > >>> >>> So this is your response to this: >>> >>> So we agree, the pressure increases with depth. > >> >> We don't. >> >> Upto a few say 2-3 thousand kilometres below the surface of the Earth it >> does when rocks melt to magna. Below that from say 3000 to 13000 on km >> the pressure starts to fall and at the centre becomes zero. >> Give it up. > > You have to be as ignorant and stupid as Arindam to believe > that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero, > and the temperature is near zero. > > The pressure at the centre of the Earth is ~ 350 GPa, > and the temperature is ~ 5700⁰ K. > > You are an idiot, Bertitaylor, > Now, shut up. > Well, possibly, but mainly because there is no '13000 km below', because the Earth radius is slightly smaller (6378 km). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-29 04:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <91596ae0aa4793a78067d49e3a53e12b@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664665 |
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:09:28 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >> Den 27.06.2025 06:01, skrev Bertitaylor: >>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:51:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Den 25.06.2025 00:42, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>>> You are an ass, Paul. >>>>> Now, fuck off. >>>>> >> >>>> >>>> So this is your response to this: >>>> >>>> So we agree, the pressure increases with depth. >> >>> >>> We don't. >>> >>> Upto a few say 2-3 thousand kilometres below the surface of the Earth it >>> does when rocks melt to magna. Below that from say 3000 to 13000 on km >>> the pressure starts to fall and at the centre becomes zero. >>> Give it up. >> >> You have to be as ignorant and stupid as Arindam to believe >> that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero, >> and the temperature is near zero. >> >> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is ~ 350 GPa, >> and the temperature is ~ 5700⁰ K. >> >> You are an idiot, Bertitaylor, >> Now, shut up. >> > > Well, possibly, but mainly because there is no '13000 km below', because > the Earth radius is slightly smaller (6378 km). Right. Sorry for our mistake, we are only dead doggies never much food in arithmetic. Anyway say after 1000-2000 Km down the magma seas causing tectonic plates shifts solidify as they cannot rush the below rocks any more. That leaves 5378-4378 Km of solid depth which insulates the core and distributes the forces from above as arches and domes do. So when we agree that the cores of heavenly bodies are cold then out goes fusion, neutron stars, black holes, big bang etc. Out with thermodynamics, relativity, quantum as horribly bad, wrong notions hanging on by fraud and bad habits. WOOF woof woof woof-woof Bertietaylor > > > TH --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-29 10:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <15fbf40e306e8ffdedd4a610289a907e@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664671 |
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:28:37 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:09:28 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> Den 27.06.2025 06:01, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:51:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Den 25.06.2025 00:42, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>>>> You are an ass, Paul. >>>>>> Now, fuck off. >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> So this is your response to this: >>>>> >>>>> So we agree, the pressure increases with depth. >>> >>>> >>>> We don't. >>>> >>>> Upto a few say 2-3 thousand kilometres below the surface of the Earth it >>>> does when rocks melt to magna. Below that from say 3000 to 13000 on km >>>> the pressure starts to fall and at the centre becomes zero. >>>> Give it up. >>> >>> You have to be as ignorant and stupid as Arindam to believe >>> that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero, >>> and the temperature is near zero. >>> >>> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is ~ 350 GPa, >>> and the temperature is ~ 5700⁰ K. >>> >>> You are an idiot, Bertitaylor, >>> Now, shut up. >>> >> >> Well, possibly, but mainly because there is no '13000 km below', because >> the Earth radius is slightly smaller (6378 km). > > Right. Sorry for our mistake, we are only dead doggies never much food Good. Sorry, we dogs are prey to autocorrect. > in arithmetic. > > Anyway say after 1000-2000 Km down the magma seas causing tectonic > plates shifts solidify as they cannot rush Crush, sorry yet again. the below rocks any more. > That leaves 5378-4378 Km of solid depth which insulates the core and > distributes the forces from above as arches and domes do. > > So when we agree that the cores of heavenly bodies are cold then out > goes fusion, neutron stars, black holes, big bang etc. > > Out with thermodynamics, relativity, quantum as horribly bad, wrong > notions hanging on by fraud and bad habits. > > WOOF woof woof woof-woof > > Bertietaylor >> >> >> TH > > -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-30 14:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mcfd43Fje1cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664671 |
Am Sonntag000029, 29.06.2025 um 06:28 schrieb Bertitaylor: > On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:09:28 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>> Den 27.06.2025 06:01, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:51:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Den 25.06.2025 00:42, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>>>> You are an ass, Paul. >>>>>> Now, fuck off. >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> So this is your response to this: >>>>> >>>>> So we agree, the pressure increases with depth. >>> >>>> >>>> We don't. >>>> >>>> Upto a few say 2-3 thousand kilometres below the surface of the >>>> Earth it >>>> does when rocks melt to magna. Below that from say 3000 to 13000 on km >>>> the pressure starts to fall and at the centre becomes zero. >>>> Give it up. >>> >>> You have to be as ignorant and stupid as Arindam to believe >>> that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero, >>> and the temperature is near zero. >>> >>> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is ~ 350 GPa, >>> and the temperature is ~ 5700⁰ K. >>> >>> You are an idiot, Bertitaylor, >>> Now, shut up. >>> >> >> Well, possibly, but mainly because there is no '13000 km below', because >> the Earth radius is slightly smaller (6378 km). > > Right. Sorry for our mistake, we are only dead doggies never much food > in arithmetic. > > Anyway say after 1000-2000 Km down the magma seas causing tectonic > plates shifts solidify as they cannot rush the below rocks any more. > That leaves 5378-4378 Km of solid depth which insulates the core and > distributes the forces from above as arches and domes do. > > So when we agree that the cores of heavenly bodies are cold then out > goes fusion, neutron stars, black holes, big bang etc. > > Out with thermodynamics, relativity, quantum as horribly bad, wrong > notions hanging on by fraud and bad habits. > Platetectonics isn't entirely wrong. But we should think more about the inside of planet Earth and about how the temperature changes with depth. Since any movement of plates upon the underground would require so kind of liquid between the plate and the underground, we have not much choice: we need either 'growing Earth' or materials in sub-surface layers beneath such plates, which are in a liquid state. Since stone mealts at temperatures above say 1600 °C, we need higher temperatur, which allows molten stone. (otherwise plates cannot float). since the upper mantle is only 300°C hot, we would need a lot of extra space, in which the interior of the Earth gets hot enough to melt stone. That could be the case below the upper mantle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_mantle "Temperatures range from approximately 500 K (227 °C; 440 °F) at the upper boundary with the crust to approximately 4,200 K (3,930 °C; 7,100 °F) at the core-mantle boundary.[12] The highest temperature of the upper mantle is 1,200 K (930 °C; 1,700 °F).[13] Although the high temperature far exceeds the melting points of the mantle rocks at the surface, the mantle is almost exclusively solid.[14]" Don't know, when exactly rock gets molten, but it seems to be well below the continental crust. If so: how could plates move at all (supposed plate tectonics would be correct)? TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-30 14:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cf490f55905525b03a9b53742e77adc4@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664706 |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:12:15 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Sonntag000029, 29.06.2025 um 06:28 schrieb Bertitaylor: >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 4:09:28 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:14 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen: >>>> Den 27.06.2025 06:01, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:51:32 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Den 25.06.2025 00:42, skrev Bertitaylor: >>>>>>> You are an ass, Paul. >>>>>>> Now, fuck off. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So this is your response to this: >>>>>> >>>>>> So we agree, the pressure increases with depth. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> We don't. >>>>> >>>>> Upto a few say 2-3 thousand kilometres below the surface of the >>>>> Earth it >>>>> does when rocks melt to magna. Below that from say 3000 to 13000 on km >>>>> the pressure starts to fall and at the centre becomes zero. >>>>> Give it up. >>>> >>>> You have to be as ignorant and stupid as Arindam to believe >>>> that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero, >>>> and the temperature is near zero. >>>> >>>> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is ~ 350 GPa, >>>> and the temperature is ~ 5700⁰ K. >>>> >>>> You are an idiot, Bertitaylor, >>>> Now, shut up. >>>> >>> >>> Well, possibly, but mainly because there is no '13000 km below', because >>> the Earth radius is slightly smaller (6378 km). >> >> Right. Sorry for our mistake, we are only dead doggies never much food >> in arithmetic. >> >> Anyway say after 1000-2000 Km down the magma seas causing tectonic >> plates shifts solidify as they cannot rush the below rocks any more. >> That leaves 5378-4378 Km of solid depth which insulates the core and >> distributes the forces from above as arches and domes do. >> >> So when we agree that the cores of heavenly bodies are cold then out >> goes fusion, neutron stars, black holes, big bang etc. >> >> Out with thermodynamics, relativity, quantum as horribly bad, wrong >> notions hanging on by fraud and bad habits. >> > > > Platetectonics isn't entirely wrong. > > But we should think more about the inside of planet Earth and about how > the temperature changes with depth. > > Since any movement of plates upon the underground would require so kind > of liquid between the plate and the underground, we have not much > choice: > > we need either 'growing Earth' or materials in sub-surface layers > beneath such plates, which are in a liquid state. > > Since stone mealts at temperatures above say 1600 °C, we need higher > temperatur, which allows molten stone. > > (otherwise plates cannot float). > > since the upper mantle is only 300°C hot, we would need a lot of extra > space, in which the interior of the Earth gets hot enough to melt stone. > > That could be the case below the upper mantle. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_mantle > > > "Temperatures range from approximately 500 K (227 °C; 440 °F) at the > upper boundary with the crust to approximately 4,200 K (3,930 °C; 7,100 > °F) at the core-mantle boundary.[12] The highest temperature of the > upper mantle is 1,200 K (930 °C; 1,700 °F).[13] Although the high > temperature far exceeds the melting points of the mantle rocks at the > surface, the mantle is almost exclusively solid.[14]" > > Don't know, when exactly rock gets molten, but it seems to be well below > the continental crust. > > If so: how could plates move at all (supposed plate tectonics would be > correct)? Consider ice floes in the Arctic. They do move around. A great deal more than tectonic plates but then they are not packed that tightly. > > > > TH --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-17 07:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1849be6be706d943$143368$2042034$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #664286 |
On 6/16/2025 10:35 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 16.06.2025 00:56, skrev Bertitaylor: >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:36:51 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> >>> bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed >>>> in the medium of aether. >>> >>> For the kiddies: this is wrong. >> >> No, it is consistent with reality. >> >>> A photon is (by definition) a momentum eigenstate of the EM field, >> >> Nice bullshit but no kid will swallow that. >> For one thing a field has no mass so no momentum for momentum is mass >> times velocity. >> And eigenstate is a complex math term which is well beyond the scope of >> kids. In this context it makes no sense except to bamboozle the >> pullulating gullible. >> Typical Einsteinian garbage designed to confuse. Anti Science! >> >> So what is happening? >> What is happening is aetheric vibrations travelling at speed of light to >> and from all the infinite charges in the universe. >> >> They are caused and created by impacts upon and corresponding >> rectifications the atomic structures that cause or rectify distortions >> to the electronic structure. >> >> Looks like this will be well within the scope of kiddies, like most of >> Arindam's physics. That is, all not dealing with his new rail gun design >> theory which is a bit difficult for kids. > > The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research > laboratory, is extremely naive, and is, like other fairy tales, > well suited for kiddies who know no physics. Well, so is the physics of Einstein, which was not even consistent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roger Babintsev <gnr@geibrrgv.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-17 10:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <102rf7d$28rh8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #664305 |
Maciej Woźniak wrote: > On 6/16/2025 10:35 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> Den 16.06.2025 00:56, skrev Bertitaylor: >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:36:51 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research >> laboratory, is extremely naive, and is, like other fairy tales, >> well suited for kiddies who know no physics. > > Well, so is the physics of Einstein, which was not even consistent. you are saying you are a jew, but you are not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-17 02:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ccc2ae813708e921eafa4ccec706d7dd@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664269 |
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 22:56:11 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 12:36:51 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed >>> in the medium of aether. >> >> For the kiddies: this is wrong. > > No, it is consistent with reality. > >> A photon is (by definition) a momentum eigenstate of the EM field, > > Nice bullshit but no kid will swallow that. > For one thing a field has no mass so no momentum for momentum is mass > times velocity. > And eigenstate is a complex math term which is well beyond the scope of > kids. In this context it makes no sense except to bamboozle the > pullulating gullible. > Typical Einsteinian garbage designed to confuse. Anti Science! > > So what is happening? > What is happening is aetheric vibrations travelling at speed of light to > and from all the infinite charges in the universe. > > They are caused and created by impacts upon and corresponding > rectifications the atomic structures that cause or rectify distortions > to the electronic structure. > > Looks like this will be well within the scope of kiddies, like most of > Arindam's physics. That is, all not dealing with his new rail gun design > theory which is a bit difficult for kids. > > WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof > > Bertietaylor > >> hence also an energy eigenstate. Energy is a scalar showing how much work can be done by whatever containing energy. An eigenstate represents with the application of a delta function for instantaneous depiction the set of fluctuating eigenvectors that are derived from the solution of the characteristic n degree differential equation indicative of the stability of a complex system. To think of simple energy - so simple that even bunnyahs understand it all too well - which is work or force times distance as any sort of eigenstate is ridiculous. What is complex is the distortion characteristic of the electron structure caused by internal forces such as radioactivity or external such as particle impact of radiation in meaning aetheric vibrations. These distortions create force absorption and the remedial process creates the varying electric field which is the brief electromagnetic pulse called photon. >> This implies both wave and particle aspects. Both relate to force. Force is for physicists. Energy is for bunnyahs and their attendant lords. The term energy should be minimised as far as possible in physics texts. >> >> Hence it has infinite extent. It is not a brief flash. >> You can make brief flashes of light of course, >> as linear superpositions of (infinitely many) eigenstates. Blah WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor >> But then but its localisation and its frequency/energy are spread out. >> (typical example: coherent states) >> >> Jan >> >> >> [snip more nonsense] > > -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-28 23:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <660a8f908d7b07b03f1175060ced6ef0@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #663812 |
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:03:22 +0000, bertitaylor wrote: > A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed > in the medium of aether. > > Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from > external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric > field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a > electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on, > infinitely infinitely. > > Woof woof woof woof, great is the design of the universe and wonderful > its workings, when seen in correct detail. > > Bertietaylor > > -- When a nascent hydrogen ion or proton meets an electron coming at or near it, one of three things must happen. The electron can go past it if the speed or angle was too much. The electron can orbit the proton forming a hydrogen atom. The electron and proton can meet in tight union and form a neutron. WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-28 17:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <jff6jl-9pmv.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664657 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:03:22 +0000, bertitaylor wrote: > >> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed >> in the medium of aether. >> >> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from >> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric >> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a >> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on, >> infinitely infinitely. >> >> Woof woof woof woof, great is the design of the universe and wonderful >> its workings, when seen in correct detail. >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- > > When a nascent hydrogen ion or proton meets an electron coming at or > near it, one of three things must happen. How would the proton be nascent? What difference would it make if the proton were 5 billion years old versus 5 nanoseconds old? > > The electron can go past it if the speed or angle was too much. Yes. > > The electron can orbit the proton forming a hydrogen atom. Yes. > The electron and proton can meet in tight union and form a neutron. Nope, free protons are stable and don't turn into neutrons. Beta plus decay is a type of radioactive decay where a proton in a NUCLEUS is converted into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. > > WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor > > -- -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-29 04:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ebf6321570ea0c824351d8d4c63a23b2@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664658 |
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 0:54:45 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:03:22 +0000, bertitaylor wrote: >> >>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed >>> in the medium of aether. >>> >>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from >>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric >>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a >>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on, >>> infinitely infinitely. >>> >>> Woof woof woof woof, great is the design of the universe and wonderful >>> its workings, when seen in correct detail. >>> >>> Bertietaylor >>> >>> -- >> >> When a nascent hydrogen ion or proton meets an electron coming at or >> near it, one of three things must happen. > > How would the proton be nascent? > > What difference would it make if the proton were 5 billion years old > versus 5 nanoseconds old? > >> >> The electron can go past it if the speed or angle was too much. > > Yes. > >> >> The electron can orbit the proton forming a hydrogen atom. > > Yes. > >> The electron and proton can meet in tight union and form a neutron. > > Nope, free protons are stable and don't turn into neutrons. Beta plus > decay is a type of radioactive decay where a proton in a NUCLEUS is > converted into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. Rubbish, beta ray is electron coming out from a radioactive nucleus. Neutrinos and positrons are lies too. Made up to protect the evil and wrong law of conservation of energy. (Checked the above about beta ray from a textbook on nuclear physics) What liars these Einsteinian rogues be! Woof woof Bertietaylor > >> >> WOOF woof woof woof-woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor >> >> -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-29 07:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0iu7jl-m3h11.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664672 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 0:54:45 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:03:22 +0000, bertitaylor wrote: >>> >>>> A photon is a brief electromagnetic wave pulse travelling a light speed >>>> in the medium of aether. >>>> >>>> Following antenna theory, of asymmetry in the electron orbit from >>>> external excitation causing vibration to aether. A change in electric >>>> field causes a change in the magnetic field, which again causes a >>>> electric field, which creates a magnetic field, and so on and on, >>>> infinitely infinitely. >>>> >>>> Woof woof woof woof, great is the design of the universe and wonderful >>>> its workings, when seen in correct detail. >>>> >>>> Bertietaylor >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> When a nascent hydrogen ion or proton meets an electron coming at or >>> near it, one of three things must happen. >> >> How would the proton be nascent? >> >> What difference would it make if the proton were 5 billion years old >> versus 5 nanoseconds old? >> >>> >>> The electron can go past it if the speed or angle was too much. >> >> Yes. >> >>> >>> The electron can orbit the proton forming a hydrogen atom. >> >> Yes. >> >>> The electron and proton can meet in tight union and form a neutron. >> >> Nope, free protons are stable and don't turn into neutrons. Beta plus >> decay is a type of radioactive decay where a proton in a NUCLEUS is >> converted into a neutron, a positron and a neutrino. > > Rubbish, beta ray is electron coming out from a radioactive nucleus. True, but beta plus decay is a process, not a partical, crackpot. https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsbeta-decay > Neutrinos and positrons are lies too. Made up to protect the evil and > wrong law of conservation of energy. Yet everyone on the planet that has studied such with real experiments has observed them for a long time, crackpot. Positrons, for example, were first observed by Carl Anderson in 1932. > > (Checked the above about beta ray from a textbook on nuclear physics) Do you understand that "beta ray" refers to a partical and that "beta decay" refers to a process, crackpot? > > What liars these Einsteinian rogues be! What an ignorant, delusional crackpot Arindam is! > > Woof woof > > Bertietaylor -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web