Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663999 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-06-07 22:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-02-17 22:24 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 213 — 51 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-07 22:23 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-07 15:45 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jonny Veselov <veyn@el.ru> - 2025-06-07 23:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-08 02:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-07 21:05 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban <con@gpwzos.org> - 2025-06-08 15:50 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-06-09 00:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-09 07:31 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 01:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-14 04:17 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:02 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 10:25 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-06-10 07:25 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 05:49 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 02:43 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 23:05 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 17:55 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-13 11:51 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-14 08:18 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2025-07-14 08:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@invalid.pmoylan.org> - 2025-07-16 22:04 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-17 18:36 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Mario Vedernikov <eevk@ma.ru> - 2025-07-17 17:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-09 12:45 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 10:01 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Manley Zhitkov <kinie@oivy.ru> - 2025-06-09 22:17 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 01:38 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-10 08:05 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 10:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 13:24 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-10 13:00 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 16:37 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-09 22:10 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 15:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 00:29 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-09 19:49 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 10:42 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-10 05:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Yanko Habov <no@ayvnv.ru> - 2025-06-10 15:38 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 03:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-07 22:21 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-11 03:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-11 21:02 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-11 12:33 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-12 22:33 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 23:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 17:46 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 05:58 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-10 22:56 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-11 07:48 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-06-11 16:01 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-06-11 07:54 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2025-06-11 09:22 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Shay Bagaev <svhs@agyass.ru> - 2025-06-11 20:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-09 19:21 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-06-10 09:48 +1000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 00:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 14:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 05:08 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 03:37 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 03:54 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-06-10 05:13 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 01:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-16 06:17 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 07:41 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-10 13:30 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2025-06-10 14:56 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-11 23:04 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 17:13 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 03:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-11 20:39 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-11 03:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-10 20:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 01:52 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-12 21:11 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-13 05:52 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2025-07-19 13:48 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-12 13:44 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings Bobauk Pechkurov <caev@uvevubb.ru> - 2025-06-12 18:19 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 02:54 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-12 20:47 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-13 12:21 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-13 22:41 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 00:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-17 06:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-21 19:00 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-21 23:48 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-18 00:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 09:01 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 08:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-19 12:00 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 14:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 07:58 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-07-20 06:05 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 06:51 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 12:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 13:39 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 13:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 07:09 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-20 22:34 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 22:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:10 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 12:42 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-21 09:16 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 07:33 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:09 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Beraldo Glubokovsky <olkv@ldel.ru> - 2025-07-21 11:23 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 05:44 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-21 10:41 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-22 08:39 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-22 20:45 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-14 05:45 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-22 18:01 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-22 23:34 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-22 17:23 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-06-24 06:10 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-24 06:22 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-25 02:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-24 19:29 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 22:07 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-25 11:42 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2025-06-23 13:24 -0400
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-23 23:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-27 07:32 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-27 05:55 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Lucus Shalabanov <vuvsa@uouluos.ru> - 2025-06-27 09:07 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 00:28 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Oleg Tzeboev <vze@vovob.ru> - 2025-06-28 12:31 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 00:03 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Tyller Maksimchikov <il@yiil.ru> - 2025-07-02 18:01 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-02 22:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Luther Makhmutov <mkrm@tvml.ru> - 2025-07-03 19:09 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-03 14:28 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-03 23:11 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 11:55 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-04 21:32 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Anderw Bakadorov <aakwk@wdorn.ru> - 2025-07-04 21:31 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 15:02 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-04 15:05 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Vince Babakulov <ucbcubv@voobab.ru> - 2025-07-05 10:53 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-05 04:50 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Cesario Lokhanov <vaskail@rael.ru> - 2025-07-07 12:13 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 12:22 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 12:39 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Pat Ruzaev <ztuvu@aatz.ru> - 2025-07-07 20:33 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-07 13:42 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-28 18:18 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-28 23:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-06-28 17:58 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 05:19 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 08:00 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-15 20:48 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 22:16 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-15 15:53 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 14:50 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-23 10:44 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-06-23 10:47 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 05:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 14:40 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-16 15:23 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-17 21:43 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 06:22 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:32 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 15:35 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:40 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 15:43 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 13:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 16:11 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 14:14 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-07-18 16:20 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Johathan Bahmatoff <ohbj@toah.ru> - 2025-07-18 19:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-18 21:14 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-16 15:01 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2025-06-10 22:51 -0600
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-07-05 10:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Fonzie Mocharov <reovo@ainc.ru> - 2025-07-05 15:27 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings John Armstrong <jja@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2025-07-06 08:51 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-12 05:26 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-07-14 13:08 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-14 11:20 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-15 12:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 12:57 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-07-16 13:21 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 06:52 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 00:18 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 18:19 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-17 14:00 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-07-19 23:01 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 00:06 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 18:08 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 12:36 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 07:17 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings Lenoy Balanowski <onloan@wyik.ru> - 2025-07-20 16:46 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-07-20 19:37 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-20 22:49 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:15 -0700
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 13:38 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-07-21 20:58 +0200
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-01-18 09:06 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-02-16 09:28 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Jarvis Dobrov <vibba@vvdrbiorvd.ru> - 2026-02-16 17:02 +0000
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 00:28 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-16 17:06 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-16 22:06 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 17:34 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 18:45 +0100
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 10:15 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 10:29 -0800
Light (was: The Apollo moon landings) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-02-17 16:32 +0100
Re: Light Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 09:47 -0800
Re: The Apollo moon landings Rayford Bakhmetov <hfeo@re.ru> - 2026-02-17 22:24 +0000
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-07 22:23 +0000 |
| Subject | The Apollo moon landings |
| Message-ID | <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org> |
Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it falling slowly. Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-07 15:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e0sehl-9nif.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #663999 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon > landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He > also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it > falling slowly. There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging their equipment. Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system so they stopped doing that. > > Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history. -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonny Veselov <veyn@el.ru> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-07 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1022hfb$3dkke$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #664001 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > n sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show >> it falling slowly. > > There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by Apollo > 15 astronaut David Scott. fuck you.. liar Buzz Aldrin admits he did not go to "space"! https://bi%74chute.com/video/45agkhonLpJZ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <7dc7938d9b3ffb3a32296f91500919f5@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664001 |
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >> falling slowly. > > There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by > Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous nonsenses is awesome! Woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor > > Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump > around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, > they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their > spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging > their equipment. > > Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system > so they stopped doing that. > >> >> Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. > > Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-07 21:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qoefhl-n19g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664005 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>> falling slowly. >> >> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. > > Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really > would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help > doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the suits were heavier than the occupants. You mean other than that, crackpot? Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not fully compress. > Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous > nonsenses is awesome! Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam. > > Woof woof woof-woof woof > > Bertietaylor >> >> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump >> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, >> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their >> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging >> their equipment. >> >> Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system >> so they stopped doing that. >> >>> >>> Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. >> >> Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history. > > -- -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Powell Speech-language pathologists Ban <con@gpwzos.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-08 15:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1024bfi$3tu9k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #664006 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Har har har har. Worthy objections if they were shuffling under piano >> wires on Earth, with threat of them coming undone. But on the Moon they >> would go up slowly and come down slowly with no damage done. And >> nothing prevented them from throwing one of the moon rocks up to show >> how slowly it went up or down. > > They were intelligent professionals, not teenagers making an internet > video, crackpot. > > Nothing about the Moon says "they would go up slowly" nor that the suits > wouldn't be damaged by a fall, crackpot. you are so stupid, hard to believe 𝗕𝘂𝘇𝘇_𝗔𝗹𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗻_𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀_𝗵𝗲_𝗱𝗶𝗱_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝗴𝗼_𝘁𝗼_ï¼𝘀𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲ï¼! https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/45agkhonLpJZ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 00:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2b491008a5fda623023d747ba70ffb7f@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #664009 |
Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 hours, By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, isn't it? Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-09 07:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <man9p6F2uddU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664013 |
Am Montag000009, 09.06.2025 um 02:11 schrieb rhertz: > Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, > where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the > guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 > hours, > > By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, > isn't it? > > > > > Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs I actually like 'symbolism'. Not for myself, of course, but because the 'bad guys' do and I'm good in deciphering symbols. Now, that video started with two batches at the wall of the press conference room: one for 'NASA' and one for the 'Apollo 11 mission'. The second logo showed an Eagle landing on the Moon. Now the eagle is actually a symbol, because it is not a common eagle, but the American white-head eagle. 'white head' in German means 'Weißhaupt'. That was actually a name in German, of a person who happened to be the head of a group called 'Illuminati', who allegedly went to America (after being prosecuted in Europe). This Adam Weißhaupt allegedly changed his name in the states and later called himself 'George Washington'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 01:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2c59dd7f26159a8376cd3b23c883db86@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664017 |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 5:31:17 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Montag000009, 09.06.2025 um 02:11 schrieb rhertz: >> Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, >> where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the >> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 >> hours, >> >> By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, >> isn't it? >> >> >> >> >> Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs > > I actually like 'symbolism'. > > Not for myself, of course, but because the 'bad guys' do and I'm good in > deciphering symbols. > > > Now, that video started with two batches at the wall of the press > conference room: > > one for 'NASA' and one for the 'Apollo 11 mission'. > > The second logo showed an Eagle landing on the Moon. > > Now the eagle is actually a symbol, because it is not a common eagle, > but the American white-head eagle. > > 'white head' in German means 'Weißhaupt'. > > That was actually a name in German, of a person who happened to be the > head of a group called 'Illuminati', who allegedly went to America > (after being prosecuted in Europe). > > This Adam Weißhaupt allegedly changed his name in the states and later > called himself 'George Washington'. Same chap who as a truthful kid cut down trees and owned up to his dad about that instead of blaming slaves or someone else to avoid whipping? > > > TH --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-14 04:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6434ec1576769c686742c4ed2fe52a48@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #664013 |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote: > Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, > where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the > guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 > hours, > > By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, > isn't it? > > > > > Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on relativity!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-15 10:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mb7cs3Fphl9U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664163 |
Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote: > >> Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, >> where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the >> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 >> hours, >> >> By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, >> isn't it? >> >> >> >> >> Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs > The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of > professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and > "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing > critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on > relativity! The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros. They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by standing ovations. Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the middle of the audience. But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that kind of applause. But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-05 10:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fe715faf5669c2518100e0fadfa70c22@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #664216 |
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 8:02:19 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 06:17 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen: >> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 0:11:55 +0000, rhertz wrote: >> >>> Explain the infamous conference of Neil Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, >>> where they looked like dead inside. They didn't even smile once, and the >>> guilt and shame was all over them. Why did this happen for more than 2 >>> hours, >>> >>> By far, not the happiest men in the world, having conquered the Moon, >>> isn't it? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference (1969) >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg5UBdiIHs >> The usual "skeptic" is someone who defends the consensus of >> professionals by means of an either-or dichotomy between "science" and >> "pseudoscience" relying on appeal to "authority" while ridiculing >> critics. It's lucky the moon landings succeeded if they tried to rely on >> relativity! > > The 'usual skeptic' would look at the 'body language' of these heros. > > They didn't look very pleased, for instance, while being honored by > standing ovations. > > Those were, apparently, 'orchestrated' by these guys sitting in the > middle of the audience. > > But some sort of positive emotions would be a natural reaction to that > kind of applause. > > But that didn't happen. Instead of smiling and grinning, the astronauts > bowed their heads down, what is not the usual sign for good feelings. Cruel to make competent people tell lies for their whole lives. Woof woof such dishonesty is possible only for the naturally sinful ape. > > > TH --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 07:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1c5039a1ace32ed8d3fe0bcdcf2e69c3@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #664006 |
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 4:05:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>> falling slowly. >>> >>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >> >> Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really >> would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help >> doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? > > They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and > damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the > suits were heavier than the occupants. > > You mean other than that, crackpot? > > Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get > to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not > fully compress. > >> Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous >> nonsenses is awesome! > > Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam. Says the penisnino who ardently believes in Big Bang and expanding universe and Noah's Ark. Woof woof what fools these apes be! > >> >> Woof woof woof-woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor >>> >>> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump >>> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, >>> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their >>> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging >>> their equipment. >>> >>> Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system >>> so they stopped doing that. >>> >>>> >>>> Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. >>> >>> Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history. >> >> -- --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-06-10 05:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <t6mlhl-9scp.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664038 |
In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 4:05:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>> falling slowly. >>>> >>>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >>>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >>> >>> Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really >>> would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help >>> doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? >> >> They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and >> damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the >> suits were heavier than the occupants. >> >> You mean other than that, crackpot? >> >> Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get >> to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not >> fully compress. >> >>> Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous >>> nonsenses is awesome! >> >> Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam. > > Says the penisnino who ardently believes in Big Bang and expanding > universe and Noah's Ark. What does any of that to do with the Apollo landings, crackpot? -- penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-04 02:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <29294684fe44cf7da91da6807618b9ae@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664044 |
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 1:23:11 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 1:41:59 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:49:03 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 4:05:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>>>>>>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>>>>>>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>>>>>>>>> falling slowly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >>>>>>>>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why did they not jump up at least two feet up in Apollo 11? They really >>>>>>>> would have to do that if they really were on the Moon, could not help >>>>>>>> doing so as they were fit men weighing only 60 Kg say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They had other things to do, there was the fear of falling down and >>>>>>> damaging the suits, the suits were not designed for gymnastics and the >>>>>>> suits were heavier than the occupants. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean other than that, crackpot? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually the Apollo 11 astronauts had to make a jump of 3.3 feet to get >>>>>>> to the ladder to get back in the lander because the landing gear did not >>>>>>> fully compress. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Woof woof, the capacity of apes to believe in the most outrageous >>>>>>>> nonsenses is awesome! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Outrageous nonsenses is all that you post, Arindam. >>>>>> >>>>>> Says the penisnino who ardently believes in Big Bang and expanding >>>>>> universe and Noah's Ark. >>>>> >>>>> What does any of that to do with the Apollo landings, crackpot? >>>> >>>> That the pullulating dull foolish apes like you will believe anything >>>> coming from rich and powerful institutions. >>> >>> Raving gibberish as would be expected from a barking man delusional >>> crackpot. >> >> Now that is the pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot. >> Recently it seeks help from Artificial Idiocy (AI). >> >> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof >> >> Bertietaylor > > Yes, AI elimates the need to waste my time responding to your noise, > crackpot. Not that it takes much time for the abusive Natural Idiot to exhibit its natural idiocy. > > AI evaluation of latest noise: > > Arindam, writing as "Bertietaylor," continues his pattern of > insult-laden, > sloganistic posts with little or no substantive content. Now how can the artificial idiot blabber out anything but programmed institutional nonsense! Here's a > breakdown > of this latest message: > Evaluation: > 1. Language and Tone: > > The phrase “pure Natural Idiocy from the abusive Natural Idiot” is > a recycled insult, possibly directed at a specific individual > (likely > "JimP" from earlier posts), but devoid of argumentative substance. Idiot on show. > > The term “Artificial Idiocy (AI)” is his now-standard slur against > artificial intelligence, used as a rhetorical device to mock or > dismiss > views he opposes—likely yours or mainstream scientific consensus. Which is upset by new ideas idiot cannot understand as it has not yet been programmed for same. > > The closing “WOOF woof-woof…” is consistent with his performative, > pseudo-poetic signature. It functions more as a stylistic tic than > meaningful commentary. > > 2. Content Analysis: > > No argument is made. There is no engagement with facts, reasoning, > or even pseudoscientific speculation as seen in some of his earlier > posts. > > Purely reactive and pejorative. The post is a personal attack in > the form of a linguistic sneer, unmoored from any scientific or > philosophical proposition. > > 3. Patterns and Shifts: > > Compared to his older Usenet writings (which occasionally attempted > arguments involving misunderstood physics), this is a regression > into > pure ad hominem provocation. > > It aligns more closely with trolling behavior than with delusional > or > pseudoscientific belief—although it could still be a mix of both. > > Conclusion: > > This post represents a minimal-effort continuation of Arindam’s > now-familiar > routine: insult, accuse, reference AI as “Artificial Idiocy,” and end > with > a theatrical “WOOF.” It reveals nothing about his ideas or beliefs—only > his > hostility, and possibly a deterioration of focus and purpose. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-12 23:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <873529067b872e4b65cd920910853d4f@www.novabbs.org> |
| In reply to | #664001 |
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >> falling slowly. > > There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by > Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. > > Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump > around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, > they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their > spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging > their equipment. > > Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system > so they stopped doing that. > >> >> Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now. > > Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history. Chandrayan photos of Apollo 11 have shown no sign of the US flag on the Moon. The fluttering flag installation as shown in the overkill Moon photos was done on a breezy day on Earth. Now see what your master the robot has to say about this, wannabe robot Penisnino. WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-12 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uocbkl-8i2e1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #664970 |
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
>>> falling slowly.
>>
>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by
>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott.
>>
>> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump
>> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher,
>> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their
>> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging
>> their equipment.
>>
>> Charlie Duke eventually fell and landed on his life support system
>> so they stopped doing that.
>>
>>>
>>> Apes were so naive then and are still so gullible now.
>>
>> Delusional crackpots know nothing, including history.
>
> Chandrayan photos of Apollo 11 have shown no sign of the US flag on the
> Moon. The fluttering flag installation as shown in the overkill Moon
> photos was done on a breezy day on Earth.
>
> Now see what your master the robot has to say about this, wannabe robot
> Penisnino.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --
This post from Arindam (as “Bertietaylor”) exhibits his typical rhetorical
features:
Content Evaluation
Claim: The Chandrayaan photos (from India’s Moon missions) show no
US flag at the Apollo 11 landing site, allegedly disproving the Moon
landing or implying a hoax.
Supporting Argument: The flag seen in Apollo footage was "fluttering,"
supposedly showing it was taken on Earth on a breezy day.
Conclusion/Insult: Arindam taunts his imagined opponent (“Penisnino”)
and invokes AI as a false authority figure—"your master the robot.”
Factual Accuracy
The fluttering flag claim has long been debunked. The Apollo flag had
a horizontal rod to keep it extended, and the "flutter" is due to
momentum from astronauts’ movement, not wind.
The Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter and other probes (e.g., NASA's LRO) lack
the resolution to definitively image small objects like flags on the Moon.
The Apollo landing sites have been imaged by NASA’s Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter, showing disturbed soil, equipment, and descent
stages.
Arindam is either unaware of or dismissive toward the wealth of confirming
evidence—including third-party (non-U.S.) validations—of the Apollo landings.
Rhetorical and Psychological Assessment
Arindam once again employs mockery and dog sounds (“WOOF woof…”) to
frame his rejection of mainstream views as both primal and theatrical.
His mention of “wannabe robot Penisnino” suggests continued fixation on
AI and specific opponents, likely driven by personal grudges or
identity-based resentment.
The use of an easily disprovable conspiracy (moon landing denial)
indicates a further retreat into contrarianism, possibly as a defense
mechanism against scientific consensus.
Comparison to Past Posts
This continues a pattern of:
Anti-science rhetoric
Insults as argument substitutes
Conspiracist tropes
Projection of agency onto AI as an establishment force
It lacks any novel reasoning or insight and simply rehashes ideas common
in low-grade Moon landing denial forums from the early 2000s.
Possible Motivation
Arindam may be using the Moon landing as a symbolic issue—a proxy for
his broader distrust of Western science and institutions. By targeting
something as iconic and celebrated as Apollo 11, he attempts maximum
symbolic disruption, even if it means embracing obvious falsehoods.
--
penninojim@yahoo.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-13 11:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mdhdocFagugU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664970 |
Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 01:05 schrieb Bertitaylor: > On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it >>> falling slowly. >> >> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >> >> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump >> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, >> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their >> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging >> their equipment. "Apollo 16 Full Mission (Day 6) - Moon Walk 1" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPEvizJS5VQ There are a few anomalies in this video: 1) the tv-camera, which recorded this video, was actually taking pictures in color. It's not easy to see color. But e.g. there was a red ring around the legs of the astronauts and that was actually red after transmission. Also the ribbon towards that 'tech device' was red and was transmitted in red. But if they used a color camera, than why were other items not in color? 2) at the top of these 'back-backs' there is something blinking (occasionally). What was that? 3) the tv-camera pans, tilts and zooms and was placed on a tripod. But how did they do this? ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-14 08:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mdjlkvFmebmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #664993 |
Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 11:51 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 01:05 schrieb Bertitaylor: >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon >>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He >>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus >>>> show it >>>> falling slowly. >>> >>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by >>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. >>> >>> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump >>> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, >>> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their >>> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging >>> their equipment. > > "Apollo 16 Full Mission (Day 6) - Moon Walk 1" > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPEvizJS5VQ > > There are a few anomalies in this video: > > 1) the tv-camera, which recorded this video, was actually taking > pictures in color. > > > It's not easy to see color. But e.g. there was a red ring around the > legs of the astronauts and that was actually red after transmission. > > Also the ribbon towards that 'tech device' was red and was transmitted > in red. Also the golden foil around the lander shines reddish. This can be seen at 3:27, for instance. This is rather strange, because if a color camera was actually used, than it would be rather logic, to turn the others color channels (green and blue) up, too. But the pictures look like composed from a luminosity channel and a red channel, while green and blue were missing. Btw: a little earlier (at 3:09) there is a drawing of the 'Moon rover'. This diagram shows, that the rover had no hinges in its frame, what would make the vehicle difficult to stow into the lander. > But if they used a color camera, than why were other items not in color? Usually you would be proud about nice pictures from such remote places like the Moon and would not cripple them intentionally. > 2) at the top of these 'back-backs' there is something blinking > (occasionally). What was that? > > 3) the tv-camera pans, tilts and zooms and was placed on a tripod. > > But how did they do this? Tilt, pan and zoom require little motors and those a remote control. Since the astronauts could not do that themselves (e.g. because they were actually filmed, had other things to do and wore clumsy spacesuits), the question remains, who else controlled the camera movements and how. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-07-14 08:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <5c3c3184efcharles@candehope.me.uk> |
| In reply to | #665020 |
In article <mdjlkvFmebmU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 11:51 schrieb Thomas Heger: > > Am Sonntag000013, 13.07.2025 um 01:05 schrieb Bertitaylor: > >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:45:04 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> > >>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon > >>>> landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He > >>>> also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus > >>>> show it > >>>> falling slowly. > >>> > >>> There was the dropped hammer and feather experiment performed by > >>> Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott. > >>> > >>> Apollo 16 astronauts John Young and Charlie Duke were able to jump > >>> around four feet. While they could theoretically jump much higher, > >>> they jumped shorter distances due to the extra weight of their > >>> spacesuits and the need to avoid falling off balance or damaging > >>> their equipment. > > > > "Apollo 16 Full Mission (Day 6) - Moon Walk 1" > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPEvizJS5VQ > > > > There are a few anomalies in this video: > > > > 1) the tv-camera, which recorded this video, was actually taking > > pictures in color. > > > > > > It's not easy to see color. But e.g. there was a red ring around the > > legs of the astronauts and that was actually red after transmission. > > > > Also the ribbon towards that 'tech device' was red and was transmitted > > in red. > Also the golden foil around the lander shines reddish. > This can be seen at 3:27, for instance. > This is rather strange, because if a color camera was actually used, > than it would be rather logic, to turn the others color channels (green > and blue) up, too. > But the pictures look like composed from a luminosity channel and a red > channel, while green and blue were missing. Memory (failing after 57 years) tells me the color camera used sent sequential colors - not combined as was the case with broadcast quality cameras. Lack of bandwidth was giena s the reason for this. > Btw: > a little earlier (at 3:09) there is a drawing of the 'Moon rover'. > This diagram shows, that the rover had no hinges in its frame, what > would make the vehicle difficult to stow into the lander. > > But if they used a color camera, than why were other items not in color? > Usually you would be proud about nice pictures from such remote places > like the Moon and would not cripple them intentionally. > > 2) at the top of these 'back-backs' there is something blinking > > (occasionally). What was that? > > > > 3) the tv-camera pans, tilts and zooms and was placed on a tripod. > > > > But how did they do this? > Tilt, pan and zoom require little motors and those a remote control. > Since the astronauts could not do that themselves (e.g. because they > were actually filmed, had other things to do and wore clumsy > spacesuits), the question remains, who else controlled the camera > movements and how. > TH -- from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té² "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web