Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662121 > unrolled thread

Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-24 22:22 +0100
    Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-25 10:16 +0100
      Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-03-26 08:39 +0100
        Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-26 08:57 +0100
          James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]] Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-27 10:21 +0100
            USA finally getting out of recession (Re: James Bond 007) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-27 10:25 +0100
            USA finally getting out of recession (Re: James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-27 10:27 +0100
              GDP by Industry [USA is in a deep recession] (Was: USA finally getting out of recession) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-27 16:14 +0100
                Re: GDP by Industry [USA is in a deep recession] (Was: USA finally getting out of recession) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-27 16:15 +0100
            Re: James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-28 07:39 +0100
          Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-07 12:03 +0200
            Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-09 08:44 +0200
              Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-04-09 11:55 +0200
                Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-09 14:27 +0200
                  Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Bennie Lolos <le@issn.gr> - 2025-04-09 13:21 +0000
                  Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-10 08:57 +0200
                Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy] Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-10 08:48 +0200

#662121 — Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]

Hi,

When the Statue of Liberty still had a value:

Donald dans une Allemagne [or USA now?]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VihggRSvVic

Bye

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#662134

Am Montag000024, 24.03.2025 um 22:22 schrieb Mild Shock:
> Hi,
> 
> When the Statue of Liberty still had a value:
> 
> Donald dans une Allemagne [or USA now?]
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VihggRSvVic


That 'isn't available in your country', but this one is:

"LOONEY TUNES (Looney Toons): The Ducktators (1942)"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdMlqq-vL5A


It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler 
(roughly ten years).

And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662145

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

> Am Montag000024, 24.03.2025 um 22:22 schrieb Mild Shock:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > When the Statue of Liberty still had a value:
> > 
> > Donald dans une Allemagne [or USA now?]
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VihggRSvVic
> 
> 
> That 'isn't available in your country', but this one is:
> 
> "LOONEY TUNES (Looney Toons): The Ducktators (1942)"
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdMlqq-vL5A

You might also like Disney's 'Donald Duck in Nutziland'.

> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
> (roughly ten years).
> 
> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.

There you go again.
Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?

Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662146

Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
>> (roughly ten years).
>>
>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
> 
> There you go again.
> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
> 

Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy

quote:

"Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in 
politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."

(So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for 
MI5.

Sorry for that...)

But also Stalin and Hitler were (allegedly) on the payroll of 
UK-intelligence:

https://www.amazon.de/-/en/True-Crime-Solving-History-Vol/dp/047311478X

https://www.amazon.de/Stalins-British-Training/dp/0473120739


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662157 — James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]]

Hi,

So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.

I am little disappointed now...

LoL

Bye

Thomas Heger schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> 
>>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
>>> (roughly ten years).
>>>
>>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
>>
>> There you go again.
>> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
>>
> 
> Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy 
> 
> 
> quote:
> 
> "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in 
> politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
> 
> (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for 
> MI5.
> 
> Sorry for that...)
> 
> But also Stalin and Hitler were (allegedly) on the payroll of 
> UK-intelligence:
> 
> https://www.amazon.de/-/en/True-Crime-Solving-History-Vol/dp/047311478X
> 
> https://www.amazon.de/Stalins-British-Training/dp/0473120739
> 
> 
> TH
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662158 — USA finally getting out of recession (Re: James Bond 007)

Hi,

USA finally getting out of recession:

Trump Announces Creation Of Strategic JD Vance Meme Reserve
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-announces-creation-of-strategic-jd-vance-meme-reserve

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
> 
> I am little disappointed now...
> 
> LoL
> 
> Bye
> 
> Thomas Heger schrieb:
>> Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
>>
>>>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than 
>>>> Hitler
>>>> (roughly ten years).
>>>>
>>>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
>>>
>>> There you go again.
>>> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
>>>
>>
>> Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy 
>>
>>
>> quote:
>>
>> "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in 
>> politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
>>
>> (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but 
>> for MI5.
>>
>> Sorry for that...)
>>
>> But also Stalin and Hitler were (allegedly) on the payroll of 
>> UK-intelligence:
>>
>> https://www.amazon.de/-/en/True-Crime-Solving-History-Vol/dp/047311478X
>>
>> https://www.amazon.de/Stalins-British-Training/dp/0473120739
>>
>>
>> TH
>>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662159 — USA finally getting out of recession (Re: James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce!)

Hi,

USA finally getting out of recession:

Trump Announces Creation Of Strategic JD Vance Meme Reserve:

According to Trump, the memes of the vice president
that flooded American social media marked an important
era in the nation's history that must be stockpiled
and used strategically. Each meme was to be carefully
printed off as a glossy photo, hand-signed by Vance
himself, and then laminated and locked away for preservation.

"I've always said, memes can be so hard to find again
once you scroll past them," Trump told reporters,
holding up the newly signed executive order creating
the reserve. "If we don't start this now, believe me,
everyone will be wishing they had saved their funny
pictures of JD. We love JD, don't we, folks? Our new
strategic reserve is going to be the first — and
greatest — strategic reserve of JD Vance memes.
China won't won't be able to touch us."

https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-announces-creation-of-strategic-jd-vance-meme-reserve

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
> 
> I am little disappointed now...
> 
> LoL
> 
> Bye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662161 — GDP by Industry [USA is in a deep recession] (Was: USA finally getting out of recession)

Hi,

ChatGPT tells me:

2022: Technical Recession (But Not Official)
- The U.S. experienced two consecutive quarters
of negative GDP growth in early 2022 (Q1: -1.6%,
Q2: -0.6%), which is often considered a
technical recession.

2023:  Big Tech has outperformed other sectors, meaning
GDP growth excluding these firms would likely be weaker.
For example, in 2023, tech stocks surged, but industries
like manufacturing, retail, and housing struggled.

So basically using Zoom during Corona saved
the Big Techs, but the country went down otherwise?

Bye

P.S.: Ha Ha, very funny:

Selected data tables have been discontinued due to budget constraints.
https://www.bea.gov/itable/gdp-by-industry

So USA is fucked, and it doesn't want to let the people know?

Or asked otherwise, where can I get the fucking data, from DOGE?

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> USA finally getting out of recession:
> 
> Trump Announces Creation Of Strategic JD Vance Meme Reserve:
> 
> According to Trump, the memes of the vice president
> that flooded American social media marked an important
> era in the nation's history that must be stockpiled
> and used strategically. Each meme was to be carefully
> printed off as a glossy photo, hand-signed by Vance
> himself, and then laminated and locked away for preservation.
> 
> "I've always said, memes can be so hard to find again
> once you scroll past them," Trump told reporters,
> holding up the newly signed executive order creating
> the reserve. "If we don't start this now, believe me,
> everyone will be wishing they had saved their funny
> pictures of JD. We love JD, don't we, folks? Our new
> strategic reserve is going to be the first — and
> greatest — strategic reserve of JD Vance memes.
> China won't won't be able to touch us."
> 
> https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-announces-creation-of-strategic-jd-vance-meme-reserve 
> 
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
>>
>> I am little disappointed now...
>>
>> LoL
>>
>> Bye

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662162 — Re: GDP by Industry [USA is in a deep recession] (Was: USA finally getting out of recession)

Ok, here is some data:

https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/NEA-AU24-Briefing.pdf

I am basically looking for an indicator that would
subtract the big tech from the GDP. This would have
the advantage that the indicator would be immune

to big tech slumping right now. LoL

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> ChatGPT tells me:
> 
> 2022: Technical Recession (But Not Official)
> - The U.S. experienced two consecutive quarters
> of negative GDP growth in early 2022 (Q1: -1.6%,
> Q2: -0.6%), which is often considered a
> technical recession.
> 
> 2023:  Big Tech has outperformed other sectors, meaning
> GDP growth excluding these firms would likely be weaker.
> For example, in 2023, tech stocks surged, but industries
> like manufacturing, retail, and housing struggled.
> 
> So basically using Zoom during Corona saved
> the Big Techs, but the country went down otherwise?
> 
> Bye
> 
> P.S.: Ha Ha, very funny:
> 
> Selected data tables have been discontinued due to budget constraints.
> https://www.bea.gov/itable/gdp-by-industry
> 
> So USA is fucked, and it doesn't want to let the people know?
> 
> Or asked otherwise, where can I get the fucking data, from DOGE?
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> USA finally getting out of recession:
>>
>> Trump Announces Creation Of Strategic JD Vance Meme Reserve:
>>
>> According to Trump, the memes of the vice president
>> that flooded American social media marked an important
>> era in the nation's history that must be stockpiled
>> and used strategically. Each meme was to be carefully
>> printed off as a glossy photo, hand-signed by Vance
>> himself, and then laminated and locked away for preservation.
>>
>> "I've always said, memes can be so hard to find again
>> once you scroll past them," Trump told reporters,
>> holding up the newly signed executive order creating
>> the reserve. "If we don't start this now, believe me,
>> everyone will be wishing they had saved their funny
>> pictures of JD. We love JD, don't we, folks? Our new
>> strategic reserve is going to be the first — and
>> greatest — strategic reserve of JD Vance memes.
>> China won't won't be able to touch us."
>>
>> https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-announces-creation-of-strategic-jd-vance-meme-reserve 
>>
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
>>>
>>> I am little disappointed now...
>>>
>>> LoL
>>>
>>> Bye
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662168 — Re: James Bond 007 [Re: Glory to the Workforce! [Legalize Comedy]]

Am Donnerstag000027, 27.03.2025 um 10:21 schrieb Mild Shock:
> Hi,
> 
> So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
> 
> I am little disappointed now...
> 

007 was (allegedly) the room number of a storage-room in the basement of 
MI6' headquarter.

'James Bond' was actually an author, who wrote a book about the birds in 
the west indies.

Ian Flemming was a top man in British intelligence, before he wrote spy 
stories.

He was head of an 'operation James Bond', which rescued Martin Borman 
out of Berlin at the end of the war.

In this operation a John Ainsworth-Davis (the 'real' James Bond) brought 
Martin Borman to London.

This was all long before Mussolini became head of the fascist movement 
in Italy (around 1917).

TH
> Bye
> 
> Thomas Heger schrieb:
>> Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
>>
>>>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than 
>>>> Hitler
>>>> (roughly ten years).
>>>>
>>>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
>>>
>>> There you go again.
>>> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
>>>
>>
>> Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini- 
>> recruited-mi5-italy
>>
>> quote:
>>
>> "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in 
>> politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
>>
>> (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but 
>> for MI5.
>>
>> Sorry for that...)
>>
>> But also Stalin and Hitler were (allegedly) on the payroll of UK- 
>> intelligence:
>>
>> https://www.amazon.de/-/en/True-Crime-Solving-History-Vol/dp/047311478X
>>
>> https://www.amazon.de/Stalins-British-Training/dp/0473120739
>>
>>
>> TH
>>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662490

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

> Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> 
> >> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
> >> (roughly ten years).
> >>
> >> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
> > 
> > There you go again.
> > Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
> > 
> 
> Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
> 
> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-i
taly
> 
> quote:
> 
> "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in 
> politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
> 
> (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for
> MI5.
> 
> Sorry for that...)


Your quote mining is far worse, in the way of error.
The preceding sentence says it is about:
===
[Mussolini] ... his brief career as a British agent.
===

What part of 'brief' don't you understand?

And for the perhaps misled kiddies, on what it was all about:
Italy fought on the Allied side in WWI.
But the war went bady for them, and there was a lot of peace protests.
Mussolini, a mere journalist at the time, was fiercely on the allied
side, so for keeping up the war.
He ordered hisgang of blackshirts to beat up peace demonstrators.
Well worth some pocket money, while it lasted.
To the British Mussolini was a paid agitator, more than an agent,

Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662548

Am Montag000007, 07.04.2025 um 12:03 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
> Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
>>
>>>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
>>>> (roughly ten years).
>>>>
>>>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
>>>
>>> There you go again.
>>> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
>>>
>>
>> Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-i
> taly
>>
>> quote:
>>
>> "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in
>> politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
>>
>> (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for
>> MI5.
>>
>> Sorry for that...)
> 
> 
> Your quote mining is far worse, in the way of error.
> The preceding sentence says it is about:
> ===
> [Mussolini] ... his brief career as a British agent.
> ===
> 
> What part of 'brief' don't you understand?
> 
> And for the perhaps misled kiddies, on what it was all about:
> Italy fought on the Allied side in WWI.
> But the war went bady for them, and there was a lot of peace protests.
> Mussolini, a mere journalist at the time, was fiercely on the allied
> side, so for keeping up the war.
> He ordered hisgang of blackshirts to beat up peace demonstrators.
> Well worth some pocket money, while it lasted.
> To the British Mussolini was a paid agitator, more than an agent,
> 

The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.

(E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )

Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.

So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and 
supporting him???


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662556

Den 09.04.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>
> 
> The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.
> 
> (E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )
> 
> Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.
> 
> So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and 
> supporting him???
> 
> 
> TH
> 
> 

He is not joking.
He is Tomas Heger!

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662560

Paul.B.Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

> Den 09.04.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
> >>
> > 
> > The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.
> > 
> > (E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )
> > 
> > Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.
> > 
> > So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and 
> > supporting him???
> > 
> > 
> > TH
> > 
> > 
> 
> He is not joking.
> He is Tomas Heger!

Certainly! And apart from an unbridled historical fantasy
his knowledge of English is lacking.
He doesn't understand what 'agent' means, in an MI5/MI6 context,

Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662565

J. J. Lodder wrote:

> Paul.B.Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
>> He is not joking.
>> He is Tomas Heger!
> 
> Certainly! And apart from an unbridled historical fantasy his knowledge
> of English is lacking.
> He doesn't understand what 'agent' means, in an MI5/MI6 context,
> 
> Jan

traitors, like the gay polakia, a former real, historical and proper 
Russian province, as a child of a mother. My friends got their luggage 
stolen in gay polakia. Completely disgrace. Order has to be restored in 
that territory. I would to visit Gdansk, where people once worked for 
their country and their children, and not for the oligarchs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662591

Am Mittwoch000009, 09.04.2025 um 14:27 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

>>> The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.
>>>
>>> (E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )
>>>
>>> Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.
>>>
>>> So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and
>>> supporting him???
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He is not joking.
>> He is Tomas Heger!
> 
> Certainly! And apart from an unbridled historical fantasy
> his knowledge of English is lacking.
> He doesn't understand what 'agent' means, in an MI5/MI6 context,

Sorry for that, but I have actually no contacts to MI5/6.

Im my world 'agent' is the same as 'spy' (if operating abroad).

Possibly the agents of MI5/6/... use some sorts of euphemisms. But I 
don't know, since to the best of my knowledge I don't know any of them.

About Hitler I had the theory, that 'the Fuehrer' and Hitler were two 
different people and the 'Fuehrer' actually a born Englishman, who lived 
in Germany since prior to WWI in the house Prinzregentenplatz 16 in 
Munich, together with a daughter of Richard Wagner named 'Isolde Beidler'.

His real name was (according to my theory) Noel Trevenen Huxley.




TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662590

Am Mittwoch000009, 09.04.2025 um 11:55 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
> Den 09.04.2025 08:44, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>
>>
>> The US/British had a LOOOONG history of political double agents.
>>
>> (E.g. Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gadhaffi ... )
>>
>> Most likely Dönitz, Rommel and Hitler himself were British agents, too.
>>
>> So, why not Mussolini, if the British already admitted paying and 
>> supporting him???
>>
>>
>> TH
>>
>>
> 
> He is not joking.
> He is Tomas Heger!
> 

I had many ideas from Greg Hallet, who wrote this book:

https://www.lovelybooks.de/autor/Greg-Hallett/Hitler-Was-a-British-Agent-628882516-w/

Hallet wrote, that Dönitz was also an agent and supplied secret Navi 
Enigma-codes to British intelligence.

This is plausible, because imho the British 'bomb' at Bletchley Park 
used only three wheels in a group, while the Navi enigmas used four.

Therefore the bomb could rotate until the end of all days and could not 
decode the Enigma messages, even if you knew the code.

The only person, who could possible cheat and deliver the codes to the 
British agencies was Dönitz himself.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web