Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800 |
| Last post | 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 197 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-15 10:14 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-15 03:06 -0800
Re: ww2 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-16 06:50 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-16 21:24 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-18 13:42 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:34 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 17:16 -0600
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:48 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 10:08 -0800
Re: ww3 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 11:32 -0700
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-24 00:38 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-27 11:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 00:14 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:58 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 04:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-02 06:43 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 22:52 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-01 15:05 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-03 09:12 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-04 07:38 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-03 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-05 09:05 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:38 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 12:26 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:45 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 00:05 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:09 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:55 +0100
Re: ww3 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-09 08:02 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-09 10:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:20 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:05 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 08:57 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:57 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 21:35 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 17:17 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 16:28 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:15 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:53 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:25 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:27 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 10:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:29 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-20 08:38 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-20 09:58 +0000
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-18 15:58 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-19 07:40 +0100
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:35 -0600
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-20 14:26 +0100
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-21 07:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-22 09:19 +0100
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-23 11:54 +0100
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-23 14:12 +0100
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-23 22:15 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 14:15 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-24 09:01 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:35 -0800
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-24 20:49 +0100
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-25 10:29 +0100
Re: ww3 Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 14:01 +0000
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 12:14 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 23:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:32 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:08 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:51 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:25 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:29 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:26 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 14:32 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 16:16 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:18 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:22 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:12 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 12:14 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:50 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:51 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:22 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:13 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:39 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:39 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:33 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:37 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:02 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:28 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:34 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:00 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:44 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:01 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-03 08:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-06 23:59 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:30 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:04 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 16:07 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:17 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:18 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:20 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:54 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 18:41 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 20:32 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:00 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 17:52 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:55 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:39 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:45 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 23:02 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:03 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:08 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:11 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:13 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:41 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-20 07:04 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:51 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 13:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:05 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 20:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-19 20:49 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:41 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 22:46 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:18 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:56 -0500
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-07 11:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:35 -0500
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0700
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-12 23:06 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-13 10:46 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 02:23 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:09 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 03:15 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 21:27 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:26 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:25 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 15:32 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:57 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 02:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:24 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 16:36 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 19:08 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 05:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 21:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 02:28 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:36 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 14:50 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:49 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:11 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:12 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 12:53 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:10 -0700
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:15 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:45 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:58 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-21 05:48 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 14:35 -0600
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-22 05:39 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-22 02:50 -0600
Re: ww3 patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) - 2025-01-19 03:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-16 17:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6789AFA1.1414@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660430 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > i don't see any indication that Russia will ever use nucluer weapons on > anyone... I still don't understand why sooo many people don't believe Iran already has an nucluer bomb... Haven't you ever ordered a cabinate from AmaZon or Ikea, and all the parts need to be assembled (with instructions included)??? A nucluer bomb can EASILY be shipped separately in very easy parts, and then you just reassemble it at your home! (make sure you get the pdf file) shouldn't take you longer than 2000 hours to reasemble all the parts and ready to rock! Need a plane to carry it and drop it off? You can buy the parts to build your own plane in your garage..like the Van's RV-10. Oh, do you need a nucluer bomb? I take PayPal. LETS GET DIS WW3 STARTED!!!! ww4, I'll sell you the rocks... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-15 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vm9jrb$36bq0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660398 |
Governor Swill wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:35:49 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) > wrote: > >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 6:20:53 +0000, Governor Swill wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:01:25 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com >>> (Bertietaylor) >>> wrote: >>> >>>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. They also got lands >>> >from Persia and reduced Poland and Lithuania. Lands from China and >>>> Japan. Beat up Sweden, expanded South. They are big for a reason and >>>> getting 12% of Ukraine is thin icing on the cake. Putin's main success >>>> is political having China and thirdworld support and now buddy Trumpo in >>>> power. >>> >>> And where are all those gains now? >> See the current map of Ukraine and that before the reoccupation of >> Crimea. Some 12 trillion dollars of prime real estate. > > Their Navy, such as it now is, can't use the Sevastopol port because Ukraine has > cowed it. > > The cities and industrial centers in the east that Putin wanted, have been, in > many cases, 100% destroyed and will have to be rebuilt from scratch. > > He expended 200,000 Russian men taking Bakhmut and Avdiivka. Another 50,000 > failing to retake Kharkiv. Three quarters of a million Russia dead and maimed > so far to steal a wasteland. > > Ukraine controls Crimea's water supply. Without it, Crimea is useless. > > Putin is still refusing to accept Trump's offer for talks. > > He hasn't been hurt enough yet. > > NP: Carly Simon - That's The Way I've Always Heard It Should Be > <https://www.newsweek.com/russia-arrests-general-military-purge-putin-war-mirza-mirzaev-1979651> A top Russian general has been arrested on bribery charges, according to the Tass news agency. Russian President Vladimir Putin's purge of his top military officials continued with the arrest of Major General Mirza Mirzaev. The detention of Mirzaev, the deputy chief of logistics of the Russian National Guard, for allegedly trying to extort a contractor marks the latest arrest of a high-ranking military figure and fuels speculation about a crackdown on dissent and corruption within Vladimir Putin's top military brass. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 08:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lubvp6F4rvdU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660187 |
Am Donnerstag000009, 09.01.2025 um 11:01 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>>> >>>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>>> >>>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>>> kicked now. >>> >>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >> >> >> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >> to a separate peace. > > True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what the Prussians disliked. The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate Prussians. As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in Waterloo. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-14 08:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b85bedd5c796cc623c11f45487be6d3f@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660204 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 7:15:51 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Donnerstag000009, 09.01.2025 um 11:01 schrieb Bertietaylor: > >>>>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>>>> >>>>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>>>> kicked now. >>>> >>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>> >>> >>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>> to a separate peace. >> >> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. > > Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. > > The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what > the Prussians disliked. > > The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the > Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. > > From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate > Prussians. > > As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in > Waterloo. Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern and egalitarian. Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. All were supremely influential militant shitheads from any pacific point of view. Arindam's touch is softer than butterfly wings. Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof Bertietaylor > > > .... > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-16 08:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lursdjFnciaU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660336 |
Am Dienstag000014, 14.01.2025 um 09:53 schrieb Bertietaylor: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 7:15:51 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag000009, 09.01.2025 um 11:01 schrieb Bertietaylor: >> >>>>>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>>>>> >>>>>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>>>>> kicked now. >>>>> >>>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>>> to a separate peace. >>> >>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. >> >> Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. >> >> The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what >> the Prussians disliked. >> >> The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the >> Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. >> >> From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate >> Prussians. >> >> As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in >> Waterloo. > > Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern > and egalitarian. > > Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top > European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. All of them did essentially the same thing: they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in large numbers in the Russian winter. That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. Hitler did almost the same thing. Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much more devastating for the German soldiers. E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad. This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking through the Russian winter). To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime, too. But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control. That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth and that in turn would have saved millions of lifes. Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly. It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place. But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire army). So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as Napoleon. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-16 08:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <4894da5d1b1170a6ff8f447ac3a82695@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660434 |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 7:56:40 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Dienstag000014, 14.01.2025 um 09:53 schrieb Bertietaylor: >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 7:15:51 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am Donnerstag000009, 09.01.2025 um 11:01 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>> >>>>>>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>>>>>> kicked now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>>>> to a separate peace. >>>> >>>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. >>> >>> Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. >>> >>> The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what >>> the Prussians disliked. >>> >>> The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the >>> Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. >>> >>> From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate >>> Prussians. >>> >>> As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in >>> Waterloo. >> >> Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern >> and egalitarian. >> >> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. > > All of them did essentially the same thing: > > they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and > forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. > > In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in > large numbers in the Russian winter. > > That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the > Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. > > Hitler did almost the same thing. > > Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much > more devastating for the German soldiers. > > E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad. > > This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a > harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking > through the Russian winter). > > To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and > starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime, > too. > > But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad > the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control. > > That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth > and that in turn would have saved millions of lifes. > > > Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly. > > It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place. > > But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the > campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire > army). > > So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as > Napoleon. Pale versions of Genghis Khan. No sentimentality or squeamishness, just take the existing order and destroy it like a natural force, like forest fire, tsunami, volcano, etc. > > > > > > > .... > > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 08:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lv13egFi6glU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660436 |
Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor: ... >>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. 'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as 'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF). So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient Rome. Well, yes, possibly. But who wants Rome back??? Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three people were slaves. Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself. >> All of them did essentially the same thing: >> >> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >> >> In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in >> large numbers in the Russian winter. >> >> That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the >> Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. >> >> Hitler did almost the same thing. >> >> Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much >> more devastating for the German soldiers. >> >> E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad. >> >> This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a >> harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking >> through the Russian winter). >> >> To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and >> starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime, >> too. >> >> But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad >> the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control. >> >> That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth >> and that in turn would have saved millions of lifes. >> >> >> Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly. >> >> It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place. >> >> But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the >> campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire >> army). >> >> So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as >> Napoleon. > > Pale versions of Genghis Khan. Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than Napoleon and Hitler combined. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 10:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <889eb0b1309730e58f6ebd49b6481cd6@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660500 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:27:21 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor: > .... >>>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. > > 'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as > 'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF). More or less. > > So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient > Rome. Benevolent competent dictator adored by masses with increasing living standards. Ideal. > > Well, yes, possibly. > > But who wants Rome back??? Rome is there in legal systems where theoretically only guilty are punished with innocents not to be harmed. > > Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three > people were slaves. Now we have machines that work better than slaves. > Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions > of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself. I thought Jews had their slaves but Jews are very much around. > >>> All of them did essentially the same thing: >>> >>> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >>> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >>> >>> In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in >>> large numbers in the Russian winter. >>> >>> That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the >>> Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. >>> >>> Hitler did almost the same thing. >>> >>> Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much >>> more devastating for the German soldiers. >>> >>> E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad. >>> >>> This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a >>> harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking >>> through the Russian winter). >>> >>> To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and >>> starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime, >>> too. >>> >>> But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad >>> the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control. >>> >>> That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth >>> and that in turn would have saved millions of lifes. >>> >>> >>> Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly. >>> >>> It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place. >>> >>> But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the >>> campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire >>> army). >>> >>> So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as >>> Napoleon. >> >> Pale versions of Genghis Khan. > > Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than > Napoleon and Hitler combined. Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared. Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages. Religious bigots may not be happy about that. > .... > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 15:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmjqs7$6ipb$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660554 |
On 1/19/25 4:35 AM, Bertietaylor wrote: > > Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared. > Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages. > Religious bigots may not be happy about that. It was not Chengiz himself who did it. His grandsons did after getting educated and cultivated in Iran.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 08:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lv6crvFdhokU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660554 |
Am Sonntag000019, 19.01.2025 um 11:35 schrieb Bertietaylor: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:27:21 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor: >> .... >>>>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>>>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. >> >> 'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as >> 'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF). > > More or less. >> >> So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient >> Rome. > > Benevolent competent dictator adored by masses with increasing living > standards. Ideal. Most dictators in history started benevolant and ended, because they left too many corpses behind. >> >> Well, yes, possibly. >> >> But who wants Rome back??? > > Rome is there in legal systems where theoretically only guilty are > punished with innocents not to be harmed. >>>WAS<<< !!! Actually ancient Rome is long gone and has existed two thousand years ago. But many Roman principles of jurisdiction have stil survived and are still in use today. >> Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three >> people were slaves. > > Now we have machines that work better than slaves. > Slavery turned out to be very inefficinat. So modern forms of slavery were introduced, where the slaves had to feed themselves. >> Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions >> of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself. > > I thought Jews had their slaves but Jews are very much around. Well, possibly God is taking revenge now. >>>> All of them did essentially the same thing: >>>> >>>> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >>>> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >>>> ... >>>> So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as >>>> Napoleon. >>> >>> Pale versions of Genghis Khan. >> >> Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than >> Napoleon and Hitler combined. > > Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared. > Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages. > Religious bigots may not be happy about that. I would say, that the Mongols had occuption in mind, when they came to the west. Whether or not they wanted to bring enlightment to the people of the 'dark ages' would be a theoretical question, because they were defeated by the people they have tried to enlighten. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 09:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <40d0c0bd87fcad95833b582567637dd1@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660603 |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 7:38:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Sonntag000019, 19.01.2025 um 11:35 schrieb Bertietaylor: >> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:27:21 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:25 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>> .... >>>>>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>>>>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. >>> >>> 'egalitarianism' is apparently meant as 'socialism' and 'modernity' as >>> 'technocracy' (which are the buzz words of the WEF). >> >> More or less. >>> >>> So 'the GREAT RESET' is actually the return of Caesar and the ancient >>> Rome. >> >> Benevolent competent dictator adored by masses with increasing living >> standards. Ideal. > > Most dictators in history started benevolant and ended, because they > left too many corpses behind. Other way around, monarchs generally were wonderful dictators at least in Hindu States. Elsewhere they fell short by varying lengths. > >>> >>> Well, yes, possibly. >>> >>> But who wants Rome back??? >> >> Rome is there in legal systems where theoretically only guilty are >> punished with innocents not to be harmed. > > >>>WAS<<< !!! Still is in theory. > > Actually ancient Rome is long gone and has existed two thousand years > ago. > > But many Roman principles of jurisdiction have stil survived and are > still in use today. Yes. > >>> Ancients Rome was a slaveholder society, where about two out of three >>> people were slaves. >> >> Now we have machines that work better than slaves. >> > > Slavery turned out to be very inefficinat. > So modern forms of slavery were introduced, where the slaves had to feed > themselves. They feed billionaires. > >>> Since slave-ownership ranks among the unforgivable sins, all successions >>> of ancient Rome will be destroyed by God himself. >> >> I thought Jews had their slaves but Jews are very much around. > > > Well, possibly God is taking revenge now. No, Jews' have it all save for minor hiccups here and there. Protestants adore them. > >>>>> All of them did essentially the same thing: >>>>> >>>>> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >>>>> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >>>>> > .... >>>>> So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as >>>>> Napoleon. >>>> >>>> Pale versions of Genghis Khan. >>> >>> Well, that shithead lived much earlier, but was actually worse than >>> Napoleon and Hitler combined. >> >> Those who gladly accepted his rule were spared. >> Dear Genghis dragged Europe out of the Dark ages. >> Religious bigots may not be happy about that. > > I would say, that the Mongols had occuption in mind, when they came to > the west. They were nomads clueless about civilisation. > > Whether or not they wanted to bring enlightment to the people of the > 'dark ages' would be a theoretical question, because they were defeated > by the people they have tried to enlighten. Not the point. They shook up things. > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-16 08:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3f95389621596009415f2e8089d68784@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660434 |
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 7:56:40 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Dienstag000014, 14.01.2025 um 09:53 schrieb Bertietaylor: >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 7:15:51 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am Donnerstag000009, 09.01.2025 um 11:01 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>> >>>>>>>>> NATO already has ships in the Black Sea. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Possibly yes, but there is no war between Russia and NATO till now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Important is, what would happen in the case of a conflict. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Russia would get it's ass kicked even more than it's getting its ass >>>>>>> kicked now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>>>> to a separate peace. >>>> >>>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. >>> >>> Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. >>> >>> The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what >>> the Prussians disliked. >>> >>> The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the >>> Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. >>> >>> From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate >>> Prussians. >>> >>> As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in >>> Waterloo. >> >> Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern >> and egalitarian. >> >> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. > > All of them did essentially the same thing: > > they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and > forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. > > In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in > large numbers in the Russian winter. Napoleon invaded Russia as the Czar broke the earlier treaty after losing a big battle. The idea was to contain Russia, not let it expand by sea, stop its association with the UK. > > That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the > Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. He lost. Russia won and the Cossacks romped in Paris. However those serfs got ideas from France and over time they grew strong enough to overthrow the Czar. > > Hitler did almost the same thing. Big mistake. That is why there are those who say that Hitler was actually anti-German or anti-Arya. The greatest conman ever. > > Hitlers occupation involved more serious crimes however, which were much > more devastating for the German soldiers. Indeed. Either a very big fool or the greatest traitor. Stalin never thought he would be so stupid as to have war on two fronts. Hitler should have finished UK before attacking USSR. > > E.g. Hitler refused to occupy Leningrad. He did say he would have dinner there but looks like Soviet resistance was great. > > This was extremely stupid, because Leningrad has a harbor and having a > harbor there would allow the Wehrmacht to use ships (instead of walking > through the Russian winter). This assumes he could have walked in. > > To prevent German success, the Nazis had to surround Leningrad and > starved 1 million Russians to death, which was a very serious crime, > too. So you hold Hitler and Nazis to be anti German. Well they certainly ruined Germany while claiming to love Germans. > > But it was also extremely stupid, because with occupation of Leningrad > the Baltic Sea would have been entirely under German control. > > That in turn would allow Navi-ships to move quite safely back and forth > and that in turn would have saved millions of lifes. Yes, but the Soviets stopped them. Once their troops returned from the Chinese front the tide turned. > > > Also the Stalingrad campaign was extremely stupid and extremely deadly. > > It made not sense of any kind to invade that region in the first place. They wanted the oil in that region, and the rich lands of Ukraine. > > But especially the city Stalingrad was of no particular interest and the > campaigned served no obvious purpose (despite wiping out an entire > army). > > So: Hitler was a piece of shit, too, but for very similar reasons as > Napoleon. Look at their plus points. They were scientific, modern, egalitarian, supported research, cared for the common man, introduced many reforms, improved quality of life, weakened the grip of the feudal lords and religious bigots, broke down barriers... We all must die and who knows that better than dictators. Their point is that mass killings will lead to positive change in due course. Genghis Khan is credited with the Renaissance in Europe, dragged them out of the Dark Aged. > > > > > > > .... > > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 08:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lv13pjFi6glU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660437 |
Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:56 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>>>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>>>>> to a separate peace. >>>>> >>>>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. >>>> >>>> Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. >>>> >>>> The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, >>>> what >>>> the Prussians disliked. >>>> >>>> The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the >>>> Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. >>>> >>>> From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate >>>> Prussians. >>>> >>>> As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in >>>> Waterloo. >>> >>> Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern >>> and egalitarian. >>> >>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. >> >> All of them did essentially the same thing: >> >> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >> >> In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in >> large numbers in the Russian winter. > > Napoleon invaded Russia as the Czar broke the earlier treaty after > losing a big battle. The idea was to contain Russia, not let it expand > by sea, stop its association with the UK. >> >> That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the >> Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. > > He lost. Russia won and the Cossacks romped in Paris. However those > serfs got ideas from France and over time they grew strong enough to > overthrow the Czar. >> >> Hitler did almost the same thing. > Big mistake. That is why there are those who say that Hitler was > actually anti-German or anti-Arya. The greatest conman ever. The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg 'Greg Hallett'. That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. So, Stalin was the greatest 'conman ever', because his head count was much greater. About Hitler's real identity I had assumed, that it could have been 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'. The reason is a little difficult to explain. But the younger brother of Julian Huxley (head of 'Eugenics') would fit. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 15:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8714cd5a09eaef82a980f7b5073e2f13@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #660501 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 7:33:15 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:56 schrieb Bertietaylor: > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war >>>>>>>> with Russia- mostly very miserably. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced >>>>>>> to a separate peace. >>>>>> >>>>>> True but a century earlier they thrashed the French. >>>>> >>>>> Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia. >>>>> >>>>> The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, >>>>> what >>>>> the Prussians disliked. >>>>> >>>>> The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the >>>>> Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers. >>>>> >>>>> From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate >>>>> Prussians. >>>>> >>>>> As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in >>>>> Waterloo. >>>> >>>> Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern >>>> and egalitarian. >>>> >>>> Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top >>>> European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity. >>> >>> All of them did essentially the same thing: >>> >>> they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and >>> forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army. >>> >>> In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in >>> large numbers in the Russian winter. >> >> Napoleon invaded Russia as the Czar broke the earlier treaty after >> losing a big battle. The idea was to contain Russia, not let it expand >> by sea, stop its association with the UK. >>> >>> That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the >>> Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers. >> >> He lost. Russia won and the Cossacks romped in Paris. However those >> serfs got ideas from France and over time they grew strong enough to >> overthrow the Czar. >>> >>> Hitler did almost the same thing. >> Big mistake. That is why there are those who say that Hitler was >> actually anti-German or anti-Arya. The greatest conman ever. > > The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg > 'Greg Hallett'. There is a similar story about Khomeni. > > That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. > > So, Stalin was the greatest 'conman ever', because his head count was > much greater. If Hitler and Stalin were British agents I suppose they were pro American really. For along with Churchill they destroyed the British Empire and colonialism, this made America great even to this day. > > About Hitler's real identity I had assumed, that it could have been > 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'. Maybe there was a switch in identity in WW1. > > The reason is a little difficult to explain. But the younger brother of > Julian Huxley (head of 'Eugenics') would fit. Maybe, but from long before Einstein to the present the main idea has been to suppress the Hinduisation of the West, happening from direct contact with the natives. Like Romans in Egypt turning to worshipping cats and jackals to the disgust of Romans. American dominance avoids direct contact, corrupts elites, uses money controls. Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof Bertietaylor > > .... > > > TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lv3l1tFef8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660513 |
Am Samstag000018, 18.01.2025 um 16:58 schrieb Bertietaylor: >>> He lost. Russia won and the Cossacks romped in Paris. However those >>> serfs got ideas from France and over time they grew strong enough to >>> overthrow the Czar. >>>> >>>> Hitler did almost the same thing. >>> Big mistake. That is why there are those who say that Hitler was >>> actually anti-German or anti-Arya. The greatest conman ever. >> >> The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg >> 'Greg Hallett'. > > There is a similar story about Khomeni. Khomeni would have been French, because he lived in Paris before. >> >> That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. >> >> So, Stalin was the greatest 'conman ever', because his head count was >> much greater. > If Hitler and Stalin were British agents I suppose they were pro > American really. For along with Churchill they destroyed the British > Empire and colonialism, this made America great even to this day. >> >> About Hitler's real identity I had assumed, that it could have been >> 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'. > > Maybe there was a switch in identity in WW1. That's what I thought. there was a famous event called 'Christmas at the front' in the trenches of Flanders. There the soldiers invited their enemies and celebrated Christmas. But what it the British put some sedatives into the wine? Then they could have kept the real Hitler and sent a false one back. As this was VERY dangerous for a spy, they have not sent Noel Huxley bach, but an intermediate spy, which was exchanged later in Beelitz Heilstaetten to the fake Hitler. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 15:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmjr6j$6ipb$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660501 |
On 1/18/25 1:33 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg > 'Greg Hallett'. > > That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. There was a whole batch of bogus Iranian historians who attributed any and every political move in Iran to "the British". Thanks to god they're dead and gone together with all that bullshit they wrote. Didn't know Europeans were not spared from that crap either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 14:26 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <678e4eef$0$28475$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #660570 |
Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/18/25 1:33 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > > The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg > > 'Greg Hallett'. > > > > That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. > > There was a whole batch of bogus Iranian historians who attributed any > and every political move in Iran to "the British". Not too bad, for the period 1913-1953, when the Americans took over. > Thanks to god they're dead and gone together with all that bullshit they > wrote. The Mossadeq coup is real history, as is the engineering of it by the CIA. > Didn't know Europeans were not spared from that crap either. Crap or not, the present mess in Iran cannot by understood without looking back to the history of colonialism that preceded it, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 07:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lv8u5bFqgp5U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660609 |
Am Montag000020, 20.01.2025 um 14:26 schrieb J. J. Lodder: > Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/18/25 1:33 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>> The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg >>> 'Greg Hallett'. >>> >>> That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. >> >> There was a whole batch of bogus Iranian historians who attributed any >> and every political move in Iran to "the British". > > Not too bad, for the period 1913-1953, > when the Americans took over. > >> Thanks to god they're dead and gone together with all that bullshit they >> wrote. > > The Mossadeq coup is real history, > as is the engineering of it by the CIA. > >> Didn't know Europeans were not spared from that crap either. > > Crap or not, the present mess in Iran cannot by understood > without looking back to the history of colonialism that preceded it, I would miss the French in this picture, because Khomeini came actually from Paris. 'the picture' is this female 'black all over the body' clothing, which is supposed to be required by the Islam. But to me this type of dress reminds me of nuns in catholic monasteries and not of the Arabian world. So, possibly, that was all a French fake, who wanted to destroy Islam. TH > > Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-22 09:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vmq9m7$so72$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660635 |
On 2025-01-21 06:46:15 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > Am Montag000020, 20.01.2025 um 14:26 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/18/25 1:33 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg >>>> 'Greg Hallett'. >>>> >>>> That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. >>> >>> There was a whole batch of bogus Iranian historians who attributed any >>> and every political move in Iran to "the British". >> >> Not too bad, for the period 1913-1953, >> when the Americans took over. >> >>> Thanks to god they're dead and gone together with all that bullshit they >>> wrote. >> >> The Mossadeq coup is real history, >> as is the engineering of it by the CIA. >> >>> Didn't know Europeans were not spared from that crap either. >> >> Crap or not, the present mess in Iran cannot by understood >> without looking back to the history of colonialism that preceded it, > > I would miss the French in this picture, because Khomeini came actually > from Paris. Bollocks. Unless this is just an illustration of your inabilty to write idiomatic English. Khomeini had taken political refuge near Paris, yes, but he didn't "come from Paris": he came from Iran, as one would guess. > > 'the picture' is this female 'black all over the body' clothing, which > is supposed to be required by the Islam. > > But to me this type of dress reminds me of nuns in catholic monasteries > and not of the Arabian world. > > So, possibly, that was all a French fake, who wanted to destroy Islam. > > > TH >> >> Jan -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-23 11:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <lvelefFogmdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #660688 |
Am Mittwoch000022, 22.01.2025 um 09:19 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden: > On 2025-01-21 06:46:15 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > >> Am Montag000020, 20.01.2025 um 14:26 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/18/25 1:33 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >>>>> The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg >>>>> 'Greg Hallett'. >>>>> >>>>> That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'. >>>> >>>> There was a whole batch of bogus Iranian historians who attributed any >>>> and every political move in Iran to "the British". >>> >>> Not too bad, for the period 1913-1953, >>> when the Americans took over. >>> >>>> Thanks to god they're dead and gone together with all that bullshit >>>> they >>>> wrote. >>> >>> The Mossadeq coup is real history, >>> as is the engineering of it by the CIA. >>> >>>> Didn't know Europeans were not spared from that crap either. >>> >>> Crap or not, the present mess in Iran cannot by understood >>> without looking back to the history of colonialism that preceded it, >> >> I would miss the French in this picture, because Khomeini came >> actually from Paris. > > Bollocks. Unless this is just an illustration of your inabilty to write > idiomatic English. Khomeini had taken political refuge near Paris, yes, > but he didn't "come from Paris": he came from Iran, as one would guess. Did you know, that Lenin came actually from Switzerland and through Germany, before he went to Russia. The German Kaiser admitted later, that Lenin was supported, because he should harm Russia. Possibly the French have something similar to the CIA, too, which could do dirty tricks by sending 'refugees' back. But actually I don't know and possibly the French don't have secret agencies and never do dirty tricks. But Germans did, I must admit, but not with Khomeini. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web