Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654922 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-07-14 22:30 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-08-10 10:40 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 234 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-14 22:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 02:52 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 07:15 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 13:04 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 15:08 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 11:58 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 12:33 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 12:55 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 18:53 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 17:01 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 17:08 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 20:24 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 20:59 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 21:54 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 22:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 23:21 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-16 12:18 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-16 14:47 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-17 09:05 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-17 12:05 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-17 14:16 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-17 20:26 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-17 23:34 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-18 02:10 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-18 05:41 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-31 15:23 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Reign Batura <nuinr@giu.ru> - 2024-07-18 14:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 16:20 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 18:34 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 15:36 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 14:32 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 17:25 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 17:49 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 20:07 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 20:19 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-11 13:35 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 22:49 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 02:42 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 06:34 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 13:50 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 06:33 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 12:53 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 15:21 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 15:27 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 15:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 16:06 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 16:15 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 16:22 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 14:23 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 17:30 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 17:36 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 17:42 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 17:46 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 17:51 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 20:05 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 23:44 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 01:49 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 17:08 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 02:14 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 18:32 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 03:46 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 19:46 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 04:48 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Javis Orbán <tsnb@sia.hu> - 2024-08-13 10:25 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-14 10:09 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-14 10:22 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Balabaanoff Bibitinsky <yyinsy@krtikb.ru> - 2024-08-14 17:36 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 10:30 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 08:36 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Mozhar Bairamkulov <aueail@oroamlt.ru> - 2024-08-13 07:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 12:38 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 15:27 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 13:47 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 15:54 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 15:15 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 16:29 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 18:08 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:09 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 23:31 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:26 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-13 17:43 -0700
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 20:21 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 20:24 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:04 +0200
His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... JC_Lavau <jacques.lavau@free.fr> - 2024-08-14 19:38 +0000
Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:32 +0000
Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:36 +0000
"Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 23:54 +0200
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:01 +0200
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:33 +0000
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:24 +0000
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:33 +0200
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:35 +0000
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:39 +0200
Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-15 10:56 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 13:29 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 07:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-13 06:18 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Josh Vassilopulos <hsihos@shsvvai.gr> - 2024-08-12 19:11 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 21:14 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Pete Beaulieu <ieae@uabei.fr> - 2024-08-12 20:01 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Szűcs Kővári <amb@asyypag.hu> - 2024-08-11 15:59 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Kalakos Angelopoulos <eko@gevaa.gr> - 2024-08-11 13:44 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-18 08:33 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-18 13:02 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-19 12:08 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-07-19 12:20 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-19 10:34 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-20 08:11 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 00:03 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 22:44 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-07-31 11:04 +0800
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 06:52 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-07-31 07:03 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 08:08 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 15:10 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 11:32 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 13:37 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 11:39 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 14:17 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 15:05 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 13:29 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 15:33 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 16:26 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 16:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 16:55 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 17:02 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 17:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 16:34 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-01 17:30 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 17:31 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 20:04 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 20:38 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 20:44 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-02 22:53 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Dino Todorsky <idndr@kindsdi.ru> - 2024-08-02 21:49 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 22:06 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 22:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 06:23 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 21:03 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-02 21:49 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 22:07 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:24 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:51 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 19:44 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 19:40 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:59 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 20:36 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 20:04 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 21:17 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Mitsuharu Sakakibara <aair@srkkrr.jp> - 2024-08-03 10:54 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 22:28 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:23 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:40 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-04 14:50 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-04 14:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-04 14:28 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Egorov Zheludkov <kzaoko@jlhekj.ru> - 2024-08-04 16:19 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-04 14:30 +0000
Important to know Python opinion on this... Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-06 21:50 +0000
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 02:26 +0200
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 01:31 +0000
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 03:40 +0200
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 03:44 +0200
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 02:03 +0000
Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 05:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:45 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:50 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 21:52 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Conard Demakis <dd@sirrd.gr> - 2024-08-02 23:02 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-02 12:12 +0300
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 11:46 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 13:06 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 16:15 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 18:00 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 20:33 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 18:50 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 21:12 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Milton Tolboev <lo@vtno.ru> - 2024-08-01 12:39 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-02 12:04 +0300
Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-31 12:50 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 15:45 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 14:30 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-08-01 00:38 +0800
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 17:12 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 20:37 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-08-07 10:05 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 12:14 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:16 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:19 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:37 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:54 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:57 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:07 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:09 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:21 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:23 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:52 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:53 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 13:17 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:33 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:38 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 16:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:52 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@org.invalid> - 2024-08-08 14:56 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:10 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:12 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:23 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:25 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:37 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:40 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:54 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 16:25 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 11:26 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-09 07:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-09 10:56 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 12:06 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 12:41 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-09 15:57 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 19:08 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 03:27 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 05:45 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 13:24 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 17:35 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 17:16 +0000
Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-09 20:44 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-10 10:17 +0200
Re: Relativistic aberration Blaine Kántor <kndisk@ibgkk.hu> - 2024-08-10 10:40 +0000
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11bHpZFFz_SBu0-vvnRxaeRh-6s@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655907 |
Le 13/08/2024 à 20:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >> Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say? > > Of course not. Particularly when expressing opinions. > > “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal > more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic > and argument than others.” -- Douglas Adams > > And when they're presenting data, consider how it fits > in with previous data. And wait for independent confir- > mation. > > Consider the Gran Sasso report of FTL neutrinos. I > doubted it because it didn't fit with extended SR. > And I was right. Yes, me too. Although the word "doubt" is not strong enough. Personally I laughed, and I said that the experimenter had necessarily been wrong. It was for me as obvious as: "We have found a whole natural number that is between 9 and 10", or "we have finally found a natural square that is equal to the sum of two other squares". It was physically stupid, but it was sad to cry (and it remains so), it shows that physicists have not understood SR correctly. They would never have said such bullshit. Even today, many spit on me (why not) but once in their WC-toilet, they imagine that we will soon discover tachyons. It's stupid. The clowns are them, not me. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b4b7d685a60fab132296336b62341c61@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #655914 |
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:09:33 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: > > Le 13/08/2024 à 20:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > > > > Richard Hachel wrote: > > > Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say? >> >> Of course not. Particularly when expressing opinions. >> >> “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal >> more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic >> and argument than others.” -- Douglas Adams >> >> And when they're presenting data, consider how it fits >> in with previous data. And wait for independent confir- >> mation. >> >> Consider the Gran Sasso report of FTL neutrinos. I >> doubted it because it didn't fit with extended SR. >> And I was right. > > Yes, me too. > Although the word "doubt" is not strong enough. > Personally I laughed, and I said that the experimenter > had necessarily been wrong. I didn't laugh, because it's just possible that new data that disagrees with past data is indicative of new physics. I was pretty sure it was wrong, but not certain. "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -- Voltaire > It was for me as obvious as: "We have found a whole natural > number that is between 9 and 10", or "we have finally found > a natural square that is equal to the sum of two other squares". Physics, and the real world, is different from mathematics. But even mathematics has its uncertainties: “God exists since mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists since we cannot prove the consistency.” -- Morris Kline > It was physically stupid, but it was sad to cry (and it remains > so), it shows that physicists have not understood SR correctly. > They would never have said such bullshit. Actually, they did a lot of checking their equipment, they just didn't check the part that was faulty. > Even today, many spit on me (why not) but once in their WC-toilet, > they imagine that we will soon discover tachyons. > It's stupid. > The clowns are them, not me. > > R.H. I am a clown then. So are Charles Schwartz, Alan Chodos, Robert Ehrlich and many others. As I said, physics is different from mathematics. The analogies you've used in the past aren't applicable to physics, which still has a LOT of unexplored domains. The domain c < u < infinity is one such. You are much too certain. You should remember your countryman: "Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -- Voltaire "What is not surrounded by uncertainty cannot be the truth." -- Richard Feynman “Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.” -- Albert Einstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <NJ_WX0fDIsgjeCUSiV54-Tj2V5E@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655907 |
Le 13/08/2024 à 20:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:29:48 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: >> The guy, you tell him that four days after its >> first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he >> swallows it, > > I doubt that :-) You, yes, you doubt, because you are intelligent. But you know, I have had a long life, and anyone who has seen a lot can have learned a lot: there are many idiots in the universe. Millions of people believe today, because they have been told, that the Holy Virgin made a baby all by herself, contravening the very laws of nature and theology itself (I will place on your throne a fruit from your loins and your descendants). Others believe that the prophet Muhammad traveled on a winged horse when Allah wanted him to (against the laws of nature that the good Lord himself had decreed and against the anti-spectacular logic of the hidden God of Isaiah). Others believe that the Titanic encountered a flying saucer, and that the terrible shock caused the ship to sink majestically in one piece. I beg you to believe me: the guys are buying it. Even Python, the greatest scientific critic of all time: he's buying it. Okay, a few people are surprised to note that the two pieces were found in two different places, proof that they didn't sink together, but anyway. And a few people take seriously the belated testimony of passengers who said: "We were paid not to tell the truth. We shouldn't have said that the boat simply broke in two by itself." So a flying saucer was invented, and the universe bought it. Don't laugh, guys, they all bought it. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 17:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <GMqcnX4B5KIPYCb7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #655916 |
On 08/13/2024 03:26 PM, Richard Hachel wrote: > Le 13/08/2024 à 20:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:29:48 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: > >>> The guy, you tell him that four days after its >>> first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he >>> swallows it, >> >> I doubt that :-) > > You, yes, you doubt, because you are intelligent. > But you know, I have had a long life, and anyone who has seen a lot can > have learned a lot: there are many idiots in the universe. > > Millions of people believe today, because they have been told, that the > Holy Virgin made a baby all by herself, contravening the very laws of > nature and theology itself (I will place on your throne a fruit from > your loins and your descendants). > Others believe that the prophet Muhammad traveled on a winged horse when > Allah wanted him to (against the laws of nature that the good Lord > himself had decreed and against the anti-spectacular logic of the hidden > God of Isaiah). > Others believe that the Titanic encountered a flying saucer, and that > the terrible shock caused the ship to sink majestically in one piece. I > beg you to believe me: the guys are buying it. > > Even Python, the greatest scientific critic of all time: he's buying it. > Okay, a few people are surprised to note that the two pieces were found > in two different places, proof that they didn't sink together, but > anyway. And a few people take seriously the belated testimony of > passengers who said: "We were paid not to tell the truth. We shouldn't > have said that the boat simply broke in two by itself." > > So a flying saucer was invented, and the universe bought it. > > Don't laugh, guys, they all bought it. > > R.H. You mean Jefimenko wheel? Hey the Mars and Jupiter are making a syzygy, according to Allais effect it should result being reflected as a blip on the Parameterized-Post-Newtonian model's factors of the Earth ephemeris. How about "vix-motrix vis-a-vis vis-viva"? I.e., the balleton, affects dynamics in motion, while simply alive and flying like Jordan, vis-a-vis after the last shudder that the combined central moment of lifetime stays or leaves, as with regards to the sarira or some such notion. All explained by rest-exchange-momentum and a sort of simple accoutrement of space-contraction separately for the linear and rotational, .... With fall gravity, ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 20:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <VtNuO.1186514$Liga.920803@fx15.ams4> |
| In reply to | #655904 |
Den 13.08.2024 18:29, skrev Richard Hachel: > > Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this > guy who swallows everything? He doesn't swallow what you tell him. Maybe that's because he is able to think for himself? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-13 20:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v9g8cc$3vsfg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655904 |
Den 13.08.2024 18:29, skrev Richard Hachel: > Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this > guy who swallows everything? He doesn't swallow what you tell him. Maybe that's because he is able to think for himself? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 14:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v9i6ge$bvnu$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655909 |
Le 13/08/2024 à 20:24, Paul.B.Andersen a écrit : > Den 13.08.2024 18:29, skrev Richard Hachel: >> Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this >> guy who swallows everything? > > He doesn't swallow what you tell him. > Maybe that's because he is able to think for himself? This is a common trend among cranks: "This is right because *I* said it and you are not even allowed to contest *me*!". This could be called "authoritarianism with authority". Another crank on fr.sci.* is using this a lot, Jacques Lavau. His hobby is to pretend to have discovered, independently from Cramer, the transactional interpretation of QM while he was a student. This is of course ridiculous when it comes to confronting his own "work" to Cramer's one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JC_Lavau <jacques.lavau@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 19:38 +0000 |
| Subject | His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... |
| Message-ID | <J5mY6np6ByUsjDGwwijvhI3nEJg@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655931 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 14:04, Python wrote : > Another crank > on fr.sci.* is using this a lot, Jacques Lavau. His hobby is to pretend > to have discovered, independently from Cramer, the transactional > interpretation of QM while he was a student. This is of course > ridiculous when it comes to confronting his own "work" to Cramer's > one. Whichever is is pseudonym, the passion of Jean-Pierre Messager is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences of his permanent forgeries... Enjoy this one: Le 12/08/2024 à 22:40, noreply@bluehost.com wrote : > FW > > ====================================================== > > > jpierremessager@gmail.com > > Domain: deonto-ethics.org > Description: A Web site hosted on server box2178.bluehost.com contains several > pages full of insults, libels and threats (in French) targeting numerous people, > include me. For instance : > https://deonto-ethics.org/impostures/index.php?topic=293.0 End of quotation. Now, about the facts in transactional subquantic microphysics, it was so inevitable that we are half a dozen to have independantly discovered some parts of it, and John Gleason Cramer is only one of them. One may wonder why it was not discovered around 1932 : they had all the necessary pieces in hands (but not in mind...). A handbook is available, but I warn you to wait for the ninth edition, much increased. https://www.lulu.com/fr/shop/jacques-lavau/transactional-quantum-microphysics-principles-and-applications/paperback/product-1mmdgqgr.html -- La science se distingue de tous les autres modes de transmission des connaissances : nous CROYONS que les "experts" sont faillibles, que les traditions peuvent charrier toutes sortes de fables et d'erreurs, et qu'il faut vérifier, avec des expériences.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 20:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... |
| Message-ID | <ZW0w6-FVj8nhm-S8PMXvptzdy5Y@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655960 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 21:38, JC_Lavau a écrit : > Le 14/08/2024 à 14:04, Python wrote : > Whichever is is pseudonym, the passion of Jean-Pierre Messager is to persecute > scapegoats, but he fears evidences of his permanent forgeries... Absolutely. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 20:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... |
| Message-ID | <QDX5fx5x1VzjYvC-9PHTCGMrUlw@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655960 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 21:38, JC_Lavau a écrit : > > Now, about the facts in transactional subquantic microphysics, it was so > inevitable that we are half a dozen to have independantly discovered some parts of > it, and John Gleason Cramer is only one of them. One may wonder why it was not > discovered around 1932 : they had all the necessary pieces in hands (but not in > mind...). > A handbook is available, but I warn you to wait for the ninth edition, much > increased. Don't hesitate to give us references when it appears. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 23:54 +0200 |
| Subject | "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <v9j92i$iefe$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655960 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 21:38, JC_Lavau a écrit : > Le 14/08/2024 à 14:04, Python wrote : >> Another crank >> on fr.sci.* is using this a lot, Jacques Lavau. His hobby is to pretend >> to have discovered, independently from Cramer, the transactional >> interpretation of QM while he was a student. This is of course >> ridiculous when it comes to confronting his own "work" to Cramer's >> one. > > Whichever is is pseudonym, the passion of Jean-Pierre Messager is to > persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences of his permanent forgeries... > Enjoy this one: > > Le 12/08/2024 à 22:40, noreply@bluehost.com wrote : >> FW >> >> ====================================================== >> >> >> jpierremessager@gmail.com >> >> Domain: deonto-ethics.org >> Description: A Web site hosted on server box2178.bluehost.com contains >> several pages full of insults, libels and threats (in French) >> targeting numerous people, include me. For instance : >> https://deonto-ethics.org/impostures/index.php?topic=293.0 > > End of quotation. Yes enjoy, you'll have a glitch or Jacques Lavau's usuel trend: "You are contradicting be because you've sodomized by your mother" These numerous pages, about almost all posters of fr.sci.physics are in place for ages with the same kind of insults (in his mind). I don't give a shit. They are telling far more about the one, Jacques Lavau, who set up the site, than on everyone else. BTW, After decades I thing it is time to tear down this kind of people space on the Internet (who brought Trump in USA, almost RN in France). There are a few French speaking people around. Enjoy (not)! Next steps will be in courts. > Now, about the facts in transactional subquantic microphysics, it was so > inevitable that we are half a dozen to have independantly discovered > some parts of it, and John Gleason Cramer is only one of them. One may > wonder why it was not discovered around 1932 : they had all the > necessary pieces in hands (but not in mind...). > A handbook is available, but I warn you to wait for the ninth edition, > much increased. > https://www.lulu.com/fr/shop/jacques-lavau/transactional-quantum-microphysics-principles-and-applications/paperback/product-1mmdgqgr.html > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 00:01 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <v9j9fi$iefe$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655968 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 23:54, Python a écrit : > Le 14/08/2024 à 21:38, JC_Lavau a écrit : >> Le 14/08/2024 à 14:04, Python wrote : >>> Another crank >>> on fr.sci.* is using this a lot, Jacques Lavau. His hobby is to pretend >>> to have discovered, independently from Cramer, the transactional >>> interpretation of QM while he was a student. This is of course >>> ridiculous when it comes to confronting his own "work" to Cramer's >>> one. >> >> Whichever is is pseudonym, the passion of Jean-Pierre Messager is to >> persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences of his permanent >> forgeries... >> Enjoy this one: >> >> Le 12/08/2024 à 22:40, noreply@bluehost.com wrote : >>> FW >>> >>> ====================================================== >>> >>> >>> jpierremessager@gmail.com >>> >>> Domain: deonto-ethics.org >>> Description: A Web site hosted on server box2178.bluehost.com >>> contains several pages full of insults, libels and threats (in >>> French) targeting numerous people, include me. For instance : >>> https://deonto-ethics.org/impostures/index.php?topic=293.0 >> >> End of quotation. > > Yes enjoy, you'll have a glitch or Jacques Lavau's usuel trend: > "You are contradicting be because you've sodomized by your mother" > > These numerous pages, about almost all posters of fr.sci.physics > are in place for ages with the same kind of insults (in his mind). > I don't give a shit. They are telling far more about the one, Jacques > Lavau, who set up the site, than on everyone else. > > BTW, After decades I thing it is time to tear down this kind of > people space on the Internet (who brought Trump in USA, almost RN in > France). > > There are a few French speaking people around. Enjoy (not)! Next > steps will be in courts. > > > > >> Now, about the facts in transactional subquantic microphysics, it was >> so inevitable that we are half a dozen to have independantly >> discovered some parts of it, and John Gleason Cramer is only one of >> them. One may wonder why it was not discovered around 1932 : they had >> all the necessary pieces in hands (but not in mind...). >> A handbook is available, but I warn you to wait for the ninth edition, >> much increased. >> https://www.lulu.com/fr/shop/jacques-lavau/transactional-quantum-microphysics-principles-and-applications/paperback/product-1mmdgqgr.html Tes ordures, Lavau, n'ont jamais desservi que toi-même. Je m'en tape des saloperies que tu as copiées en ligne sur la plupart des participants à Usenet-FR. Tu es tellement dingue que tu ne peux pas réaliser que son effet argumentatif est inverse de ce que tu crois. Tu es mentalement malade, comme Éric. Je m'en tape. À l'heure des Trumps et des Barnellas, Zemmour, bon, tes potes donc, il faut, je pense, pousser un peu le curseur. Next step will be before the court. I'm not joking.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 22:33 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <5pYUE7AuIIxXXbvD-FBEt7q5VfY@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655969 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 00:01, Python a écrit : > À l'heure des Trumps et des Barnellas, Zemmour, bon, tes potes > donc, il faut, je pense, pousser un peu le curseur. Trump is fantastic! Trump president 2024 !!! Barnellas, Zemmour, Merluche, il va falloir que je monte à Paris t'expliquer pourquoi j'ai une bite bien plus grosse que la tienne. Meuh c'euh tous des faux opposants, hé! TOUS! Ils font tous parti de la French american fondation, hé! Au parlement européen soit ils n'y sont jamais (Barnellas), soit ils se trompe sustématiquement de bouton en montrant leur ultra(européisme macroniste. C'est des faux opposants. N'aie pas peur, ils sont tous avec toi pour la régionalisation de la France, avec plein de Pays indépendant, comme ta Sainte Bratagne. C'est des faux, je te dis. Mais arrêtes d'avoir peur pour rien... R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 22:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <B0l5TOOoKi-5na1ioYEZoZBFaT0@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655968 |
Le 14/08/2024 à 23:54, Python a écrit : > Yes enjoy, you'll have a glitch or Jacques Lavau's usuel trend: > "You are contradicting be because you've sodomized by your mother" > > These numerous pages, about almost all posters of fr.sci.physics > are in place for ages with the same kind of insults (in his mind). > I don't give a shit. They are telling far more about the one, Jacques > Lavau, who set up the site, than on everyone else. > > BTW, After decades I thing it is time to tear down this kind of > people space on the Internet (who brought Trump in USA, almost RN in > France). > > There are a few French speaking people around. Enjoy (not)! Next > steps will be in courts. But Donald Trump is very good. Trump 2024!!! One of the rare presidents who has not started any war in the world. As for the French National Rally, it's pure bullshit, they are all Macronists as the leftist parties (LFI) are all Macronists. Mélenchon invites to vote massively for Macron at 8:00 p.m. in the first round, and Marine Le Pen deliberately loses her last debate. Everything is oiled, they are all the same. Don't worry, your bank account compared to that of Merluche, or Marinette, it's Laurel and Hardy... If you knew.... Bah bien sûr... Jean-Pierre, Jean-Pierre, t'es encore plus nul en politique qu'en physique théorique... :)) R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 00:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <v9jbbj$iefe$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655970 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 00:24, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : > Le 14/08/2024 à 23:54, Python a écrit : >> Yes enjoy, you'll have a glitch or Jacques Lavau's usuel trend: >> "You are contradicting be because you've sodomized by your mother" >> >> These numerous pages, about almost all posters of fr.sci.physics >> are in place for ages with the same kind of insults (in his mind). >> I don't give a shit. They are telling far more about the one, Jacques >> Lavau, who set up the site, than on everyone else. >> >> BTW, After decades I thing it is time to tear down this kind of >> people space on the Internet (who brought Trump in USA, almost RN in >> France). >> >> There are a few French speaking people around. Enjoy (not)! Next >> steps will be in courts. > > > But Donald Trump is very good. See :-) (btw I do not support Macron, but everyone with a brain knows that) Macron is quite acting like Trump, these days. M.D. Lengrand should praise him :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 22:35 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <CAMH4wNkLN8xCzwkmPoEp7E3qtE@jntp> |
| In reply to | #655971 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 00:33, Python a écrit : > Macron is quite acting like Trump, these days. Les deux hommes se détestent. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 00:39 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <v9jbnr$iefe$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655973 |
Le 15/08/2024 à 00:35, Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : > Le 15/08/2024 à 00:33, Python a écrit : > >> Macron is quite acting like Trump, these days. > > Les deux hommes se détestent. They are of the same kind. In a lot of ways, you also. I could write down of long list of your (Macron, Trump, Lengrand) common traits that are obvious. Lavau too btw.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 10:56 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts |
| Message-ID | <li5u61Fnbi3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #655971 |
On 2024-08-14 22:33:23 +0000, Python said: > Le 15/08/2024 à 00:24, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >> Le 14/08/2024 à 23:54, Python a écrit : >>> Yes enjoy, you'll have a glitch or Jacques Lavau's usuel trend: >>> "You are contradicting be because you've sodomized by your mother" >>> >>> These numerous pages, about almost all posters of fr.sci.physics >>> are in place for ages with the same kind of insults (in his mind). >>> I don't give a shit. They are telling far more about the one, Jacques >>> Lavau, who set up the site, than on everyone else. >>> >>> BTW, After decades I thing it is time to tear down this kind of >>> people space on the Internet (who brought Trump in USA, almost RN in >>> France). >>> >>> There are a few French speaking people around. Enjoy (not)! Next >>> steps will be in courts. >> >> >> But Donald Trump is very good. > > See :-) > > (btw I do not support Macron, but everyone with a brain knows that) > > Macron is quite acting like Trump, these days. A bit of an exaggeration, I think (and hope). Dragging his feet over nominating a Prime Minister is worrying, certainly, but maybe he's hoping to avoid a débacle that might result from having a minority government that will certainly lose a vote of no confidence within a short time of governing. > M.D. Lengrand should > praise him :-) -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-14 13:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <v9i4fg$bvnu$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #655904 |
Le 13/08/2024 à 18:29, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : > Le 13/08/2024 à 17:15, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > > Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say? Of course not, but they are certainly more credible than a demented old country doctor who pretends that SR is wrong, Einstein is a "anglo-saxon plot", that the Titanic didn't collide with an iceberg, has a lot of uninteresting claims about theology nobody cares about, propagated numerous fake news and spend most of his time bragging about the size of his genitals. > There is something quite strange about human beings from a behavioral > point of view. They say that we must form our own ideas, have free will, > and not swallow everything we hear. > But I have often noticed that they do the opposite. > I have never understood this discrepancy. > Don't laugh, friends, but it is quite logical, in the human system, that > people like the buffoon Python accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, > because I am immensely more Cartesian than him insofar as I practice > methodical doubt (which has saved my life at least once). > Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this > guy who swallows everything? The guy, you tell him that four days after > its first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he swallows it, and > those who doubt, he attacks them, he humiliates them, he harasses them, > he beats them up like an Orwellian police bob. > Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled in him (he read it > in the newspapers) he swallows it without even making a face. > Should we believe what scientists say? Should we believe what the media > say? For him, yes, we must swallow everything and not think. > Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I love it. > I think we must apply methodical doubt. > And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit a flying saucer, I > don't believe it at all. The ship was poorly designed enough not to > break apart in half on its own in the middle of the ocean just hours > after it was launched. > Problem: it's too inexpressible. What will entire nations think of us if > we reveal that Royal Navy ships break apart on their own as soon as they > are launched? We had to invert a flying saucer, and millions of little > Pythons would not only swallow it all, but declare total war on > conspiracy theorists and other doubters. All this bullshit couldn't change anything to the FACT that I have proven, black and white, that your claims are contradictory and contradict the principle of Relativity. You are evading the issue. You look as desperate as Donald Trump these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-15 07:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <li5jlpFlo18U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #655904 |
Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 18:29 schrieb Richard Hachel: > Le 13/08/2024 à 17:15, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > > Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say? > There is something quite strange about human beings from a behavioral > point of view. They say that we must form our own ideas, have free will, > and not swallow everything we hear. ... > Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled in him (he read it > in the newspapers) he swallows it without even making a face. > Should we believe what scientists say? Should we believe what the media > say? For him, yes, we must swallow everything and not think. > Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I love it. > I think we must apply methodical doubt. > And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit a flying saucer, I > don't believe it at all. The ship was poorly designed enough not to > break apart in half on its own in the middle of the ocean just hours > after it was launched. My own theory about the Titanic: the Titanic was secretly swapped for her sister ship Olympic. The Olympic had a bent bow, because she collided with a German submarine. This turned out to be uncurable, hence the Olympic and the Titanic swapped their names and the Olympic was deliberatly sunken, but as 'Titanic'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web