Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #654922 > unrolled thread

Relativistic aberration

Started byRichard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
First post2024-07-14 22:30 +0000
Last post2024-08-10 10:40 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 234 — 30 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-14 22:30 +0000
    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 02:52 +0000
      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 07:15 +0200
        Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 13:04 +0000
          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 15:08 +0200
      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 11:58 +0000
        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 12:33 +0000
          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 12:55 +0000
            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 16:12 +0000
              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-15 18:53 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 17:01 +0000
              Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 17:08 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 20:24 +0000
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 20:59 +0000
                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 21:54 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 22:30 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-15 23:21 +0000
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-16 12:18 +0000
                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-16 14:47 +0000
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-17 09:05 +0200
                                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-17 12:05 +0000
                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-17 14:16 +0200
                                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-17 20:26 +0000
                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-17 23:34 +0200
                                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-18 02:10 +0000
                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-18 05:41 +0200
                                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-31 15:23 +0000
                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Reign Batura <nuinr@giu.ru> - 2024-07-18 14:30 +0000
                                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 16:20 +0000
                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 18:34 +0200
                                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 13:08 +0000
                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 15:36 +0200
                                                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 14:32 +0000
                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 17:25 +0200
                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 17:49 +0000
                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-11 20:07 +0200
                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-11 20:19 +0000
                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-11 13:35 -0700
                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-11 13:39 -0700
                                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 22:49 +0200
                                                                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 02:42 +0000
                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 06:34 +0200
                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 13:50 -0700
                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 06:33 +0200
                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 12:53 +0000
                                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 15:21 +0200
                                                                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 15:27 +0200
                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 15:57 +0200
                                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 16:06 +0200
                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 16:15 +0200
                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 16:22 +0200
                                                                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 14:23 +0000
                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 17:30 +0200
                                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 17:36 +0200
                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 17:42 +0200
                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 17:46 +0200
                                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 17:51 +0000
                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-12 20:05 +0200
                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-12 23:44 +0000
                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 01:49 +0200
                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 02:14 +0200
                                                                                Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 18:32 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 03:46 +0200
                                                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-12 19:46 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 04:48 +0200
                                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Javis Orbán <tsnb@sia.hu> - 2024-08-13 10:25 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-14 10:09 +0200
                                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-14 10:22 +0200
                                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Balabaanoff Bibitinsky <yyinsy@krtikb.ru> - 2024-08-14 17:36 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 10:30 +0200
                                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 08:36 +0200
                                                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Mozhar Bairamkulov <aueail@oroamlt.ru> - 2024-08-13 07:30 +0000
                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 12:38 +0000
                                                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 15:27 +0200
                                                                                Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 13:47 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-13 15:54 +0200
                                                                                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 15:15 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 16:29 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 18:08 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:09 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-13 23:31 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-13 22:26 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-08-13 17:43 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 20:21 +0200
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-13 20:24 +0200
                                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 14:04 +0200
                                                                                            His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences... JC_Lavau <jacques.lavau@free.fr> - 2024-08-14 19:38 +0000
                                                                                              Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:32 +0000
                                                                                              Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 20:36 +0000
                                                                                              "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 23:54 +0200
                                                                                                Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:01 +0200
                                                                                                  Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with  facts  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:33 +0000
                                                                                                Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with  facts  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:24 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:33 +0200
                                                                                                    Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with  facts  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-14 22:35 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-15 00:39 +0200
                                                                                                    Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted   with facts Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-15 10:56 +0200
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-14 13:29 +0200
                                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-15 07:57 +0200
                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-13 06:18 +0200
                                                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Josh Vassilopulos <hsihos@shsvvai.gr> - 2024-08-12 19:11 +0000
                                                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-12 21:14 +0200
                                                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Pete Beaulieu <ieae@uabei.fr> - 2024-08-12 20:01 +0000
                                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Szűcs Kővári <amb@asyypag.hu> - 2024-08-11 15:59 +0000
                                              Re: Relativistic aberration Kalakos Angelopoulos <eko@gevaa.gr> - 2024-08-11 13:44 +0000
                                  Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-18 08:33 +0200
                                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-18 13:02 +0000
                                      Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-19 12:08 +0200
                                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-07-19 12:20 +0200
                                          Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-07-19 10:34 +0000
                                          Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-07-20 08:11 +0200
                                            Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 00:03 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-15 22:44 +0000
    Re: Relativistic aberration Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-07-31 11:04 +0800
      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 06:52 +0200
        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-07-31 07:03 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 08:08 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 15:10 +0000
            Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 11:32 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 13:37 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 11:39 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 14:17 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 15:05 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 13:29 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 15:33 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 16:26 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 16:35 +0200
                            Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 16:55 +0200
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-01 17:02 +0200
                                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 17:35 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 16:34 +0000
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-01 17:30 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 17:31 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 20:04 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 20:38 +0000
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 20:44 +0000
                    Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-02 22:53 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Dino Todorsky <idndr@kindsdi.ru> - 2024-08-02 21:49 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-01 22:06 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-01 22:57 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 21:30 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 06:23 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-01 21:03 +0000
                    Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-02 21:49 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 22:07 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:24 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:51 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 19:44 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 19:40 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 20:59 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 20:36 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 20:04 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 21:17 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Mitsuharu Sakakibara <aair@srkkrr.jp> - 2024-08-03 10:54 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-03 22:28 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:23 +0000
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:40 +0000
                            Re: Relativistic aberration "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-08-04 14:50 +0200
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-04 14:57 +0200
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-04 14:28 +0000
                                Re: Relativistic aberration Egorov Zheludkov <kzaoko@jlhekj.ru> - 2024-08-04 16:19 +0000
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-04 14:30 +0000
                            Important to know Python opinion on this...  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-06 21:50 +0000
                              Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 02:26 +0200
                                Re: Important to know Python opinion on this...  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 01:31 +0000
                                  Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 03:40 +0200
                                    Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 03:44 +0200
                                    Re: Important to know Python opinion on this...  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 02:03 +0000
                                    Re: Important to know Python opinion on this... Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 05:57 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:45 +0000
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-03 21:50 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-08-02 21:52 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Conard Demakis <dd@sirrd.gr> - 2024-08-02 23:02 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-02 12:12 +0300
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 11:46 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 13:06 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 16:15 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 18:00 +0000
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 20:33 +0200
                            Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-02 18:50 +0000
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-02 21:12 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Milton Tolboev <lo@vtno.ru> - 2024-08-01 12:39 +0000
            Re: Relativistic aberration Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-08-02 12:04 +0300
      Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-07-31 12:50 +0200
        Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 15:45 +0200
      Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 14:30 +0000
        Re: Relativistic aberration Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2024-08-01 00:38 +0800
          Re: Relativistic aberration Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> - 2024-07-31 17:12 +0000
          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-07-31 20:37 +0200
    Re: Relativistic aberration film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2024-08-07 10:05 +0000
      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 12:14 +0200
      Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:16 +0000
        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:19 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-07 13:37 +0000
            Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:40 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:54 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:57 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:07 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:09 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 16:21 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 16:23 +0200
          Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-07 15:52 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-07 15:53 +0200
            Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-08 09:05 +0200
              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 13:17 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:33 +0000
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:38 +0000
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 16:40 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 14:52 +0000
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@org.invalid> - 2024-08-08 14:56 +0000
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:10 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:12 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:23 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:25 +0200
                            Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:37 +0200
                              Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-08 17:40 +0200
                                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-08 17:54 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-08 16:25 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-11 11:26 +0200
                Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-09 07:35 +0200
                  Re: Relativistic aberration Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-08-09 10:56 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 12:06 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 12:41 +0000
                      Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-09 15:57 +0000
                        Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-09 19:08 +0200
                          Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 03:27 +0000
                            Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 05:45 +0200
                              Re: Relativistic aberration hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) - 2024-08-10 13:24 +0000
                                Re: Relativistic aberration Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-08-10 17:35 +0200
                        Re: Relativistic aberration  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> - 2024-08-09 17:16 +0000
                          Re: Relativistic aberration nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-08-09 20:44 +0200
                    Re: Relativistic aberration Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-08-10 10:17 +0200
                      Re: Relativistic aberration Blaine Kántor <kndisk@ibgkk.hu> - 2024-08-10 10:40 +0000

Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12  Next page →


#655877

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2024-08-12 17:08 -0700
Message-ID<5ZudncmrKqWKOSf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#655876
On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>
>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>
>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>
> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>
>
>

Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
for your infantile in-group out-casting.

It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.

Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
the deserved and the after-life according to morals
doesn't mean much, to many.

For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.

There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.


Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
both advise and are advised what's measure according to
their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
just, not the one most think they have.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655878

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-13 02:14 +0200
Message-ID<v9e8hi$3fish$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655877
Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>
>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>
>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>
>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
> 
> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
> 
> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
> doesn't mean much, to many.
> 
> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
> 
> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
> 
> 
> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
> just, not the one most think they have.

Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655879

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2024-08-12 18:32 -0700
Message-ID<1vycnbIRxZctKif7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#655878
On 08/12/2024 05:14 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>>
>>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>>
>>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>>
>>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
>> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
>> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
>>
>> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
>> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
>> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
>> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
>>
>> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
>> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
>> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
>> doesn't mean much, to many.
>>
>> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
>>
>> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
>> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
>> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
>> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
>>
>>
>> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
>> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
>> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
>> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
>> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
>> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
>> just, not the one most think they have.
>
> Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.
>
>
>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tODnCZvVtLg&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=15

The fall gravity is a great idea, though it does involve
having a super-fluid and tachyonic model of flux,
while theory today, has officially "no opinion, is the opinion",
because otherwise gravitating bodies would constantly be doing
work and violate conservation and perpetual motion, or
rather perpetual work output of an otherwise closed system.

I think it's a good idea if you have the time and capacity,
to consider something like d'Espagnat's Philosophy and Physics,
as with respect to, Einstein's "model physicist" and "model
philosopher", that as a theoretical physicist he talks about
or rather writes about in his book that he left for us.


If you don't know Bohm, David Bohm, particularly for Implicate
Order, I'd say you're missing out, where Bohm-deBroglie and
the pilot wave in quantum mechanics wave/particle duality wave
theory, is a result of having all the data on the table.

So, I can just point to them, while at the same time,
any good theory of everything physics-wise has to also
be one mathematics-wise, for there to be one, at all.

So, fall gravity is a natural and given enough thought
necessary feature of a theory where all the other usual
principles of the theory of physics, which is only sum-of-histories
sum-of-potentials and least action, all hold, all the time.


Then, that the Parameterized Post-Newtonian _is_ the
Ephemeris in effect, and is updated regularly,
is a fact that is required to drive the updates to
the clocks to the satellites in their orbits so that
all the receivers at the ground-stations can be dirt-cheap
solid-state simple-theory minders and keepers of you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655880

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-13 03:46 +0200
Message-ID<v9edtj$3fish$9@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655879
Le 13/08/2024 à 03:32, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 08/12/2024 05:14 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>>>
>>>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>>>
>>>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>>>
>>>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
>>> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
>>> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
>>>
>>> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
>>> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
>>> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
>>> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
>>>
>>> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
>>> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
>>> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
>>> doesn't mean much, to many.
>>>
>>> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
>>>
>>> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
>>> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
>>> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
>>> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
>>> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
>>> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
>>> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
>>> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
>>> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
>>> just, not the one most think they have.
>>
>> Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tODnCZvVtLg&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=15
> 
> The fall gravity is a great idea, though it does involve
> having a super-fluid and tachyonic model of flux,
> while theory today, has officially "no opinion, is the opinion",
> because otherwise gravitating bodies would constantly be doing
> work and violate conservation and perpetual motion, or
> rather perpetual work output of an otherwise closed system.
> 
> I think it's a good idea if you have the time and capacity,
> to consider something like d'Espagnat's Philosophy and Physics,
> as with respect to, Einstein's "model physicist" and "model
> philosopher", that as a theoretical physicist he talks about
> or rather writes about in his book that he left for us.
> 
> 
> If you don't know Bohm, David Bohm, particularly for Implicate
> Order, I'd say you're missing out, where Bohm-deBroglie and
> the pilot wave in quantum mechanics wave/particle duality wave
> theory, is a result of having all the data on the table.
> 
> So, I can just point to them, while at the same time,
> any good theory of everything physics-wise has to also
> be one mathematics-wise, for there to be one, at all.
> 
> So, fall gravity is a natural and given enough thought
> necessary feature of a theory where all the other usual
> principles of the theory of physics, which is only sum-of-histories
> sum-of-potentials and least action, all hold, all the time.
> 
> 
> Then, that the Parameterized Post-Newtonian _is_ the
> Ephemeris in effect, and is updated regularly,
> is a fact that is required to drive the updates to
> the clocks to the satellites in their orbits so that
> all the receivers at the ground-stations can be dirt-cheap
> solid-state simple-theory minders and keepers of you.
> 
> 

Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655881

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2024-08-12 19:46 -0700
Message-ID<uMecnSbjm6uMVCf7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#655880
On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 13/08/2024 à 03:32, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>> On 08/12/2024 05:14 PM, Python wrote:
>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>>> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>>>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>>>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>>>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>>>>
>>>>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>>>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>>>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>>>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>>>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>>>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
>>>> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
>>>> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
>>>>
>>>> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
>>>> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
>>>> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
>>>> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
>>>>
>>>> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
>>>> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
>>>> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
>>>> doesn't mean much, to many.
>>>>
>>>> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
>>>>
>>>> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
>>>> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
>>>> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
>>>> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
>>>> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
>>>> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
>>>> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
>>>> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
>>>> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
>>>> just, not the one most think they have.
>>>
>>> Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tODnCZvVtLg&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=15
>>
>>
>> The fall gravity is a great idea, though it does involve
>> having a super-fluid and tachyonic model of flux,
>> while theory today, has officially "no opinion, is the opinion",
>> because otherwise gravitating bodies would constantly be doing
>> work and violate conservation and perpetual motion, or
>> rather perpetual work output of an otherwise closed system.
>>
>> I think it's a good idea if you have the time and capacity,
>> to consider something like d'Espagnat's Philosophy and Physics,
>> as with respect to, Einstein's "model physicist" and "model
>> philosopher", that as a theoretical physicist he talks about
>> or rather writes about in his book that he left for us.
>>
>>
>> If you don't know Bohm, David Bohm, particularly for Implicate
>> Order, I'd say you're missing out, where Bohm-deBroglie and
>> the pilot wave in quantum mechanics wave/particle duality wave
>> theory, is a result of having all the data on the table.
>>
>> So, I can just point to them, while at the same time,
>> any good theory of everything physics-wise has to also
>> be one mathematics-wise, for there to be one, at all.
>>
>> So, fall gravity is a natural and given enough thought
>> necessary feature of a theory where all the other usual
>> principles of the theory of physics, which is only sum-of-histories
>> sum-of-potentials and least action, all hold, all the time.
>>
>>
>> Then, that the Parameterized Post-Newtonian _is_ the
>> Ephemeris in effect, and is updated regularly,
>> is a fact that is required to drive the updates to
>> the clocks to the satellites in their orbits so that
>> all the receivers at the ground-stations can be dirt-cheap
>> solid-state simple-theory minders and keepers of you.
>>
>>
>
> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>
>

I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice
to people with real medical problems.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655882

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-13 04:48 +0200
Message-ID<v9ehhh$3fish$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655881
Le 13/08/2024 à 04:46, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 03:32, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>> On 08/12/2024 05:14 PM, Python wrote:
>>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 02:08, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
>>>>> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>>>>>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>>>>>> ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>>>>>>> coming out about an afterlife,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> he should really be worried about his future:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>>>>>>> abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>>>>>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>>>>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>>>>>>> with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>>>>>>> death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
>>>>> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word,
>>>>> for your infantile in-group out-casting.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems he's reflecting upon that according to some
>>>>> popular theories of justice delivered eventually,
>>>>> that liars, gossips, and such are doomed to an
>>>>> eternity of deprivation, strife, and agony.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it's not scientific to even aver the existence
>>>>> of the soul, it's super-scientific, and such notions of
>>>>> the deserved and the after-life according to morals
>>>>> doesn't mean much, to many.
>>>>>
>>>>> For a long time though it kept a lot of bad behavior in check.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was also for those who aren't carrot-and-stick types
>>>>> that there are carrots like that being nice and enlightened
>>>>> might allow karma to see reincarnation in a higher form,
>>>>> vis-a-vis, how you say, a usual theory where it's worm-food.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways though the clocks on-board the GPS satellites
>>>>> both advise and are advised what's measure according to
>>>>> their moving dead-reckoning, as with regards to the
>>>>> ephemeris, which everybody knows is Parameterized Post-Newtonian,
>>>>> which is not the same as "defined by Special Relativity",
>>>>> while though it is defined by a kind of Relativity,
>>>>> just, not the one most think they have.
>>>>
>>>> Ross, could you refrain from adding nonsense to nonsense? Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tODnCZvVtLg&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=15
>>>
>>>
>>> The fall gravity is a great idea, though it does involve
>>> having a super-fluid and tachyonic model of flux,
>>> while theory today, has officially "no opinion, is the opinion",
>>> because otherwise gravitating bodies would constantly be doing
>>> work and violate conservation and perpetual motion, or
>>> rather perpetual work output of an otherwise closed system.
>>>
>>> I think it's a good idea if you have the time and capacity,
>>> to consider something like d'Espagnat's Philosophy and Physics,
>>> as with respect to, Einstein's "model physicist" and "model
>>> philosopher", that as a theoretical physicist he talks about
>>> or rather writes about in his book that he left for us.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you don't know Bohm, David Bohm, particularly for Implicate
>>> Order, I'd say you're missing out, where Bohm-deBroglie and
>>> the pilot wave in quantum mechanics wave/particle duality wave
>>> theory, is a result of having all the data on the table.
>>>
>>> So, I can just point to them, while at the same time,
>>> any good theory of everything physics-wise has to also
>>> be one mathematics-wise, for there to be one, at all.
>>>
>>> So, fall gravity is a natural and given enough thought
>>> necessary feature of a theory where all the other usual
>>> principles of the theory of physics, which is only sum-of-histories
>>> sum-of-potentials and least action, all hold, all the time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then, that the Parameterized Post-Newtonian _is_ the
>>> Ephemeris in effect, and is updated regularly,
>>> is a fact that is required to drive the updates to
>>> the clocks to the satellites in their orbits so that
>>> all the receivers at the ground-stations can be dirt-cheap
>>> solid-state simple-theory minders and keepers of you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>>
>>
> 
> I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice
> to people with real medical problems.
> 
> 

You have medical problems, no doubt about that Ross.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655888

FromJavis Orbán <tsnb@sia.hu>
Date2024-08-13 10:25 +0000
Message-ID<v9fcba$2m6ee$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#655881
Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
>> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>
> I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice to people with
> real medical problems.

correct observation, my friend. It just came to me, that "viruses" are a 
capitalist sham, perpetrated by medical doctors, media and hospitals, to 
simply kill humans faster.

firstly, "viruses" are NOT animals nor bacteria, to eat humans. Hence not 
existent, which is the 100% proof that "viruses", vaccines and the 
"danger" of CO2, are 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮, whereas capitalist perpetrators 
of america should be arrested sent to Siberia to work for the food they 
eat. Read this paper here

𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹_𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼_𝗼𝗳_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗼𝗳_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗿_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻_𝗶𝗻_𝗞𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗸
https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/vRm9kbAHMlGk

𝗨.𝗦._𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗢𝗥_𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠_𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗢𝗬𝗘𝗗_𝗕𝗬_𝗨𝗞𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘'𝗦_𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦_𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗞_𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡
https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/naezlhgDf3dx

𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻_𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗡'𝗧_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽,_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽_𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗗𝗜𝗗._𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/2VwFsxkXZIMn

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655925

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2024-08-14 10:09 +0200
Message-ID<li3714F9r6iU8@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#655888
Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Javis Orbán:
> Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
>> On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
>>> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>>
>> I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice to people with
>> real medical problems.
> 
> correct observation, my friend. It just came to me, that "viruses" are a
> capitalist sham, perpetrated by medical doctors, media and hospitals, to
> simply kill humans faster.
> 
> firstly, "viruses" are NOT animals nor bacteria, to eat humans. Hence not
> existent, which is the 100% proof that "viruses", vaccines and the
> "danger" of CO2, are 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮, whereas capitalist perpetrators
> of america should be arrested sent to Siberia to work for the food they
> eat. Read this paper here
> 
> 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹_𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼_𝗼𝗳_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗼𝗳_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗿_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻_𝗶𝗻_𝗞𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗸
> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/vRm9kbAHMlGk
> 
> 𝗨.𝗦._𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗢𝗥_𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠_𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗢𝗬𝗘𝗗_𝗕𝗬_𝗨𝗞𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘'𝗦_𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦_𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗞_𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡
> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/naezlhgDf3dx
> 
> 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻_𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗡'𝗧_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽,_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽_𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗗𝗜𝗗._𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/2VwFsxkXZIMn

My theory:

the state of Israel is simply too hot, hence the Jews shall relocate to 
some other and more pleasant regions.

To 'help' this development, war and trouble is needed and for this the 
'enemy'.

As possible goal of this 'New Exodus' there is only one possible country 
in sight: the Ukraine!

To wipe the annyoing inhabitants from that area another war is need, 
which till now is going on.

To deter that stream of people from other more peaceful regions like the 
UK or the USA, those regions are in trouble, too.

But how about Germany?

Germans are really nice people and really like Jews (despite rumors 
saying otherwise).


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655926

FromAthel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com>
Date2024-08-14 10:22 +0200
Message-ID<li37qcFarepU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#655925
On 2024-08-14 08:09:27 +0000, Thomas Heger said:

> Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Javis Orbán:

Don't encourage the troll.



-- 
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly 
in England until 1987.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655945

FromBalabaanoff Bibitinsky <yyinsy@krtikb.ru>
Date2024-08-14 17:36 +0000
Message-ID<v9ipvk$30tlh$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#655926
Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2024-08-14 08:09:27 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>> Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Javis Orbán:
> 
> Don't encourage the troll. --
> Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
> in England until 1987.

this fucking teethless inbreed cretin is saying he is a bastard of ukrane. French and British, kiss my ass. What a fucking idiot. The brit bastard pig fucked your mother french whore into she ass, what are trying to say

 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲𝘀_𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁_𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁_𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘁_𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿_𝗡𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺_𝗯𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘁𝘀_–_𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮
The suspect has reportedly been identified as Ukrainian national ‘Vladimir Z’ 
https://r%74.com/news/602603-germany-reports-arrest-warrant-nord-stream/

All of Germany's media is owned and controlled by people who look exactly like Blinken and Nuland...

BALTOPS22 (Baltic NATO Operations 2022)
These countries will exercise a myriad of capabilities, demonstrating the inherent flexibility of maritime forces. Exercise scenarios include amphibious, gunnery, anti-submarine, air defense, and mine clearance operations, as well as 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙫𝙚_𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙖𝙡, unmanned underwater and surface vehicle exercises, and medical responses.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-off-in-the-baltic-sea/
Participating nations include Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Türkiye, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655927

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-14 10:30 +0200
Message-ID<v9hpv0$bvnu$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655925
Le 14/08/2024 à 10:09, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Javis Orbán:
>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
>>>> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>>>
>>> I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice to people with
>>> real medical problems.
>>
>> correct observation, my friend. It just came to me, that "viruses" are a
>> capitalist sham, perpetrated by medical doctors, media and hospitals, to
>> simply kill humans faster.
>>
>> firstly, "viruses" are NOT animals nor bacteria, to eat humans. Hence not
>> existent, which is the 100% proof that "viruses", vaccines and the
>> "danger" of CO2, are 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮, whereas capitalist 
>> perpetrators
>> of america should be arrested sent to Siberia to work for the food they
>> eat. Read this paper here
>>
>> 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹_𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼_𝗼𝗳_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗼𝗳_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗿_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻_𝗶𝗻_𝗞𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗸
>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/vRm9kbAHMlGk
>>
>> 𝗨.𝗦._𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗢𝗥_𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠_𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗢𝗬𝗘𝗗_𝗕𝗬_𝗨𝗞𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘'𝗦_𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦_𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗞_𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡
>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/naezlhgDf3dx
>>
>> 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻_𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗡'𝗧_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽,_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽_𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗗𝗜𝗗._𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/2VwFsxkXZIMn
> 
> My theory:
> 
> the state of Israel is simply too hot, hence the Jews shall relocate to 
> some other and more pleasant regions.
> 
> To 'help' this development, war and trouble is needed and for this the 
> 'enemy'.
> 
> As possible goal of this 'New Exodus' there is only one possible country 
> in sight: the Ukraine!
> 
> To wipe the annyoing inhabitants from that area another war is need, 
> which till now is going on.
> 
> To deter that stream of people from other more peaceful regions like the 
> UK or the USA, those regions are in trouble, too.
> 


(This is a joke Thomas, right?)


> But how about Germany?
> 
> Germans are really nice people and really like Jews (despite rumors 
> saying otherwise).

Yep. Rumors.

It always bothered me that people despise Adolf Hitler so much but
never tell if they don't like the painter or the writer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655981

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2024-08-15 08:36 +0200
Message-ID<li5lvhFlo18U3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#655927
Am Mittwoch000014, 14.08.2024 um 10:30 schrieb Python:
> Le 14/08/2024 à 10:09, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> Am Dienstag000013, 13.08.2024 um 12:25 schrieb Javis Orbán:
>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 08/12/2024 06:46 PM, Python wrote:
>>>>> Ross. You need professional medical help. FAST.
>>>>
>>>> I think you're making a mockery and doing a disservice to people with
>>>> real medical problems.
>>>
>>> correct observation, my friend. It just came to me, that "viruses" are a
>>> capitalist sham, perpetrated by medical doctors, media and hospitals, to
>>> simply kill humans faster.
>>>
>>> firstly, "viruses" are NOT animals nor bacteria, to eat humans. Hence 
>>> not
>>> existent, which is the 100% proof that "viruses", vaccines and the
>>> "danger" of CO2, are 𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙨_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙝𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮, whereas capitalist 
>>> perpetrators
>>> of america should be arrested sent to Siberia to work for the food they
>>> eat. Read this paper here
>>>
>>> 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹_𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼_𝗼𝗳_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗼𝗳_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗿_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻_𝗶𝗻_𝗞𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗸
>>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/vRm9kbAHMlGk
>>>
>>> 𝗨.𝗦._𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗢𝗥_𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗠_𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗝𝗢𝗬𝗘𝗗_𝗕𝗬_𝗨𝗞𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘'𝗦_𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦_𝗞𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗞_𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡
>>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/naezlhgDf3dx
>>>
>>> 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻_𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗡'𝗧_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽,_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽_𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝗗𝗜𝗗._𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀
>>> https://old.bi%74%63%68%75te.com/%76%69%64eo/2VwFsxkXZIMn
>>
>> My theory:
>>
>> the state of Israel is simply too hot, hence the Jews shall relocate 
>> to some other and more pleasant regions.
>>
>> To 'help' this development, war and trouble is needed and for this the 
>> 'enemy'.
>>
>> As possible goal of this 'New Exodus' there is only one possible 
>> country in sight: the Ukraine!
>>
>> To wipe the annyoing inhabitants from that area another war is need, 
>> which till now is going on.
>>
>> To deter that stream of people from other more peaceful regions like 
>> the UK or the USA, those regions are in trouble, too.
>>
> 
> 
> (This is a joke Thomas, right?)

Well, it's more a hypothesis than a joke.

My observations were: there exists widespread antisemitism and 
xenophobia in the lower classes of the UK.

This is caused by mass immigration in 2014/15 (and onwards).

This was also the time of Russia annexing the Crimean 
peninsula,'Euro-Maidan' and the start of the civil war in Ukraine.

The outcome of that conflict was mass emigration of ukrainians and masiv 
loss of life in the war.

Mostly men were lost and femals stayed or went to western countries, too.

Now this development leaves kind of 'population vacuum', which would 
'suck' people in from somewhere else.

But whom?

Now the region today called 'Ukraine' was the former home of the people 
called 'Khazar'.

These people converted to Judaism many centuries ago and their offspring 
  are now mainly citizens of Israel.

Since there is trouble, too, this would fit, if we assume, that the 
'Ashkenazim' should be relocated and move to Ukraine.

To move them exactly there and nowhere else, the possible routes to 
other destinations needed to be closed.

To achive this, antisemitism in the UK was stirred up.


> 
> 
>> But how about Germany?
>>
>> Germans are really nice people and really like Jews (despite rumors 
>> saying otherwise).
> 
> Yep. Rumors.
> 
> It always bothered me that people despise Adolf Hitler so much but
> never tell if they don't like the painter or the writer.
> 
> 

Hitler wasn't a German, but from Austria (Austria is a different country 
and is much more antisemitic than Germany).

The Nazis were actually supported from the USA, Uk and Switzerland, 
mainly to attack the soviet union.

My own theory is, that 'my struggle' (Hitler's book) wasn't written by 
Hitler himself, but by some unknown author, who belonged to British 
intelligence and the so called 'Tavistock institute for Human Relations'.

The origional version was imho the version actually published by 
Paternoster Library in 1933.

This was (badly) translated into German by Hess and his coworkers in 
Landsberg prison (which Hitler himself vitied only once and very briefly).

Hitler himself was according to Greg Hallet a British spy. He had, 
according to my own theory, the real name 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655887

FromMozhar Bairamkulov <aueail@oroamlt.ru>
Date2024-08-13 07:30 +0000
Message-ID<v9f23i$2lqq5$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#655877
Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 08/12/2024 04:49 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>>> "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers,
>>> and whoremongers,
>>> and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>>> shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
>>> brimstone: which is the second death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>
>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>
> Perhaps you'd be happier with "odd" instead of "weird",
> it's even less letters to spell and mouth out a word, for your infantile
> in-group out-casting.

dr harnagel is correct, the french python is a wanker not undrestanding 
anything. A wanker at his age. Everything out of his mouth is stupid.

here's another fucking stupid overpaid wanker, who should be arrested sent 
to Siberia to work for the food he eats.

 𝗨𝗦_𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿_𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀_𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢_𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘁𝘀_𝘁𝗼_𝗳𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁_𝗳𝗼𝗿_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲
Foreigners could help get F-16s into combat “sooner rather than later,” 
Lindsey Graham has said
https://www.r%74.com/news/602516-ukraine-f16-pilots-lindsey-graham/

Why does this dangerous idiot always remind me of that other idiot McCain? 
Same kind of brain tumor?

So, planes given by NATO, loaded with NATO weapons, guided by NATO AWACS, 
starting from NATO airfields in NATO country Romania, and flown by NATO 
pilots. Reasons enough, seems to me, for Russia to bomb those airfields in 
Romania.

"Strong is the jewish blackmail in you, Lindsay"

PSYCHOPATH!! The fucking 𝙠𝙝𝙖𝙯𝙖𝙧_𝙜𝙤𝙮𝙨 are psychopaths, period, here it is.

Senator Graham is always the bravest of the brave when he does not have to 
put his life on the line. He was beaten by his mother and his wife, who is 
a man.

this guy lindsay is a fucking transvestite gay, even by his name, be 
fucked by his wife, who is a man, with a big cook, like the "first lady" 
of america named Michael.

there is no fucking shame in fucking america. Nor in science, physics nor 
in relativity. Kiss my ass, amrica.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655892

Fromhitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Date2024-08-13 12:38 +0000
Message-ID<28e6191fe1b0d86de8d155cedeb6592c@www.novabbs.com>
In reply to#655876
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:49:48 +0000, Python wrote:
>
> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
> >
> > ...  Considering all the evidence that's
> > coming out about an afterlife,
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
> >
> > he should really be worried about his future:
> >
> > "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
> > abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
> > and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
> > shall have their part in the lake which burneth
> > with fire and brimstone: which is the second
> > death." -- Revelation 21:8
>
> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?

A few years ago, I did a statistical analysis of
MacDougall's "experiment" and concluded that it
was 99.9% probable that one's body lost measurable
weight upon death.  It wasn't 21 grams as the Wiki
site says: that was the largest value.  MacDougall
experimented on seven terminal patients, but only
four had valid results (one died before he could
get his system set up, a nurse interfered with one
and something else happened with the third).  The
only valid criticism of his work is the paucity of
data.  He was kicked out of the hospital because
his work was considered to be macabre.

The modern reporting of his work is disingenuous
because it implies more precision than was involved:
MacDougall didn't weigh in grams, the four examples
were 3/8, 1/2, 1/2 and 3/4 ounce IIRC.

So it IS a "weird" result, but it's not quite BS.
Does it belong here?  Does Wozniak belong here?
I wouldn't post it if Wozniak didn't post his
blatant lies.  He needs the fear of God instilled
in him, IMHO :-)

I noticed you've been trying to deal with the
spammer(s).  That's probably as ineffective as my
dealing with spammer Wozniak. :-)

Anyway, the other three links concern near-death
experiences, which can be considered as anecdotal,
I guess, but it all adds up to serious doubts
about the belief system of atheists.

And then there's the AATIP revelations.  What are
these things?  Are they ET?  If so, they have physics
far beyond what we deem possible.  Is this related
to MacDougall and the NDEs?  I don't know, but doesn't
all this spark your curiosity?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655895

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-13 15:27 +0200
Message-ID<v9fmve$3t7j7$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655892
Le 13/08/2024 à 14:38, gharnagel a écrit :
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:49:48 +0000, Python wrote:
>>
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 01:44, gharnagel a écrit :
>> >
>> > ...  Considering all the evidence that's
>> > coming out about an afterlife,
>> >
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_After_Life_(Moody_book)
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_Is_for_Real
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracles_from_Heaven
>> >
>> > he should really be worried about his future:
>> >
>> > "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the
>> > abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers,
>> > and sorcerers, and idolaters, and ALL LIARS,
>> > shall have their part in the lake which burneth
>> > with fire and brimstone: which is the second
>> > death." -- Revelation 21:8
>>
>> Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
> 
> A few years ago, I did a statistical analysis of
> MacDougall's "experiment" and concluded that it
> was 99.9% probable that one's body lost measurable
> weight upon death.  It wasn't 21 grams as the Wiki
> site says: that was the largest value.  MacDougall
> experimented on seven terminal patients, but only
> four had valid results (one died before he could
> get his system set up, a nurse interfered with one
> and something else happened with the third).  The
> only valid criticism of his work is the paucity of
> data.  He was kicked out of the hospital because
> his work was considered to be macabre.
> 
> The modern reporting of his work is disingenuous
> because it implies more precision than was involved:
> MacDougall didn't weigh in grams, the four examples
> were 3/8, 1/2, 1/2 and 3/4 ounce IIRC.
> 
> So it IS a "weird" result, but it's not quite BS.
> Does it belong here?  Does Wozniak belong here?
> I wouldn't post it if Wozniak didn't post his
> blatant lies.  He needs the fear of God instilled
> in him, IMHO :-)
> 
> I noticed you've been trying to deal with the
> spammer(s).  That's probably as ineffective as my
> dealing with spammer Wozniak. :-)
> 
> Anyway, the other three links concern near-death
> experiences, which can be considered as anecdotal,
> I guess, but it all adds up to serious doubts
> about the belief system of atheists.
> 
> And then there's the AATIP revelations.  What are
> these things?  Are they ET?  If so, they have physics
> far beyond what we deem possible.  Is this related
> to MacDougall and the NDEs?  I don't know, but doesn't
> all this spark your curiosity?

This is complete BS.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655898

Fromhitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Date2024-08-13 13:47 +0000
Message-ID<1ba79173ec9450b5c84be28c9f1964c0@www.novabbs.com>
In reply to#655895
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:27:10 +0000, Python wrote:
>
> Le 13/08/2024 à 14:38, gharnagel a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:49:48 +0000, Python wrote:
> > >
> > > Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
> >
> > A few years ago, I did a statistical analysis of
> > MacDougall's "experiment" and concluded that it
> > was 99.9% probable that one's body lost measurable
> > weight upon death.  It wasn't 21 grams as the Wiki
> > site says: that was the largest value.  MacDougall
> > experimented on seven terminal patients, but only
> > four had valid results (one died before he could
> > get his system set up, a nurse interfered with one
> > and something else happened with the third).  The
> > only valid criticism of his work is the paucity of
> > data.  He was kicked out of the hospital because
> > his work was considered to be macabre.
> >
> > The modern reporting of his work is disingenuous
> > because it implies more precision than was involved:
> > MacDougall didn't weigh in grams, the four examples
> > were 3/8, 1/2, 1/2 and 3/4 ounce IIRC.
> >
> > So it IS a "weird" result, but it's not quite BS.
> > Does it belong here?  Does Wozniak belong here?
> > I wouldn't post it if Wozniak didn't post his
> > blatant lies.  He needs the fear of God instilled
> > in him, IMHO :-)
> >
> > I noticed you've been trying to deal with the
> > spammer(s).  That's probably as ineffective as my
> > dealing with spammer Wozniak. :-)
> >
> > Anyway, the other three links concern near-death
> > experiences, which can be considered as anecdotal,
> > I guess, but it all adds up to serious doubts
> > about the belief system of atheists.
> >
> > And then there's the AATIP revelations.  What are
> > these things?  Are they ET?  If so, they have physics
> > far beyond what we deem possible.  Is this related
> > to MacDougall and the NDEs?  I don't know, but doesn't
> > all this spark your curiosity?
>
> This is complete BS.

Okay, so you aren't curious.  Even about the AATIP stuff?

https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=aatip+ufo+footage#id=2&vid=7bfc7658cf746fc27c50af6747aaecff&action=click

Are those BS, too?

“There may be millions of inhabited worlds circling other
suns, harboring beings who to us would seem godlike, with
civilizations and cultures beyond our wildest dreams.”
 -- Arthur C. Clarke

Don't you think so?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655899

FromPython <python@invalid.org>
Date2024-08-13 15:54 +0200
Message-ID<v9fojc$3t7j7$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#655898
Le 13/08/2024 à 15:47, gharnagel a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:27:10 +0000, Python wrote:
>>
>> Le 13/08/2024 à 14:38, gharnagel a écrit :
>> >
>> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 23:49:48 +0000, Python wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Why are you introducing such weird bullshit?
>> >
>> > A few years ago, I did a statistical analysis of
>> > MacDougall's "experiment" and concluded that it
>> > was 99.9% probable that one's body lost measurable
>> > weight upon death.  It wasn't 21 grams as the Wiki
>> > site says: that was the largest value.  MacDougall
>> > experimented on seven terminal patients, but only
>> > four had valid results (one died before he could
>> > get his system set up, a nurse interfered with one
>> > and something else happened with the third).  The
>> > only valid criticism of his work is the paucity of
>> > data.  He was kicked out of the hospital because
>> > his work was considered to be macabre.
>> >
>> > The modern reporting of his work is disingenuous
>> > because it implies more precision than was involved:
>> > MacDougall didn't weigh in grams, the four examples
>> > were 3/8, 1/2, 1/2 and 3/4 ounce IIRC.
>> >
>> > So it IS a "weird" result, but it's not quite BS.
>> > Does it belong here?  Does Wozniak belong here?
>> > I wouldn't post it if Wozniak didn't post his
>> > blatant lies.  He needs the fear of God instilled
>> > in him, IMHO :-)
>> >
>> > I noticed you've been trying to deal with the
>> > spammer(s).  That's probably as ineffective as my
>> > dealing with spammer Wozniak. :-)
>> >
>> > Anyway, the other three links concern near-death
>> > experiences, which can be considered as anecdotal,
>> > I guess, but it all adds up to serious doubts
>> > about the belief system of atheists.
>> >
>> > And then there's the AATIP revelations.  What are
>> > these things?  Are they ET?  If so, they have physics
>> > far beyond what we deem possible.  Is this related
>> > to MacDougall and the NDEs?  I don't know, but doesn't
>> > all this spark your curiosity?
>>
>> This is complete BS.
> 
> Okay, so you aren't curious.  Even about the AATIP stuff?
> 
> https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=aatip+ufo+footage#id=2&vid=7bfc7658cf746fc27c50af6747aaecff&action=click
> 
> Are those BS, too?

Of course...

> “There may be millions of inhabited worlds circling other
> suns, harboring beings who to us would seem godlike, with
> civilizations and cultures beyond our wildest dreams.”
> -- Arthur C. Clarke
> 
> Don't you think so?

"may be". IMHO it is very very unlikely.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655903

Fromhitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Date2024-08-13 15:15 +0000
Message-ID<964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com>
In reply to#655899
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:54:52 +0000, Python wrote:
>
> Le 13/08/2024 à 15:47, gharnagel a écrit :
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:27:10 +0000, Python wrote:
> > >
> > > This is complete BS.
> >
> > Okay, so you aren't curious.  Even about the AATIP stuff?
> >
> >
> https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?fr=ymyy-t&ei=UTF-8&p=aatip+ufo+footage#id=2&vid=7bfc7658cf746fc27c50af6747aaecff&action=click
> >
> > Are those BS, too?
>
> Of course...

Interesting.  It did take a long time for scientists to
come around to the fact that rocks fell from the sky, but
those videos were recorded using some of the most advanced
equipment in existence, so it's much more credible than
peasants claiming they saw a rock falling.

>> “There may be millions of inhabited worlds circling other
>> suns, harboring beings who to us would seem godlike, with
>> civilizations and cultures beyond our wildest dreams.”
>> -- Arthur C. Clarke
>>
>> Don't you think so?
>
> "may be". IMHO it is very very unlikely.

IMHO, it's inevitable considering that the universe is at
least three times as old as our solar system.  Add to that
the probability that huge hydrogen stars existed and went
supernova in a few thousand years, spreading heavy elements
out, and the fact that there are trillions of galaxies.
Early civilizations have had 12 billion years to develop,
which fits the bill for Clarke's claim.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655904

From Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Date2024-08-13 16:29 +0000
Message-ID<GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
In reply to#655903
Le 13/08/2024 à 17:15, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

  Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say?
There is something quite strange about human beings from a behavioral 
point of view. They say that we must form our own ideas, have free will, 
and not swallow everything we hear.
But I have often noticed that they do the opposite.
I have never understood this discrepancy.
Don't laugh, friends, but it is quite logical, in the human system, that 
people like the buffoon Python accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, 
because I am immensely more Cartesian than him insofar as I practice 
methodical doubt (which has saved my life at least once).
Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this guy 
who swallows everything? The guy, you tell him that four days after its 
first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he swallows it, and those 
who doubt, he attacks them, he humiliates them, he harasses them, he beats 
them up like an Orwellian police bob.
Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled in him (he read it in 
the newspapers) he swallows it without even making a face.
Should we believe what scientists say? Should we believe what the media 
say? For him, yes, we must swallow everything and not think.
Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I love it.
I think we must apply methodical doubt.
And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit a flying saucer, I 
don't believe it at all. The ship was poorly designed enough not to break 
apart in half on its own in the middle of the ocean just hours after it 
was launched.
Problem: it's too inexpressible. What will entire nations think of us if 
we reveal that Royal Navy ships break apart on their own as soon as they 
are launched? We had to invert a flying saucer, and millions of little 
Pythons would not only swallow it all, but declare total war on conspiracy 
theorists and other doubters.

R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#655907

Fromhitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Date2024-08-13 18:08 +0000
Message-ID<7f383eca3ec4616e72373eac4d772e77@www.novabbs.com>
In reply to#655904
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:29:48 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
>   Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say?

Of course not.  Particularly when expressing opinions.

“All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal
more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic
and argument than others.”  -- Douglas Adams

And when they're presenting data, consider how it fits
in with previous data.  And wait for independent confir-
mation.

Consider the Gran Sasso report of FTL neutrinos.  I
doubted it because it didn't fit with extended SR.
And I was right.

> There is something quite strange about human beings
> from a behavioral point of view. They say that we must
> form our own ideas, have free will, and not swallow
> everything we hear.
>
> But I have often noticed that they do the opposite.
> I have never understood this discrepancy.
> Don't laugh, friends, but it is quite logical, in the
> human system, that people like the buffoon Python
> accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, because I am
> immensely more Cartesian than him insofar as I practice
> methodical doubt (which has saved my life at least once).

"I try to be skeptical of everything (I don't believe
there's any other way to learn about how the world really
works)." -- Lawrence M. Krauss

> Let's take the case of Python. What could be less
> scientific than this guy who swallows everything?

But, he categorically doesn't.

> The guy, you tell him that four days after its
> first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he
> swallows it,

I doubt that :-)

> and those who doubt, he attacks them, he humiliates
> them, he harasses them, he beats them up like an
> Orwellian police bob.

Like opinions, some doubt is more rational than other
doubts.  Wozniak's doubts, for example, are quite
irrational.  Some of yours are, too.

> Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled
> in him (he read it in the newspapers) he swallows it
> without even making a face.

This is contrary to the facts, Richard.

> Should we believe what scientists say? Should we
> believe what the media say? For him, yes, we must
> swallow everything and not think.

I think his pronouncements are much more valid than yours.

> Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I
> love it.  I think we must apply methodical doubt.
> And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit
> a flying saucer, I don't believe it at all. The ship
> was poorly designed enough not to break apart in
> half on its own in the middle of the ocean just
> hours after it was launched.
> Problem: it's too inexpressible. What will entire
> nations think of us if we reveal that Royal Navy
> ships break apart on their own as soon as they
> are launched? We had to invert a flying saucer, and
> millions of little Pythons would not only swallow
> it all, but declare total war on conspiracy
> theorists and other doubters.
>
> R.H.

I think you're being a conspiracy theorist about
Python :-)
So who do you think he's conspiring with?  Looks to
me like that would be physicists who have lots and
lots of data to support their theories.

Argue against authoritarian dictates, fine, but
arguing against data may or may not be fine.  If
you believe it to be BAD data, find out why it's
bad - or wait for someone else to find out.

This applies to theories, too.  I did that in
DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101.  You, OTOH, was
skeptical.  Seems to me you were "Incapable of
questioning an idea that was instilled" in you :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web