Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661772 > unrolled thread

Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 01:04 +0000
    Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-08 17:50 -0800
      Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-03-09 02:21 +0000
        Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-03-08 20:36 -0800
          Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-03-10 03:16 +0000
      Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-03-09 11:30 +0200
    Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 21:21 -0600
      Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-03-31 02:49 +0000
        Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-30 22:51 -0500
          Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-07 21:51 +0000

#661772 — Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>
> <snip old crap>
>
>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>
> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.

Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
and ignorant as ever.
Lost cause!
>
> But what can one expect from a barking mad crackpot?

Laughable wretch, JimPee the Penisnino!

Woof-woof woof woof

Arindam >> da Vinci, as Arindam foresaw back in 1999 with his formula
for free energy
e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
 that upsets the silly laws of thermodynamics. Now the Chinese have used
permanent magnets to create free energy, and selling such motors galore
in alibaba.com

What fools these Eurocentric baboons be!

woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#661773

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip old crap>
>>
>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>
>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
> 
> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
> and ignorant as ever.

So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a
pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661774

On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip old crap>
>>>
>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>
>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>
>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>> and ignorant as ever.
>
> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a
> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?



Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o
stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino.  See if you can get
this basic fact into your fat head. For one thing, the former are very
very large mostly solid spheres.

Woof-woof, what incredible fools these Eurocentric baboons be!

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661777

In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>
>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>>
>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>>
>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>>> and ignorant as ever.
>>
>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a
>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?
> 
> 
> 
> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o
> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino.

Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity
can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely
different thing than pressure and has different units.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661794

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 2:28:16 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 3/9/25 4:21 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 4:36:39 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 1:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>>>>>> and ignorant as ever.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a
>>>>> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Suns and planets are not equivalent to tires and pressure cookers, o
>>>> stupid, pigheaded and ignorant JimPee the Penisnino.
>>>
>>> Yes, and that was exactly the point, barking mad crackpot, i.e. gravity
>>> can cause pressure in some circumstances but gravity is an entirely
>>> different thing than pressure and has different units.
>>
>> One cannot know whether to laugh of cry by such absurdity.

Indeed such is the surpassingly distressing result of generations of
foolish apes fed by the bullshit laws of thermodynamics, the depravity
of relativity and the bunkum of quantum. Their heads are fried with such
astounding nonsenses. No decency, no morality and no intelligence too.
Inevitable result of seeing wrong as right, and right as wrong. Sad.

So they need AI badly, having no NI. With lack of proper romantic
skills, they will have artificial robotic partners next, if they can so
afford, as Elon Musk has foreseen and will hugely profit by.

>
>
> That's because you're talking to the dead.

Hush, Roachie. Bigots like the Penisnino here consider talking to the
dead to be taboo.

woof woof woof woof

Bertitaylor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661778

On 2025-03-09 01:50:56 +0000, Jim Pennino said:

> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> <snip old crap>
>>> 
>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>> 
>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>> 
>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>> and ignorant as ever.
> 
> So what effect does gravity have on tire pressure or the pressure in a
> pressure cooker, barking mad crackpot?

Where there is no gravity no tire pressure is needed. More pressure is
needed in strong gravity than in weak gravity.

-- 
Mikko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#661775

On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip old crap>
>>
>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>
>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
> 
> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
> and ignorant as ever.
> Lost cause!
>


It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years 
back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he 
had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That 
moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to 
place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it.

He's farted out.

It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662223

On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip old crap>
>>>
>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>
>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>
>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>> and ignorant as ever.
>> Lost cause!
>>
>
>
> It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years
> back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he
> had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That
> moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to
> place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it.
>
> He's farted out.
>
> It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role.

As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats.

Woof woof

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662224

On 3/30/25 9:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>> On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>
>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>>
>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>>
>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>>> and ignorant as ever.
>>> Lost cause!
>>>
>>
>>
>> It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years
>> back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he
>> had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That
>> moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to
>> place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it.
>>
>> He's farted out.
>>
>> It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role.
> 
> As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats.
> 
> Woof woof
> 
> 


Sciencevas? Are you losing it too, like that Mitch something? Hey!... 
where's Mitch by the way! Is that one dead too?

I wouldn't do one fart for that son of a bitch.

But you?.. You know what your worth is to physics community. I will, not 
that long after you read this, fart a few hours getting you out of my 
system, and giving you back to Shiva in the most adequate way to respect 
your memory here in sci.physics.

And that'll be one 1 lb bag of pinto beans less in my fridge. It will be 
a nice good day, that day.

(don't forget to tell one of your 39 kids to post something here saying 
you're ready to be farted out)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#662524

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 3:51:00 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 3/30/25 9:49 PM, Bertitaylor wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 3:21:47 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/8/25 7:04 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:00:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In sci.physics Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the net
>>>>>> gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gravitational force and pressure are two different things, crackpot.
>>>>
>>>> Ridiculous penisnano Penisnino still around, and as stupid, pigheaded
>>>> and ignorant as ever.
>>>> Lost cause!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is Vulva vulvalizing by imitating "Jim Pennino" who died a few years
>>> back. He was 90 years old in 2016 (estimated by the choice of handgun he
>>> had). Are you assuming he is 99 years old now and still posting? That
>>> moron was super lucky to be 90 back then and alive, barely managing to
>>> place three words in his usenet post before retiring from it.
>>>
>>> He's farted out.
>>>
>>> It's that vulvat "Vulva" now assuming the dead man's role.
>>
>> As important to Sciencevas the wind that issues from the rears of rats.
>>
>> Woof woof
>>
>>
>
>
> Sciencevas? Are you losing it too,

Replace v in Sciencevas with a blank and then you get Science as.

like that Mitch something? Hey!...
> where's Mitch by the way! Is that one dead too?
>
> I wouldn't do one fart for that son of a bitch.
>
> But you?.. You know what your worth is to physics community. I will, not
> that long after you read this, fart a few hours getting you out of my
> system, and giving you back to Shiva in the most adequate way to respect
> your memory here in sci.physics.

Tch tch, Roachie. Arindam has ground the entire corrupt physics
community into the dust like so many toxic cigarette butts. Worry not,
as but a scurrying roach you never belonged there. Remain safe under
your stone until Trump squashes you.
>
> And that'll be one 1 lb bag of pinto beans less in my fridge. It will be
> a nice good day, that day.

Have it anyway in your little closet but don't light a match after. You
are such fun.
>
> (don't forget to tell one of your 39 kids to post something here saying
> you're ready to be farted out)

Well that reminds me of Ali baba and his treasures which Arindam will
get from the thieves.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web