Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #615948 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-24 08:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-07-28 21:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 167 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 08:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:27 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 08:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 18:30 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 10:39 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 20:38 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 12:06 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 21:25 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 09:56 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-01 22:47 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 17:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-02 11:51 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 16:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:14 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 12:06 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 03:18 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 17:24 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 11:55 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:28 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 15:03 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 15:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 23:53 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 21:18 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 11:13 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 21:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 16:57 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 15:25 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 23:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 06:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 12:28 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 09:50 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-15 01:03 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 06:21 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-16 01:05 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 22:09 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 07:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:04 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 10:15 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 09:52 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 19:01 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-15 01:06 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 23:42 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-15 16:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 20:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 01:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:21 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:15 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Rasih Taube <eusr@rruietrt.as> - 2023-07-27 16:51 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 12:47 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Virgilio Fabri <iivf@valvoffb.af> - 2023-07-27 17:08 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Cortez Granat <enrn@oezarnca.rt> - 2023-07-27 23:04 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 12:57 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 13:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 14:25 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 20:01 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 21:40 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 08:58 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-28 16:46 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:25 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-28 21:26 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-29 22:38 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 16:07 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-29 23:31 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 21:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 09:51 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 10:04 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 20:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 22:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Emanuele Babloev <vloe@abeebevb.ab> - 2023-07-30 09:19 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:39 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 16:11 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 18:47 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 16:54 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 16:30 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Beau Yukhotsky <bteu@hthakbes.yy> - 2023-07-30 20:43 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Foster Bass <bstb@trfbsbss.bf> - 2023-07-30 22:09 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 17:42 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 20:23 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:36 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 18:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 22:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-31 09:38 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 06:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-31 18:40 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:09 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:20 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-31 20:17 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-31 23:21 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 22:07 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 07:09 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 22:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:26 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:35 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:38 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:40 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:55 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-01 02:51 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-01 09:24 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 06:56 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-01 10:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 10:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-01 11:03 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 18:30 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 09:07 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 00:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:16 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 01:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-31 10:05 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 08:15 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Edurardo Babadzhanov <aoba@oubraboh.da> - 2023-07-30 20:06 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:25 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Shaun Michudo <hdud@musnmcai.uu> - 2023-07-30 20:18 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 16:29 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Darbel Doich <bhcb@lbadical.cd> - 2023-07-30 22:15 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:17 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:16 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 14:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 23:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 23:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 09:38 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 10:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 14:23 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 13:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 14:29 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 19:12 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-25 11:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:31 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-27 13:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 09:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Bunnie Belokhvostikov <kksb@ubsnonkk.hn> - 2023-07-24 17:02 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 19:34 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Alekzandr Billevich <ldni@leedahli.ah> - 2023-07-25 10:56 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:11 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-24 20:50 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 21:26 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 09:08 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-25 10:20 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-25 14:58 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 13:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 21:35 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:15 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-25 14:31 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:01 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-25 10:48 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 18:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-01 23:08 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 22:00 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 19:37 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Leeroy Babosoff <lolr@orolooof.bo> - 2023-07-26 10:46 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 07:36 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:19 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Parker Nasrutdinov <nkea@roatreru.ue> - 2023-07-28 21:42 +0000
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 07:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaa427$3j1mc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616470 |
Le 01/08/2023 à 07:07, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, >>> >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>> anything. >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. ah ah, dosens of times, sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 22:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2a08a0ef-3702-4b6a-86f7-472966d79e6an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616470 |
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > > >> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > > > > > Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > > and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > > inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > > anything. > > If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > > hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 23:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <00b519cd-a907-45fc-ba6d-6aca247d6d28n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616474 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > > > > >> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > > > > > > > Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > > > and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > > > inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > > > anything. > > > If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > > > hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. Your "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" rants are not changing anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 08:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaa92o$3jfo4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616475 |
Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, >>>>> >>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>>>> anything. >>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why >>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? >> >>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. >> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? > > Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable > in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. No you didn't. > Your "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" > rants are not changing anything. Definitely not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 23:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f10b3f6d-ed51-41a7-85e1-a11fd480ccc8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616478 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:35:07 UTC+2, Python wrote: > Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > >>>>> > >>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > >>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > >>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > >>>>> anything. > >>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > >>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > >> > >>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > >> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? > > > > Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable > > in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. > No you didn't. Yes, I did. Your "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" rants are not changing anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaa9ck$3jfo4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616479 |
Le 01/08/2023 à 08:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:35:07 UTC+2, Python wrote: >> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>>>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>>>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>>>>>> anything. >>>>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why >>>>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? >>>> >>>>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. >>>> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? >>> >>> Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable >>> in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. >> No you didn't. > > Yes, I did. If you want me to argue anymore, then you have to pay.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 23:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bb3eb24-68e6-43f8-a5a1-8a878b0ba6ean@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616480 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:40:23 UTC+2, Python wrote: > Le 01/08/2023 à 08:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:35:07 UTC+2, Python wrote: > >> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > >>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > >>>>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > >>>>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > >>>>>>> anything. > >>>>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > >>>>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > >>>> > >>>>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > >>>> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? > >>> > >>> Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable > >>> in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. > >> No you didn't. > > > > Yes, I did. > If you want me to argue anymore, then you have to pay. You've lost any contact with the reality, poor halfbrain. But that was obvious before.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 08:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaaa8i$3jfo4$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616481 |
Le 01/08/2023 à 08:43, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:40:23 UTC+2, Python wrote: >> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:35:07 UTC+2, Python wrote: >>>> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>>>>>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>>>>>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why >>>>>>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. >>>>>> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? >>>>> >>>>> Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable >>>>> in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. >>>> No you didn't. >>> >>> Yes, I did. >> If you want me to argue anymore, then you have to pay. > > You've lost any contact with the reality, poor halfbrain. > But that was obvious before. > Idiot and ignorant, good job Woz ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpAvcGcEc0k (Argument Clinic) Anyway, I know nothing I'm from Barcelona :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 02:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kirrrcFeuj4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616482 |
On 8/1/2023 1:55 AM, Python wrote: > Le 01/08/2023 à 08:43, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:40:23 UTC+2, Python wrote: >>> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 08:35:07 UTC+2, Python wrote: >>>>> Le 01/08/2023 à 08:26, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 07:45:01 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 10:07:23 PM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than >>>>>>>>>>> welcome, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>>>>>>>>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>>>>>>>>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>>>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>>>> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven >>>>>>>>> inconsistent, why >>>>>>>>> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported >>>>>>>>> inconsistency here? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. >>>>>>> So, Woz, you subscribe to the old "tell a lie often enough and >>>>>>> people will start to believe it" crowd... but I STILL claim that >>>>>>> in science you really, really need evidence! Got any? >>>>>> >>>>>> Al, you lying shit, I've pointed ditrectly 2 claims derivable >>>>>> in the physics of your idiot guru and denying each other. >>>>> No you didn't. >>>> >>>> Yes, I did. >>> If you want me to argue anymore, then you have to pay. >> >> You've lost any contact with the reality, poor halfbrain. >> But that was obvious before. >> > > Idiot and ignorant, good job Woz ! > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpAvcGcEc0k > (Argument Clinic) > > Anyway, I know nothing I'm from Barcelona :-) Manuel, is that really you?????? I had hoped you'd got away from Fawlty before now!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 09:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uab12u$3lnuo$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616470 |
On 8/1/2023 1:07 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, >>> >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing >>> anything. >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. You've repeated lots of crap hundreds (thousands?) of times. But the Big Lie concept is wrong, repeating your lie over and over doesn't make it true. Again, Paul wrote: "Evidence rules in science... got any?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 06:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e2190d5-3c8b-407f-8564-4f8c4d49ad9an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616501 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 15:24:49 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 8/1/2023 1:07 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > >> > >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > >>> > >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > >>> anything. > > >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > You've repeated lots of crap hundreds (thousands?) of times. And I've also repeated a proof of inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot guru dosens of times, stupid Mike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 10:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <733cccdf-91fc-4905-8b35-8fd280bc7f1en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616505 |
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:56:32 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 15:24:49 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > On 8/1/2023 1:07 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > >> > > >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > >>> > > >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > >>> anything. > > > > >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > > >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > > > > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > > You've repeated lots of crap hundreds (thousands?) of times. > And I've also repeated a proof of inconsistency of the mumble > of your idiot guru dosens of times, stupid Mike. All the relativists can say is, "duh experiments, duh texts, duh math." They can't defend their interpretation of the experiments, the reasoning behind the texts, or the lies told by the math.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <816e117e-93c9-43ef-a229-73eb29f31ce6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616521 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 19:49:25 UTC+2, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:56:32 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 15:24:49 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > On 8/1/2023 1:07 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > > >>> > > > >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > > >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > > >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > > >>> anything. > > > > > > >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > > > >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > > > > > > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > > > You've repeated lots of crap hundreds (thousands?) of times. > > And I've also repeated a proof of inconsistency of the mumble > > of your idiot guru dosens of times, stupid Mike. > All the relativists can say is, "duh experiments, duh texts, duh math." And speaking of math, it's always good to remind that their insane guru has announced its oldest, very important part false, as it didn't want to fit his mad delusions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-01 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ac9f93ec-0d8b-4851-b698-b839adb44f6dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616524 |
On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:54:30 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 19:49:25 UTC+2, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:56:32 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 15:24:49 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > > On 8/1/2023 1:07 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > > >> On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > >>> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>>> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > > > >>> and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > > > >>> inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > > > >>> anything. > > > > > > > > >> If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > > > > >> hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? > > > > > > > > > > I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike. > > > > You've repeated lots of crap hundreds (thousands?) of times. > > > And I've also repeated a proof of inconsistency of the mumble > > > of your idiot guru dosens of times, stupid Mike. > > All the relativists can say is, "duh experiments, duh texts, duh math." > And speaking of math, it's always good to remind that > their insane guru has announced its oldest, very important > part false, as it didn't want to fit his mad delusions. Yes, Einstein's science by decree. We have to pretend time is a spatial dimension.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 18:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2a9c3ba7-a133-44c2-9968-bf8b050380fcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616374 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 9:54:22 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. > Criticism of relativity is welcome here, as long as it is accompanied by evidence to support it. Unfortunately for you, you present zero evidence at all... so relativity remains unchallenged! Your fantasies are not evidence! > > In over 100 years no criticism of relativity has passed the test... and it only takes one! Just one! > > Evidence rules in science... got any? The speed of light can be constant in all frames. Why? Because a constant interval of clock time (including a clock second) doesn't exist. 1 A clock second/=1 B c;pck second
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 09:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kip4ucF6eaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616341 |
On 2023-07-30 18:44:33 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as > possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. Really?!! You must be reading a different version of this group from what I see. Otherwise, how do you explain how it comesabout that around 80% of the threads here are started by anti-Einstein fanatics? > In fact, the defenders of relativity here are willfully ignorant of the > criticism of it. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 00:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55b7c6fe-5f54-4fda-9d34-6e6bb4787770n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616385 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 09:08:01 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-30 18:44:33 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: > > > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as > > possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. > Really?!! You must be reading a different version of this group from > what I see. Otherwise, how do you explain how it comesabout that around > 80% of the threads here are started by anti-Einstein fanatics? We're for sure welcome here! Welcome with spitting, insults, slanders by fanatic relativistic doggies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 10:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kip8veFqf4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616386 |
On 2023-07-31 07:55:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said: > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 09:08:01 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-07-30 18:44:33 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: >> >>> I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as >>> possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. >> Really?!! You must be reading a different version of this group from >> what I see. Otherwise, how do you explain how it comesabout that around >> 80% of the threads here are started by anti-Einstein fanatics? > > We're for sure welcome here! Welcome with spitting, insults, slanders > by fanatic relativistic doggies. So, you're saying that the crackpots are such delicate flowers that they feel persecuted if people mention the errors and inconsistencies in their posts? -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 01:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2eb58515-0e35-419a-8c8c-bbd159461828n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616387 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 10:16:51 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-31 07:55:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said: > > > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 09:08:01 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2023-07-30 18:44:33 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: > >> > >>> I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as > >>> possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. > >> Really?!! You must be reading a different version of this group from > >> what I see. Otherwise, how do you explain how it comesabout that around > >> 80% of the threads here are started by anti-Einstein fanatics? > > > > We're for sure welcome here! Welcome with spitting, insults, slanders > > by fanatic relativistic doggies. > So, you're saying that the crackpots are such delicate flowers that You're not. And I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that you're constantly spitting, insulting and slandering. That's what is expected from indoctrinated doggies, that's what The Shit has been training you for.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 10:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kiq0u0F4is7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616387 |
On 7/31/2023 3:16 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-31 07:55:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak said: > >> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 09:08:01 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >>> On 2023-07-30 18:44:33 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: >>> >>>> I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as >>>> possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. >>> Really?!! You must be reading a different version of this group from >>> what I see. Otherwise, how do you explain how it comesabout that around >>> 80% of the threads here are started by anti-Einstein fanatics? >> >> We're for sure welcome here! Welcome with spitting, insults, slanders >> by fanatic relativistic doggies. > > So, you're saying that the crackpots are such delicate flowers that they > feel persecuted if people mention the errors and inconsistencies in > their posts? Only delicate where it comes to receiving.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web