Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #615948 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-24 08:05 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-07-28 21:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 167 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 08:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:27 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 08:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 18:30 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 10:39 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 20:38 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 12:06 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 21:25 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 09:56 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-01 22:47 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 17:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-02 11:51 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 16:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:14 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 02:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 12:06 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 03:18 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 17:24 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 11:55 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 11:28 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-07 15:03 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 15:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 23:53 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 21:18 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 11:13 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 21:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 16:57 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-07 15:25 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-07 23:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 06:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-09 12:28 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 09:50 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-15 01:03 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 06:21 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-16 01:05 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 22:09 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 07:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 19:04 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-09 10:15 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 09:52 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 19:01 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-15 01:06 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 23:42 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-15 16:17 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 17:28 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 20:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-07-25 01:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-24 17:21 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 08:35 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-26 16:15 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Rasih Taube <eusr@rruietrt.as> - 2023-07-27 16:51 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 12:47 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Virgilio Fabri <iivf@valvoffb.af> - 2023-07-27 17:08 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Cortez Granat <enrn@oezarnca.rt> - 2023-07-27 23:04 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 12:57 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 13:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 14:25 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-27 20:01 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 21:40 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 08:58 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-28 16:46 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:25 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-28 21:26 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-29 22:38 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 16:07 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-29 23:31 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-29 21:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 09:51 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 10:04 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 20:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 22:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Emanuele Babloev <vloe@abeebevb.ab> - 2023-07-30 09:19 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 10:39 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 16:11 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 18:47 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-30 16:54 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-30 16:30 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Beau Yukhotsky <bteu@hthakbes.yy> - 2023-07-30 20:43 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 16:24 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Foster Bass <bstb@trfbsbss.bf> - 2023-07-30 22:09 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 17:42 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 20:23 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-30 11:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:36 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 18:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 22:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-31 09:38 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 06:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-31 18:40 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:09 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:20 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-31 20:17 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-31 23:21 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 22:07 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 07:09 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 22:44 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:26 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:35 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:38 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:40 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:43 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-01 08:55 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-01 02:51 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-01 09:24 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 06:56 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-01 10:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 10:54 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-08-01 11:03 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 18:30 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 09:07 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 00:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 10:16 +0200
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 01:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-31 10:05 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 08:15 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Edurardo Babadzhanov <aoba@oubraboh.da> - 2023-07-30 20:06 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:25 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Shaun Michudo <hdud@musnmcai.uu> - 2023-07-30 20:18 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 16:29 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Darbel Doich <bhcb@lbadical.cd> - 2023-07-30 22:15 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:17 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:16 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-28 14:55 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 23:59 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 23:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 09:38 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 10:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-29 14:23 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 13:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 14:29 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 13:46 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 19:12 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-25 11:10 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:31 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-27 13:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 09:14 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Bunnie Belokhvostikov <kksb@ubsnonkk.hn> - 2023-07-24 17:02 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 19:34 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Alekzandr Billevich <ldni@leedahli.ah> - 2023-07-25 10:56 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:04 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:05 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-24 15:11 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-24 20:50 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 21:26 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 09:08 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-25 10:20 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-25 14:58 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 13:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 21:35 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:15 -0500
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-25 14:31 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:01 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-25 10:48 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 18:49 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-01 23:08 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 22:00 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 19:37 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Leeroy Babosoff <lolr@orolooof.bo> - 2023-07-26 10:46 +0000
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 07:36 -0700
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-28 15:19 -0400
Re: The speed of light can't be a universal constant in all frames Parker Nasrutdinov <nkea@roatreru.ue> - 2023-07-28 21:42 +0000
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 16:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <EbaYedyJUJoZurPDAlMhBdKKiTg@jntp> |
| In reply to | #616335 |
Le 30/07/2023 à 18:47, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit : > On 2023-07-30 16:11:29 +0000, Richard Hachel said: >> I beg you to explain to me what the Russians are doing on this forum. > > That's a question you need to address to the Russian propagandists who > constantly come here uninvited. +1 R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 16:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ua6h9c$30rab$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616335 |
On 7/30/2023 12:47 PM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-30 16:11:29 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > >> Le 30/07/2023 à 16:39, Volney a écrit : >>> On 7/30/2023 5:19 AM, Emanuele Babloev wrote: >>>> Volney wrote: >>> >>>> how the fuck you retards can live in that ð˜€ð˜ð—¼ð—¹ð—²ð—» >>>> ð—°ð—¼ð˜‚ð—»ð˜ð—¿ð˜†, >>> >>> I don't know, how can the åRu⚡︎⚡︎ianså live with >>> themselves when living in stolen Ukrainian territories like Crimea or >>> the Donbass. >>> >>> On the other hand, stealing territory is the åRu⚡︎⚡︎ianå >>> way, with åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå occupying huge stolen territory. >>> åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå needs to be reduced to Moscovia, with the rest >>> of the territory granted freedom and independence. >>> >>> Hell, åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå even stole its own name, "Russia"! It >>> comes from the old Kyiven Rus 1000 years ago, which, obvious from its >>> name, started in Kyiv in what's now Ukraine. Back then, Kyiv was a >>> city but Moscow was still a swampy forest. > > You're on dangerous ground there. Did England steal its name from the > Angles who came from the European continent in the 5th century? Did > France steal its name from the Franks, who were not French? Do the English deny the existence of the Angles on the European mainland? Do the French deny the existence of the Franks (or claim the Franks really were French)? >> I beg you to explain to me what the Russians are doing on this forum. > > That's a question you need to address to the Russian propagandists who > constantly come here uninvited. > > I'd like to ask it how much it gets paid to spread offtopic Russian propaganda here. But yes, I shouldn't respond to it at all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Beau Yukhotsky <bteu@hthakbes.yy> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 20:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ua6i2a$2rfg8$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #616356 |
Volney wrote: > I'd like to ask it how much it gets paid to spread offtopic Russian > propaganda here. But yes, I shouldn't respond to it at all. you can't. You never did. You seemingly are a waste of time. An idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 16:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kio2p9Fpg5jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616359 |
On 7/30/2023 3:43 PM, Beau Yukhotsky wrote: > Volney wrote: > >> I'd like to ask it how much it gets paid to spread offtopic Russian >> propaganda here. But yes, I shouldn't respond to it at all. > > you can't. You never did. You seemingly are a waste of time. An idiot. I'll take more idiots like Volney and fewer like you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Foster Bass <bstb@trfbsbss.bf> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ua6n2t$304gn$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #616363 |
whodat wrote: > On 7/30/2023 3:43 PM, Beau Yukhotsky wrote: >> Volney wrote: >>> I'd like to ask it how much it gets paid to spread offtopic Russian >>> propaganda here. But yes, I shouldn't respond to it at all. >> >> you can't. You never did. You seemingly are a waste of time. An idiot. > > I'll take more idiots like Volney excellent. You retards never walks alone.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 17:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kio7b6Fq9buU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616365 |
On 7/30/2023 5:09 PM, Foster Bass wrote: > whodat wrote: > >> On 7/30/2023 3:43 PM, Beau Yukhotsky wrote: >>> Volney wrote: >>>> I'd like to ask it how much it gets paid to spread offtopic Russian >>>> propaganda here. But yes, I shouldn't respond to it at all. >>> >>> you can't. You never did. You seemingly are a waste of time. An idiot. >> >> I'll take more idiots like Volney > > excellent. You retards never walks alone. The retard part of me walks with you, the sane advanced part walks with Volney. You take cheap shots like editing my words because you have nothing to be proud of...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3c11723-44a6-44ba-b76c-488fe43f4b0cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616334 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 9:11:33 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote: > Le 30/07/2023 à 16:39, Volney a écrit : > > On 7/30/2023 5:19 AM, Emanuele Babloev wrote: > >> Volney wrote: > > > >> how the fuck you retards can live in that 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻 > >> 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆, > > > > I don't know, how can the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ians卐 live with themselves when > > living > > in stolen Ukrainian territories like Crimea or the Donbass. > > > > On the other hand, stealing territory is the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 way, with > > 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 occupying huge stolen territory. 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 > > needs to be > > reduced to Moscovia, with the rest of the territory granted freedom and > > independence. > > > > Hell, 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 even stole its own name, "Russia"! It comes from > > the > > old Kyiven Rus 1000 years ago, which, obvious from its name, started in > > Kyiv in what's now Ukraine. Back then, Kyiv was a city but Moscow was > > still a swampy forest. > What is the relationship with the Poincaré transformations? > x"=(x+Vo.To)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) > y'=y > z'=z > To'=(To+x.Vo/c²)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²) > > I beg you to explain to me what the Russians are doing on this forum. > > R.H. Yes. Does Volney have to entertain them?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 20:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kino5mFntv7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616337 |
On 2023-07-30 18:10:04 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 9:11:33 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote: >> Le 30/07/2023 à 16:39, Volney a écrit :> > On 7/30/2023 5:19 AM, >> Emanuele Babloev wrote:> >> Volney wrote:> >> >> how the fuck you >> retards can live in that ð˜€ð˜ð—¼ð—¹ð—²ð—»> >> >> ð—°ð—¼ð˜‚ð—»ð˜ð—¿ð˜†,> >> > I don't know, how can the >> åRu⚡︎⚡︎ianså live with themselves when> > living> > in >> stolen Ukrainian territories like Crimea or the Donbass.> >> > On the >> other hand, stealing territory is the åRu⚡︎⚡︎ianå way, >> with> > åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå occupying huge stolen territory. >> åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå> > needs to be> > reduced to Moscovia, with the >> rest of the territory granted freedom and> > independence.> >> > Hell, >> åRu⚡︎⚡︎iaå even stole its own name, "Russia"! It comes >> from> > the> > old Kyiven Rus 1000 years ago, which, obvious from its >> name, started in> > Kyiv in what's now Ukraine. Back then, Kyiv was a >> city but Moscow was> > still a swampy forest. >> What is the relationship with the Poincaré transformations?> >> x"=(x+Vo.To)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)> y'=y> z'=z> >> To'=(To+x.Vo/c²)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)>> I beg you to explain to me what >> the Russians are doing on this forum.>> R.H. > Yes. Does Volney have to entertain them? He probably gets bored with answering the heaps of craziness from the likes of you. Nonetheless, I think he's making a mistake to reply to the Russian propagandists, but that's his choice. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 11:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7108b5da-7c7a-4c9d-b28a-aed7a264506fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616339 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:23:54 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-07-30 18:10:04 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: > > > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 9:11:33 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote: > >> Le 30/07/2023 à 16:39, Volney a écrit :> > On 7/30/2023 5:19 AM, > >> Emanuele Babloev wrote:> >> Volney wrote:> >> >> how the fuck you > >> retards can live in that 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻> >> > >> 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆,> >> > I don't know, how can the > >> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ians卐 live with themselves when> > living> > in > >> stolen Ukrainian territories like Crimea or the Donbass.> >> > On the > >> other hand, stealing territory is the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 way, > >> with> > 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 occupying huge stolen territory. > >> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐> > needs to be> > reduced to Moscovia, with the > >> rest of the territory granted freedom and> > independence.> >> > Hell, > >> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 even stole its own name, "Russia"! It comes > >> from> > the> > old Kyiven Rus 1000 years ago, which, obvious from its > >> name, started in> > Kyiv in what's now Ukraine. Back then, Kyiv was a > >> city but Moscow was> > still a swampy forest. > >> What is the relationship with the Poincaré transformations?> > >> x"=(x+Vo.To)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)> y'=y> z'=z> > >> To'=(To+x.Vo/c²)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)>> I beg you to explain to me what > >> the Russians are doing on this forum.>> R.H. > > Yes. Does Volney have to entertain them? > He probably gets bored with answering the heaps of craziness from the > likes of you. Nonetheless, I think he's making a mistake to reply to > the Russian propagandists, but that's his choice. > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. In fact, the defenders of relativity here are willfully ignorant of the criticism of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 14:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kinsdkFo1j3U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #616341 |
On 7/30/2023 1:44 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:23:54 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-07-30 18:10:04 +0000, Laurence Clark Crossen said: >> >>> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 9:11:33 AM UTC-7, Richard Hachel wrote: >>>> Le 30/07/2023 à 16:39, Volney a écrit :> > On 7/30/2023 5:19 AM, >>>> Emanuele Babloev wrote:> >> Volney wrote:> >> >> how the fuck you >>>> retards can live in that 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻> >> >>>> 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗿𝘆,> >> > I don't know, how can the >>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ians卐 live with themselves when> > living> > in >>>> stolen Ukrainian territories like Crimea or the Donbass.> >> > On the >>>> other hand, stealing territory is the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 way, >>>> with> > 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 occupying huge stolen territory. >>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐> > needs to be> > reduced to Moscovia, with the >>>> rest of the territory granted freedom and> > independence.> >> > Hell, >>>> 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 even stole its own name, "Russia"! It comes >>>> from> > the> > old Kyiven Rus 1000 years ago, which, obvious from its >>>> name, started in> > Kyiv in what's now Ukraine. Back then, Kyiv was a >>>> city but Moscow was> > still a swampy forest. >>>> What is the relationship with the Poincaré transformations?> >>>> x"=(x+Vo.To)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)> y'=y> z'=z> >>>> To'=(To+x.Vo/c²)/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)>> I beg you to explain to me what >>>> the Russians are doing on this forum.>> R.H. >>> Yes. Does Volney have to entertain them? >> He probably gets bored with answering the heaps of craziness from the >> likes of you. Nonetheless, I think he's making a mistake to reply to >> the Russian propagandists, but that's his choice. >> -- >> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. In fact, the defenders of relativity here are willfully ignorant of the criticism of it. Yet another low caste critique. One of the many things you fail to understand is that valid criticism of relativity is welcomed, it is the repetitive howling of the dogs of anti-science, such as the nonsense you peddle, that those of us interested in progress decry. "When will they ever learn?" You've made it clear you are incapable of learning anything. For acceptance, try alt.flame. The problem is they too have standards you probably will be unable to meet. Your posts will certainly be welcomed at /dev/zero. Try that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 18:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6319a3d1-0bfa-4f33-819e-4b55ede87ea8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616341 |
On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. Criticism of relativity is welcome here, as long as it is accompanied by evidence to support it. Unfortunately for you, you present zero evidence at all... so relativity remains unchallenged! Your fantasies are not evidence! In over 100 years no criticism of relativity has passed the test... and it only takes one! Just one! Evidence rules in science... got any?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-30 22:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cdfd8e63-5a53-450a-8dcd-e8b8efb472e2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616374 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 03:54:22 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. > Criticism of relativity is welcome here, as long as it is accompanied by evidence to support it. Unfortunately for you, you present zero evidence at all... so relativity remains unchallenged! Your fantasies are not evidence! Both lies, of course, the proof of the inconsistency of the mumble of your idiot gfuru is only provokin g Polish jokes from relativistic fanatics. > In over 100 years no criticism of relativity has passed the test... No surprise with a bunch of fanatic worshippers judging.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 09:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ua8dge$39klr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616380 |
On 7/31/2023 1:14 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 03:54:22 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> >>> I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. >> Criticism of relativity is welcome here, as long as it is accompanied by evidence to support it. Unfortunately for you, you present zero evidence at all... so relativity remains unchallenged! Your fantasies are not evidence! > > Both lies, of course, the proof of the inconsistency of > the mumble of your idiot gfuru is only provokin g Polish > jokes from relativistic fanatics. The only Polish joke here is yourself, janitor. Despite repeating a 40 year old joke here, I really have plenty of respect for the Polish people. They turned their country around from being a poor post-Soviet country to what it is now, with a military not to be messed with and their assistance of the Ukrainian people in their time of need. Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, but is conspicuous in its absence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 06:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a7286afc-ed78-441e-adcc-132265481a38n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616396 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 7/31/2023 1:14 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 03:54:22 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> > >>> I certainly agree we make the forum as open to free expression as possible. Unfortunately, it is not welcoming to critics of relativity. > >> Criticism of relativity is welcome here, as long as it is accompanied by evidence to support it. Unfortunately for you, you present zero evidence at all... so relativity remains unchallenged! Your fantasies are not evidence! > > > > Both lies, of course, the proof of the inconsistency of > > the mumble of your idiot gfuru is only provokin g Polish > > jokes from relativistic fanatics. > > The only Polish joke here is yourself, janitor. > > Despite repeating a 40 year old joke here, I really have plenty of > respect for the Polish people. Sure, sure, trash, but when defending your moronic religion by spitting at me - you couldn't resist the temptation to spit at my whole nation. The Shit is training its doggies well. > Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ua8o5a$3akk9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616398 |
you are a "a piece of lying shit" face it, Wozniak.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bfe34003-3c2a-4a6f-95c1-41dff5d5e59en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616416 |
Light has its own fastest speed in space. The atom can compete with it as a motion BH. A motion BH is defined as the atom moving ahead of light nearest to the light speed. It leaves light behind temporarily.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3179eaa8-cfdf-4069-83e7-c79b37e7a353n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616416 |
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 18:40:14 UTC+2, Python wrote: > you are a "a piece of lying shit" face it, Wozniak. I'm also a Polish drunkard, nazi antisemite, licking toilets janitor and so on. Right, trash? Anything for the enemies of your insane Shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 20:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e6UWJL4r_Zsi4J9WHP7fcsDpA40@jntp> |
| In reply to | #616422 |
Le 31/07/2023 à 19:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 18:40:14 UTC+2, Python wrote: >> you are a "a piece of lying shit" > I'm also a Polish drunkard, nazi antisemite, Yes, and you eat babies. R.H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 23:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ua9tof$3igr6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #616398 |
On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > anything. If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? Or as Paul keeps telling you, "Evidence rules in science... got any?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-31 22:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b87a4e7a-af20-405d-95ef-59c4fdee623cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #616459 |
On Tuesday, 1 August 2023 at 05:21:55 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 7/31/2023 9:49 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 15:38:26 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > > >> Paul is right. Evidence against relativity would be more than welcome, > > > > Paul is a piece of lying shit, just like you, stupid Mike, > > and the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven > > inconsistent; your (or his) moronic rants are not changing > > anything. > If this "mumble of the idiot guru" has been proven inconsistent, why > hasn't anyone provided any proof of this purported inconsistency here? I've repeated it dosens of times, stupid Mike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web