Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #610274 > unrolled thread

I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:56 +0000
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 21:59 -0700
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-10 15:03 +1000
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 07:09 +0000
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-10 19:25 +1000
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:46 +0000
            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 11:04 -0700
              Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 23:23 +0000
                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-11 19:23 -0700
                  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Domingo Vassilopulos <gdag@iipmugao.op> - 2023-05-12 11:49 +0000
                  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-13 00:20 +0000
                    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-12 19:45 -0700
                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 01:27 +0000
                    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-13 10:26 +0200
                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 01:33 +0000
                        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-15 21:07 +0200
                          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 01:51 +0000
                            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-16 21:02 -0700
                              Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 23:09 +0000
                                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-18 16:02 +0200
                                  Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 01:50 +0000
                                    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-18 22:00 -0500
                                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 07:40 +0000
                                        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-19 08:39 -0500
                                          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-20 19:34 +0000
                                    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-18 22:00 -0700
                                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 07:34 +0000
                                        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 12:04 -0700
                                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-20 00:32 +0000
                            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-05-17 10:41 -0700
                    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-05-13 10:39 -0500
                      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-14 02:41 +0000
                        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-13 23:02 -0500
                          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:01 +0000
                            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-14 22:28 -0500
                              Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 02:25 +0000
                                Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 00:52 -0500
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:05 +0000
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 05:03 -0700
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-10 08:53 -0700
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:49 +0000
            Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 17:46 -0700
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:07 +0000
    Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 00:39 -0500
      Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:32 +0000
        Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-05-11 01:40 +0200
          Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 12:41 +0000
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-09 23:50 -0700
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 10:07 -0700
    Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 06:57 -0700
      Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 07:31 -0700
        Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 08:16 -0700
          Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-19 10:43 -0500
          Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 09:51 -0700
            Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 11:42 -0700
              Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, *Plonk* Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 11:49 -0700
            Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-19 15:34 -0400
              Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 12:44 -0700
                Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-05-19 17:31 -0700
              Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. Eusebio Rompa <ebei@aooosree.si> - 2023-05-20 20:44 +0000

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#610348

On Wed, 10 May 2023 08:53:54 -0700, The Starmaker wrote:

> Jane wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 10 May 2023 15:03:02 +1000, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> 
>> 
> 
>     Arrows fired without spinning:
>     When we shoot arrows without spinning from a machine gun, we launch
> ten arrows every second. Imagine you have a toy that pops out of a box
> ten times in one second. We can say the arrows come out with a frequency
> of 10 times per second. So, the frequency of the arrows is 10.
> 
>     Spinning arrows fired:
>     Now, let's imagine we fire spinning arrows from the machine gun.
> Again, we shoot ten arrows every second, but these arrows are spinning
> as they fly through the air. When something spins, it goes around in
> circles. So, it's like the spinning arrows are going around in circles
> while they move forward. If you have a toy car with wheels that spin
> around two times in one second, you can say the car has a spinning
> frequency of 2 times per second. Similarly, the spinning arrows have a
> spinning frequency of 2.
> 
> Now, regarding the line of arrows itself, we can say that the line
> doesn't have a frequency of its own. The frequency refers to how many
> times something happens in a given amount of time. It's about the
> individual arrows and how often they appear or spin, but not about the
> entire line as a whole.
> 
> To summarize:
> 
>     Arrows fired without spinning: The arrows come out with a frequency
> of 10 times per second.
>     Spinning arrows fired: The spinning arrows have a spinning frequency
> of 2 times per second.
>     The line of arrows itself doesn't have a frequency.
> 
> 
> 
> I am the most knowledgeable person on Earth! I'm a fuckin genius !!!
> 
> I'm high above the spectrum...in the sky with diamonds.
> 
> 
> i tink i'm a mistake of nature...
> 
> wat am i doing here? i am not suppose to be here. someone made a
> mistake. i wasn't suppose to get through...

Aha! At last an intelligent answer. Starmaker I congratulate you on being 
clearly the second most intelligent person on his NG....




-- 
-- lover of truth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610355

On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2023 08:53:54 -0700, The Starmaker wrote: 

> > i tink i'm a mistake of nature... 
> > 
> > wat am i doing here? i am not suppose to be here. someone made a 
> > mistake. i wasn't suppose to get through...

> Aha! At last an intelligent answer. Starmaker I congratulate you on being 
> clearly the second most intelligent person on his NG....

Holy Cow, you have just aligned yourself with the second biggest crank here... or maybe the third, since you have arrived...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610800

On Wed, 10 May 2023 15:03:02 +1000, Sylvia Else wrote:

> On 10-May-23 2:56 pm, Jane wrote:
>> Let's do an experiment.
>> 
>> 1) We will fire golf balls from a machine gun at the rate of ten per
>> second. Their speed is v and spacing is L.
>> 2) We will then fire golf balls THAT ARE SPINNING at 20rps from the
>> machine gun at the rate of ten per second. Their speed is again v and
>> spacing is again L.
> 
> Is that the rate of spin in the frame of the centres of the balls, or in
> the frame of the gun?

Why would it differ? Rotation is absolute and frame independent.

> Sylvia.





-- 
-- lover of truth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610287 — Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again)

On 5/9/2023 11:56 PM, Jane wrote:
> Let's do an experiment.
> 
> 1) We will fire golf balls from a machine gun at the rate of ten per
> second. Their speed is v and spacing is L.
> 2) We will then fire golf balls THAT ARE SPINNING at 20rps from the
> machine gun at the rate of ten per second. Their speed is again v and
> spacing is again L.
> 
> Q. What is the frequency of the golf balls in each case?

As a "scientist" you are supposed to know you have to precisely
define your terms. So why haven't you? Probably because you are
no scientist. But like a madwoman you do give good screech.

=========================================================================
1
: the fact or condition of occurring frequently
the frequency of automobile accidents
2
a
: the number of times that a periodic function repeats the same sequence 
of values during a unit variation of the independent variable
b
: the number, proportion, or percentage of items in a particular 
category in a set of data
3
: the number of repetitions of a periodic process in a unit of time: such as
a
: the number of complete alternations (see ALTERNATION sense 1) per 
second of an alternating current
b
: the number of complete oscillations (see OSCILLATION sense 3) per 
second of energy (such as sound or electromagnetic radiation) in the 
form of waves

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/frequency

=========================================================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610344 — Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again)

On Wed, 10 May 2023 00:39:25 -0500, whodat wrote:

> On 5/9/2023 11:56 PM, Jane wrote:
>> Let's do an experiment.
>> 
>> 1) We will fire golf balls from a machine gun at the rate of ten per
>> second. Their speed is v and spacing is L.
>> 2) We will then fire golf balls THAT ARE SPINNING at 20rps from the
>> machine gun at the rate of ten per second. Their speed is again v and
>> spacing is again L.
>> 
>> Q. What is the frequency of the golf balls in each case?
> 
> As a "scientist" you are supposed to know you have to precisely define
> your terms. So why haven't you? Probably because you are no scientist.
> But like a madwoman you do give good screech.
> 
> 
=========================================================================
> 1
> : the fact or condition of occurring frequently the frequency of
> automobile accidents 2
> a
> : the number of times that a periodic function repeats the same sequence
> of values during a unit variation of the independent variable b
> : the number, proportion, or percentage of items in a particular
> category in a set of data 3
> : the number of repetitions of a periodic process in a unit of time:
> such as a
> : the number of complete alternations (see ALTERNATION sense 1) per
> second of an alternating current b
> : the number of complete oscillations (see OSCILLATION sense 3) per
> second of energy (such as sound or electromagnetic radiation) in the
> form of waves

Yes it is wrong like everyone else since radio engineers introduced the 
terminology.

> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/frequency
> 
> 
=========================================================================





-- 
-- lover of truth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610345 — Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again)

Jane wrote:
...
> Yes it is wrong like everyone else since radio engineers introduced the
> terminology.

Sure.

Jane, as you are here, can I ask you a favor?

Could you pee for me on your uncle's (John Parker, aka Androcle) grave.

Thank you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610396 — Re: Uncle Jane plays at being as scientist (was Re: I Received No Reply to My Question . Here it is Again)

On Thu, 11 May 2023 01:40:30 +0200, Python wrote:

> Jane wrote:
> ...
>> Yes it is wrong like everyone else since radio engineers introduced the
>> terminology.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> Jane, as you are here, can I ask you a favor?
> 
> Could you pee for me on your uncle's (John Parker, aka Androcle) grave.

That is not very nice. Are you very drunk?

> Thank you.





-- 
-- lover of truth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610291

Jane wrote:
> 
> Let's do an experiment.
> 
> 1) We will fire golf balls from a machine gun at the rate of ten per
> second. Their speed is v and spacing is L.
> 2) We will then fire golf balls THAT ARE SPINNING at 20rps from the
> machine gun at the rate of ten per second. Their speed is again v and
> spacing is again L.
> 
> Q. What is the frequency of the golf balls in each case?
> 
> --
> -- lover of truth


    Golf balls fired without spinning:
    When we fire the golf balls without any spinning, we shoot ten balls
every second. 
So, if you imagine a clock ticking, it's like the golf balls are going
around the clock ten times in one second. We say the frequency of the
golf balls is 10 times per second, or 10 Hz.

    Golf balls fired with spinning at 20 revolutions per second (rps):
    Now, let's imagine the golf balls are spinning as they fly out of
the machine gun. We still shoot ten balls every second, but because of
the spinning, each ball 
goes around in a circle not once, but twice during that time. So, if you
think about the clock again, it's like the golf balls are going around
the clock two times in one second. 
This means the frequency of the golf balls, with the spinning, is 2
times per second, or 2 Hz.

To summarize:

    Golf balls fired without spinning: The golf balls go around the
clock 10 times in one second, so the frequency is 10 times per second
(10 Hz).
    Golf balls fired with spinning at 20 rps: The golf balls go around
the clock 2 times in one second because of the spinning, so the
frequency is 2 times per second (2 Hz).



i'm a fuckin genuies..


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#610324

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 9:56:52 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote:
> Let's do an experiment. 
> 
> 1) We will fire golf balls from a machine gun at the rate of ten per 
> second. Their speed is v and spacing is L. 
> 2) We will then fire golf balls THAT ARE SPINNING at 20rps from the 
> machine gun at the rate of ten per second. Their speed is again v and 
> spacing is again L. 
> 
> Q. What is the frequency of the golf balls in each case? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- lover of truth

Not everything spins. Wheels and balls rotate instead
because their radius's don't change.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611137

On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote:

> Let's do an experiment. 

May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses.

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611139

On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> 
> > Let's do an experiment.
> May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> 
> *Plonk* 
> 
> Julio
kookfight

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611141

On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> > > Let's do an experiment. 
> > May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> kookfight

You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit.

May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults.

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611142

On 5/19/2023 10:16 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
>> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote:
>>>> Let's do an experiment.
>>> May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses.
>> kookfight
> 
> You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit.
> 
> May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults.
> 
> *Plonk*
> 
> Julio

All cheer for Dono as he walks the plank. Hip hip HOORAY!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611149 — Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > > On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> > > > Let's do an experiment. 
> > > May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses.
> > kookfight 
> 
> You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit. 
> 
> May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults. 
> 
> *Plonk* 
> 
> Julio
Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611156 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 18:51:25 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> > > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > > > On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> > > > > Let's do an experiment. 
> > > > May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> > > kookfight 
> > You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit. 
> > May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults. 
> Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. 

You wish, you utter imbecile.  What's *your* real name, you
resident piece of shit for decades?  A rhetorical question...

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611157 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, *Plonk* Julio Di Egidio is back.

On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:42:19 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 18:51:25 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > > On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> > > > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > > > > On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> > > > > > Let's do an experiment. 
> > > > > May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> > > > kookfight 
> > > You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit. 
> > > May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults.
> > Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.
> You wish, 

I don;t wish you back, crank.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611162 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

On 5/19/2023 12:51 PM, Dono. wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
>>> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote:
>>>>> Let's do an experiment.
>>>> May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses.
>>> kookfight
>>
>> You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit.
>>
>> May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults.
>>
>> *Plonk*
>>
>> Julio
> Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

And apparently he's off his meds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611163 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> On 5/19/2023 12:51 PM, Dono. wrote: 
> > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> >> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> >>> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> >>>> On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> >>>>> Let's do an experiment. 
> >>>> May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> >>> kookfight 
> >> 
> >> You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit. 
> >> 
> >> May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults. 
> >> 
> >> *Plonk* 
> >> 
> >> Julio 
> > Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.
> And apparently he's off his meds.
Again

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611183 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 21:44:29 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: 
> > On 5/19/2023 12:51 PM, Dono. wrote: 
> > > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 8:17:00 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > >> On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 16:31:07 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: 
> > >>> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 6:57:55 AM UTC-7, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > >>>> On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 06:56:52 UTC+2, Jane wrote: 
> > >>>>> Let's do an experiment. 
> > >>>> May the Lord stick a pole up your vile polluting asses. 
> > >>> kookfight 
> > >> You wish, you other resident paladin of just polluting shit. 
> > >> May the Lord etc. etc... you are not even worth my insults. 
> > > Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back. 
> > And apparently he's off his meds.
> Again

You nazi-retarded cunts and permanent pieces of polluting shit, if you had
half a conscience you'd jump off a cliff, give humanity a chance.

Stupidity is a moral defect, you stupid vile cunts.  Eat your own shit and die.

*Plonk*

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#611251 — Re: Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.

Volney wrote:

> On 5/19/2023 12:51 PM, Dono. wrote:
>> Dumbfuck computer programmer, physics crank, Julio Di Egidio is back.
> 
> And apparently he's off his meds.

here some proofs.

*_Does_POS_bidon¸bidet_stinks_like_shit_*
https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/8mwquadlgZO4

likely polakers. They are idiots.
Following khakhols to khakhole hole to bury
https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/bCn8GADdZdf5

Interesting Footage Propagandist Conducts Social Experiment After Ukraine 
Broke From USSR 
https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/FCma8t9Xt8zX

*_Ukraine_Update_May_20_*, 2023
https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/kPESdykAQEve

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web