Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601614 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-18 10:01 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-03-09 10:12 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 435 — 37 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-18 10:01 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:25 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-18 10:44 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-04 15:56 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-05 08:03 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 09:44 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 16:16 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-08 07:59 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> - 2023-05-08 09:23 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 14:23 -0500
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> - 2023-05-08 19:28 +0000
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 14:29 -0500
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> - 2023-05-08 19:37 +0000
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 17:09 -0500
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-08 17:44 -0400
Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-09 08:51 +0200
Re: shithead "whodat" sucks dicks in differential equations Blaide Theofilopoulos <eoft@ipbsiepo.ll> - 2023-05-09 10:38 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 01:48 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-18 11:17 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 11:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-20 21:25 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 01:44 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-23 08:39 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 00:28 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-24 08:47 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 02:52 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:28 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-20 21:30 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 03:32 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-03 08:44 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 09:08 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-18 12:19 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:11 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-19 21:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 01:30 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-20 21:49 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 02:44 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-21 21:48 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-23 08:46 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 00:52 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-25 12:07 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 03:57 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-26 08:19 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 11:58 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 01:48 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-28 08:12 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 09:31 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-01 09:27 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-01 01:53 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-03-01 12:26 -0600
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-02 21:30 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-28 13:55 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-28 11:38 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-23 20:33 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-02-23 20:57 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-02-23 20:58 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-24 14:39 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-02-24 14:28 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-02-24 16:29 +0100
Ignorant imbecile ? Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-02-24 16:13 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT HGW <hewn@bigpond.com> - 2023-03-02 20:02 +1100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 10:39 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-31 08:29 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-30 23:37 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-02-26 05:50 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 07:11 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-26 20:38 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-28 08:29 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-02-28 08:34 +1100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 23:32 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-28 08:30 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-02-28 19:43 +1100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-02-28 11:28 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-02-28 12:57 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-03 08:47 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-03-03 23:03 +1100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-05 07:59 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-03-05 18:49 +1100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-06 08:26 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-06 03:16 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 00:42 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-06 12:35 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 10:57 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-07 00:20 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 00:22 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-07 09:10 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-07 04:20 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 08:15 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-09 10:06 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-09 10:37 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 07:41 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-10 08:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-10 11:20 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 10:45 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-10 21:26 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 22:05 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-12 00:41 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 00:33 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-11 09:00 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-11 13:40 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 11:29 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-11 23:50 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 19:52 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-12 01:13 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-12 12:13 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-12 11:37 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-12 21:21 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 09:45 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-11 09:05 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 09:51 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 19:06 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 10:11 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 11:01 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-11 23:50 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 19:47 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-12 12:13 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-03-12 14:57 +0300
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 09:46 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-12 21:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 13:56 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-14 07:31 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-12 23:26 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-13 10:31 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 07:34 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 08:55 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-12 13:34 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-12 14:29 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-12 15:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-12 15:34 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-12 11:49 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-12 16:51 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-12 16:22 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-13 04:41 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-13 14:16 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-13 12:43 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-13 17:55 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 11:43 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-13 18:57 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 14:54 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-14 01:55 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 19:19 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-14 09:50 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:36 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:44 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-14 18:34 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 14:16 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-14 21:36 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 15:44 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-15 08:17 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 09:20 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 01:49 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 10:01 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 02:09 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 10:13 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 02:24 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 10:36 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 03:06 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 12:43 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 05:04 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 13:17 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 05:25 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 14:26 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 06:56 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 14:57 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 07:11 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-15 16:30 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 13:44 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:36 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-16 03:46 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 09:19 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-16 11:13 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 11:16 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-12 21:49 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2023-03-13 10:39 +0300
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-14 07:40 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Fernando Bosco <refd@nbeoeno.cr> - 2023-03-14 18:14 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 14:15 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-15 08:19 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:38 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-15 16:35 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-16 09:43 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 09:42 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-16 14:48 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-18 08:28 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-18 15:54 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-19 07:59 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-13 09:31 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-14 07:53 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 10:16 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-14 11:02 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 13:41 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 06:47 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 14:51 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 06:58 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 15:01 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 07:24 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 17:01 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 09:28 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 17:34 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 09:39 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 17:50 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:03 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 18:10 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:18 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-14 18:21 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:41 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-15 02:24 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-15 20:29 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-15 08:31 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-15 09:18 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:40 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-15 17:06 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-16 09:58 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 09:34 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 03:00 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-16 12:06 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 11:10 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-16 12:20 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-16 11:42 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-16 13:04 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-16 12:08 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 12:32 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 11:37 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 11:41 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 11:25 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 19:42 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 12:51 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-18 08:41 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-03-18 08:07 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-18 11:04 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 11:44 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-18 18:01 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-18 12:27 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-19 08:26 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-19 21:52 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-20 02:30 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-20 09:43 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-20 14:21 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-20 22:30 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-21 08:44 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-22 08:57 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-22 22:10 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-24 09:20 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Benaventura Bellandini <vvrr@vbbtulti.el> - 2023-03-24 22:31 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-20 11:46 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-21 09:00 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-21 11:40 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 14:47 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 06:40 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-22 08:27 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 00:49 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-22 09:49 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-24 08:52 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-03-24 10:14 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 10:35 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-24 10:56 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-25 08:25 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 08:51 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-26 12:31 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-26 13:30 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-27 10:18 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-27 11:14 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-27 02:49 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-28 08:58 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 01:00 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 10:37 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 04:12 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 15:03 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-28 10:35 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-29 07:54 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-29 08:46 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-30 19:03 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-30 19:30 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-31 08:27 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-31 10:27 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-01 09:36 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-01 10:45 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-02 07:58 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-02 10:08 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-02 10:38 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-03 12:48 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-27 11:35 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-27 18:15 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 15:11 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 08:02 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-03-22 15:10 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-22 09:06 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 11:11 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 11:55 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Eudaldo De campo <daoc@elpoupau.oc> - 2023-03-22 21:55 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 17:47 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-24 09:06 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-24 12:02 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 13:32 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-25 08:44 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Rayford Vicario Gannucce <vivi@lcafcccf.fi> - 2023-03-25 11:12 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 10:05 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 10:11 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-19 08:39 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 09:22 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 11:24 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 10:31 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-15 02:38 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-14 23:45 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-05 08:14 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-06 08:31 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-05 23:40 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-06 10:38 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:15 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 08:22 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:26 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 08:35 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:43 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 08:49 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:52 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 09:45 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 10:14 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-06 15:34 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:48 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-06 17:55 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-06 11:39 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-07 08:47 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-09 07:45 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-09 17:50 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 18:26 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 21:44 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Hector Bergamaschi <eoom@chrchmms.ct> - 2023-04-09 20:29 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 22:34 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-09 16:04 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Hector Bergamaschi <eoom@chrchmms.ct> - 2023-04-10 00:07 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-09 23:02 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT James Willi Negri <lnes@allligal.nr> - 2023-04-10 23:12 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-10 20:50 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-10 21:17 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-10 13:35 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-10 23:47 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-10 21:24 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-11 09:08 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-11 01:09 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-12 08:00 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 18:23 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-09 17:59 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 20:06 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 21:13 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-09 11:14 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 21:09 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-09 13:06 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 22:09 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 22:15 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-09 22:43 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-07 02:27 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-07 10:43 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-07 18:17 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-08 07:47 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-08 01:00 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-09 23:22 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-10 10:43 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-10 10:46 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-13 22:48 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-10 10:53 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-13 23:22 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 10:36 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-14 13:31 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 12:01 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-14 23:17 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-14 05:26 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 10:40 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 11:09 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-15 03:36 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-10 11:10 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-10 11:14 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-13 23:00 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 10:33 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-04-14 14:02 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 12:25 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-14 16:02 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-14 16:34 +0300
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-14 15:09 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-15 16:59 +0300
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-06 15:39 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-06 17:50 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-06 18:08 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-07 11:39 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesaispu.fr> - 2023-04-07 11:20 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-12 08:21 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Royal Traversa <soel@ertsavas.rv> - 2023-04-12 17:32 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-15 10:58 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 07:36 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-04-21 18:09 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 22:13 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-22 08:21 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-07 08:35 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 09:10 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-05 08:05 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 10:28 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-06 08:34 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 09:32 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-07 09:23 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 09:22 -0800
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-09 10:40 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-27 07:12 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-28 11:15 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 20:48 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 09:33 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-04-30 07:06 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-30 15:26 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-30 22:21 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-01 08:25 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-05-01 12:08 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-02 07:34 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-02 00:04 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-03 08:20 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-05-03 09:45 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-04 07:32 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 08:35 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-06 07:40 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> - 2023-05-06 13:17 +0000
Re: New annotated version of SRT carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-05-06 10:21 -0700
Re: New annotated version of SRT Josue De felice <eeee@leejleio.el> - 2023-05-04 16:02 +0000
Introducing Crazy Ivan (was Re: New annotated version of SRT) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-04 13:35 -0500
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-07 08:42 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-05-07 17:03 -0400
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-05-08 06:26 +0200
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-05 20:53 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-05 22:02 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-06 08:47 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-06 10:57 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-07 09:30 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 13:05 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-07 09:38 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-03-07 11:42 +0100
Re: New annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-03-09 10:12 +0100
Page 1 of 22 [1] 2 3 … 22 Next page →
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 10:01 +0100 |
| Subject | New annotated version of SRT |
| Message-ID | <k5big4Fll8qU1@mid.individual.net> |
Hi NG now I have finished my latest version after rewriting almost all annotations from previous versions. The idea behind writing aannotations is this: take a certain text (here: 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' by A. Einstein from 1905) and write annotations into it, similar to how a professor writes annotations into the homework of a student. It was actually meant as a learning tool and aimed to find ALL errors in a text and to write into the annotations, why that is an error. I wrote more than 400 annotations and most of them aare bout errors in Einstein's text. The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: formal errors missing quotes unclear formulations wrong or reused variables illogic resoning wrong math and so forth... Many of my arguments were discussed in this forum extensively. Then I had, if possible, taken hints and corrections by members of this board and integrated them into this version, too. A different class of improvements of this lates version came from my attempt to identify the possibly sources, which Einstein had used (but not quoted). As I speak, of course, German, I could read the works of Heinrich Hertz und could identify possible sources. French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. (Dutch is impossible for me, hence I had to leave Hendrik Lorentz away.) Also language, spelling and formats were improved in this version (besides of rethinking and checking the annotations themselves). So, here comes my latest annotated version of SRT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing You need to download the pdf-file, because this is stored as google doc and google will not show the annotations online. Hope you like it... TH
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 10:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k5bjslFlsdaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #601614 |
On 2023-02-18 09:01:56 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > > [ … ] > > The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: > > formal errors > missing quotes > unclear formulations > wrong or reused variables > illogic resoning > wrong math > and so forth... > > [ … ] > > French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, > Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). Can we assume that your list of "errors" in Einstein's paper is as carelessly assembled as that? > > (Dutch is impossible for me, hence I had to leave Hendrik Lorentz away.) > > Also language, spelling and formats were improved in this version > (besides of rethinking and checking the annotations themselves). > > > So, here comes my latest annotated version of SRT: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing > > > You need to download the pdf-file, because this is stored as google doc > and google will not show the annotations online. > > > Hope you like it... > > TH -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 10:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k5bkv9Fm17bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #601615 |
Am 18.02.2023 um 10:25 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden: .. >> >> French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, >> Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. > > Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have > used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", > not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an > accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided > beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). Can we assume that your list of > "errors" in Einstein's paper is as carelessly assembled as that? Poincaré was French and I am German. French is something you can learn in German schools, by I didn't, because to Learn Latin was the other option, which I had chosen. French is something I can speaak on 'tourists level', like Italian, Spanish and a few others. Sorry for my very poor French. I can understand a few words, but not many. English I can speak far better than French, while still not perfect. The annotations are all written in English and I tried hard to make them as perfect as possible. This wasn't that easy for me, but at least you should be able to understand them. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 10:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k5bl8rFm2hcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #601620 |
On 2023-02-18 09:44:09 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > Am 18.02.2023 um 10:25 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden: > .. > >>> >>> French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, >>> Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. >> >> Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have >> used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", >> not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an >> accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided >> beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). Can we assume that your list of >> "errors" in Einstein's paper is as carelessly assembled as that? > > Poincaré was French and I am German. > > French is something you can learn in German schools, by I didn't, > because to Learn Latin was the other option, which I had chosen. > > French is something I can speaak on 'tourists level', like Italian, > Spanish and a few others. > > Sorry for my very poor French. I can understand a few words, but not many. Yes, but surely you can copy a text of a few words without so many errors? > > English I can speak far better than French, while still not perfect. > > The annotations are all written in English and I tried hard to make > them as perfect as possible. This wasn't that easy for me, but at least > you should be able to understand them. > > > TH -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-04 15:56 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qa7ljf.1i6cp7t1wu5ouyN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #601615 |
Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2023-02-18 09:01:56 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > > > > > [ … ] > > > > The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: > > > > formal errors > > missing quotes > > unclear formulations > > wrong or reused variables > > illogic resoning > > wrong math > > and so forth... > > > > [ … ] > > > > French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, > > Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. > > Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have > used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", > not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an > accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided > beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). Can we assume that your list of > "errors" in Einstein's paper is as carelessly assembled as that? Yes, and he is also incapable of doing even elementary literature searching. Doing so would have revealed that Poincare's work appeared nominally in 1906, but actually in 1908, so it cannot heve been a source for Einstein 1905, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 08:03 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kbjkiaFpibrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #609573 |
Am 04.05.2023 um 15:56 schrieb J. J. Lodder: > Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2023-02-18 09:01:56 +0000, Thomas Heger said: >> >>> >>> [ … ] >>> >>> The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: >>> >>> formal errors >>> missing quotes >>> unclear formulations >>> wrong or reused variables >>> illogic resoning >>> wrong math >>> and so forth... >>> >>> [ … ] >>> >>> French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, >>> Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. >> >> Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have >> used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", >> not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an >> accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided >> beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). Well, sorry for speaking only poor French. But how about your German? > > Yes, and he is also incapable > of doing even elementary literature searching. > Doing so would have revealed that Poincare's work > appeared nominally in 1906, but actually in 1908, > so it cannot heve been a source for Einstein 1905, The book of Poincare was accepted in July 1905 (afaik 15th) and the article of Einstein roughly two weeks earlier. If Einstein's text contains quotes from Poincare's text, than this would be a proof, that Einstein's date at the beginning of his article was wrong. This would mean, that a certain date of Einstein's text would be the date of publication of the article, which was afaik in November 1905. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 09:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kbjqfiFqeccU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #609696 |
On 2023-05-05 06:03:53 +0000, Thomas Heger said: > Am 04.05.2023 um 15:56 schrieb J. J. Lodder: >> Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2023-02-18 09:01:56 +0000, Thomas Heger said: >>> >>>> >>>> [ … ] >>>> >>>> The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: >>>> >>>> formal errors >>>> missing quotes >>>> unclear formulations >>>> wrong or reused variables >>>> illogic resoning >>>> wrong math >>>> and so forth... >>>> >>>> [ … ] >>>> >>>> French is not that possible, but I can understand a little. So, >>>> Poincare's 'Sur le dynamic de la electron' was another possible source. >>> >>> Poincaré was French. I find it impossible to believe that he would have >>> used such an illiterate title (five errors in six words: "dynamique", >>> not "dynamic"; it is feminine, so "la" not "le"; "électron" has an >>> accent; and is masculine, so "du", not "de la", and anyway it's elided >>> beforea vowel: "de l'électron"). > > Well, sorry for speaking only poor French. It's not a matter of speaking; it's matter of being able to copy a title accurately. > > But how about your German? Perfectly adequate for copying the titles of papers. Perfectly adequate also when I want to quote a longer piece of text, for example Die Gesellschaft ist ein autopoietisches System auf der Basis von sinnhafter Kommunikation. Sie besteht aus Kommunikationen, sie besteht nur aus Kommunikationen, sie besteht aus allen Kommunikationen. Sie reproduziert Kommunikation durch Kommunikation.... Gesellschaft ist also ein geschlossenes und ein offenes System zugleich, und Kommunikation ist die Form der elementaren Operation, die diese Kombination laufend leistet und reproduziert. Any obvious errors of German you see there? To get a better idea of what it means... (Society is an autopoietic system based on meaningful communication. It consists of communications, it consists only of communications, it consists of all communi- cations. It reproduces communication through communication.... Society is therefore a closed and an open system at the same time, and communication is the form of the elementary operation that constantly makes this combination and reproduces it.) ...I consulted a German-speaking colleague. That seems the normal scholarly thing to do, not to write any old rubbish and then claim poor knowledge of German as an excuse. >> >> Yes, and he is also incapable >> of doing even elementary literature searching. >> Doing so would have revealed that Poincare's work >> appeared nominally in 1906, but actually in 1908, >> so it cannot heve been a source for Einstein 1905, > > The book of Poincare was accepted in July 1905 (afaik 15th) and the > article of Einstein roughly two weeks earlier. > > If Einstein's text contains quotes from Poincare's text, than this > would be a proof, that Einstein's date at the beginning of his article > was wrong. > > This would mean, that a certain date of Einstein's text would be the > date of publication of the article, which was afaik in November 1905. More important, you (Thomas Heger) haven't given an example of anything significant you learned from your study of the 1905 paper. I'm still waiting. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 16:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <63b7d710-4d55-4d63-a786-57c961a59a1fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609703 |
hey bitch does SR include Maxwell's equations?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 07:59 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kbrhdlF1h3vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #609772 |
Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: > ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? > Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by Heinrich Hertz. This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other things- discovered electromagnetic waves. Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz absolute ones. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 09:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u3af2c$3ra8v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #610063 |
Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: >> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >> > Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by > Heinrich Hertz. > This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other > things- discovered electromagnetic waves. > Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz had > written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz absolute > ones. idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and "absolute" ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 14:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kbt0hfF8gacU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #610077 |
On 5/8/2023 4:23 AM, Deandre Theofilopoulos wrote: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: >>> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >>> >> Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by >> Heinrich Hertz. >> This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other >> things- discovered electromagnetic waves. >> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz had >> written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz absolute >> ones. > > idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and "absolute" > ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is there really any difference?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 19:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <u3bigu$3uhec$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #610124 |
uneducated imbecile whodat wrote: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >> >>> Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: >>>> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >>>> >>> Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by >>> Heinrich Hertz. >>> This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other >>> things- discovered electromagnetic waves. >>> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz >>> had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz >>> absolute ones. >> >> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >> "absolute" >> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. > > Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is > there really any difference? isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 14:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <kbt0tpF8gacU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #610130 |
On 5/8/2023 2:28 PM, Deandre Theofilopoulos wrote: > uneducated imbecile whodat wrote: > >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> >>>> Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: >>>>> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >>>>> >>>> Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by >>>> Heinrich Hertz. >>>> This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other >>>> things- discovered electromagnetic waves. >>>> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz >>>> had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz >>>> absolute ones. >>> >>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>> "absolute" >>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >> >> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >> there really any difference? > > isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You > stinking sack of subhuman excrement. Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is there really any difference?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Deandre Theofilopoulos <dolf@oooerreo.he> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 19:37 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <u3bj2a$3uhec$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #610131 |
sick fuck whodat wrote: >>>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>>> "absolute" >>>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >>> >>> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >>> there really any difference? >> >> isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You >> stinking sack of subhuman excrement. > > Another this uneducated sick fuck, named _whodat_ doesn't know the basics in differential equations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 17:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <kbta8kFa4fbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #610138 |
On 5/8/2023 2:37 PM, Deandre Theofilopoulos wrote: > sick fuck whodat wrote: > >>>>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>>>> "absolute" >>>>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >>>> >>>> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >>>> there really any difference? >>> >>> isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You >>> stinking sack of subhuman excrement. >> >> Another > > this uneducated sick fuck, named _whodat_ doesn't know the basics in > differential equations. When, if ever, you have something that isn't demented to say I'll listen. In the meantime everything you've said or will say is at best nonsense when it isn't a word salad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 17:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <u3bqfg$3vuit$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #610131 |
On 5/8/2023 3:29 PM, whodat wrote: > On 5/8/2023 2:28 PM, Deandre Theofilopoulos wrote: >> uneducated imbecile whodat wrote: >> >>>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> >>>>> Am 06.05.2023 um 01:16 schrieb carl eto: >>>>>> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >>>>>> >>>>> Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were developed by >>>>> Heinrich Hertz. >>>>> This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other >>>>> things- discovered electromagnetic waves. >>>>> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz >>>>> had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz >>>>> absolute ones. >>>> >>>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>>> "absolute" >>>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >>> >>> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >>> there really any difference? >> >> isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You >> stinking sack of subhuman excrement. > > Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is > there really any difference? > That's the nymshifter troll, paid to disrupt things and post 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 propaganda. That is worse than being merely drunk or demented.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-09 08:51 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: cretin of the month _whodat_ eats shit |
| Message-ID | <kbu8r2FeivnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #610147 |
Am 08.05.2023 um 23:44 schrieb Volney: >>>>>>> ..does SR include Maxwell's equations? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Einstein used a variant of Maxwell's equations which were >>>>>> developed by >>>>>> Heinrich Hertz. >>>>>> This was a famous German physicist from Hamburg, who -among other >>>>>> things- discovered electromagnetic waves. >>>>>> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what Hertz >>>>>> had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and Hertz >>>>>> absolute ones. >>>>> >>>>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>>>> "absolute" >>>>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >>>> >>>> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >>>> there really any difference? >>> >>> isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You >>> stinking sack of subhuman excrement. >> >> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >> there really any difference? >> > That's the nymshifter troll, paid to disrupt things and post 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian > 卐 propaganda. That is worse than being merely drunk or demented. Anyhow: Heinrich Hertz wrote 'd' in his equations and Einstein 'del'. I had critizised that because quotes should be verbatim and to alter something in a quote would not be allowed. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Blaide Theofilopoulos <eoft@ipbsiepo.ll> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-09 10:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: shithead "whodat" sucks dicks in differential equations |
| Message-ID | <u3d7ql$80l6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #610147 |
shithead *whodat* sucks _dicks_ in differential equations, shithead *Volney*, aka Morony, is supporting him wrote: > On 5/8/2023 3:29 PM, whodat wrote: >> On 5/8/2023 2:28 PM, Deandre Theofilopoulos wrote: >>>>>> Einstein's 'Maxwell-Hertz-equations' differ slightly from what >>>>>> Hertz had written, because Einstein used partial differentials and >>>>>> Hertz absolute ones. >>>>> idiot, you don't even know the difference between partial and >>>>> "absolute" >>>>> ones. Stay with the history, because you are close to nil otherwise. >>>> Another word salad in the guise of an insult. Drunk or demented, is >>>> there really any difference? >>> isn't it, you fucking uneducated demented braindamaged imbecile. You >>> stinking sack of subhuman excrement. > T̶h̶a̶t̶'s̶ t̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ t̶r̶o̶l̶l̶, p̶a̶i̶d̶ t̶o̶ d̶i̶s̶r̶u̶p̶t̶ t̶h̶i̶n̶g̶s̶ a̶n̶d̶ > p̶o̶s̶t̶ 卐R̶u̶⚡︎⚡︎i̶a̶n̶卐 p̶r̶o̶p̶a̶g̶a̶n̶d̶a̶. T̶h̶a̶t̶ i̶s̶ w̶o̶r̶s̶e̶ t̶h̶a̶n̶ b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ m̶e̶r̶e̶l̶y̶ d̶r̶u̶n̶k̶ o̶r̶ > d̶e̶m̶e̶n̶t̶e̶d̶. was I Russia, capitalist *_terrorist_* america would be working for food in Siberia. About *_754_terrorist_military_bases_* around the world! Morony, Kibo Parry, neither know the basics in differential equations, lol. Proofs: THIS IS WW3, the U.S. is in real trouble! with Clayton Morris https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/Fqlo7YeN_1M
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 01:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0dc39c0e-0a15-4964-ab9d-5c27bf7f59f9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #601614 |
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 10:02:00 AM UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: > Hi NG > > now I have finished my latest version after rewriting almost all > annotations from previous versions. > > The idea behind writing aannotations is this: > > take a certain text (here: 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' by > A. Einstein from 1905) and write annotations into it, similar to how a > professor writes annotations into the homework of a student. It only makes sense if it's truly a teacher-pupil relationship. In other words, it only makes sense if the person making the annotations understands the content. > It was actually meant as a learning tool and aimed to find ALL errors in > a text and to write into the annotations, why that is an error. Ergo, what you are doing cannot possibly serve as a "learning tool". > I wrote more than 400 annotations and most of them aare bout errors in > Einstein's text. All of them are your errors only. > The errors stem from a great varfiety of topics, like: > > formal errors There are no "formal errors" in that paper. > missing quotes > unclear formulations > wrong or reused variables These are not errors. You simply are not familiar with certain notational conventions, most of them used to this day, everywhere. > illogic resoning There is none of that in the paper. There are instances of clumsiness, yes. But they are not errors. > wrong math There is no wrong math in the paper. There are instances of clumsiness, yes. But they are not errors. > and so forth... Again, there are no errors in Einstein's 1905 paper. There are instances of minor sloppiness but this sort of thing is present in virtually all science papers. > Many of my arguments were discussed in this forum extensively. Not really "discussed". Your arguments are all errors or misunderstandings. There is nothing to "discuss" here except your wasting your time on this nonsensical "project" is a bit of a psychological mystery. > Then I > had, if possible, taken hints and corrections by members of this board > and integrated them into this version, too. These are, again, microscopic changes which, again, every science paper in existence could benefit from. This is a non-issue. > A different class of improvements of this lates version came from my > attempt to identify the possibly sources, which Einstein had used (but > not quoted). This was the custom back then. Look up Annalen der Physik from around that time and you'll see multitudes of papers with no references in them. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-18 11:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k5bmsvFm9psU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #601621 |
Am 18.02.2023 um 10:48 schrieb JanPB: > On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 10:02:00 AM UTC+1, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Hi NG >> >> now I have finished my latest version after rewriting almost all >> annotations from previous versions. >> >> The idea behind writing aannotations is this: >> >> take a certain text (here: 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' by >> A. Einstein from 1905) and write annotations into it, similar to how a >> professor writes annotations into the homework of a student. > > It only makes sense if it's truly a teacher-pupil relationship. In other words, > it only makes sense if the person making the annotations understands > the content. This is actually true. Iow: you can only learn to swim by swimming. This is why the method works really great: you are forced to understand every single word in the text, every equation, every picture or reference... As I was not really an Einstein expert, it took me a very long time to understand the entire text. I have also rewritten my annotations several times. Now I'm actually quite good and you wouldn't be able (most likely) to find any error by me in them at all. There will be a few remaining flaws, most likely, but certainly not many, because every single of my annotation was checked for validity many times (for instance in discussions here). Now I'm quite confident, that I'm able to defend almost all of my arguments, because I was able to do that here in this newsgroup several times. (If not and the errors were actually mine, I had ample opportunity to change my annotations.) >> It was actually meant as a learning tool and aimed to find ALL errors in >> a text and to write into the annotations, why that is an error. > > Ergo, what you are doing cannot possibly serve as a "learning tool". Well, wrong... Practice is actually the best method for learning and writing is much more practice than reading. Far better are, of course, real experiments. But theoretical physics is not a science of experiments. So, reading, thinking and writing are the main tools, which could be assisted by discussions and possibly by advice of a teatcher. But unfortunately I have no teatcher, because I'm just a hobbyist. >> I wrote more than 400 annotations and most of them aare bout errors in >> Einstein's text. > > All of them are your errors only. Well, then show me at least one. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 22 [1] 2 3 … 22 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web