Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #607821 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 199 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-18 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 10:07 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:14 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 19:37 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-19 17:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-20 10:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 01:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-19 22:23 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:08 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-20 08:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-19 17:25 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-29 09:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 19:04 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-01 00:04 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:15 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:29 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:40 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:44 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-01 00:30 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:21 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 06:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:02 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 09:54 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 14:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 15:13 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:56 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 05:57 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 06:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 17:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 21:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 05:10 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:12 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-21 12:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:20 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 07:08 -0700
Mask falls off the face of hardened crank Amrit Gehan "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 02:07 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:23 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-21 22:52 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:48 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 09:17 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 12:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 10:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 11:00 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 17:55 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 18:27 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 19:31 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 22:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 23:16 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-23 07:02 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-23 08:40 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-23 14:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 17:24 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-22 15:33 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:17 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 01:58 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 00:53 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 18:18 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-26 11:11 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-26 08:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 13:20 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 19:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 21:21 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-27 23:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 13:47 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 09:29 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 00:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 10:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:37 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:47 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-30 23:57 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-04 20:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-04 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:06 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:44 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-07 23:48 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 23:22 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-08 20:08 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 22:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:45 +0000
Uncle Jane Discusses Science (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 00:24 -0500
Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 02:11 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:57 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 14:06 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 23:35 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 20:16 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-14 22:38 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 02:01 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 00:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 06:31 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 22:57 +0000
Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-17 19:20 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-05-04 21:24 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 22:36 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:41 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:07 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 18:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 23:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:03 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 19:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:59 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:57 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 00:02 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 20:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 20:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 23:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:28 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:03 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 21:18 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 17:26 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 22:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 18:39 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 20:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-25 17:00 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 11:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:10 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 10:28 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:49 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 03:11 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 23:30 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-25 22:12 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 22:23 -0500
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:50 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-27 09:15 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:53 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:43 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 15:53 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-07 13:34 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 21:27 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-29 19:01 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-30 11:11 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 14:18 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 14:38 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-26 23:15 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tommy Africani <ffci@tiacyctm.mo> - 2023-04-26 13:39 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-24 12:44 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 17:44 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:20 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 17:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 23:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:42 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 03:30 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:41 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 22:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:33 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-04 23:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c594224c-04b2-4c1f-9a0e-7bdd472edcban@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609700 |
On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 08:26:08 UTC+2, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:09 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > The validity of GR is much more at risk due to puzzles like dark matter > > and dark energy. To date they do not refute GR, but it appears to me > > that they have the potential to do so if future experiments and > > measurements work out that way (but IMHO it is likely they won't turn > > out that way). > Most of the proposed alternatives to GR predict violations of > the equivalence principle at some level, and if these alternatives > are correct, experiments testing the equivalence principle are > probably (?) within only a few orders of magnitude of sensitivity > of being able to detect EP violations. > > Of course, this would be far from being any sort of "refutation" > of GR, merely the ascertaining of limits to its applicability. Stop fucking, poor halfbrain, even you are not stupid enough to apply this shit for real. You're only pretending.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-06 00:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175c653c9af0e20b$3$588642$c7d34dd6@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #609700 |
On Thu, 04 May 2023 23:26:05 -0700, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:09 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> The validity of GR is much more at risk due to puzzles like dark matter >> and dark energy. To date they do not refute GR, but it appears to me >> that they have the potential to do so if future experiments and >> measurements work out that way (but IMHO it is likely they won't turn >> out that way). > > Most of the proposed alternatives to GR predict violations of the > equivalence principle at some level, and if these alternatives are > correct, experiments testing the equivalence principle are probably (?) > within only a few orders of magnitude of sensitivity of being able to > detect EP violations. > > Of course, this would be far from being any sort of "refutation" of GR, > merely the ascertaining of limits to its applicability. Any theory based on constant light speed is obviously wrong. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 18:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a3a46314-ce3c-4af2-907d-c24b3f5f1576n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609777 |
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 5:07:54 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > Any theory based on constant light speed is obviously wrong. And your evidence in support of this claim is what, exactly? You can only blow smoke for so long... and your time is rapidly evaporating...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 23:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8ee142c4-4d0b-4543-8674-51dc4c4873d2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609787 |
On Saturday, 6 May 2023 at 03:39:07 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 5:07:54 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > > > Any theory based on constant light speed is obviously wrong. > And your evidence in support of this claim is what, exactly? Well, even your idiot guru was unable to stick for this nonsensical assertion for long and his GR shit had to withdraw.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 21:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kbltudF5eglU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #609777 |
On 5/5/2023 7:07 PM, Jane wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2023 23:26:05 -0700, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > >> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:09 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: >> >>> The validity of GR is much more at risk due to puzzles like dark matter >>> and dark energy. To date they do not refute GR, but it appears to me >>> that they have the potential to do so if future experiments and >>> measurements work out that way (but IMHO it is likely they won't turn >>> out that way). >> >> Most of the proposed alternatives to GR predict violations of the >> equivalence principle at some level, and if these alternatives are >> correct, experiments testing the equivalence principle are probably (?) >> within only a few orders of magnitude of sensitivity of being able to >> detect EP violations. >> >> Of course, this would be far from being any sort of "refutation" of GR, >> merely the ascertaining of limits to its applicability. > > Any theory based on constant light speed is obviously wrong. Actually that depends on what is meant by "consistent light speed." The term alone, without further clarification, is not definitive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 20:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8b03025e-c5c7-4cbc-8c46-ea2c8231adfan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609777 |
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 5:07:54 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2023 23:26:05 -0700, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:09 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > >> The validity of GR is much more at risk due to puzzles like dark matter > >> and dark energy. To date they do not refute GR, but it appears to me > >> that they have the potential to do so if future experiments and > >> measurements work out that way (but IMHO it is likely they won't turn > >> out that way). > > > > Most of the proposed alternatives to GR predict violations of the > > equivalence principle at some level, and if these alternatives are > > correct, experiments testing the equivalence principle are probably (?) > > within only a few orders of magnitude of sensitivity of being able to > > detect EP violations. > > > > Of course, this would be far from being any sort of "refutation" of GR, > > merely the ascertaining of limits to its applicability. > > Any theory based on constant light speed is obviously wrong. But your post above is not even wrong. It's just word salad. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 20:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0aa96d03-0748-4162-a48e-1e5bb44f3b4bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609700 |
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 11:26:08 PM UTC-7, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:09 PM UTC-5, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > The validity of GR is much more at risk due to puzzles like dark matter > > and dark energy. To date they do not refute GR, but it appears to me > > that they have the potential to do so if future experiments and > > measurements work out that way (but IMHO it is likely they won't turn > > out that way). > > Most of the proposed alternatives to GR predict violations of > the equivalence principle at some level, and if these alternatives > are correct, experiments testing the equivalence principle are > probably (?) within only a few orders of magnitude of sensitivity > of being able to detect EP violations. That would be interesting. It would mean at the very least a reinterpretation of the GR model: no curved spacetime but a Minkowski spacetime with a symmetric tensor field on it (analogous to classical electrodynamics). > Of course, this would be far from being any sort of "refutation" > of GR, merely the ascertaining of limits to its applicability. Yes. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-05 19:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <737e150b-d116-437a-a9f4-1acebe46d154n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609618 |
On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 1:50:02 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > > Naturally any proof that Einstein's theories are a load of crap would be > offensive to an incurably indoctrinated member of the Einsteinian church. No, it doesn't work that way. Also, there is no such thing as "Einsteinian church". This sort of strawman confabulation is infantile and makes you look like a flake. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-07 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175cb6a588794792$4$2230647$fd385da@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #609799 |
On Fri, 05 May 2023 19:59:45 -0700, JanPB wrote: > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 1:50:02 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >> >> Naturally any proof that Einstein's theories are a load of crap would >> be offensive to an incurably indoctrinated member of the Einsteinian >> church. > > No, it doesn't work that way. Also, there is no such thing as > "Einsteinian church". > This sort of strawman confabulation is infantile and makes you look like > a flake. There are billions of people in the world today who are not aware that their minds are being controlled by well organized powermongers. You are obviously one of them. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-06 21:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kboidiFhthdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #609905 |
On 5/6/2023 7:59 PM, Jane wrote: > On Fri, 05 May 2023 19:59:45 -0700, JanPB wrote: > >> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 1:50:02 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>> >>> Naturally any proof that Einstein's theories are a load of crap would >>> be offensive to an incurably indoctrinated member of the Einsteinian >>> church. >> >> No, it doesn't work that way. Also, there is no such thing as >> "Einsteinian church". >> This sort of strawman confabulation is infantile and makes you look like >> a flake. > > There are billions of people in the world today who are not aware that > their minds are being controlled by well organized powermongers. You are > obviously one of them. Please provide something real that science can actually sink its teeth into. Where's the beef? You lend new meaning to the old adage, "Promises Promises..."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 02:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175d0b5471088657$52$565070$c3d349d6@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #609932 |
On Sat, 06 May 2023 21:57:46 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 5/6/2023 7:59 PM, Jane wrote: > > Please provide something real that science can actually sink its teeth > into. Where's the beef? You lend new meaning to the old adage, "Promises > Promises..." The 'beef' is well presented in Paul Andersen's article and Michelson's moving mirror experiment. Go there yourself and find the mistakes so you will not forget them. If I tell you what they are, you will probably just pretend to ignore me, call me a crackpot and then claim credit by publishing the facts yourself. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-08 00:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kbre2vFpahU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #610039 |
On 5/7/2023 9:51 PM, Jane wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2023 21:57:46 -0500, whodat wrote: > >> On 5/6/2023 7:59 PM, Jane wrote: > >> >> Please provide something real that science can actually sink its teeth >> into. Where's the beef? You lend new meaning to the old adage, "Promises >> Promises..." > > The 'beef' is well presented in Paul Andersen's article and Michelson's > moving mirror experiment. Go there yourself and find the mistakes so you > will not forget them. If I tell you what they are, you will probably just > pretend to ignore me, call me a crackpot and then claim credit by > publishing the facts yourself. What makes you think I should be carrying your water for you? I say this is the first time I've seen both narcissism and paranoia in the same individual. So far all you've demonstrated is being a crackpot. Just because you presently claim errors doesn't mean they are any more real that George Hammond's "proof of God" that he swears by just as you support your claims although he's gone to greater lengths than you have. I looked for "progress in science" in a couple of search engines and guess what, "making an ass of oneself" as you are doing does not appear anywhere. Sorry but it appears that unwanted mental deterioration has taken control of your life. Best wishes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-07 20:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f799b2e7-3d07-4247-86d9-b7002cfb6d29n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #609905 |
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 6:01:24 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > On Fri, 05 May 2023 19:59:45 -0700, JanPB wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 1:50:02 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > >> > >> Naturally any proof that Einstein's theories are a load of crap would > >> be offensive to an incurably indoctrinated member of the Einsteinian > >> church. > > > > No, it doesn't work that way. Also, there is no such thing as > > "Einsteinian church". > > This sort of strawman confabulation is infantile and makes you look like > > a flake. > > There are billions of people in the world today who are not aware that > their minds are being controlled by well organized powermongers. You are > obviously one of them. This is just an infantile attempt at belittling an opponent. How about either: (a) staying away from the keyboard if you have nothing to say with the information content greater than zero, or: (b) provide an argument for your idiotic (utterly idiotic) claim of the existence of some imagined "Einsteinian church", confabulated again just to belittle your opponents. You'll get nowhere with this. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-27 20:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2d23b8e4-2381-4471-b337-cc1c2387ee4bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608388 |
On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:18:51 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > > > What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten > > seconds at the same instant? > Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your math... if you can... I repeat, Jane... Where is *your* math in support of *your* claim? I ask the question... evidence rules, Jane... got any? No? I didn't think so...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-27 23:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a58c3b9-86a6-4a0c-bfc9-b5a18d6f0403n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608753 |
On Friday, 28 April 2023 at 05:22:40 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:18:51 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > > > > > What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten > > > seconds at the same instant? > > > Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your math... if you can... > I repeat, Jane... Where is *your* math in support of *your* claim? Speaking of math - it's always good to remind that your bunch of idiots had to announce its oldest and very important part false, as it didn't want to provide support for your madness. > I ask the question... evidence rules, Jane... Got any for this nonsense?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 07:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175a08a83ff87adb$41$588642$c7d34dd6@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608753 |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:22:38 -0700, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:18:51 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >> >> > What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >> > seconds at the same instant? > >> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >> math... if you can... > > I repeat, Jane... Where is *your* math in support of *your* claim? Where is YOUR maths that give you the right and reason to be sceptical about my important observation? > I ask the question... evidence rules, Jane... got any? No? I didn't > think so... -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 07:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52d785af-3ae4-4004-84e5-defd4c9c0759n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608790 |
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 12:28:52 AM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:22:38 -0700, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:18:51 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > >> > >> > What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten > >> > seconds at the same instant? > > > >> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your > >> math... if you can... > > > > I repeat, Jane... Where is *your* math in support of *your* claim? > Where is YOUR maths that give you the right and reason to be sceptical > about my important observation? > > I ask the question... evidence rules, Jane... got any? No? I didn't > > think so... I made no claim that needs defending... but *you* did... so put up or shut up! You are putting undue stress on my bullshit meter...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 16:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kb2qkoF5m8vU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608790 |
On 4/28/2023 2:28 AM, Jane wrote: > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:22:38 -0700, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 6:18:51 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>> >>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>> seconds at the same instant? >> >>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>> math... if you can... >> >> I repeat, Jane... Where is *your* math in support of *your* claim? > > Where is YOUR maths that give you the right and reason to be sceptical > about my important observation? Skepticism is the backbone of all science. >> I ask the question... evidence rules, Jane... got any? No? I didn't >> think so... > > > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 21:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u2hd78$2j7m2$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #608905 |
whodat wrote: > On 4/28/2023 2:28 AM, Jane wrote: >> Where is YOUR maths that give you the right and reason to be sceptical >> about my important observation? > > Skepticism is the backbone of all science. not in mathematics, logic and so on. You can't have skepticism, idiot. I have to leak a wind. Another one. Good morning to you too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 17:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kb2vgeF5m8vU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608906 |
On 4/28/2023 4:18 PM, Evenezer Nigro wrote: > whodat wrote: > >> On 4/28/2023 2:28 AM, Jane wrote: >>> Where is YOUR maths that give you the right and reason to be sceptical >>> about my important observation? >> >> Skepticism is the backbone of all science. > > not in mathematics, logic and so on. You can't have skepticism, idiot. I > have to leak a wind. Another one. Good morning to you too. Clearly you do not know the definition of "science" that is the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained. Of course there are more modern definitions that incorporate "social science" and things like mathematics to the detriment of society not unlike calling a building janitor or garbage collector an "engineer." Yes indeed, science is reliant on skepticism, and if that's not necessary to some discipline or another then by definition that discipline is not a science at all. Do you think "computer science" is really a "science?" I do not. It belongs to the realm of technology. Janitors and garbage collectors are nothing more than laborer distinctions. Piggybacking descriptions of job categories is designed to enhance pay checks, nothing more. How about "Library Science?" A few years back I encountered a "Doctor of Physical Therapy." WHAT??? Show me a doctoral thesis that advances the state of the art for librarians or physical therapists. Sheesh!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web