Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #607821 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 199 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-18 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 10:07 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:14 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 19:37 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-19 17:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-20 10:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 01:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-19 22:23 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:08 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-20 08:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-19 17:25 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-29 09:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 19:04 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-01 00:04 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:15 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:29 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:40 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:44 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-01 00:30 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:21 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 06:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:02 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 09:54 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 14:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 15:13 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:56 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 05:57 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 06:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 17:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 21:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 05:10 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:12 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-21 12:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:20 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 07:08 -0700
Mask falls off the face of hardened crank Amrit Gehan "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 02:07 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:23 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-21 22:52 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:48 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 09:17 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 12:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 10:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 11:00 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 17:55 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 18:27 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 19:31 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 22:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 23:16 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-23 07:02 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-23 08:40 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-23 14:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 17:24 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-22 15:33 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:17 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 01:58 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 00:53 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 18:18 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-26 11:11 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-26 08:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 13:20 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 19:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 21:21 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-27 23:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 13:47 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 09:29 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 00:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 10:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:37 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:47 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-30 23:57 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-04 20:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-04 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:06 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:44 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-07 23:48 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 23:22 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-08 20:08 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 22:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:45 +0000
Uncle Jane Discusses Science (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 00:24 -0500
Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 02:11 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:57 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 14:06 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 23:35 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 20:16 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-14 22:38 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 02:01 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 00:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 06:31 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 22:57 +0000
Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-17 19:20 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-05-04 21:24 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 22:36 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:41 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:07 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 18:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 23:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:03 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 19:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:59 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:57 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 00:02 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 20:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 20:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 23:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:28 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:03 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 21:18 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 17:26 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 22:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 18:39 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 20:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-25 17:00 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 11:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:10 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 10:28 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:49 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 03:11 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 23:30 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-25 22:12 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 22:23 -0500
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:50 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-27 09:15 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:53 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:43 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 15:53 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-07 13:34 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 21:27 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-29 19:01 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-30 11:11 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 14:18 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 14:38 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-26 23:15 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tommy Africani <ffci@tiacyctm.mo> - 2023-04-26 13:39 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-24 12:44 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 17:44 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:20 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 17:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 23:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:42 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 03:30 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:41 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 22:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:33 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 15:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1q9l0op.13f9x2tj6g798N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #608123 |
Jane <Jane@home.com> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:07:15 -0700, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > >> > brain doesn't work that way. > >> > . > >> -- > >> -- lover of truth > > > > What question? > > > > Nice videos, Jan. > > > > I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or > > you were moving relative to the ground when > > you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the Earth > > down, though. > > Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it > will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of > wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly from > the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. ROTFL, again. You are better at providing amusement than it seemed at first sight. Do keep it up. I'll leave it to you to find your error, more educational that way, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-24 00:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1758b6c88ba5f136$1$746483$4dd3c7de@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608164 |
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:33:17 +0200, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Jane <Jane@home.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:07:15 -0700, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> > brain doesn't work that way. >> >> > . >> >> -- >> >> -- lover of truth >> > >> > What question? >> > >> > Nice videos, Jan. >> > >> > I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or >> > you were moving relative to the ground when >> > you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the >> > Earth down, though. >> >> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it >> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of >> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly >> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. > > ROTFL, again. > You are better at providing amusement than it seemed at first sight. > Do keep it up. I cannot believe this! A whole bunch of obviously 'wannabe' physicists who have never heard of Coriolis. This provides even more evidence that Einstein worshippers are all seriously short of grey matter. . The Earth's rotation creates Coriolis forces which are almost entirely responsible for the existence of trade winds. These are favoured by wind farmers because they run almost 24/7/52 and contain far more energy than local sea breezes caused by the sun's heat. Extracting energy from trade winds will inevitably slow the Earth. This is therefore not fantasy but just another realism that I alone, being apparently an exceptional physicist, has realised. If the total human energy supply is derived from wind energy, the Earth will eventually stop spinning. Understand!!!!! Some of you pseudo-experts might like to do the simple calculations that will reveal how long that will take. You should all be able to roughly estimate the moment of inertia of a reasonably homogeneous sphere. (To relieve you concerns, I can tell you we don't have to worry for a while yet). > I'll leave it to you to find your error, > more educational that way, > > Jan -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-24 01:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <589195ac-628b-44a0-9633-cf4efc5a11b3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608288 |
On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 7:17:16 PM UTC-5, Jane wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:33:17 +0200, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Jane <Ja...@home.com> wrote: > >> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it > >> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of > >> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly > >> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. > > > > ROTFL, again. > > You are better at providing amusement than it seemed at first sight. > > Do keep it up. > I cannot believe this! A whole bunch of obviously 'wannabe' physicists > who have never heard of Coriolis. This provides even more evidence that > Einstein worshippers are all seriously short of grey matter. . > > The Earth's rotation creates Coriolis forces which are almost entirely > responsible for the existence of trade winds. These are favoured by wind > farmers because they run almost 24/7/52 and contain far more energy than > local sea breezes caused by the sun's heat. Extracting energy from trade > winds will inevitably slow the Earth. > This is therefore not fantasy but just another realism that I alone, > being apparently an exceptional physicist, has realised. > > If the total human energy supply is derived from wind energy, the Earth > will eventually stop spinning. Understand!!!!! > > Some of you pseudo-experts might like to do the simple calculations that > will reveal how long that will take. You should all be able to roughly > estimate the moment of inertia of a reasonably homogeneous sphere. > > (To relieve you concerns, I can tell you we don't have to worry for a > while yet). > > I'll leave it to you to find your error, > > more educational that way, All wind energy is COMPLETELY converted to heat regardless of the extent of human activity, which does virtually nothing to affect the rate of this conversion. The generation of wind by differential heating of the Earth's surface by the Sun, the bending of the wind's motions into circular patterns due to Coriolis effects, and the conversion of wind energy into heat does nothing to slow down the Earth's rotation. Certainly nothing that humans do can significantly affect the rate at which wind energy converts to heat. In any event, the relevant metric to follow is not energy, but angular momentum. The major sources of loss of angular momentum by the Earth arise from the fact that the Earth is not a closed system. The major effects are tidal influences by the Moon, Sun and other Solar System bodies. To a lesser extent there will be such influences as the torques exerted by the Sun's magnetic field as the Earth (and its conductive ionosphere) spins within the field. Gain/loss of mass from/to space due to meteor strikes and atmospheric losses, pushes from the solar wind etc. will have minor effects that are difficult to calculate. The human contribution to angular momentum change is not significant. This is quite different from the human contribution to the Earth's heat balance. Launching of artificial satellites will cause the Earth to slow down lightly, because they are almost always launched in a direction to get a boost from the Earth's spin, but I think you will agree that the combined effect of the various space programs is not much.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-25 00:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1759075263ed6cbb$1$3048414$13d399db@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608311 |
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:58:52 -0700, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 7:17:16 PM UTC-5, Jane wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:33:17 +0200, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> >> > Jane <Ja...@home.com> wrote: > >> >> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long >> >> it will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the >> >> harnessing of wind power? Not many people would know that wind >> >> energy comes mainly from the Earth's rotation with relatively little >> >> from the sun. >> > >> > ROTFL, again. >> > You are better at providing amusement than it seemed at first sight. >> > Do keep it up. >> I cannot believe this! A whole bunch of obviously 'wannabe' physicists >> who have never heard of Coriolis. This provides even more evidence that >> Einstein worshippers are all seriously short of grey matter. . >> >> The Earth's rotation creates Coriolis forces which are almost entirely >> responsible for the existence of trade winds. These are favoured by >> wind farmers because they run almost 24/7/52 and contain far more >> energy than local sea breezes caused by the sun's heat. Extracting >> energy from trade winds will inevitably slow the Earth. >> This is therefore not fantasy but just another realism that I alone, >> being apparently an exceptional physicist, has realised. >> >> If the total human energy supply is derived from wind energy, the Earth >> will eventually stop spinning. Understand!!!!! >> >> Some of you pseudo-experts might like to do the simple calculations >> that will reveal how long that will take. You should all be able to >> roughly estimate the moment of inertia of a reasonably homogeneous >> sphere. >> >> (To relieve you concerns, I can tell you we don't have to worry for a >> while yet). >> > I'll leave it to you to find your error, >> > more educational that way, > > All wind energy is COMPLETELY converted to heat regardless of the extent > of human activity, which does virtually nothing to affect the rate of > this conversion. > > The generation of wind by differential heating of the Earth's surface by > the Sun, the bending of the wind's motions into circular patterns due to > Coriolis effects, and the conversion of wind energy into heat does > nothing to slow down the Earth's rotation. Certainly nothing that humans > do can significantly affect the rate at which wind energy converts to > heat. You are quite wrong. The energy driving most of the Earth's trade winds comes from the Earth's rotation > In any event, the relevant metric to follow is not energy, but angular > momentum. The sun merely causes differential warming and density gradients which in turn induce air movement towards and away from the equator. Conservation of momentum explains the Coriolis effect and the isobar lines we see on weather charts. Wind turbines extract energy that is mainly derived from the Earth's rotation and turn it into heat. This upsets the tidal balance between atmosphere and land and results in a 'drag' that MUSt ultimately result in slowing of the Earth's spin rate. Being a relativist you probably think perpetual motion is possible. > The major sources of loss of angular momentum by the Earth arise from > the fact that the Earth is not a closed system. The major effects are > tidal influences by the Moon, Sun and other Solar System bodies. To a > lesser extent there will be such influences as the torques exerted by > the Sun's magnetic field as the Earth (and its conductive ionosphere) > spins within the field. Gain/loss of mass from/to space due to meteor > strikes and atmospheric losses, pushes from the solar wind etc. will > have minor effects that are difficult to calculate. That's correct... now do the calculation I asked and see how wind power compares. > The human contribution to angular momentum change is not significant. Do the calculation and prove it. (Earth's rotational energy)/(annual human consumption of energy) > This is quite different from the human contribution to the Earth's heat > balance. Launching of artificial satellites will cause the Earth to slow > down lightly, because they are almost always launched in a direction to > get a boost from the Earth's spin, but I think you will agree that the > combined effect of the various space programs is not much. What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten seconds at the same instant? -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-24 18:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6eb4a738-2ba2-44ed-a515-a307396bd63en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608387 |
On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten > seconds at the same instant? Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your math... if you can...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-25 17:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kar45bFuc9tU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608388 |
On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > >> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >> seconds at the same instant? > > Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your math... if you can... Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth my time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five years ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 11:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u2beve$1dseu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #608495 |
On 4/25/2023 6:56 PM, whodat wrote: > On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >> >>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>> seconds at the same instant? >> >> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >> math... if you can... > > Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth > my time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five > years ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well... > Do you still think this Jane is the same retired professor whom you claimed would make a positive contribution here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 08:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55fff505-ea76-4b82-998d-c69ef50273acn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608580 |
On Wednesday, 26 April 2023 at 17:11:45 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 4/25/2023 6:56 PM, whodat wrote: > > On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > >> > >>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten > >>> seconds at the same instant? > >> > >> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your > >> math... if you can... > > > > Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth > > my time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five > > years ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well... > > > Do you still think this Jane is the same retired professor whom you And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy is some "Newton mode"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 13:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kat8caF9ufiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608580 |
On 4/26/2023 10:11 AM, Volney wrote: > On 4/25/2023 6:56 PM, whodat wrote: >> On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>> >>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>> seconds at the same instant? >>> >>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>> math... if you can... >> >> Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth >> my time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five >> years ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well... >> > Do you still think this Jane is the same retired professor whom you > claimed would make a positive contribution here? Can't tell. Some things this poster says are beyond the capacity of the cranks I've seen here over the years, other times just junk. There was at least one instance where one identity was shared by several trolls. That presents another possibility in this case. In the end, it hardly matters. Usenet is an amusement, not a scientifically significant forum. It could/should be so much more than what it has become. If it is the same person as I thought then as someone else mentioned, then dementia has seized control. Otherwise I was fooled. That's a frequent enough occurrence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175992625002d176$1$3048414$13d399db@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608495 |
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:56:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >> >>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>> seconds at the same instant? >> >> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >> math... if you can... > > Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth my > time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five years > ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well... You are clearly envious because you lack my insight. That question was serious...so I will apparently have to provide an answer. There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface rotation accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. My second question is therefore, "would that be sufficient to cause massive earthquakes all around the world?" Can you not imagine every vehicles doing that and all the world's skyscrapers simultaneously collapsing? -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 21:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kau4hpFdt84U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608607 |
On 4/26/2023 2:21 PM, Jane wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:56:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > >> On 4/24/2023 8:18 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>> >>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>> seconds at the same instant? >>> >>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>> math... if you can... >> >> Jane's postings have become so insignificant they're no longer worth my >> time. She is now in the same category as "Starmaker." Twenty-five years >> ago I'd never have thought it possible. Oh well... > > You are clearly envious because you lack my insight. Oh please... And if you weren't addressing me but Alsing, I take it on myself to answer for him, Oh please... > That question was > serious... If so, you've completely lost it. I'm surprised that you demonstrate a need to keep proving it. > so I will apparently have to provide an answer. Mistake. It was already past time to shut up so readers would not have proof how far you've run off the rails. > There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface rotation > accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. The earth is not homogeneous, therefore any and all seismic predictions are strictly local and completely dependent on the local structure differing around the globe. But the entire scenario is strictly science fiction anyway, so there's no need for further discussion. Besides that, you've failed to describe what sort of "seismic activity," there are so many kinds. > My second question is > therefore, "would that be sufficient to cause massive earthquakes all > around the world?" See above. > Can you not imagine every vehicles doing that and all the world's > skyscrapers simultaneously collapsing? You forget that all the vehicles on earth are manufactured from the earth itself as is the energy source for vehicular acceleration and each represent a small fraction of the mass of the earth and its rotational energy. You've completely lost sight of the essentials of simple mechanics, and provided us with an amusement based in classical troll/crank stuff. Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your meds that are clearly failing you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 02:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1759f858fe012990$4$406094$4bd3c1de@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608642 |
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/26/2023 2:21 PM, Jane wrote: >>>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>>> >>>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>>> seconds at the same instant? >>>> >>>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>>> math... if you can... > >> That question was serious... > > If so, you've completely lost it. I'm surprised that you demonstrate a > need to keep proving it. > >> so I will apparently have to provide an answer. > > Mistake. It was already past time to shut up so readers would not have > proof how far you've run off the rails. > >> There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface >> rotation accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. > > The earth is not homogeneous, therefore any and all seismic predictions > are strictly local and completely dependent on the local structure > differing around the globe. Vehicles are well spread throughout the world. The Earth's crust is pretty thin. > But the entire scenario is strictly science > fiction anyway, so there's no need for further discussion. You say that but you have not done the relevant sums. What is the total mass of all vehicles on Earth...include trains. What is the mass of, say, the top 20 kms of our planet? What torque and energy is involved? I was hoping somebody would do that since, after all, this is the kind of thing physicists are supposed to do. > Besides that, you've failed to describe what sort of "seismic activity," > there are so many kinds. > >> My second question is therefore, "would that be sufficient to cause >> massive earthquakes all around the world?" > > See above. > >> Can you not imagine every vehicles doing that and all the world's >> skyscrapers simultaneously collapsing? > > You forget that all the vehicles on earth are manufactured from the > earth itself as is the energy source for vehicular acceleration and each > represent a small fraction of the mass of the earth and its rotational > energy. That is quite irrelevant. > You've completely lost sight of the essentials of simple mechanics, > and provided us with an amusement based in classical troll/crank stuff. > > Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your > meds that are clearly failing you. You laugh but you have not done the sums...If you do you might see my point. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-27 23:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kb0v68Frd21U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608750 |
On 4/27/2023 9:29 PM, Jane wrote: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > >> On 4/26/2023 2:21 PM, Jane wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>>>> seconds at the same instant? >>>>> >>>>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>>>> math... if you can... > >> >>> That question was serious... >> >> If so, you've completely lost it. I'm surprised that you demonstrate a >> need to keep proving it. >> >>> so I will apparently have to provide an answer. >> >> Mistake. It was already past time to shut up so readers would not have >> proof how far you've run off the rails. >> >>> There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface >>> rotation accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. >> >> The earth is not homogeneous, therefore any and all seismic predictions >> are strictly local and completely dependent on the local structure >> differing around the globe. > > Vehicles are well spread throughout the world. The Earth's crust is > pretty thin. > >> But the entire scenario is strictly science >> fiction anyway, so there's no need for further discussion. > > You say that but you have not done the relevant sums. What is the total > mass of all vehicles on Earth...include trains. What is the mass of, say, > the top 20 kms of our planet? What torque and energy is involved? > I was hoping somebody would do that since, after all, this is the kind of > thing physicists are supposed to do. > >> Besides that, you've failed to describe what sort of "seismic activity," >> there are so many kinds. >> >>> My second question is therefore, "would that be sufficient to cause >>> massive earthquakes all around the world?" >> >> See above. >> >>> Can you not imagine every vehicles doing that and all the world's >>> skyscrapers simultaneously collapsing? >> >> You forget that all the vehicles on earth are manufactured from the >> earth itself as is the energy source for vehicular acceleration and each >> represent a small fraction of the mass of the earth and its rotational >> energy. > > That is quite irrelevant. > >> You've completely lost sight of the essentials of simple mechanics, >> and provided us with an amusement based in classical troll/crank stuff. >> >> Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your >> meds that are clearly failing you. > > You laugh but you have not done the sums...If you do you might see my > point. The hedge "might" applies to everything you've written here. It is not for me to prove your case/cause. When you do that, substantiate your thin claims, others will gladly check your work. Till then it is all simply crankish claims that have nothing to substantiate them. Bear in mind they don't pass even a rudimentary review. Challenging me to do your work for you isn't a valid argument supporting your claims. P.S. Realistically, don't try chess as an alternate hobby.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 13:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175a1d4c6ec3ec77$42$1853841$53d3d9df@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608760 |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 23:08:34 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/27/2023 9:29 PM, Jane wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: >>> >>> Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your >>> meds that are clearly failing you. I actually have a degree in psychology as well as in physics. That's why childish criticism from scientific ignoramuses doesn't worry me. >> You laugh but you have not done the sums...If you do you might see my >> point. > > The hedge "might" applies to everything you've written here. It is not > for me to prove your case/cause. When you do that, substantiate your > thin claims, others will gladly check your work. Till then it is all > simply crankish claims that have nothing to substantiate them. Bear in > mind they don't pass even a rudimentary review. Challenging me to do > your work for you isn't a valid argument supporting your claims. > > P.S. Realistically, don't try chess as an alternate hobby. Funny you should mention chess. In my younger days I was pretty good at it...I once drew with Russian Grandmaster Yuri Averbakh in a 35 board simul, when he was on tour. I confused him with a very unconventional opening. ...I even have a photo to prove it. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 07:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5eb79bc6-15f2-4f14-abf7-ffc3ebbc0972n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608831 |
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 6:47:08 AM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 23:08:34 -0500, whodat wrote: > > > On 4/27/2023 9:29 PM, Jane wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > > > >>> > >>> Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your > >>> meds that are clearly failing you. > I actually have a degree in psychology as well as in physics. So, you are a psycho pretending to do physics. Check.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 09:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <16d1ee05-cc7d-4b93-8b56-cf5d3ebce6dbn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608831 |
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 6:47:08 AM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > Funny you should mention chess. In my younger days I was pretty good at > it...I once drew with Russian Grandmaster Yuri Averbakh in a 35 board > simul, when he was on tour. I confused him with a very unconventional > opening. ...I even have a photo to prove it. > -- This puts you around 80. Your dementia has settled in firmly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1q9x1zk.1054zb21ka1ieaN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #608861 |
Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 6:47:08?AM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > > > Funny you should mention chess. In my younger days I was pretty good at > > it...I once drew with Russian Grandmaster Yuri Averbakh in a 35 board > > simul, when he was on tour. I confused him with a very unconventional > > opening. ...I even have a photo to prove it. > > -- > This puts you around 80. Your dementia has settled in firmly. Yes, Yuri Averbakh was the first grand master to reach 100. (in 2022) He died that year. Bobby Fischer battled him. So 'Jane' might be somewhat younger. Bobby would have become 80, next year, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 16:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kb2teuF5m8vU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608861 |
On 4/28/2023 11:29 AM, Dono. wrote: > On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 6:47:08 AM UTC-7, Jane wrote: > >> Funny you should mention chess. In my younger days I was pretty good at >> it...I once drew with Russian Grandmaster Yuri Averbakh in a 35 board >> simul, when he was on tour. I confused him with a very unconventional >> opening. ...I even have a photo to prove it. >> -- > This puts you around 80. Your dementia has settled in firmly. Don't be an ageist. It reflects poorly on you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 00:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kb14dqFs764U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608750 |
On 4/27/2023 9:29 PM, Jane wrote: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: > >> On 4/26/2023 2:21 PM, Jane wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for ten >>>>>> seconds at the same instant? >>>>> >>>>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show your >>>>> math... if you can... > >> >>> That question was serious... >> >> If so, you've completely lost it. I'm surprised that you demonstrate a >> need to keep proving it. >> >>> so I will apparently have to provide an answer. >> >> Mistake. It was already past time to shut up so readers would not have >> proof how far you've run off the rails. >> >>> There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface >>> rotation accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. >> >> The earth is not homogeneous, therefore any and all seismic predictions >> are strictly local and completely dependent on the local structure >> differing around the globe. > Vehicles are well spread throughout the world. What does distribution of vehicles have to do with anything when their total mass is too small to have the effect you predict? > The Earth's crust is pretty thin. Here again you're throwing things at the ceiling to see what sticks. Hint: None of your claims have enough merit to stick. >> But the entire scenario is strictly science >> fiction anyway, so there's no need for further discussion. > > You say that but you have not done the relevant sums. What is the total > mass of all vehicles on Earth...include trains. What is the mass of, say, > the top 20 kms of our planet? What torque and energy is involved? > I was hoping somebody would do that since, after all, this is the kind of > thing physicists are supposed to do. 1) Do your own work. 2) Why do you think that "the top 20 kms" have to do with the statements you've made? >> Besides that, you've failed to describe what sort of "seismic activity," >> there are so many kinds. >> >>> My second question is therefore, "would that be sufficient to cause >>> massive earthquakes all around the world?" >> >> See above. >> >>> Can you not imagine every vehicles doing that and all the world's >>> skyscrapers simultaneously collapsing? >> >> You forget that all the vehicles on earth are manufactured from the >> earth itself as is the energy source for vehicular acceleration and each >> represent a small fraction of the mass of the earth and its rotational >> energy. > > That is quite irrelevant. Show your work to substantiate your position. >> You've completely lost sight of the essentials of simple mechanics, >> and provided us with an amusement based in classical troll/crank stuff. >> >> Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your >> meds that are clearly failing you. > > You laugh but you have not done the sums...If you do you might see my > point. See my other reply for details on this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-28 07:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175a08449df202eb$40$588642$c7d34dd6@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608776 |
On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:37:56 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/27/2023 9:29 PM, Jane wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:21:40 -0500, whodat wrote: >> >>> On 4/26/2023 2:21 PM, Jane wrote: >> >>>>>> On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 5:53:09 PM UTC-7, Jane wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What if every vehicle on earth rapidly accelerated eastward for >>>>>>> ten seconds at the same instant? >>>>>> >>>>>> Never ask a question that you are not prepared to answer... show >>>>>> your math... if you can... >> >> >>>> That question was serious... >>> >>> If so, you've completely lost it. I'm surprised that you demonstrate a >>> need to keep proving it. >>> >>>> so I will apparently have to provide an answer. >>> >>> Mistake. It was already past time to shut up so readers would not have >>> proof how far you've run off the rails. >>> >>>> There would be a small ten second 'blip' in the Earth's surface >>>> rotation accompanied by an amount of seismic activity. >>> >>> The earth is not homogeneous, therefore any and all seismic >>> predictions are strictly local and completely dependent on the local >>> structure differing around the globe. > >> Vehicles are well spread throughout the world. > > What does distribution of vehicles have to do with anything when their > total mass is too small to have the effect you predict? > > >> The Earth's crust is pretty thin. > > Here again you're throwing things at the ceiling to see what sticks. > > Hint: None of your claims have enough merit to stick. > >>> But the entire scenario is strictly science fiction anyway, so there's >>> no need for further discussion. >> >> You say that but you have not done the relevant sums. What is the total >> mass of all vehicles on Earth...include trains. What is the mass of, >> say, >> the top 20 kms of our planet? What torque and energy is involved? >> I was hoping somebody would do that since, after all, this is the kind >> of thing physicists are supposed to do. > > 1) Do your own work. > > 2) Why do you think that "the top 20 kms" have to do with the statements > you've made? Obviously you people have know knowledge of geology. There are great stresses in many structures of the earth's surface. A minor tremor could easily cause a massive earthquake and often does. > >> That is quite irrelevant. > > Show your work to substantiate your position. > > >>> You've completely lost sight of the essentials of simple mechanics, >>> and provided us with an amusement based in classical troll/crank >>> stuff. >>> >>> Please see your "shrimp" (old usenet humor) for an adjustment to your >>> meds that are clearly failing you. >> >> You laugh but you have not done the sums...If you do you might see my >> point. > > See my other reply for details on this. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web