Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #607821 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 204 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 04:05 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-18 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 10:07 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:14 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-19 19:37 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-19 17:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-20 10:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 01:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-19 22:23 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:08 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-20 08:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-19 17:25 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-04-29 09:46 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 19:04 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-01 00:04 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:15 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:29 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:40 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-05-01 14:44 +1000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-01 00:30 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 13:21 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 06:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-19 16:02 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 09:54 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 14:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 15:13 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-20 10:56 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 05:57 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 06:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 17:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-20 21:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 05:10 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:12 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-21 12:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 06:20 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 07:08 -0700
Mask falls off the face of hardened crank Amrit Gehan "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 02:07 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:23 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-21 22:52 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:48 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 09:17 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-22 12:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 10:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 11:00 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 17:55 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 18:27 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 19:31 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 22:23 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 23:16 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-23 07:02 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-23 08:40 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-23 14:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 17:24 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-22 15:33 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:17 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 01:58 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 00:53 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 18:18 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-26 11:11 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-26 08:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 13:20 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 19:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-26 21:21 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:29 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-27 23:08 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 13:47 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 09:29 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 00:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 10:33 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:37 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:47 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-30 23:57 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-30 23:01 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-04 20:50 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-04 16:51 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:06 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:44 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-07 23:48 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 23:22 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-08 20:08 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 22:54 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:45 +0000
Uncle Jane Discusses Science (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 00:24 -0500
Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-10 02:11 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 23:57 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 14:06 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-11 23:35 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-11 20:16 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-14 22:38 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 02:01 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 00:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-16 06:31 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-17 22:57 +0000
Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-17 19:20 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 01:39 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-18 21:59 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-19 07:23 +0000
Re: Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-19 08:28 -0500
Re: Uncle Jane's Dementia (was Re: Uncle Jane dodges the issues (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity.) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-18 22:14 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:05 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-09 22:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-05-04 21:24 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 22:36 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:26 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-04 23:41 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-06 00:07 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 18:39 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 23:19 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-05 21:56 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:04 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 20:03 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-05 19:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-07 00:59 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 21:57 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-08 02:51 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-08 00:02 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 20:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 20:22 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-27 23:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 07:28 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 07:34 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 16:03 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 21:18 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 17:26 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-28 22:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-28 18:39 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-24 20:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:37 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-25 17:00 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 11:56 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:10 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 10:28 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:06 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:30 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 02:38 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 11:49 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle (was Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 03:11 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 13:39 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 05:19 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-25 23:30 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-25 22:12 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 22:23 -0500
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-26 18:50 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-27 09:15 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-28 02:53 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-28 10:43 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 22:09 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-28 15:53 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle Evenezer Nigro <veor@rnigeern.ne> - 2023-04-30 16:24 +0000
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-05-07 13:34 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-29 10:55 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-04-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 21:27 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-29 19:01 -0400
Re: Railway puzzle Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-04-30 11:11 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-04-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-28 14:18 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-29 14:38 +0200
Re: Railway puzzle nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-26 23:15 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Tommy Africani <ffci@tiacyctm.mo> - 2023-04-26 13:39 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-04-24 12:44 +0300
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-04-24 17:44 +0200
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-04-24 13:20 -0400
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 12:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 00:31 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-04-21 17:49 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-21 23:43 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-22 09:42 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 03:30 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-04-22 07:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-24 00:19 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-24 08:37 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-04-25 01:21 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-04-25 17:41 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:01 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-05-06 18:59 -0700
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-05-06 22:36 -0500
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. Jane <Jane@home.com> - 2023-05-10 04:33 +0000
Re: The Experiment that Resccued Einstein from Obscurity. carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-05-10 14:17 -0700
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 07:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Mask falls off the face of hardened crank Amrit Gehan |
| Message-ID | <3834a463-a481-404d-ac6e-03651516f9b2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608073 |
On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 7:08:33 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > The college course contain the same repetitive Relativistic manthras that believers often repeat ad nauseam, it could be said. > ...and the mask slides off....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-21 02:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f41abe43-157d-441e-af96-aeedefd9cdadn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #607962 |
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:56:22 PM UTC+5, Jane wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT), Prokaryotic Capase Homolog > wrote: > > On Wednesday, April 19, 2023 at 1:06:16 PM UTC-5, JanPB wrote: > > > >> No, it has a unique solution. You haven't read the problem carefully > >> (again). > > > > I don't do puzzles, so I am *very* sluggish at these things. > > But if the hour hand turns at pi/6 radians/hr and the minute hand turns > > at 2pi radians/hr, isn't there more than one solution because of modular > > arithmetic? > > > > If the hands are symmetrically offset about the numeral "12" x hours > > before noon, wouldn't they be symmetrically offset about the "12" x > > hours after noon? > The original question did not mention 'symmetrically'. It just said the > hands swapped positions. There are at least six solutions, maybe more. > ...and they abused me because they couldn't even describe it properly. > > I am prepared to be embarrassed. Like I said, I don't do puzzles. My > > brain doesn't work that way. > > . > -- > -- lover of truth What question? Nice videos, Jan. I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or you were moving relative to the ground when you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the Earth down, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 00:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175819f5bcd53512$3$1853841$53d3d9df@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608054 |
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:07:15 -0700, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > brain doesn't work that way. >> > . >> -- >> -- lover of truth > > What question? > > Nice videos, Jan. > > I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or > you were moving relative to the ground when > you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the Earth > down, though. Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-21 22:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kah412Fdg78U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608123 |
On 4/21/2023 7:23 PM, Jane wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:07:15 -0700, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >>>> brain doesn't work that way. >>>> . >>> -- >>> -- lover of truth >> >> What question? >> >> Nice videos, Jan. >> >> I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or >> you were moving relative to the ground when >> you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the Earth >> down, though. > > Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it > will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of > wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly from > the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. Pure nonsense. Hardly worthy of being picked apart but at your insistence I'll be glad to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 09:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <175838c7821010c5$1$565070$c3d349d6@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608139 |
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:52:58 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/21/2023 7:23 PM, Jane wrote: >>> I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or >>> you were moving relative to the ground when >>> you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the >>> Earth down, though. >> >> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it >> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of >> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly >> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. > > Pure nonsense. Hardly worthy of being picked apart but at your > insistence I'll be glad to. Are you arguing or just making a noise because that is all you can do. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 09:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kai8kkFiop7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608153 |
On 4/22/2023 4:48 AM, Jane wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:52:58 -0500, whodat wrote: > >> On 4/21/2023 7:23 PM, Jane wrote: > >>>> I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or >>>> you were moving relative to the ground when >>>> you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the >>>> Earth down, though. >>> >>> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it >>> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of >>> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly >>> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. >> >> Pure nonsense. Hardly worthy of being picked apart but at your >> insistence I'll be glad to. > > Are you arguing or just making a noise because that is all you can do. Now you're just working at being obnoxious. A rotating earth relies very heavily on the sun's contribution for wind. Bing finds something over 3 million entries for "what causes wind." (save yourself the trouble if you were going to answer "beans.") Prevailing winds around the world tend to be from the west, that is to say, flowing in the same direction as the earth's rotation and most of the time faster than surface movement. To make your case you'd have to demonstrate enough of a coupling and explain why the wind is faster than the earth's surface. Wind powered electrical generation adds to the earth's rotation if anything, with the wind urging faster rotation because the wind usually travels faster than the surface. Yes, that's a repeat because I don't think you got it the first time. Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. As has been stated here before, you really do need to get a different hobby, physics isn't your strong suit any longer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 08:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f09724a-c4d2-45c7-9155-1e0dae8148a7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608169 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. You used to know this person as being reasonable. You must have missed the signs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 12:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kaiiljFkc7fU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #608175 |
On 4/22/2023 10:15 AM, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >> Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more >> than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. You used to know this > person as being reasonable. You must have missed the signs Cheap shot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 10:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <73659e0a-560a-4049-9aa7-890452185523n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608188 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 10:09:12 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 4/22/2023 10:15 AM, Dono. wrote: > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > >> Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > >> than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. You used to know this > > person as being reasonable. You must have missed the signs > Cheap shot. I was referring to HER mental issues, not yours.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-24 12:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1q9ovcp.hxfa654b6pf5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #608192 |
Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 10:09:12?AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > On 4/22/2023 10:15 AM, Dono. wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00?AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > > > >> Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > >> than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > > > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. You used to know this > > > person as being reasonable. You must have missed the signs > > Cheap shot. > I was referring to HER mental issues, not yours. Yes, but you snipped too much, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <edb84172-219a-40fc-a61e-574ba09460f8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608175 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 8:15:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. I'd say more like a narrow derangement or a monomania. We've seen lots of examples of this in other domains as well, like handling the covid or in politics. The phenomenon (manifest in many domains) has apparently always existed but it became visible through social media, so it probably appears more new or serious than it is. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "gehan.am...@gmail.com" <gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 17:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a34d5e58-69f6-42d3-ba79-e70b1a0268b4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608196 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+5, JanPB wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 8:15:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > > > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. > I'd say more like a narrow derangement or a monomania. We've seen > lots of examples of this in other domains as well, like handling the > covid or in politics. > > The phenomenon (manifest in many domains) has apparently always > existed but it became visible through social media, so it probably > appears more new or serious than it is. > > -- > Jan Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 18:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a5dba9d4-4e49-4533-8492-9f8bf7077e66n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608222 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+5, JanPB wrote: > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 8:15:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > > > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. > > I'd say more like a narrow derangement or a monomania. We've seen > > lots of examples of this in other domains as well, like handling the > > covid or in politics. > > > > The phenomenon (manifest in many domains) has apparently always > > existed but it became visible through social media, so it probably > > appears more new or serious than it is. > > > > -- > > Jan > Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. > > We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works? You've always been a crank , Gehan. So, stop pretending that you are taking classes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 19:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bb3e0105-5925-4872-a8dd-7b89a9758c99n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608222 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. > > We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works? . No. Your problem is, if you want to overthrow relativity, you need evidence to support your position. Evidence rules. Got any?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 22:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <867644a7-90ca-4f48-adaa-3161dbba46d0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608230 |
On Sunday, 23 April 2023 at 04:31:26 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. > > > > We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works? > . > No. Your problem is, if you want to overthrow relativity, you need evidence to support your position. > > Evidence rules. Got any? Anyone can check GPS, serious clocks keep measuring t'=t just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-22 23:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0b3068af-cc83-4776-aed7-378636ca3621n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608222 |
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+5, JanPB wrote: > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 8:15:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > > > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. > > I'd say more like a narrow derangement or a monomania. We've seen > > lots of examples of this in other domains as well, like handling the > > covid or in politics. > > > > The phenomenon (manifest in many domains) has apparently always > > existed but it became visible through social media, so it probably > > appears more new or serious than it is. > > > > -- > > Jan > Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. > > We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works? No. Not at all. What's really happening is that practically 100% of the anti-relativity voices here are arrogant nonsense. Most of it is not even wrong. So that's the situation. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-23 07:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e56be8a5-c119-479c-9d2f-90533c341a67n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608239 |
On Sunday, 23 April 2023 at 08:16:51 UTC+2, JanPB wrote: > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:55:40 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+5, JanPB wrote: > > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 8:15:32 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:18:00 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > > > > > > > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > > > > > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. > > > > More proof that antirelativism is a mental illness. > > > I'd say more like a narrow derangement or a monomania. We've seen > > > lots of examples of this in other domains as well, like handling the > > > covid or in politics. > > > > > > The phenomenon (manifest in many domains) has apparently always > > > existed but it became visible through social media, so it probably > > > appears more new or serious than it is. > > > > > > -- > > > Jan > > Relativists are the only ones immune. Except when they break ranks. > > > > We can establish by definition that anyone who does not support Relativity is a crank. Is this not how it works? > No. Not at all. Yes, exactly. At least Jan is ashamed of that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-23 08:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ca754323-a5e2-45ba-a3e3-2aec2cf94413n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #608260 |
On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 7:02:05 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > Yes, exactly. At least Jan is ashamed of that. The censorious are always the most stupid. The relativists don't understand that if one uses the same unit of measure of time for the two twins then the same amount of time passes for both! How do you like the new book by Mr. Liu on absolute or universal time?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-23 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1q9m15f.9ghsy31qy6ca1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #608169 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 4/22/2023 4:48 AM, Jane wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:52:58 -0500, whodat wrote: > > > >> On 4/21/2023 7:23 PM, Jane wrote: > > > >>>> I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you or > >>>> you were moving relative to the ground when > >>>> you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the > >>>> Earth down, though. > >>> > >>> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it > >>> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of > >>> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly > >>> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. > >> > >> Pure nonsense. Hardly worthy of being picked apart but at your > >> insistence I'll be glad to. > > > > Are you arguing or just making a noise because that is all you can do. > > Now you're just working at being obnoxious. > > A rotating earth relies very heavily on the sun's contribution > for wind. > > Bing finds something over 3 million entries for "what causes wind." > (save yourself the trouble if you were going to answer "beans.") > > Prevailing winds around the world tend to be from the west, that is > to say, flowing in the same direction as the earth's rotation and most > of the time faster than surface movement. To make your case you'd have > to demonstrate enough of a coupling and explain why the wind is faster > than the earth's surface. > > Wind powered electrical generation adds to the earth's rotation if > anything, with the wind urging faster rotation because the wind usually > travels faster than the surface. Yes, that's a repeat because I don't > think you got it the first time. Neither. Conservation of angular momentum of the Earth applies. (apart from the irrelevant and tiny tidal friction) The sun's radiation brings in heat, it doesn't bring in any angular momentum. > Almost daily it is becoming clearer that these days you're nothing more > than a wanabee shock jock without substantive contributions. As has been > stated here before, you really do need to get a different hobby, physics > isn't your strong suit any longer. It never was. If that 'Jane' really is recently retired from some university department it must be a pseudo-scientific one. (no lack of those, nowadays) You suggested knowing about it, sometime earlier, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jane <Jane@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-26 17:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <17598bfdd9538e0a$3$3048414$13d399db@news.newsgroupdirect.com> |
| In reply to | #608169 |
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 09:17:48 -0500, whodat wrote: > On 4/22/2023 4:48 AM, Jane wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:52:58 -0500, whodat wrote: >> >>> On 4/21/2023 7:23 PM, Jane wrote: >> >>>>> I bet you were wondering if the ground was moving relative to you >>>>> or you were moving relative to the ground when >>>>> you came in for a landing. It takes a lot more energy to slow the >>>>> Earth down, though. >>>> >>>> Seeing you mentioned that topic, have you ever worked out how long it >>>> will take for the Earth to stop spinning because of the harnessing of >>>> wind power? Not many people would know that wind energy comes mainly >>>> from the Earth's rotation with relatively little from the sun. >>> >>> Pure nonsense. Hardly worthy of being picked apart but at your >>> insistence I'll be glad to. >> >> Are you arguing or just making a noise because that is all you can do. > > Now you're just working at being obnoxious. > > A rotating earth relies very heavily on the sun's contribution for wind. > > Bing finds something over 3 million entries for "what causes wind." > (save yourself the trouble if you were going to answer "beans.") Wind is a consequence of random instability caused by temperature differences and the conservation of angular momentum > Prevailing winds around the world tend to be from the west, that is to > say, flowing in the same direction as the earth's rotation and most of > the time faster than surface movement. To make your case you'd have to > demonstrate enough of a coupling and explain why the wind is faster than > the earth's surface. Westerly winds are more prominent because the Coriolis action causes them to occur at higher latitudes than the easterly winds. And as any physicist would know, conservation of Momentum creates higher velocities at smaller radii. > Wind powered electrical generation adds to the earth's rotation if > anything, with the wind urging faster rotation because the wind usually > travels faster than the surface. Yes, that's a repeat because I don't > think you got it the first time. What nonsense! Why don't you stop posting to a physics newsgroup? You're just making a fool of yourself. Extracting energy from a system cannot add to its energy, idiot. Stick to trying to create perpetual motion. -- -- lover of truth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web