Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600733 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-03 17:05 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-07 07:26 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 134 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 17:05 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 22:19 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-04 12:31 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 04:07 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 04:39 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 04:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 08:37 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 06:15 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-04 18:43 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-04 18:21 -0600
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 16:41 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 16:52 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 17:22 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-02-05 02:29 +0100
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 17:35 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-05 04:55 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:25 -0800
Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 18:31 -0800
Re: Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 18:53 -0800
Re: Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 19:20 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 19:59 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-05 05:03 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:25 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 07:18 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 07:54 -0800
Richard Herz comes to grips with the fact he's an imbecile. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 09:16 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 11:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 00:42 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 04:49 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 07:44 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 07:48 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 14:04 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 12:21 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 21:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 22:26 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-12 23:22 +0000
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 22:26 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 06:16 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 08:34 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 08:52 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-04 18:22 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-05 19:55 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 16:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:25 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 04:38 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:45 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 08:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:55 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:16 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 09:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 21:07 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:13 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 02:39 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 00:30 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:32 -0600
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 13:49 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 10:54 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 11:13 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 13:43 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 17:33 -0500
Crank Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 14:51 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 22:32 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 23:38 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 08:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 23:19 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-04 11:29 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 10:15 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 13:31 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 13:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:10 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-04 18:24 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 02:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 06:42 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 14:22 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 14:24 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-05 20:20 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 16:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-06 20:37 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 11:57 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-07 14:22 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-07 12:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 13:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 17:37 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-08 10:45 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 22:14 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 18:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-11 19:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 21:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-12 22:11 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:52 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-12 20:59 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:12 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-13 20:08 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 20:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 00:21 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 00:40 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-17 13:35 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:52 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:48 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:56 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 10:31 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-18 13:54 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 15:03 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-05 09:09 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 01:35 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 01:44 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-07 17:53 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 09:49 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:34 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 10:10 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 14:28 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:36 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 16:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:27 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 21:14 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 23:48 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 01:19 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Donnell Costanzo <eldo@oactzo.an> - 2023-02-08 19:05 +0000
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:08 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 05:06 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 06:11 -0800
Re: According to Richard Hertz, he's an imbecile "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 07:26 -0800
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 08:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <95a6b7a6-4820-4069-8e97-d156da8877den@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600767 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:34:48 AM UTC-8, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 6:07:29 AM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > > > clocks, etc.) > > > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > > These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > The atoms in a cesium beam clock at sea level travel > in a parabolic trajectory from the emitter to the detector. > https://tinyurl.com/3jc9askc > The atoms traveling along this trajectory are in free-fall, > therefore weightless. So do you mean that cesium beam > clocks at sea level run faster than cesium beam clocks > at sea level? Electrons in the wires of electric wall clocks are subject to the same forces. And they don't run faster either. We must subject the *entire* clock to further analysis, and not cherry pick particular components of it, to find out what is going on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 18:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <1q5n43a.1gdvawb1b52x4N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #600769 |
patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:34:48 AM UTC-8, prokaryotic.c...@gmail: > > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 6:07:29 AM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, > > > > > spirals, water clocks, etc.) > > > > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? These two claims have been > > > demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm > > > sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to > > > type on each. > > > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But > > > this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material > > > components of those elements that comprise precision electronic > > > clocks. > > The atoms in a cesium beam clock at sea level travel > > in a parabolic trajectory from the emitter to the detector. > > https://tinyurl.com/3jc9askc > > The atoms traveling along this trajectory are in free-fall, > > therefore weightless. So do you mean that cesium beam > > clocks at sea level run faster than cesium beam clocks > > at sea level? > Electrons in the wires of electric wall clocks are subject to the same > forces. And they don't run faster either. We must subject the *entire* > clock to further analysis, and not cherry pick particular components of > it, to find out what is going on. The whole idea of analysing the action of gravity on clocks is thoroughly misguided.. It is time itself that is faster or slower, depending on where you are, and how you go, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 19:55 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <trou3a$2l2so$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600757 |
Den 04.02.2023 13:07, skrev patdolan: > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. Empirically? Can you refer to an experiment that confirms this? -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 16:01 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <c0a985d4-a72b-4728-b921-3da7a8eae449n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600837 |
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 04.02.2023 13:07, skrev patdolan: > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > Empirically? > Can you refer to an experiment that confirms this? > > -- > Paul > > https://paulba.no/ Can you refer to three experiments that falsify it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 16:27 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <9d22650f-d03b-49ef-ad48-b2bdeac08df2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600851 |
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 6:01:59 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > Den 04.02.2023 13:07, skrev patdolan: > > > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > Empirically? > > Can you refer to an experiment that confirms this? > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > https://paulba.no/ > Can you refer to three experiments that falsify it? Simple. Clocks in free fall "click" at different rates depending on gravitational potential, even though Newtonian gravity is identical at zero G. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#/media/File:Time_Dilation_vs_Orbital_Height.png
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 19:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <ab98f96c-345a-466a-b8f4-e70b2358b4e5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600853 |
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:27:37 PM UTC-8, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 6:01:59 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > > Den 04.02.2023 13:07, skrev patdolan: > > > > > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > > Empirically? > > > Can you refer to an experiment that confirms this? > > > > > > -- > > > Paul > > > > > > https://paulba.no/ > > Can you refer to three experiments that falsify it? > Simple. > Clocks in free fall "click" at different rates depending on > gravitational potential, even though Newtonian gravity > is identical at zero G. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#/media/File:Time_Dilation_vs_Orbital_Height.png Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 22:58 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <29f59fbb-3967-41c2-a9b9-0e3c7417901cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600869 |
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 7:25:19 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:27:37 PM UTC-8, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 6:01:59 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 10:55:41 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > > > Den 04.02.2023 13:07, skrev patdolan: > > > > > > > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > > > Empirically? > > > > Can you refer to an experiment that confirms this? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > https://paulba.no/ > > > Can you refer to three experiments that falsify it? > > Simple. > > Clocks in free fall "click" at different rates depending on > > gravitational potential, even though Newtonian gravity > > is identical at zero G. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#/media/File:Time_Dilation_vs_Orbital_Height.png > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. The odds are zero, Richard is as stupid at internet sleuthing as he is at science. BTW, you have your head very deep up his ass, must be very uncomfortable for both of you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 04:38 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <3cf2e509-2bf7-4df1-995c-70ff51a541bfn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600882 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 3:58:22 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 7:25:19 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote: <snip> > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > The odds are zero, Richard is as stupid at internet sleuthing as he is at science. > BTW, you have your head very deep up his ass, must be very uncomfortable for both of you. Adrian sa_ge Dono, it doesn't take a genius sleuth if you, mistakenly, post a file directly from your local computer, blowing up your cover, imbecile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 07:45 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <231ce2c5-9935-429a-820e-ef849e4b3c54n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600886 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 4:38:37 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 3:58:22 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 7:25:19 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote: > <snip> > > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > > > The odds are zero, Richard is as stupid at internet sleuthing as he is at science. > > BTW, you have your head very deep up his ass, must be very uncomfortable for both of you. You are as stupid at internet sleuthing as you are at science, Dick. Keep it up, dumbestdfuck!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 07:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <f582bf6a-110d-4f3f-b18e-a9581f0a1c2bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600891 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 12:45:48 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 4:38:37 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 3:58:22 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 7:25:19 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > > > > > The odds are zero, Richard is as stupid at internet sleuthing as he is at science. > > > BTW, you have your head very deep up his ass, must be very uncomfortable for both of you. > You are as stupid at internet sleuthing as you are at science, Dick. Keep it up, dumbestdfuck! Aging is making a disaster in your brain, Dono, sa_ge, Adrian Sfarti. You forget what you wrote, where did you write it and repeat yourself as a parrot. Better go and edit your self-published book and make it more readable, with a sense of continuity, and not a copy&paste of your 100+ publications (elsewhere) from the last 18 years, imbecile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 08:01 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <905df476-12fe-4c6e-9261-367134790038n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600892 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:53:07 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 12:45:48 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 4:38:37 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 3:58:22 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 7:25:19 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > > > > > > > The odds are zero, Richard is as stupid at internet sleuthing as he is at science. > > > > BTW, you have your head very deep up his ass, must be very uncomfortable for both of you. > > You are as stupid at internet sleuthing as you are at science, Dick. Keep it up, dumbestdfuck! > Aging is making a disaster in my brain It does indeed. On the other hand, it provides up with the daily entertainment based on your imbecilities, Dick!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 06:55 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <a57c23e5-82b6-48d6-aabb-eb517324701en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600869 |
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:25:19 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. These are not "aspirations". GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, DSAC, GP-A and so forth have all published specifications and results supporting GR. Crackpots like you deny their validity. Simple as that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 07:16 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <f4e69d53-7e4e-4c34-96a7-74c69aa36951n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600888 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:56:00 AM UTC-3, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:25:19 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > These are not "aspirations". GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, DSAC, > GP-A and so forth have all published specifications and > results supporting GR. Crackpots like you deny their > validity. Simple as that. I highly doubt that you have access to Beidou specs. And the european Galileo GNSS has CLEARLY LEFT "adjustments" due to relativity in the hands of each single manufacturer of receivers, either for commercial or industrial grade applications. About written specs, NOTHING is more sacred than national Constitutions. And they consist in hypocritical assertions, commands and reflections about laws and rights for the people. These vital specs are VIOLATED everywhere, 24x7 since they were written. So, what's written worth ZERO, no matter the human/animal/vegetal fields of activities. Now, statistically (they will say), those written specs are fulfilled, most of the time. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 09:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <8052326f-0bd3-4811-a995-b29e75293883n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600890 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:17:01 AM UTC-6, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:56:00 AM UTC-3, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:25:19 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: > > > > > Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. > > These are not "aspirations". GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, DSAC, > > GP-A and so forth have all published specifications and > > results supporting GR. Crackpots like you deny their > > validity. Simple as that. > I highly doubt that you have access to Beidou specs. And the european Galileo GNSS has CLEARLY LEFT "adjustments" due to relativity > in the hands of each single manufacturer of receivers, either for commercial or industrial grade applications. You'll find information about the Beidou system in various documents both in front of and behind paywalls. I don't have time to chase down the exact reference that I used for my diagram, but here are a couple of starters for you to look at. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/navi.294 https://satellite-navigation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43020-021-00044-0 Galileo (and other GNSS systems) have usually (but not always) left the relativistic corrections for orbital *ECCENTRICITY* to the receiver manufacturers. (In GLONASS, I believe that the eccentricity correction is in the broadcast signal.) The latest generation GNSS systems do not specify an *OVERALL* satellite offset because they fine tune the relativistic frequency offsets to the exact amount necessary for the particular orbit of each satellite. It is a waste of maneuvering fuel to move the satellites in response to their being pushed around by solar wind or traveling over irregularities in global mass distribution etc. so they instead compensate in software. Unlike the earliest generation GPS satellites, which used dual divisor digital PLL frequency synthesizers that could not be fine tuned and whose fixed frequency offset was therefore published in the Interface Control Documents, current frequency synthesizers are tunable and Galileo (and other GNSS systems including GPS) fine tune their outputs for maximum accuracy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 21:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <trsbq1$3a3em$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600900 |
On 2/6/2023 12:23 PM, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:17:01 AM UTC-6, Richard Hertz wrote: >> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:56:00 AM UTC-3, prokaryotic.c...@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 9:25:19 PM UTC-6, patdolan wrote: >>> >>>> Prokary, the rumor is that you are a distinguished man of science, familiar with the experimental design, execution and data capture. Yet you send me a graph your relativist's aspirations instead of hard data. Be careful, lest Richard Hertz assigns you a Dono number too. >>> These are not "aspirations". GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, DSAC, >>> GP-A and so forth have all published specifications and >>> results supporting GR. Crackpots like you deny their >>> validity. Simple as that. >> I highly doubt that you have access to Beidou specs. And the european Galileo GNSS has CLEARLY LEFT "adjustments" due to relativity >> in the hands of each single manufacturer of receivers, either for commercial or industrial grade applications. > > You'll find information about the Beidou system in various > documents both in front of and behind paywalls. I don't have > time to chase down the exact reference that I used for my diagram, > but here are a couple of starters for you to look at. > https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/navi.294 > https://satellite-navigation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43020-021-00044-0 > > Galileo (and other GNSS systems) have usually (but not always) left the > relativistic corrections for orbital *ECCENTRICITY* to the receiver > manufacturers. (In GLONASS, I believe that the eccentricity correction is in > the broadcast signal.) The latest generation GNSS systems do not specify an > *OVERALL* satellite offset because they fine tune the relativistic frequency > offsets to the exact amount necessary for the particular orbit of each > satellite. It is a waste of maneuvering fuel to move the satellites in > response to their being pushed around by solar wind or traveling over > irregularities in global mass distribution etc. so they instead compensate in > software. Unlike the earliest generation GPS satellites, which used dual > divisor digital PLL frequency synthesizers that could not be fine tuned and > whose fixed frequency offset was therefore published in the Interface Control > Documents, current frequency synthesizers are tunable and Galileo (and > other GNSS systems including GPS) fine tune their outputs for maximum > accuracy. He's right, Dick. If time wasn't subject to relativistic effects, all GNSS satellites would be forever in "Newton" mode, with their clock permanently set to 9,192,631,770 Cs cycles per one earth second, no matter what. No need to compensate for, or even care about, the solar wind or earth mascons messing with their orbit. Yet the US GPS people found out from the very first GPS prototype that the GR corrections are necessary. BTW you can buy off-the-shelf multichannel GNSS devices which can use any of the active systems, GPS, Beidou, GLONASS, whatever, so the Beidou secrets aren't too secret if you can order up a GNSS device from Amazon which uses it. Since the satellites are at a different orbital height for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different from the GPS 38µS/day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-06 19:13 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. |
| Message-ID | <6bb9020d-c135-4b3b-bfd4-0bb57a2b99ffn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600923 |
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:08:04 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: <snip> > Since the satellites are at a different orbital height > for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different > from the GPS 38µS/day. Like 0.00 µS/day. Get a life, Einstein's parrot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 02:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. |
| Message-ID | <trsv88$3fsjq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600928 |
On 2/6/2023 10:13 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:08:04 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > <snip> > >> Since the satellites are at a different orbital height >> for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different >> from the GPS 38µS/day. > > Like 0.00 µS/day. They tried that in 1977, with the GPS prototype. It didn't work. They then listened to the wisdom of Einstein and threw the magic switch, and it worked as expected. And all was right with the world, except for the continuous butthurt experienced by Dick Hurts, which continues to this day. > > Get a life, Einstein's parrot. Get some mental health treatment, Einstein obsesser.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 00:30 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. |
| Message-ID | <86258fe2-7721-4f3f-b31d-f4fdeae75306n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600942 |
On Tuesday, 7 February 2023 at 08:39:56 UTC+1, Volney wrote: > On 2/6/2023 10:13 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:08:04 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > >> Since the satellites are at a different orbital height > >> for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different > >> from the GPS 38µS/day. > > > > Like 0.00 µS/day. > They tried that in 1977, with the GPS prototype. It didn't work. Of course Einstein/ISO nonsense didn't work, common sense was warning him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 04:32 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. |
| Message-ID | <k4enmkF6a4sU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600942 |
On 2/7/2023 1:39 AM, Volney wrote: > On 2/6/2023 10:13 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: >> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:08:04 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> Since the satellites are at a different orbital height >>> for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different >>> from the GPS 38µS/day. >> >> Like 0.00 µS/day. > > They tried that in 1977, with the GPS prototype. It didn't work. They > then listened to the wisdom of Einstein and threw the magic switch, and > it worked as expected. And all was right with the world, except for the > continuous butthurt experienced by Dick Hurts, which continues to this day. >> >> Get a life, Einstein's parrot. > > Get some mental health treatment, Einstein obsesser. Bbbbbb but then he'd have nothing to talk about.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-07 13:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. |
| Message-ID | <tru6f2$3r1ut$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600928 |
On 2/6/2023 10:13 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:08:04 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > <snip> > >> Since the satellites are at a different orbital height >> for each GNSS system, the time offset for each GNSS will be different >> from the GPS 38µS/day. > > Like 0.00 µS/day. > > Get a life, Einstein's parrot. Read it and weep, Dick. Total relativistic offset [μs per day] GPS 38.44 Galileo 38.58 GLONASS 39.51 Beidou 39.48 IRNSS 46.49 https://www.academia.edu/29821239
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web