Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600733 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-02-03 17:05 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-07 07:26 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 134 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 17:05 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 22:19 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-04 12:31 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 04:07 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 04:39 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 04:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 08:37 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 06:15 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-04 18:43 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-04 18:21 -0600
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 16:41 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 16:52 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 17:22 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-02-05 02:29 +0100
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 17:35 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-05 04:55 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:25 -0800
Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 18:31 -0800
Re: Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 18:53 -0800
Re: Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 19:20 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 19:59 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-05 05:03 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 22:25 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 07:18 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 07:54 -0800
Richard Herz comes to grips with the fact he's an imbecile. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 09:16 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 11:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 00:42 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 04:49 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 07:44 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 07:48 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-11 14:04 -0500
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 12:21 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 21:55 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 22:26 -0800
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-12 23:22 +0000
Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 22:26 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 06:16 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 08:34 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 08:52 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-04 18:22 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-05 19:55 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 16:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 16:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 19:25 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 04:38 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:45 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 08:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:55 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 07:16 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 09:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-06 21:07 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 19:13 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 02:39 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 00:30 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-07 04:32 -0600
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 13:49 -0500
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 10:54 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 11:13 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 13:43 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 17:33 -0500
Crank Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 14:51 -0800
Re: Dono is a known plagiarist and one of many Einstein's parrot. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 22:32 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 23:38 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 08:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 23:19 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-02-04 11:29 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 10:15 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 13:31 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 13:41 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 14:10 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-04 18:24 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 02:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 06:42 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 14:22 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-04 14:24 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-05 20:20 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 16:01 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-06 20:37 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-06 11:57 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-07 14:22 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-02-07 12:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 13:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 17:37 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-08 10:45 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-10 22:14 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 18:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-11 19:58 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-11 21:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-12 22:11 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:52 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-12 20:59 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Lino Sebastiani <oala@ansllaeo.bo> - 2023-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-12 13:12 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-13 20:08 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-13 20:27 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 00:21 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 00:40 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-02-17 13:35 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:52 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:48 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-17 14:56 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-18 10:31 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-18 10:04 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-18 13:54 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-04 15:03 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-05 09:09 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 01:35 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-02-05 01:44 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-02-07 17:53 +0100
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 09:49 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 06:34 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 10:10 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 14:28 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 18:36 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 16:53 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 20:27 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-06 21:14 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-06 23:48 -0600
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-07 01:19 -0500
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Donnell Costanzo <eldo@oactzo.an> - 2023-02-08 19:05 +0000
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:08 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 04:23 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 05:06 -0800
Re: According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 06:11 -0800
Re: According to Richard Hertz, he's an imbecile "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-02-07 07:26 -0800
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-03 17:05 -0800 |
| Subject | According to Einstein, moving clocks run slow (SR), and elevated clocks run fast (GR) |
| Message-ID | <522d5d57-71c9-41e8-b39e-196209baa316n@googlegroups.com> |
It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water clocks, etc.)
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-03 22:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <bb4782c8-2480-426e-8cab-08e1e25b6b2dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600733 |
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > clocks, etc.) How do you know, Dick? Have you tried?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 12:31 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <1q5mjx3.eid4cq8rweg5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #600749 |
Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > clocks, etc.) > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? He could be his own clock, and start living on top of a mountain. Good for him. He could produce more nonsense faster, up there, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 22:23 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <6420f2cc-8932-4c63-977b-df0070394d4cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600756 |
On Saturday, 4 February 2023 at 12:31:51 UTC+1, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Dono. <eggy20...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > > clocks, etc.) > > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > He could be his own clock, and start living on top of a mountain. > Good for him. He could produce more nonsense faster, up there, And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by your bunch of idiots GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 04:07 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Einstein, Dick Hertz is a piece of shit |
| Message-ID | <b7cb50f0-44fa-4688-84f2-6f0fe3602b9bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600749 |
On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > clocks, etc.) > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 04:39 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <a6fb6086-4fd2-4a6d-92dd-d2b6dfb2db2dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600757 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > > clocks, etc.) > > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 04:55 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <f3f5180c-89bf-4b6c-93a6-b6f2ab6f3f8an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600758 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote: <snip> > Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. > > Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". > Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". > > Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) > > So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. Also, valid for sand clocks, water clocks, vertical spring clocks, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 08:37 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <02f4089e-9db1-4723-85a8-d0a949ccf3d5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600759 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:55:48 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:39:44 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote: > > <snip> > > Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. > > > > Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". > > Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". > > > > Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) > > > > So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. > Also, valid for sand clocks, water clocks, vertical spring clocks, etc. I agree with this. The contravariant behavior of mechanical and electromagnetic clocks further demonstrates the contention that the actual flow of time is independent of the both the type of device that measures it and the gravitational circumstance in which it is measured.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 06:15 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <6d33e022-f5a2-4a42-84e3-9bb2246dc923n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600758 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:39:44 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > > > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > > > clocks, etc.) > > > How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > > These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. > > > > Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > Not now, Pat. Kookfight
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 18:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <trmqju$2616f$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600758 |
On 2/4/2023 7:39 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: >> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: >>> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: >>>> It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water >>>> clocks, etc.) >>> How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? >> These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. >> >> Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. > > Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". > Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". > > Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) > > So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. A pendulum clock depends on a local g (gravitational acceleration) to be a certain value to work correctly. The gravitating source is part of the clock. A pendulum clock on the moon (with a different local g) will run at a different rate. A pendulum clock in deep space will not work at all, since the local gravitational source is missing. (will you claim time doesn't pass at all in deep space?) A pendulum clock won't work correctly if upside down or sideways, its gravity component must be "installed" correctly. It is part of the clock. Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. A spring clock depends on the force of the spring, not gravity. It will work in deep space or on the moon. In theory a spring clock will show GR time dilation, but you'll never be able to make a spring clock accurate enough to show the tiny GR time dilation. I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument applies to them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 18:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <k48b4bF6ct2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600799 |
On 2/4/2023 5:43 PM, Volney wrote: > On 2/4/2023 7:39 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: >> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: >>> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: >>>> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: >>>>> It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, >>>>> spirals, water >>>>> clocks, etc.) >>>> How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? >>> These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless >>> posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. >>> He will certainly have more to type on each. >>> >>> Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But >>> this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the >>> material components of those elements that comprise precision >>> electronic clocks. >> >> Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the >> INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. >> >> Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". >> Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". >> >> Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . >> √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) >> >> So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. > > A pendulum clock depends on a local g (gravitational acceleration) to be > a certain value to work correctly. The gravitating source is part of the > clock. A pendulum clock on the moon (with a different local g) will run > at a different rate. A pendulum clock in deep space will not work at > all, since the local gravitational source is missing. (will you claim > time doesn't pass at all in deep space?) A pendulum clock won't work > correctly if upside down or sideways, its gravity component must be > "installed" correctly. It is part of the clock. > > Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > A spring clock depends on the force of the spring, not gravity. It will > work in deep space or on the moon. In theory a spring clock will show > GR time dilation, but you'll never be able to make a spring clock > accurate enough to show the tiny GR time dilation. > > I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > applies to them. All functioning clocks should be considered averaging devices.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 16:41 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <2421ac4a-6d61-4ad7-b139-bd98414ee1d2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600799 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 3:44:31 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote: > On 2/4/2023 7:39 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: > >> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > >>> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > >>>> It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > >>>> clocks, etc.) > >>> How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > >> These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. > >> > >> Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > > > Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. > > > > Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". > > Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". > > > > Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) > > > > So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. > A pendulum clock depends on a local g (gravitational acceleration) to be > a certain value to work correctly. The gravitating source is part of the > clock. A pendulum clock on the moon (with a different local g) will run > at a different rate. A pendulum clock in deep space will not work at > all, since the local gravitational source is missing. (will you claim > time doesn't pass at all in deep space?) A pendulum clock won't work > correctly if upside down or sideways, its gravity component must be > "installed" correctly. It is part of the clock. > > Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > A spring clock depends on the force of the spring, not gravity. It will > work in deep space or on the moon. In theory a spring clock will show > GR time dilation, but you'll never be able to make a spring clock > accurate enough to show the tiny GR time dilation. > > I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > applies to them. Perls before the two pigs (Pat Dolan and Richard Hertz)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 16:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <3284d495-44e7-46c6-99b5-1e427bbee040n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600802 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 4:41:22 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 3:44:31 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote: > > On 2/4/2023 7:39 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: > > >> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 10:19:02 PM UTC-8, Dono. wrote: > > >>> On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 5:05:33 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > >>>> It doesn't work for mechanical clocks of any kind (pendulum, spirals, water > > >>>> clocks, etc.) > > >>> How do you know, Dick? Have you tried? > > >> These two claims have been demonstrated countless times in countless posts in this forum. But I'm sure Richard will not leave us hanging. He will certainly have more to type on each. > > >> > > >> Clocks in free-fall are empirically known to run slightly fast. But this is easily explained by Newtonian Gravity's effect on the material components of those elements that comprise precision electronic clocks. > > > > > > Not now, Pat. Only about pendulum clocks, for which gravity causes the INVERSE EFFECT that (allegedly) the IMBECILE said. > > > > > > Einstein: "Time run faster with increasing height". > > > Newton: "Time run SLOWER with increasing height". > > > > > > Newton's based pendulum clock: T = 1/2π √(L/g) = √[L/(4π²GMₑ)] . √(Rₑ+h) = Cₑ √(Rₑ+h) > > > > > > So, a Newton's based pendulum run SLOWER with height h, not faster. > > A pendulum clock depends on a local g (gravitational acceleration) to be > > a certain value to work correctly. The gravitating source is part of the > > clock. A pendulum clock on the moon (with a different local g) will run > > at a different rate. A pendulum clock in deep space will not work at > > all, since the local gravitational source is missing. (will you claim > > time doesn't pass at all in deep space?) A pendulum clock won't work > > correctly if upside down or sideways, its gravity component must be > > "installed" correctly. It is part of the clock. > > > > Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > > POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > > even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > > > A spring clock depends on the force of the spring, not gravity. It will > > work in deep space or on the moon. In theory a spring clock will show > > GR time dilation, but you'll never be able to make a spring clock > > accurate enough to show the tiny GR time dilation. > > > > I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > > local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > > applies to them. > Perls before the two pigs (Pat Dolan and Richard Hertz) Oh yeah, Dono! What about Volrony confusing the wave EM wave cavity expression with the free wave expression???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 17:22 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <85d5a570-d069-403d-bc05-995252ca32dcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600799 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: <snip usual Molroney shit> > Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. TELL IT TO YOUR PAGAN GOD. HE REPLACED ONE FOR THE OTHER WITHOUT SHAME. YOU SHOULD MEMORIZE THE 1911 PAPER, THE ONLY ONE THE CRETIN WROTE BY HIMSELF, NOT STEALING, PLAGIARIZING OR USURPING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK, EXCEPT THE VON SOLDNER PART. AND, BECAUSE OF THAT, THE PAPER LOOKS LIKE WRITTEN BY A BABBLING IMBECILE. <snip more usual Molroney shit> > I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > applies to them. WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 02:29 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <trn0pc$26g8e$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600806 |
Le 05/02/2023 à 02:22, Richard Hertz a écrit : > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > <snip usual Molroney shit> > >> Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational >> POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you >> even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > TELL IT TO YOUR PAGAN GOD. HE REPLACED ONE FOR THE OTHER WITHOUT SHAME. > YOU SHOULD MEMORIZE THE 1911 PAPER, THE ONLY ONE THE CRETIN WROTE BY HIMSELF, > NOT STEALING, PLAGIARIZING OR USURPING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK, EXCEPT THE VON SOLDNER PART. > > AND, BECAUSE OF THAT, THE PAPER LOOKS LIKE WRITTEN BY A BABBLING IMBECILE. > > > <snip more usual Molroney shit> > >> I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on >> local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument >> applies to them. > > WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). They do: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clepsidra You're not going well Richard, these days... right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 17:35 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <e8cc1307-7697-41ca-9a48-a6063f352e09n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600807 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:29:19 PM UTC-3, Python wrote: > Le 05/02/2023 à 02:22, Richard Hertz a écrit : > > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > > > <snip usual Molroney shit> > > > >> Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > >> POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > >> even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > > > TELL IT TO YOUR PAGAN GOD. HE REPLACED ONE FOR THE OTHER WITHOUT SHAME. > > YOU SHOULD MEMORIZE THE 1911 PAPER, THE ONLY ONE THE CRETIN WROTE BY HIMSELF, > > NOT STEALING, PLAGIARIZING OR USURPING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK, EXCEPT THE VON SOLDNER PART. > > > > AND, BECAUSE OF THAT, THE PAPER LOOKS LIKE WRITTEN BY A BABBLING IMBECILE. > > > > > > <snip more usual Molroney shit> > > > >> I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > >> local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > >> applies to them. > > > > WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). > They do: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clepsidra > > You're not going well Richard, these days... right? I was trolling Molroney, to see him jump. Why the fuck did you meddle into this?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-05 04:55 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <trnueg$2eh0j$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600809 |
On 2/4/2023 8:35 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 10:29:19 PM UTC-3, Python wrote: >> Le 05/02/2023 à 02:22, Richard Hertz a écrit : >>> On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: >>> >>> <snip usual Molroney shit> >>> >>>> Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational >>>> POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you >>>> even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. >>> >>> TELL IT TO YOUR PAGAN GOD. HE REPLACED ONE FOR THE OTHER WITHOUT SHAME. >>> YOU SHOULD MEMORIZE THE 1911 PAPER, THE ONLY ONE THE CRETIN WROTE BY HIMSELF, >>> NOT STEALING, PLAGIARIZING OR USURPING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK, EXCEPT THE VON SOLDNER PART. >>> >>> AND, BECAUSE OF THAT, THE PAPER LOOKS LIKE WRITTEN BY A BABBLING IMBECILE. >>> >>> >>> <snip more usual Molroney shit> >>> >>>> I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on >>>> local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument >>>> applies to them. >>> >>> WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). >> They do: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clepsidra >> >> You're not going well Richard, these days... right? > > I was trolling Molroney, to see him jump. Why the fuck did you meddle into this? > Probably because you lied (again), Richard. Why do you lie?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 22:25 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: According to Dono's mom, he's a product of inbreeding. She knows better. |
| Message-ID | <11a07b8e-4a6e-465c-af36-4e026f7af475n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600807 |
On Sunday, 5 February 2023 at 02:29:19 UTC+1, Python wrote: > Le 05/02/2023 à 02:22, Richard Hertz a écrit : > > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 8:44:31 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > > > > <snip usual Molroney shit> > > > >> Meanwhile, the GR time dilation is related to the gravitational > >> POTENTIAL at its location, not the gravitational acceleration. Do you > >> even understand what the difference is? I didn't think so. > > > > TELL IT TO YOUR PAGAN GOD. HE REPLACED ONE FOR THE OTHER WITHOUT SHAME. > > YOU SHOULD MEMORIZE THE 1911 PAPER, THE ONLY ONE THE CRETIN WROTE BY HIMSELF, > > NOT STEALING, PLAGIARIZING OR USURPING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK, EXCEPT THE VON SOLDNER PART. > > > > AND, BECAUSE OF THAT, THE PAPER LOOKS LIKE WRITTEN BY A BABBLING IMBECILE. > > > > > > <snip more usual Molroney shit> > > > >> I don't know of hourglasses or water clocks but they certainly depend on > >> local g to work correctly, just like a pendulum clock. So same argument > >> applies to them. > > > > WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). > They do: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clepsidra > > You're not going well Richard, these days... right? Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again, and trying to pretend he knows something. Tell me, poor stinker, what is your definition of a "theory" in the terms of Peano arithmetic? See: if a theorem is going to be a part of a theory, it has to be formulable in the language of the theory. Do you get it? Or are you too stupid even for that, poor stinker?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 18:31 -0800 |
| Subject | Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . |
| Message-ID | <d6206bb6-b63a-4992-b52c-87703a064c5bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600806 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 5:22:59 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). You are eating shit, Dick: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_clock Once again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-04 18:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Richard Hertz ihas been made to eat shit. Again. . |
| Message-ID | <68bde22b-2a1f-4e97-b875-40ece1dac762n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600810 |
On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 11:31:12 PM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 5:22:59 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > WATER CLOCKS DON'T EXIST, FUCKING RETARDED. I INVENTED IT JUST TO TROLL TOM (AND NOW YOU). > You are eating shit, Dick: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_clock > Once again. What are you? Molroney attorney? Read my reply to Python, asshole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 7 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web