Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598271 > unrolled thread

Tom Roberts and the resident frauds

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-12-26 06:08 -0800
    Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2023-01-01 07:51 -0800
      Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-01-01 08:33 -0800
    Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 13:06 -0800
      Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:59 -0800
        Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-01-01 17:04 -0800
          Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:16 -0800
        Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:14 -0800
          Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:17 -0800
            Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:33 -0600
              Re: Tom Roberts and the resident frauds Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:28 -0500
          Cretin Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth "egas@pacbell.net" <egas@pacbell.net> - 2023-01-01 19:20 -0800

#598271 — Tom Roberts and the resident frauds

If you think I am tired calling you up, you pieces of ugly retarded shit, you are so fucking wrong...

Julio

On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:51:08 UTC+1, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:18:10 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: 
> > On 12/23/22 11:58 AM, Python wrote: 
> > > Defining time coordinate in relation to duration is a good start,
> 
> (You have actually said a sensible thing for a change. Our local 
> representative of authorities just couldn't let it go.)
> 
> > No, it isn't any sort of start, as that is circular. Attempts to define 
> > "time" in terms of past and future are similarly circular and useless. 
> > 
> > Physics defines "time" in theories that contain time as a parameter, 
> > coordinate, or quantity, invariably notated as "t".
> 
> Bullshit! Tau is PROPER TIME, and THAT is the fundamental parameter 
> of our dynamical systems, across as many different frames as one likes.
> 
> > "Time is what clocks measure." [Einstein and others]
> 
> Which is PROPER TIME and indeed it is properly universal.
> 
> > Whether time "participates in any physical phenomenon" depends on the 
> > physical theory involved, and how time appears in the theory.
> 
> Same bullshit! PROPER TIME is just NOT relative. 
> 
> Mainstream bullshit... 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#598769

On Monday, 26 December 2022 at 15:08:56 UTC+1, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> If you think I am tired calling you up, you pieces of ugly retarded shit, you are so fucking wrong... 
> On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:51:08 UTC+1, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:18:10 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: 
> > > On 12/23/22 11:58 AM, Python wrote: 
> > > > Defining time coordinate in relation to duration is a good start, 
> > 
> > (You have actually said a sensible thing for a change. Our local 
> > representative of authorities just couldn't let it go.) 
> > 
> > > No, it isn't any sort of start, as that is circular. Attempts to define 
> > > "time" in terms of past and future are similarly circular and useless. 
> > > 
> > > Physics defines "time" in theories that contain time as a parameter, 
> > > coordinate, or quantity, invariably notated as "t". 
> > 
> > Bullshit! Tau is PROPER TIME, and THAT is the fundamental parameter 
> > of our dynamical systems, across as many different frames as one likes. 
> > 
> > > "Time is what clocks measure." [Einstein and others] 
> > 
> > Which is PROPER TIME and indeed it is properly universal. 
> > 
> > > Whether time "participates in any physical phenomenon" depends on the 
> > > physical theory involved, and how time appears in the theory. 
> > 
> > Same bullshit! PROPER TIME is just NOT relative. 
> > 
> > Mainstream bullshit...

Up, you pieces of polluting retarded shit.

Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598770

El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 12:51:35 UTC-3, ju...@diegidio.name escribió:
> On Monday, 26 December 2022 at 15:08:56 UTC+1, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 

> > > Mainstream bullshit...
> Up, you pieces of polluting retarded shit. 
> 
> Julio

Ask your doctor for stronger medication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598786

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 11:08:56 AM UTC-3, ju...@diegidio.name wrote:
> If you think I am tired calling you up, you pieces of ugly retarded shit, you are so fucking wrong... 
> 
> Julio 
> 
> On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:51:08 UTC+1, Julio Di Egidio wrote: 
> > On Friday, 23 December 2022 at 20:18:10 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote: 
> > > On 12/23/22 11:58 AM, Python wrote: 
> > > > Defining time coordinate in relation to duration is a good start, 
> > 
> > (You have actually said a sensible thing for a change. Our local 
> > representative of authorities just couldn't let it go.) 
> > 
> > > No, it isn't any sort of start, as that is circular. Attempts to define 
> > > "time" in terms of past and future are similarly circular and useless. 
> > > 
> > > Physics defines "time" in theories that contain time as a parameter, 
> > > coordinate, or quantity, invariably notated as "t". 
> > 
> > Bullshit! Tau is PROPER TIME, and THAT is the fundamental parameter 
> > of our dynamical systems, across as many different frames as one likes. 
> > 
> > > "Time is what clocks measure." [Einstein and others] 
> > 
> > Which is PROPER TIME and indeed it is properly universal. 
> > 
> > > Whether time "participates in any physical phenomenon" depends on the 
> > > physical theory involved, and how time appears in the theory. 
> > 
> > Same bullshit! PROPER TIME is just NOT relative. 
> > 
> > Mainstream bullshit...

Muons, Inc.
Innovation in Research
https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page


https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline

Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598818

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:

> Muons, Inc. 
> Innovation in Research 
> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page 
> 
> 
> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline 
> 
> Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy

Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times superior to your own?

Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598819

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 4:59:25 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> 
> > Muons, Inc. 
> > Innovation in Research 
> > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page 
> > 
> > 
> > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline 
> > 
> > Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy
> Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times superior to your own? 
> 
> Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
I don't acknowledge Tom Roberts as a physics expert.  At least not at the level of my own expertise.  The reason is simple and straight forward.  I thought up my eponymous dilemma and Tom didn't.  What could be more reasonable than that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598824

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 5:04:16 PM UTC-8, patdolan wrote:

> I don't acknowledge Tom Roberts as a physics expert.

Then you are as stupid as the day is long...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598823

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:59:25 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> 
> > Muons, Inc. 
> > Innovation in Research 
> > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page 
> > 
> > 
> > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline 
> > 
> > Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy
> Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times superior to your own? 
> 
> Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.

Obviously, you are much less than bright. You CAN'T UNDERSTAND what lies behind my post IN YOUR OWN NATIVE LANGUAGE.

Let me describe you as IF you were FIVE YEARS OLD: Besides his year and a half working BY a lab in 1975, in the rest of his
professional career HE HAS BEEN A DESKTOP SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER, active physicist wannabe! GOT IT NOW?

I even put a link for one of the "famous" program sold in the entire "collective west".

But you really SUCK DECODING SARCASM AND IRONY.

He's a fucking PROGRAMMER! In the 90's at Lucent, now in his own company.

He's Dono (Adrian Sfarti) TWIN, in a way. Only that Dono is ACTUALLY an EE, who got a PhD on Relativistic Electrodynamics AFTER
he was sacked from Berkeley as ASSISTANT Professor for external courses and advising to companies in the computer graphics field.

Roberts averaged a career in physics as I AVERAGED A CAREER IN MATHEMATICS. Capito?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598826

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 5:14:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:59:25 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > 
> > > Muons, Inc. 
> > > Innovation in Research 
> > > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline 
> > > 
> > > Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy 
> > Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times superior to your own? 
> > 
> > Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
> Obviously, you are much less than bright. You CAN'T UNDERSTAND what lies behind my post IN YOUR OWN NATIVE LANGUAGE. 
> 
> Let me describe you as IF you were FIVE YEARS OLD: Besides his year and a half working BY a lab in 1975, in the rest of his 
> professional career HE HAS BEEN A DESKTOP SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER, active physicist wannabe! GOT IT NOW? 
> 
> I even put a link for one of the "famous" program sold in the entire "collective west". 
> 
> But you really SUCK DECODING SARCASM AND IRONY. 
> 
> He's a fucking PROGRAMMER! In the 90's at Lucent, now in his own company. 
> 
> He's Dono (Adrian Sfarti) TWIN, in a way. Only that Dono is ACTUALLY an EE, who got a PhD on Relativistic Electrodynamics AFTER 
> he was sacked from Berkeley as ASSISTANT Professor for external courses and advising to companies in the computer graphics field. 
> 
> Roberts averaged a career in physics as I AVERAGED A CAREER IN MATHEMATICS. Capito?

You, too, are as stupid as the day is long...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598830

On 1/1/2023 7:17 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 5:14:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:59:25 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Muons, Inc.
>>>> Innovation in Research
>>>> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline
>>>>
>>>> Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having spent 17 years in experimental High Energy
>>> Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times superior to your own?
>>>
>>> Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
>> Obviously, you are much less than bright. You CAN'T UNDERSTAND what lies behind my post IN YOUR OWN NATIVE LANGUAGE.
>>
>> Let me describe you as IF you were FIVE YEARS OLD: Besides his year and a half working BY a lab in 1975, in the rest of his
>> professional career HE HAS BEEN A DESKTOP SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER, active physicist wannabe! GOT IT NOW?
>>
>> I even put a link for one of the "famous" program sold in the entire "collective west".
>>
>> But you really SUCK DECODING SARCASM AND IRONY.
>>
>> He's a fucking PROGRAMMER! In the 90's at Lucent, now in his own company.
>>
>> He's Dono (Adrian Sfarti) TWIN, in a way. Only that Dono is ACTUALLY an EE, who got a PhD on Relativistic Electrodynamics AFTER
>> he was sacked from Berkeley as ASSISTANT Professor for external courses and advising to companies in the computer graphics field.
>>
>> Roberts averaged a career in physics as I AVERAGED A CAREER IN MATHEMATICS. Capito?
> 
> You, too, are as stupid as the day is long...

Surely a month at least, more likely an eon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598861

On 1/1/2023 8:33 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 1/1/2023 7:17 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 5:14:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:59:25 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:06:13 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Muons, Inc.
>>>>> Innovation in Research
>>>>> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=Muons,-Inc.-Home-Page
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://muonsinc.com/Website1/tiki-index.php?page=G4beamline
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Roberts - VP Computational Physics . V.P. Technology 
>>>>> Development, Ph.D. (1975). Dr. Thomas J. Roberts is Scientist and 
>>>>> Vice President for Technology Development at MuPlus, Inc. Having 
>>>>> spent 17 years in experimental High Energy
>>>> Assuming that you got this right... why in the world would you argue 
>>>> with someone whose knowledge of physics is maybe 100 or 200 times 
>>>> superior to your own?
>>>>
>>>> Do you *like* being shown to be ignorant of the subject matter, over 
>>>> and over and over again? Again, I would claim that you definitely do 
>>>> not know what you do not know. The knowledgeable people are only 
>>>> laughing at your constant bumbling and stumbling... get a clue. 
>>>> Folks like yourself overestimate their own knowledge and ability and 
>>>> underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
>>> Obviously, you are much less than bright. You CAN'T UNDERSTAND what 
>>> lies behind my post IN YOUR OWN NATIVE LANGUAGE.
>>>
>>> Let me describe you as IF you were FIVE YEARS OLD: Besides his year 
>>> and a half working BY a lab in 1975, in the rest of his
>>> professional career HE HAS BEEN A DESKTOP SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER, active 
>>> physicist wannabe! GOT IT NOW?
>>>
>>> I even put a link for one of the "famous" program sold in the entire 
>>> "collective west".
>>>
>>> But you really SUCK DECODING SARCASM AND IRONY.
>>>
>>> He's a fucking PROGRAMMER! In the 90's at Lucent, now in his own 
>>> company.
>>>
>>> He's Dono (Adrian Sfarti) TWIN, in a way. Only that Dono is ACTUALLY 
>>> an EE, who got a PhD on Relativistic Electrodynamics AFTER
>>> he was sacked from Berkeley as ASSISTANT Professor for external 
>>> courses and advising to companies in the computer graphics field.
>>>
>>> Roberts averaged a career in physics as I AVERAGED A CAREER IN 
>>> MATHEMATICS. Capito?
>>
>> You, too, are as stupid as the day is long...
> 
> Surely a month at least, more likely an eon.

But who is stupider? Pat Dolan or Richard Hertz?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#598844 — Cretin Richard Hertz frothes at the mouth

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 5:14:23 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>cretinsms<

Dumbestfuck,

I was never "sacked" from Berkeley. For the simple reason that I never worked for Berkeley. You are as stupid at internet sleuthing as you are at science. Keep it up, dumbestfuck!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web