Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #581357 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-03-30 09:13 +0200 |
| Last post | 2022-04-04 13:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 409 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-30 09:13 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-03-30 16:46 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-30 11:37 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-31 08:16 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Vance Rera <rerv@trscnat.ag> - 2022-04-03 20:38 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-03-30 11:08 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-03-31 08:04 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 00:14 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-03-31 00:26 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-01 07:05 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 00:25 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-02 08:18 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-01 07:37 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-01 00:39 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-02 08:38 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 18:17 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 14:57 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 19:07 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-02 15:22 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 19:33 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-02 12:30 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richie Cruze <rcru@bstntap.jp> - 2022-04-02 19:53 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 00:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Elmer Joss <josl@nntdca.mx> - 2022-04-03 08:50 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 13:07 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Vance Rera <rerv@trscnat.ag> - 2022-04-03 20:24 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 15:34 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Vance Rera <rerv@trscnat.ag> - 2022-04-04 00:25 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 19:33 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Hagan Koon <koh@nisnaha.mx> - 2022-04-04 12:30 +0000
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 12:23 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Lamar Main <lana@rtcpans.in> - 2022-04-04 21:04 +0000
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 17:41 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-04 21:09 -0400
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-05 00:17 -0500
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 23:03 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-05 02:10 -0400
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Lamar Main <lana@rtcpans.in> - 2022-04-05 09:35 +0000
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-05 03:13 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Lamar Main <lana@rtcpans.in> - 2022-04-05 09:33 +0000
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 16:00 -0700
Re: Annotated nazi excrement JanPB failed the eugenicist IQ-test Lamar Main <lana@rtcpans.in> - 2022-04-05 09:54 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-05 08:09 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-03 08:07 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 00:43 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-03 12:38 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-04 07:14 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 01:44 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-05 08:16 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 13:55 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-05 08:25 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-05 02:46 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-06 07:40 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-05 14:56 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-06 07:53 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 13:50 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 07:01 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 14:18 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-06 08:45 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-07 07:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 13:25 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 07:53 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-03 15:42 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-04 07:20 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-04 13:10 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-04 13:55 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-05 08:35 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-05 10:28 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-05 03:15 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-06 08:01 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-05 14:56 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-05 14:03 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-05 18:06 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-07 07:48 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 13:25 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 07:59 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mitch Yamaguchi <sdvw@aozrihai.wg> - 2022-04-07 19:23 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 14:10 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 07:56 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-05 13:58 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-06 08:22 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-07 07:45 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 01:20 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 08:14 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 23:47 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 01:06 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 08:40 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-07 23:56 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-08 20:50 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-08 19:05 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-09 08:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-08 23:51 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 13:02 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 13:21 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-09 12:18 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 09:14 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-04-10 11:29 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-10 12:28 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-04-10 16:54 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 00:50 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 21:52 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 07:42 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:01 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-04-11 05:50 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 18:20 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 09:48 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-04-11 09:54 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:32 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-11 18:39 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:28 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-12 06:36 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-12 06:47 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 21:58 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-12 11:14 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-12 11:10 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-12 18:48 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-12 11:37 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-13 02:37 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-14 08:36 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-13 23:44 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-14 04:16 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 01:34 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Emil Imada <irzd@tlqinosm.jt> - 2022-04-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 12:47 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 13:06 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-09 07:48 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-09 14:36 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 06:18 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 08:49 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 23:52 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 12:54 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 12:51 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 05:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 21:04 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-10 22:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-10 21:20 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 07:48 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-11 08:43 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-11 13:55 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-11 21:09 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-12 02:52 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-13 07:49 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-13 07:41 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-14 08:21 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-14 14:38 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 07:47 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:26 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-14 15:42 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-15 18:29 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 17:00 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-15 15:46 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-16 10:23 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-16 12:59 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-16 23:13 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-17 10:04 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-04-17 04:46 -0500
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-17 17:11 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-18 09:33 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 12:38 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-18 16:05 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 09:24 -0700
Crank Thomas Heger perseveres (in his imbecility) "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 08:49 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-18 13:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-19 09:29 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 01:03 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-19 11:42 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 03:01 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 03:33 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-19 11:05 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-19 08:25 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-21 08:53 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-04-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-04-21 07:32 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-21 13:51 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-21 23:24 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-21 21:10 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-22 08:38 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-22 11:00 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-23 08:07 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-04-23 14:59 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-24 07:36 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-24 10:41 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 01:59 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 09:02 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-21 13:48 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-22 09:00 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 01:41 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Dong Vassilikos <saox@cowrpsho.rb> - 2022-04-24 12:23 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-22 15:39 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-22 07:11 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-23 07:55 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-23 03:34 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-23 11:52 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 05:49 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-24 08:07 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 01:52 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-25 09:52 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 12:22 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 07:02 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 22:24 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 17:35 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-27 07:59 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-28 07:14 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 01:45 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Rady Konoe <akde@oakoradn.en> - 2022-04-28 09:03 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-29 08:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 20:51 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 21:03 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-30 07:47 +0200
Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 07:00 -0700
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 14:44 +0000
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 08:19 -0700
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 15:28 +0000
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 15:33 +0000
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 17:56 +0000
Re: Imbecile Thomas Heger perseveres Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-30 20:15 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 19:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-01 10:15 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:15 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:40 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-03 07:58 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-03 09:45 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 16:44 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 23:15 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@example.invalid> - 2022-04-29 14:30 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 06:45 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2022-04-30 19:50 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-30 21:43 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-29 08:22 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 12:52 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 13:06 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 06:47 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-01 09:59 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 12:16 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-02 08:03 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-01 23:31 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 08:56 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 02:30 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 00:18 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-04 06:53 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-04 01:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-05 09:02 +0200
Crank Thomas Heger keeps on lying "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 06:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 22:17 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-05 22:34 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-06 08:55 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 00:24 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 01:15 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-06 01:41 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-07 07:19 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-07 00:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-08 08:22 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-08 12:33 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-10 07:12 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-10 00:19 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-11 07:55 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-11 11:25 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-12 07:39 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-12 10:31 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-12 21:05 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-15 11:26 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-18 07:38 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-18 16:42 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 11:33 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-12 21:28 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-13 08:41 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-14 06:43 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 19:49 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-15 08:34 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-15 12:53 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-18 08:01 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-18 10:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-20 09:32 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 19:29 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-15 08:50 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-19 08:39 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-19 11:03 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 06:56 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 02:05 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-20 09:17 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-20 15:10 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-21 08:38 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-21 18:41 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-21 11:51 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-22 07:29 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-21 23:10 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-30 07:19 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-31 12:08 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-01 08:05 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-01 12:54 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 05:38 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-02 08:00 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-02 07:58 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-02 09:36 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-03 07:29 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-03 12:13 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-04 08:01 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-06-04 10:04 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-04 13:24 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-05 08:41 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-05 12:34 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-06 08:56 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-06 11:07 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 01:18 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-07 07:59 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-07 19:38 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-08 08:40 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-08 12:05 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-10 07:55 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-10 10:31 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:59 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-11 07:03 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-12 06:47 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-13 11:46 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-14 08:09 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-06-14 13:08 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-15 12:44 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 09:39 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 07:51 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 00:53 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-07-05 08:12 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-04 20:14 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-04 22:29 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-05 08:48 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 07:43 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-08 08:43 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 22:24 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-05 13:07 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-06 08:42 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 00:16 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 00:29 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-07 08:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 23:33 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 00:35 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 00:41 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-07 11:19 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-07 02:26 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-08 08:54 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-05-19 20:00 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-03 07:39 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-06 17:09 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-07 07:32 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-07 13:53 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-07 05:10 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-08 08:33 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-08 12:34 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-09 07:20 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 02:24 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 03:04 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-09 10:14 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-09 00:25 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-18 15:54 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-18 06:17 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-18 15:53 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-05-18 16:58 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-19 08:57 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-05-19 11:42 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 06:57 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-19 16:17 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 07:41 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Python <python@invalid> - 2022-05-19 18:46 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 10:22 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-24 07:47 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-23 23:48 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-28 06:45 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-20 09:42 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 04:44 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 12:02 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-02 05:11 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-03 08:15 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-24 07:49 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 01:23 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-24 11:08 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 05:14 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-24 12:46 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Dong Vassilikos <saox@cowrpsho.rb> - 2022-04-24 21:09 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-25 10:23 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-24 12:56 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-25 10:09 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-25 11:51 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-26 07:22 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Cody Sakellariou <yall@ckcldcdd.ar> - 2022-04-23 07:59 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2022-04-23 12:56 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Dong Vassilikos <saox@cowrpsho.rb> - 2022-04-24 21:21 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT Coke Hishikawa <uhva@blseummh.nm> - 2022-04-09 11:33 +0000
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-09 13:08 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-10 11:54 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-04-10 21:10 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 12:43 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 17:43 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-19 09:43 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 08:01 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-21 10:08 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-22 07:00 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 01:02 -0700
Re: Annotated version of SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-30 01:18 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-30 07:57 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-06-30 13:58 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-07-05 08:03 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2022-07-05 09:37 +0300
Re: Annotated version of SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-07-06 07:14 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> - 2022-04-04 21:02 -0400
Re: Annotated version of SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2022-04-03 22:31 +0200
Re: Annotated version of SRT nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-04-04 13:10 +0200
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-19 09:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b20782b4-b876-4420-b241-aba23eb8b83cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586923 |
On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 11:09:36 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 12.06.2022 um 15:47 schrieb JanPB: > >> Maxwell and Heinrich Hertz, there seem to be wrong quotes, too. (That > >> >would have been already a severe departure of possible tracks in science.) > > I cannot comment on that as you provided no specifics. As Judge Judy > > would say: "That's hearsay". > > > >> >At least in case of Hertz, there seems to be a wrong quote, because > >> >Einstein called his partial differential equations 'Maxwell-Hertz > >> >equations', while Hertz used only total derivatives. > > This was probably the standard usage at the time. I'd have to check. > > I don't think Einstein just made it up, it makes no sense. > > > I was now able to identify the used source with some degree of certainty: > > https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz:148#/media/Datei:De_Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz_148.jpg > > from this book: > > https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Untersuchungen_%C3%BCber_die_Ausbreitung_der_elektrischen_Kraft > > The equations by Einstein with similar content and form were written on > page 13 (top). OK. What's your point? Of course Maxwell's equations look like Maxwell's equations, no matter how they are written. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-21 07:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jhd4i5Fem58U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #587201 |
Am 19.06.2022 um 18:39 schrieb JanPB: >>> This was probably the standard usage at the time. I'd have to check. >>> I don't think Einstein just made it up, it makes no sense. >>> >> I was now able to identify the used source with some degree of certainty: >> >> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz:148#/media/Datei:De_Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz_148.jpg >> >> from this book: >> >> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Untersuchungen_%C3%BCber_die_Ausbreitung_der_elektrischen_Kraft >> >> The equations by Einstein with similar content and form were written on >> page 13 (top). > > OK. What's your point? Of course Maxwell's equations look like > Maxwell's equations, no matter how they are written. Hertz modified the Maxwell equations and Einstein used Hertz' modified version. He actually wrote that in his text and called the set of equations 'Maxwell-Hertz equations'. He used actually the very same variable names as Hertz. But Einstein used partial derivatives, what Hertz had not done. This would be a false quote, even if the quote itself was missing. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-29 00:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ca5130a2-3b90-4096-b1f6-a579f45874e0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #587342 |
On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 10:51:05 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 19.06.2022 um 18:39 schrieb JanPB: > > >>> This was probably the standard usage at the time. I'd have to check. > >>> I don't think Einstein just made it up, it makes no sense. > >>> > >> I was now able to identify the used source with some degree of certainty: > >> > >> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz:148#/media/Datei:De_Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz_148.jpg > >> > >> from this book: > >> > >> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Untersuchungen_%C3%BCber_die_Ausbreitung_der_elektrischen_Kraft > >> > >> The equations by Einstein with similar content and form were written on > >> page 13 (top). > > > > OK. What's your point? Of course Maxwell's equations look like > > Maxwell's equations, no matter how they are written. > Hertz modified the Maxwell equations and Einstein used Hertz' modified > version. He actually wrote that in his text and called the set of > equations 'Maxwell-Hertz equations'. > > He used actually the very same variable names as Hertz. So what? > But Einstein used partial derivatives, what Hertz had not done. So what? -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-05 08:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jii31vF8oucU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #587655 |
Am 29.06.2022 um 09:53 schrieb JanPB: > On Monday, June 20, 2022 at 10:51:05 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 19.06.2022 um 18:39 schrieb JanPB: >> >>>>> This was probably the standard usage at the time. I'd have to check. >>>>> I don't think Einstein just made it up, it makes no sense. >>>>> >>>> I was now able to identify the used source with some degree of certainty: >>>> >>>> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz:148#/media/Datei:De_Elektrische_Kraft_Hertz_148.jpg >>>> >>>> from this book: >>>> >>>> https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Untersuchungen_%C3%BCber_die_Ausbreitung_der_elektrischen_Kraft >>>> >>>> The equations by Einstein with similar content and form were written on >>>> page 13 (top). >>> >>> OK. What's your point? Of course Maxwell's equations look like >>> Maxwell's equations, no matter how they are written. >> Hertz modified the Maxwell equations and Einstein used Hertz' modified >> version. He actually wrote that in his text and called the set of >> equations 'Maxwell-Hertz equations'. >> >> He used actually the very same variable names as Hertz. > > So what? Hertz used his equations to describe the behaviour of 'the aether', while Einstein declared, that an aether would not exist. To me it seems to be - at least- odd, to use the arguments of kind opponent, to prove the own postion, which is totally opposite to the realm, from where the arguments came. >> But Einstein used partial derivatives, what Hertz had not done. > > So what? It is not a only a missing quote, but also a false quote. If you quote something from somobody, the quote has to be correct. What you should never ever do, that is a false quote. A false quote is a quote, which does not quote the actual source correctly, but says so. Actually Einstein didn't say, he quoted Heinrich Hertz, just mentioned his name. That is already scientific misbehaviour. But even in this case there has to be a one to one relation between source and quote. If the source is altered without notice, this is regarded as severe sin in science. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-04 20:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e618866-99b7-461a-8c4b-d41533ce383bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586401 |
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. > But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-04 22:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <13a33c39-fac8-44ff-add4-908fc646736fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586450 |
On Sunday, 5 June 2022 at 05:14:53 UTC+2, Dono. wrote: > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > > Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. > > > But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism. See, Dono: you ARE a fanatic, lying piece of shit - but it's still an insult when I write it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-05 08:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jg31tnFml47U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586450 |
Am 05.06.2022 um 05:14 schrieb Dono.: > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. >> > But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism. > These are two unjustified claims, which were meant to be insults. In case you want to link me to Naziism, you would need to quote any kind or political statement by me, which would connect me to right winged movements. But that will be most likely not succesfull, as I have been politically active more at the left side of the political spectrum. So, you took something out of thin air and meant it as an insult, just because I dared to criticise Einstein/SRT. But please notice, that that is not how science works. Science is an endeavour to discover truth and therefore needs criticque of any results, even those of Einstein. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-06 07:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d2b6b769-929f-413b-b1a7-da33de678927n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586456 |
On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 11:48:28 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 05.06.2022 um 05:14 schrieb Dono.: > > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > > >> Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. > >> > > But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism. > > > These are two unjustified claims, which were meant to be insults. > > In case you want to link me to Naziism, you would need to quote any kind > or political statement by me, which would connect me to right winged > movements. > Your statements over the years make it quite clear that you ARE a nazi piece of shit. > But that will be most likely not succesfull, as I have been politically > active more at the left side of the political spectrum. > Today's "left" is clearly antisemitic. So, you fit the mold. > So, you took something out of thin air and meant it as an insult, just > because I dared to criticise Einstein/SRT. > You are not competent to "criticize", you are just a pathetic hack.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-08 08:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jgauojF22biU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586506 |
Am 06.06.2022 um 16:43 schrieb Dono.: >>>> Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. >>>> >>> But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism. >>> >> These are two unjustified claims, which were meant to be insults. >> >> In case you want to link me to Naziism, you would need to quote any kind >> or political statement by me, which would connect me to right winged >> movements. >> > > Your statements over the years make it quite clear that you ARE a nazi piece of shit. > > >> But that will be most likely not succesfull, as I have been politically >> active more at the left side of the political spectrum. >> > > Today's "left" is clearly antisemitic. So, you fit the mold. > What you have still failed to explain, that's why writing a critique about 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' has anything to do with religion. ... TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-10 22:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f121b66c-2025-49b6-90ae-0dbf1778d76an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586576 |
On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 11:43:36 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 06.06.2022 um 16:43 schrieb Dono.: > > >>>> Many insults came from a user named 'Dono', who called me 'Nazi' or similar. > >>>> > >>> But you ARE a nazi (piece of shit). You are motivated by rabid racism. > >>> > >> These are two unjustified claims, which were meant to be insults. > >> > >> In case you want to link me to Naziism, you would need to quote any kind > >> or political statement by me, which would connect me to right winged > >> movements. > >> > > > > Your statements over the years make it quite clear that you ARE a nazi piece of shit. > > > > > >> But that will be most likely not succesfull, as I have been politically > >> active more at the left side of the political spectrum. > >> > > > > Today's "left" is clearly antisemitic. So, you fit the mold. > > > What you have still failed to explain, that's why writing a critique > about 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' has anything to do with > religion. > Has to do with your rabid antisemitism. You try to hide it but it doesn't work. You are a nazi piece of shit , Thomas. Choke on it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-05 13:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <726f2e26-bf3d-4428-a75a-e3a3f3108908n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586401 |
On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > That could possibly be explained by a large scale scientific fraud, > which is assisted by massive amounts of money and power. > > Now the question is: who is behind this scam and for which reasons? Nobody. It's all inside your head. There is no "scientific fraud" and no "massive amounts of money and power" there. > I actually do not know. But I do know, that this is not how science > should work. Sure. But the root cause is your fantasising. It's not real. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-06 08:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jg5lvcF5gm0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586481 |
Am 05.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb JanPB: > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> That could possibly be explained by a large scale scientific fraud, >> which is assisted by massive amounts of money and power. >> >> Now the question is: who is behind this scam and for which reasons? > > Nobody. It's all inside your head. There is no "scientific fraud" and > no "massive amounts of money and power" there. Well, if I can find four hundred errors in Einstein's paper, than certainly Planck would have been able, too. The reason: I'm not even a physicist, let alone a leading expert and a professor. But Planck published Einstein's text, hence had known the text prior to printing it. To me it is hard to believe, that he would have accepted such a faulty paper. But not alone was this crap printed, but was heralded to the world as pinnacle of all science, which was written by a true genius, who invented relativity and E=m*c². Now many criticised this particular article in the years to come. But he critique was swept under the rug till the present day. >> I actually do not know. But I do know, that this is not how science >> should work. > > Sure. But the root cause is your fantasising. It's not real. > Sure. But if you think that I'm making this all up and there are in fact no errors in Einstein's text, let alone hundreds, then you should be able to show at least a few of my four hundred errors. here are my comments again: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dlajModzLK4wgScoOLEMmzpzS2JTUft6/view?usp=sharing TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-06 00:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <45c0b7a9-bc43-49b0-baea-36e13367d265n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586494 |
On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 11:42:57 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 05.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb JanPB: > > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> > >> That could possibly be explained by a large scale scientific fraud, > >> which is assisted by massive amounts of money and power. > >> > >> Now the question is: who is behind this scam and for which reasons? > > > > Nobody. It's all inside your head. There is no "scientific fraud" and > > no "massive amounts of money and power" there. > Well, if I can find four hundred errors in Einstein's paper, than > certainly Planck would have been able, too. But you haven't found any errors there. It's all a fantasy inside your head only. > The reason: I'm not even a physicist, let alone a leading expert and a > professor. > > But Planck published Einstein's text, hence had known the text prior to > printing it. > > To me it is hard to believe, that he would have accepted such a faulty > paper. But the paper is not faulty. It contains no errors and it contains a very interesting and innovative way of resolving certain problems that were known to exist within electrodynamics (and its relation to mechanics). That's why it was accepted. It also demonstrated that Lorentz's 1904 results could be derived in a simple general way. > But not alone was this crap printed, It's not "crap", it's a very good paper. > but was heralded to the world as > pinnacle of all science, Because it is. > which was written by a true genius, Because it was. >who > invented relativity and E=m*c². Because he did. > Now many criticised this particular article in the years to come. > > But he critique was swept under the rug till the present day. There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. At best, such critiques may be debating something. > >> I actually do not know. But I do know, that this is not how science > >> should work. > > > > Sure. But the root cause is your fantasising. It's not real. > > > Sure. But if you think that I'm making this all up and there are in fact > no errors in Einstein's text, Yes, this is correct. >let alone hundreds, then you should be > able to show at least a few of my four hundred errors. No, this is impossible. That phenomenon is very well-known. It is impossible to point out errors to a person who does not understand the subject. Life on Earth in general would be much easier if such a thing were possible. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-06 00:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ff1f1235-c194-488d-a4ed-57a2c8e2ff87n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586496 |
On Monday, 6 June 2022 at 09:16:21 UTC+2, JanPB wrote: > On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 11:42:57 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 05.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb JanPB: > > > On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:01:20 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > >> > > >> That could possibly be explained by a large scale scientific fraud, > > >> which is assisted by massive amounts of money and power. > > >> > > >> Now the question is: who is behind this scam and for which reasons? > > > > > > Nobody. It's all inside your head. There is no "scientific fraud" and > > > no "massive amounts of money and power" there. > > Well, if I can find four hundred errors in Einstein's paper, than > > certainly Planck would have been able, too. > But you haven't found any errors there. It's all a fantasy inside your head only. > > The reason: I'm not even a physicist, let alone a leading expert and a > > professor. > > > > But Planck published Einstein's text, hence had known the text prior to > > printing it. > > > > To me it is hard to believe, that he would have accepted such a faulty > > paper. > But the paper is not faulty. It contains no errors and it contains > a very interesting and innovative way of resolving certain problems The paper is some insane mumble inconsistent with basic definitions, up to 1968 (afair) valid also in your moronic physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-07 08:08 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jg88akFilstU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #586496 |
Am 06.06.2022 um 09:16 schrieb JanPB: >> But not alone was this crap printed, > It's not "crap", it's a very good paper. > >> >but was heralded to the world as >> >pinnacle of all science, > Because it is. Possibly he got a hit in the error count. >> >which was written by a true genius, > Because it was. There are two problems with your statement: Was Einstein a genius? had Einstein written the text himself? Both questions needed to be examined and I would guess 'no' about both. >> >who >> >invented relativity and E=m*c². > Because he did. The equation was know already in 1905 and stems from nuclear decay. As far as I can tell, Poincaré used it a couple of years before Einstein. >> >Now many criticised this particular article in the years to come. >> > >> >But he critique was swept under the rug till the present day. > There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. > At best, such critiques may be debating something. > I have personally read several articles, which criticised the text of Einstein. One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-06 23:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <97234092-1b1d-42ff-a543-9eee908166d9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586527 |
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 at 08:08:24 UTC+2, Thomas Heger wrote: > One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. > > This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. > > Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. No critique of The Shit will ever be valid for a fanatic believer in The Shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-07 00:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f72fcedd-7458-453d-86b6-ab3f5a7366e1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586527 |
On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:08:24 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 06.06.2022 um 09:16 schrieb JanPB: > >> > > There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. > > At best, such critiques may be debating something. > > > I have personally read several articles, which criticised the text of > Einstein. > > One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. > > This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. Yes, that's one instance I meant. > Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. No, you misread. My point was one can write valid critiques but they necessarily presume the understanding of the subject. This is not the case here, you guys are merely fantasising and making some nonsense up. Dingle's critique could only be philosophical, there is no internal contradiction within the theory and there is no experimental disproof (yet?). -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-07 00:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <029fc38b-7345-497c-8aa7-8626ed8ce591n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586535 |
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 at 09:35:32 UTC+2, JanPB wrote: > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:08:24 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 06.06.2022 um 09:16 schrieb JanPB: > > >> > > > There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. > > > At best, such critiques may be debating something. > > > > > I have personally read several articles, which criticised the text of > > Einstein. > > > > One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. > > > > This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. > Yes, that's one instance I meant. > > Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. > No, you misread. My point was one can write valid critiques but they > necessarily presume the understanding of the subject. Only people understending The Shit enough to kneel before it may criticize it! It's obvious. > Dingle's critique could only be philosophical, there is no internal contradiction within > the theory An idiot is asserting! Must be true. > and there is no experimental disproof (yet?). In the meantime in the real world, however, forbidden by your insane religion TAI and GPS keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-07 11:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <629f1831$0$3008$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #586535 |
JanPB wrote: > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:08:24 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 06.06.2022 um 09:16 schrieb JanPB: >>>> >>> There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. >>> At best, such critiques may be debating something. >>> >> I have personally read several articles, which criticised the text of >> Einstein. >> >> One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. >> >> This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. > > Yes, that's one instance I meant. > >> Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. > > No, you misread. My point was one can write valid critiques but they > necessarily presume the understanding of the subject. This is not > the case here, you guys are merely fantasising and making some nonsense up. > > Dingle's critique could only be philosophical, there is no internal contradiction within > the theory and there is no experimental disproof (yet?). Dingle goofed badly. https://home.deds.nl/~dvdm/dirk/Physics/Dingle/DinglesTrivialFumble.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-06-07 02:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e96dedcc-c22c-4448-968a-3dcc3422800en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #586538 |
On Tuesday, 7 June 2022 at 11:19:48 UTC+2, Python wrote: > JanPB wrote: > > On Monday, June 6, 2022 at 11:08:24 PM UTC-7, Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Am 06.06.2022 um 09:16 schrieb JanPB: > >>>> > >>> There are no valid critiques pointing out any errors in the paper. > >>> At best, such critiques may be debating something. > >>> > >> I have personally read several articles, which criticised the text of > >> Einstein. > >> > >> One is 'Science at the crossroads' by Herbert Dingle. > >> > >> This was a profesor of physics with some reputation. > > > > Yes, that's one instance I meant. > > > >> Therefore you are wrong with your statement, that no valid critique existed. > > > > No, you misread. My point was one can write valid critiques but they > > necessarily presume the understanding of the subject. This is not > > the case here, you guys are merely fantasising and making some nonsense up. > > > > Dingle's critique could only be philosophical, there is no internal contradiction within > > the theory and there is no experimental disproof (yet?). > Dingle goofed badly. What to expect from a profesor of physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17] 18 19 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web