Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586242 > unrolled thread

Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 16:13 -0700
    Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 16:42 -0700
    Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 10:20 -0700
      Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 10:28 -0700
        Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-05 10:16 +0200
          Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried   again. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-06 09:40 +0200
    Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again. "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-06-06 16:58 -0700

#586242 — Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again.

Dark Side of Einstein Emerges in His Letters
By Dinitia Smith. Nov. 6, 1996
https://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/06/arts/dark-side-of-einstein-emerges-in-his-letters.html

************* Excerpt *******************************
In July 1914, Albert Einstein wrote to his first wife, Mileva Maric, the mother of his two sons, laying down a series of conditions under which he would agree to continue their marriage:

''A. You will see to it (1) that my clothes and linen are kept in order, (2) that I am served three regular meals a day in my room. B. You will renounce all personal relations with me, except when these are required to keep up social appearances.'' And: ''You will expect no affection from me . . . You must leave my bedroom or study at once without protesting when I ask you to.''

On Nov. 25, this letter and more than 400 others, most of them never before seen by scholars, will be auctioned at Christie's in New York along with a RARE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT. This collection of Einstein letters, the most important one ever to go on the block, is expected to sell for $2 million and the manuscript for $250,000 to $350,000.
----------------
They reveal the domestic side of Einstein, a sometimes tender yet sometimes brutal husband of Mileva, and a devoted yet sometimes unthinking and cruel father to his sons, Hans Albert and Eduard.

************* End of excerpt *******************************

The RARE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT is no more and no less, the "lost
54 pages manuscript" elaborated with his FRIEND Michelle Besso in the
summer-autum of 1913, when both showed their profound ignorance when
dealing with Grossman's theory (Entwurf I) to be applied to the problem of
Mercury. After being discovered in Besso's house in 1954, after his death, 
and being examined by a dozen of "relartivity scholars", the manuscript was
 LOST AGAIN for another 40 years, until it emerged at the auction in 1996.
It clearly shows that the accumulation of errors and misconceptions within
the document produced a final result with an error 1,000 times LOWER than
which was handwritten, plus A SIGN error.

So, in short, a pile of crap from two complete imbeciles that LIVED TOGETHER
for more than 3 months, after Besso took time off from his job in Italy.

Besso, it's claimed and also written by Einstein in his 1905 paper, was 
instrumental as a "sounding board" for his SR paper. His friendship started
around 1898, and lasted until Besso's death.

But, WHY did Besso kept such manuscript hidden for 40 years? Blackmail?
Assurance of something that Einstein kept supplying?
The manuscript, written 2 years before a new paper was presented in 1915,
is the proof that NONE OF THEM knew what they were doing.

The intelligence embedded in the manuscript by the couple in 1913, is 
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT of the one present in the 1915 paper, as a clear
indication that both were written by DIFFERENT PERSONS!

My bet is on Schwarzschild, who was the SPONSOR of Einstein since the
end of 1913, and who made possible that Einstein did receive a professorship
at the University of Berlin by March 1914. He was instrumental on the
seek of a patron, who funded half the 10,000 marks/year that Einstein 
claimed, as well as to achieve the other half from the Prussian Academy
of Science, where Schwarzschild was HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL.

The WWI separated Besso from Einstein, but there are TOO MANY SIGNS
that both were engaged in much more than "a bromance". And I mean as
a couple, who almost lived together for more than 16 years.

Why did Besso HIDE such manuscript, which is a proof that Einstein was
lying to the teeth regarding his FAILURE, creating the myth that he had 
achieved a result of +18"/cy, when in the manuscript (available online now)
is CLEARLY WRITTEN +2.3"/cy?

And even worse: the analysis made by "brilliant relativists" AFTER 1954
proves that the REAL VALUE was -0.012"/cy.

Why did Besso do that? Jealousy of a rejected lover?

Even when they mantained correspondence in the next 40 years, their
"relation" frozen after Einstein gained fame and money, and turned to other
"friends". 

Why don't make a movie about this love-hate affair, so the truth is known
by every fucking WORSHIPER?

Isn't it evident? Cabal protection.

Same as with the degenerate homo clown Zelensky. Only that now it's
almost impossible to hide past life, as more and more films about the
degeneracy of this bloody cretin keep emerging. Of course, not in USA.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#586245

On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 8:13:10 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:

<snip>

> Isn't it evident? Cabal protection. 
> 
> Same as with the degenerate homo clown Zelensky. Only that now it's 
> almost impossible to hide past life, as more and more films about the 
> degeneracy of this bloody cretin keep emerging. Of course, not in USA.

WARNING: You will not able to UNSEE this short video. It will remain in your head for years to come.

President of Ukraine, Zelensky, raging homosexual nude video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQMbJoMJlzM

And this video is not "deep fake". We haven't advanced that much with CGI and shit.

There is more from where this video came.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586262

https://www.christies.com/features/Einstein-letters-to-Michele-Besso-8422-1.aspx

Time’s arrow: Albert Einstein’s letters to Michele Besso

Thomas Venning, Head of Books & Manuscripts at Christie’s in London, explores the touching correspondence between Einstein 
and his dear friend of more than 50 years — illustrated with letters offered in past and upcoming sales.

Cataloguing the letters from Albert Einstein to his closest friend, Michele Besso, was a roller-coaster ride: intellectually exhilarating, funny, endearing — and with an unexpected conclusion.

Michele Besso and Einstein first met as students in Zurich in the late 1890s, and their friendship was cemented during their time working together in the early 1900s in the Swiss federal patent office in Bern. In the evenings after work, the two friends would stroll home together, and many years later Einstein would remember how thoughts of everyday life would fall away as they discussed scientific subjects. When Einstein changed the world of physics for ever in 1905 with four groundbreaking papers, Michele Besso was his only acknowledged collaborator. 

It was because of their close intellectual understanding that Einstein felt able to talk freely and in detail to Besso about the key scientific concepts of his career: special and general relativity, the ‘cosmological constant’, the red shift of spectral lines, ‘time’s arrow’, unified field theory, quantum mechanics and much else. For a non-scientist it was hard — sometimes impossible — to keep up, but the sensation of observing this great mind working at full speed was extraordinary.
......................
The letters also reveal the human side of Einstein: walking in the mountains with his young son, making fun of crusty old colleagues in Berlin, grumbling about being shown off ‘like a prize bullock’ on an early tour of the United States, dying of boredom in a League of Nations meeting. You feel his anguish and remorse as his first marriage breaks down and he becomes estranged from his children. There are plenty of jokes, too, about himself, his fame, being Jewish, getting old — even about quantum physics.
....................
Working through these 56 letters was almost like getting to know Einstein himself. What’s more, this was a particularly attractive side of him, the side that his closest friend saw over 50 years. 

**********************************************************

And the 54 pages stupid 1913 manuscript that Besso hide for 40 years without apparent reason, which proved that Einstein was a liar?

Mmm... fishy as hell.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586263

https://allthatsinteresting.com/elsa-einstein

.............................
Elsa Einstein was born Elsa Einstein on January 18, 1876. That’s not a mistake — Elsa’s father was Rudolf Einstein, the cousin of Albert Einstein’s father. That’s not as strange as it gets, though. Her mother and Albert’s mother were also sisters, so Elsa and Albert Einstein were actually first cousins.

Elsa changed her name when she married her first husband, Max Lowenthal, in 1896. The two had three children before getting divorced in 1908 and Elsa regained her maiden name when she married Albert.

Albert Einstein had a marriage before Elsa as well. His first wife, Mileva Maria, was a Serbian mathematician and the two were married in 1903. Though Einstein was initially charmed and impressed by Maria, an archive of nearly 1,400 letters written by Einstein gave evidence that he became detached and even cruel to his first wife.
.......................

Einstein-Einstein couple, blood related.

And he was doing Besso as well.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586458

Am 01.06.2022 um 19:28 schrieb Richard Hertz:
> https://allthatsinteresting.com/elsa-einstein
>
> .............................
> Elsa Einstein was born Elsa Einstein on January 18, 1876. That’s not a mistake — Elsa’s father was Rudolf Einstein, the cousin of Albert Einstein’s father. That’s not as strange as it gets, though. Her mother and Albert’s mother were also sisters, so Elsa and Albert Einstein were actually first cousins.

Elsa Einstein looked imho like a shaven man in a dress - somehow.

Possibly 'Elsa' was Einstein himself, after something went wrong with 
the time-machine.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586499 — Re: Was Einstein a homoSOB? His Dark Side emerged, just to be buried again.

Am 05.06.2022 um 10:16 schrieb Thomas Heger:
> Am 01.06.2022 um 19:28 schrieb Richard Hertz:
>> https://allthatsinteresting.com/elsa-einstein
>>
>> .............................
>> Elsa Einstein was born Elsa Einstein on January 18, 1876. That’s not a
>> mistake — Elsa’s father was Rudolf Einstein, the cousin of Albert
>> Einstein’s father. That’s not as strange as it gets, though. Her
>> mother and Albert’s mother were also sisters, so Elsa and Albert
>> Einstein were actually first cousins.
>
> Elsa Einstein looked imho like a shaven man in a dress - somehow.
>
> Possibly 'Elsa' was Einstein himself, after something went wrong with
> the time-machine.
>
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-the-ss-celtic-picture-id517323960?s=594x594


To me Elsa Einstein looked like a shaven copy of Einstein himself in a 
dress and a little younger.

For this we would need a time machine.

An error is assumed, because a younger copy should not meet the 
origional (according to standard 'sci-fi-logic').

Now the origional had to go to the USA, hence the teleported copy 
needed/wanted to go to the USA, too.

To do so, Einstein maried his younger clone, but in a dress, because the 
clone would get no visa otherwise.

;-)))



TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#586519

On Tuesday, May 31, 2022 at 4:13:10 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Dark Side of Einstein Emerges in His Letters 
> By Dinitia Smith. Nov. 6, 1996 
> https://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/06/arts/dark-side-of-einstein-emerges-in-his-letters.html 
> 
> ************* Excerpt ******************************* 
> In July 1914, Albert Einstein wrote to his first wife, Mileva Maric, the mother of his two sons, laying down a series of conditions under which he would agree to continue their marriage: 
> 
> ''A. You will see to it (1) that my clothes and linen are kept in order, (2) that I am served three regular meals a day in my room. B. You will renounce all personal relations with me, except when these are required to keep up social appearances.'' And: ''You will expect no affection from me . . . You must leave my bedroom or study at once without protesting when I ask you to.'' 
> 
> On Nov. 25, this letter and more than 400 others, most of them never before seen by scholars, will be auctioned at Christie's in New York along with a RARE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT. This collection of Einstein letters, the most important one ever to go on the block, is expected to sell for $2 million and the manuscript for $250,000 to $350,000. 
> ---------------- 
> They reveal the domestic side of Einstein, a sometimes tender yet sometimes brutal husband of Mileva, and a devoted yet sometimes unthinking and cruel father to his sons, Hans Albert and Eduard. 
> 
> ************* End of excerpt ******************************* 
> 
> The RARE SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT is no more and no less, the "lost 
> 54 pages manuscript" elaborated with his FRIEND Michelle Besso in the 
> summer-autum of 1913, when both showed their profound ignorance when 
> dealing with Grossman's theory (Entwurf I) to be applied to the problem of 
> Mercury. After being discovered in Besso's house in 1954, after his death, 
> and being examined by a dozen of "relartivity scholars", the manuscript was 
> LOST AGAIN for another 40 years, until it emerged at the auction in 1996. 
> It clearly shows that the accumulation of errors and misconceptions within 
> the document produced a final result with an error 1,000 times LOWER than 
> which was handwritten, plus A SIGN error. 
> 
> So, in short, a pile of crap from two complete imbeciles that LIVED TOGETHER 
> for more than 3 months, after Besso took time off from his job in Italy. 
> 
> Besso, it's claimed and also written by Einstein in his 1905 paper, was 
> instrumental as a "sounding board" for his SR paper. His friendship started 
> around 1898, and lasted until Besso's death. 
> 
> But, WHY did Besso kept such manuscript hidden for 40 years? Blackmail? 
> Assurance of something that Einstein kept supplying? 
> The manuscript, written 2 years before a new paper was presented in 1915, 
> is the proof that NONE OF THEM knew what they were doing. 
> 
> The intelligence embedded in the manuscript by the couple in 1913, is 
> COMPLETELY DIFFERENT of the one present in the 1915 paper, as a clear 
> indication that both were written by DIFFERENT PERSONS! 
> 
> My bet is on Schwarzschild, who was the SPONSOR of Einstein since the 
> end of 1913, and who made possible that Einstein did receive a professorship 
> at the University of Berlin by March 1914. He was instrumental on the 
> seek of a patron, who funded half the 10,000 marks/year that Einstein 
> claimed, as well as to achieve the other half from the Prussian Academy 
> of Science, where Schwarzschild was HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL. 
> 
> The WWI separated Besso from Einstein, but there are TOO MANY SIGNS 
> that both were engaged in much more than "a bromance". And I mean as 
> a couple, who almost lived together for more than 16 years. 
> 
> Why did Besso HIDE such manuscript, which is a proof that Einstein was 
> lying to the teeth regarding his FAILURE, creating the myth that he had 
> achieved a result of +18"/cy, when in the manuscript (available online now) 
> is CLEARLY WRITTEN +2.3"/cy? 
> 
> And even worse: the analysis made by "brilliant relativists" AFTER 1954 
> proves that the REAL VALUE was -0.012"/cy. 
> 
> Why did Besso do that? Jealousy of a rejected lover? 
> 
> Even when they mantained correspondence in the next 40 years, their 
> "relation" frozen after Einstein gained fame and money, and turned to other 
> "friends". 
> 
> Why don't make a movie about this love-hate affair, so the truth is known 
> by every fucking WORSHIPER? 
> 
> Isn't it evident? Cabal protection. 
> 
> Same as with the degenerate homo clown Zelensky. Only that now it's 
> almost impossible to hide past life, as more and more films about the 
> degeneracy of this bloody cretin keep emerging. Of course, not in USA.

You can't believe what you read. They said his wife did the math too...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web