Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #585249 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-05-12 20:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-05-15 06:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 59 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 20:20 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 20:45 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 21:25 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 22:09 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 22:26 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-14 07:32 +0200
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 23:13 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-05-14 13:54 -0500
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-05-18 01:01 +0200
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 16:46 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-05-15 08:12 +0200
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-12 22:14 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-12 22:25 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-13 12:04 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 18:06 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz goes off the deep end "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 19:35 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-15 00:48 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-15 10:39 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-16 09:35 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 10:58 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-16 11:37 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 22:59 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 09:26 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-17 09:58 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 10:08 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-17 10:17 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 10:44 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-17 11:00 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-05-16 20:03 -0500
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-17 11:27 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 15:02 -0500
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 13:41 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-17 14:38 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 14:52 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-17 18:36 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-17 20:27 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-18 11:09 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-18 12:05 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-18 14:40 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-18 14:59 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 23:34 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2022-05-19 22:50 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-13 07:12 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 09:06 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-05-13 09:36 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz mental unraveling "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 09:44 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz mental unraveling The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-13 10:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz mental unraveling Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-13 12:04 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz mental unraveling The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-13 12:31 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-13 12:19 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 03:37 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 11:45 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-14 12:00 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 13:06 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-05-14 13:23 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-14 14:24 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-05-14 22:10 -0700
Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2022-05-15 06:24 -0700
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-16 10:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cb26d264-b7ba-4d78-9ee5-edb181466038n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585457 |
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 1:35:01 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > The Question is.. > going by the images.. > > are there any Black Holes > in our solar system? <snip> I wonder how could you "photograph" it in any way, even by using contrast of gases radiating EM waves, like in the promoted "photo" of the BH at the center of the Milky Way. The cretins asserted that gases orbit around the BH at near the speed of light, making several turns per minute. But, if TIME SLOWS as you approach the BH border, as seen from far away, how come the fuckers registered any motion around the hole? If a BH is within the solar system, as in the Interstellar movie (from which consultants on CGI did help to make the famous "photo"), you couldn't see it, because there are no gases on the loose to doctor the "photo". Only if the BH is placed in the middle of the main asteroid belt (between Mars and Jupiter), you could "photograph" strange patterns of motions of ROCKS around it. So, you'll never know, Starmaker. Now, read this shit and learn something. https://profoundphysics.com/why-time-slows-down-near-a-black-hole/ Does Time Stop In a Black Hole? As one moves closer and closer to a black hole, the passing of time will also slow down more and more. So, does time therefore stop as one falls into a black hole? Time does stop at the event horizon of a black hole, but only as seen by someone outside the black hole. This is because any physical signal will get infinitely redshifted at the event horizon, thus never reaching the outside observer. Someone falling into a black hole, however, would not see time stop. Now, to understand what actually happens to time dilation at the black hole’s event horizon, we need to discuss an important distinction made by general relativity and that is the distinction between coordinate time and proper time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-16 11:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b30f67cd-4ae1-435b-8cae-b5fc34bc6dedn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585459 |
El lunes, 16 de mayo de 2022 a las 13:58:39 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 1:35:01 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Question is.. > > going by the images.. > > > > are there any Black Holes > > in our solar system? > <snip> > > I wonder how could you "photograph" it in any way, even by using contrast of gases radiating EM waves, like in the > promoted "photo" of the BH at the center of the Milky Way. > You are so wrong in so many ways that it is funny!!! The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known for over 70 years, mostly because we can "see" close to 100 stars orbiting it. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S2_(star)) > The cretins asserted that gases orbit around the BH at near the speed of light, making several turns per minute. > The star S2 has an orbit of 16 years arounf the black hole and in its closest approach reaches a speed of 7250 km/sec (2.5% of the speed of light). S62 is another star orbiting the black hole which takes 9.9 years in its orbit reaching a speed of 30000 km/sec (10% of the speed of light). > But, if TIME SLOWS as you approach the BH border, as seen from far away, how come the fuckers registered any motion around the hole? > Actually, for a spaceship aproaching the event horizon of a large black hole (such as Sagittarius A* which has around 4.1 million solar mass), nothing would happen to its passengers. Clocks would continue to tick at 1 second per second and the spaceship entering inside the event horizon would produce none effects on the ship or the passengers. A totally different situation is when the black hole is small (because then the event horizon is also quite small). In that case the spaceship and passengers would be destroyed by the tidal forces of the black hole. > If a BH is within the solar system, as in the Interstellar movie (from which consultants on CGI did help to make te famous "photo"), > you couldn't see it, because there are no gases on the loose to doctor the "photo". Only if the BH is placed in the middle of the main. But in the case of Sagittarius A*, that black hole is surrounded by dust and that would make far more easy to "see" the event horizon of the black hole. Why we do "see" a bright halo encircling the black hole? The reason is that light from the dust behind the black hole is severely curved by the black hole gravity and it allow us to "see" it from the front of the black hole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-16 22:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9321e20c-c752-47d7-98d9-65cb5bf925b2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585461 |
On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > El lunes, 16 de mayo de 2022 a las 13:58:39 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 1:35:01 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > The Question is.. > > > going by the images.. > > > > > > are there any Black Holes > > > in our solar system? > > <snip> > > > > I wonder how could you "photograph" it in any way, even by using contrast of gases radiating EM waves, like in the > > promoted "photo" of the BH at the center of the Milky Way. > > > You are so wrong in so many ways that it is funny!!! > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known as a bright radiation source.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 09:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ceb799e9-6921-4692-b212-b83ff9c75522n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585482 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:59:14 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: <snip> > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known > as a bright radiation source. maluw made me laugh! And better not to ask to Paparios which is his "story" about quasars (quasi stellar objects). His answer WILL BE hilarious. Halton Arp, a REAL astrophysicist, dared to question the narrative of the BBT, as "z" factor didn't fit the "Hubble expansion". The cretins silenced Arp at USA, so he had to migrate to Germany, ending his career at the Planck Institute, outcasted. https://www.haltonarp.com/articles Halton Arp: https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.5.031438/full/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_Arp Relativity AND cosmology can't provide a fucking explanation about quasars, which disrupt the STUPID MODEL of the universe that establishment is pushing for decades. Yet, Hilbert-Schwarzschild metric is at the heart of any explanation the imbeciles publish. QUASAR: a massive and extremely remote celestial object, emitting exceptionally large amounts of energy, and typically having a starlike image in a telescope. It has been suggested that quasars contain massive black holes and may represent a stage in the evolution of SOME galaxies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar A quasar (quasi-stellar object, abbreviated QSO) is an extremely luminous active galactic nucleus (AGN), powered by a supermassive black hole, with mass ranging from millions to tens of billions of solar masses, surrounded by a gaseous accretion disc. Gas in the disc falling towards the black hole heats up because of friction and releases energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation. The radiant energy of quasars is enormous; the most powerful quasars have luminosities thousands of times greater than that of a galaxy such as the Milky Way.[2][3] Usually, quasars are categorized as a subclass of the more general category of AGN. The redshifts of quasars are of cosmological origin.[4] CONCLUSION: Arrogant assholes, Einstein's worshipers, DON'T KNOW NOTHING. Relativity POISONED astronomy and brought it to a dead alley. Only a few independent scientists remain, mainly in Russia and China, Western science IS DEAD!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 09:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b276b7c0-73c3-4a55-8128-a3ec26eab208n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585511 |
El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 12:26:59 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:59:14 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > <snip> > > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known > > as a bright radiation source. > maluw made me laugh! > Sure, trolls like the Polish janitor who believes he is the best logician mankind has created and is famous for using the Webster dictionary for his science posts, make us all laugh!!!! You are comfortably in a very respectable second place!!!! > And better not to ask to Paparios which is his "story" about quasars (quasi stellar objects). His answer WILL BE hilarious. > Actually a quasar is a "quasi stellar radio source". The term quasar originated as a contraction of "quasi-stellar [star-like] radio source"—because quasars were first identified during the 1950s as sources of radio-wave emission of unknown physical origin—and when identified in photographic images at visible wavelengths, they resembled faint, star-like points of light. > > CONCLUSION: Arrogant assholes, Einstein's worshipers, DON'T KNOW NOTHING. Relativity POISONED astronomy and brought it to > a dead alley. Only a few independent scientists remain, mainly in Russia and China, Western science IS DEAD! LOL, as always. Keep up the good job of making a total fool of your self!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 10:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0044641b-0b27-46d0-b26c-50bedd6f5dacn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585512 |
On Tuesday, 17 May 2022 at 18:59:01 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 12:26:59 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:59:14 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > > <snip> > > > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known > > > as a bright radiation source. > > maluw made me laugh! > > > Sure, trolls like the Polish janitor who believes he is the best logician mankind has created and is famous for using the Webster dictionary for his science posts, make us all laugh!!!! And they're particularly laughable when they demonstrate your geocentrism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 10:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, |
| Message-ID | <6283D8C4.632F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #585511 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:59:14 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > > <snip> > > > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known > > as a bright radiation source. > > maluw made me laugh! > > And better not to ask to Paparios which is his "story" about quasars (quasi stellar objects). His answer WILL BE hilarious. > > Halton Arp, a REAL astrophysicist, dared to question the narrative of the BBT, as "z" factor didn't fit the "Hubble expansion". > The cretins silenced Arp at USA, so he had to migrate to Germany, ending his career at the Planck Institute, outcasted. > > https://www.haltonarp.com/articles > Halton Arp: https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.5.031438/full/ > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_Arp > > Relativity AND cosmology can't provide a fucking explanation about quasars, which disrupt the STUPID MODEL of the universe > that establishment is pushing for decades. Yet, Hilbert-Schwarzschild metric is at the heart of any explanation the imbeciles publish. > > QUASAR: a massive and extremely remote celestial object, emitting exceptionally large amounts of energy, and typically having a > starlike image in a telescope. It has been suggested that quasars contain massive black holes and may represent a stage in the > evolution of SOME galaxies. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar > > > > CONCLUSION: Arrogant assholes, Einstein's worshipers, DON'T KNOW NOTHING. Relativity POISONED astronomy and brought it to > a dead alley. Only a few independent scientists remain, mainly in Russia and China, Western science IS DEAD! Western science IS DEAD???? But you're in the Western part of the world. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1892ac1-86e9-495f-a8a1-7163f801cb73n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585514 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:17:33 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:59:14 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Monday, 16 May 2022 at 20:37:39 UTC+2, Paparios wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > The black hole at Sagittarius A* has been known > > > as a bright radiation source. > > > > maluw made me laugh! > > > > And better not to ask to Paparios which is his "story" about quasars (quasi stellar objects). His answer WILL BE hilarious. > > > > Halton Arp, a REAL astrophysicist, dared to question the narrative of the BBT, as "z" factor didn't fit the "Hubble expansion". > > The cretins silenced Arp at USA, so he had to migrate to Germany, ending his career at the Planck Institute, outcasted. > > > > https://www.haltonarp.com/articles > > Halton Arp: https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/pt.5.031438/full/ > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_Arp > > > > Relativity AND cosmology can't provide a fucking explanation about quasars, which disrupt the STUPID MODEL of the universe > > that establishment is pushing for decades. Yet, Hilbert-Schwarzschild metric is at the heart of any explanation the imbeciles publish. > > > > QUASAR: a massive and extremely remote celestial object, emitting exceptionally large amounts of energy, and typically having a > > starlike image in a telescope. It has been suggested that quasars contain massive black holes and may represent a stage in the > > evolution of SOME galaxies. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar > > > > > > > > CONCLUSION: Arrogant assholes, Einstein's worshipers, DON'T KNOW NOTHING. Relativity POISONED astronomy and brought it to > > a dead alley. Only a few independent scientists remain, mainly in Russia and China, Western science IS DEAD! > Western science IS DEAD???? But you're in the Western part of the world. > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. Only metascience remains, in the occult, challenging God (medicine, physics, chemistry, society). Ask Zuckerberg. Engineering and applied hard sciences, for profit, is what only remains. Now go to cry to the corner. As I wrote many times: Nothing out of the range of 10E-10 mt TO 10E+19 mt can be analyzed by scientific methods. Only metascience. And nothing out of the range of 10E-14 sec TO 10E+20 sec can be analyzed by scientific methods. Only metascience. And the above marks the limits of what a fucking human can measure and model. That's why relativity IS A FUCKING HOAX! And Paparios, FUCK your idiotic explanation about quasar. Being a drooling elder, you answer things like A FUCKING CHILD, asshole!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 11:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7170dcbe-0431-4b4c-b824-f10796b690d3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585515 |
El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 13:44:06 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > Only metascience remains, in the occult, challenging God (medicine, physics, chemistry, society). Ask Zuckerberg. > > Engineering and applied hard sciences, for profit, is what only remains. Now go to cry to the corner. > > As I wrote many times: Nothing out of the range of 10E-10 mt TO 10E+19 mt can be analyzed by scientific methods. Only metascience. > > And nothing out of the range of 10E-14 sec TO 10E+20 sec can be analyzed by scientific methods. Only metascience. > > And the above marks the limits of what a fucking human can measure and model. That's why relativity IS A FUCKING HOAX! > > And Paparios, FUCK your idiotic explanation about quasar. Being a drooling elder, you answer things like A FUCKING CHILD, asshole! LOL, so says the unemployed and uneducated completely unknown argentinian EE.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-16 20:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jegaj2F4dk2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #585459 |
On 5/16/2022 12:58 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 1:35:01 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: >> The Question is.. >> going by the images.. >> >> are there any Black Holes >> in our solar system? > > <snip> > > I wonder how could you "photograph" it in any way, even by using contrast of gases radiating EM waves, like in the > promoted "photo" of the BH at the center of the Milky Way. > > The cretins asserted that gases orbit around the BH at near the speed of light, making several turns per minute. > > But, if TIME SLOWS as you approach the BH border, as seen from far away, how come the fuckers registered any motion around the hole? > > If a BH is within the solar system, as in the Interstellar movie (from which consultants on CGI did help to make the famous "photo"), > you couldn't see it, because there are no gases on the loose to doctor the "photo". Only if the BH is placed in the middle of the main > asteroid belt (between Mars and Jupiter), you could "photograph" strange patterns of motions of ROCKS around it. > > So, you'll never know, Starmaker. Now, read this shit and learn something. > > > https://profoundphysics.com/why-time-slows-down-near-a-black-hole/ > Does Time Stop In a Black Hole? There are theories about what might be happening inside a black hole but there is no way to test any of them, including the theories you've posted here. > As one moves closer and closer to a black hole, the passing of time will also slow down more and more. So, does time therefore stop as one falls into a black hole? > > Time does stop at the event horizon of a black hole, but only as seen by someone outside the black hole. This is because any physical signal will get infinitely redshifted at the event horizon, thus never reaching the outside observer. Someone falling into a black hole, however, would not see time stop. > > Now, to understand what actually happens to time dilation at the black hole’s event horizon, we need to discuss an important distinction made by general relativity and that is the distinction between coordinate time and proper time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6283E907.25F1@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #585457 |
Maybe yous people don't understand the question.. even if i made it simplier for you by using short sentences.. I'll try again. > The Question is.. > going by the images.. "going by the images.." means, only looking at the photos, not what other peoples opinions are what in those photos...likes gases, or black holes. I'll tell you what it is... it is simply the sun shinning through waves above it. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3WK6-U0AYV39t?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314442599365636097/photo/1 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3Vj_xUYAEJPUx?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 and the gravitional pull of the sun 'bends' the waves. There are gravitional waves in our solar system. Where's my camera? > > are there any Black Holes > in our solar system? well, it might look like a black hole if you're one of "those people" in the 'scientific community'. > > > the blurry one > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/1 > > > > > > and my sharpen version one > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/2 https://youtu.be/0a7etYMLqPs The Truth Board The Starmaker wrote: > > The Question is.. > going by the images.. > > are there any Black Holes > in our solar system? > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > It appears to me that the mad scientists took > > their info to the ...'Art Dept.' and told them, > > "Gimme a Black Hole without looking like it was retouch > > in Photoshop!" > > > > And the 'art dept' genius blurred it so that > > it appears to be a black hole in the center. > > > > Actually, THEY BLURRED EVERYTHING!!!! > > > > Then they took it back to the > > mad scientists and he said... > > "WHAT THE FUCK IS DAT????" > > > > and the girl sez, "That's your black hole." > > > > and the mad scientists sez to her.. > > > > "IT LOOK LIKE YOUR FUCKING ASS YOU UGLY FUCKIN BITCH!!!!" > > > > of course she runs out of the room crying... > > > > (watch how real women scientists are treated in the scientific community) > > > > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Now, here is the First black hole photo they showed last year: > > > > > > the blurry one > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/1 > > > > > > and my sharpen version one > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/2 > > > > > > Are they going to repeat the same process over and over again for the rest of the billion black holes out there??? > > > > > > I like my sharpen version better: > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/2 > > > > > > only problem is, there is no black hole... > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1314447384261193728/photo/3 > > > > > > they are just waves like an ocean wave... > > > > > > waddayoucallit, gravitional waves? > > > > > > space is wet > > > but > > > you're > > > like a fish > > > you don't feel > > > the wet. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Here is a video from sharp back to blurry > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1525273775251419136 > > > > > > > > https://youtu.be/0a7etYMLqPs > > > > > > > > i guess they are trying to hide the stuff that is inside a black hole... > > > > > > > > but i'm in the mood for a jelly doughnut! > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Now, all you have to do is take this 'sharpen' photo of the blurry black > > > > > hole > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1524978633311256577/photo/1 > > > > > > > > > > and add around 160 percent blur (Gaussian Blur) and it looks the new > > > > > fraudulent Black Hole photo in the news. > > > > > > > > > > There is a reason why men's vision gets blurry as they get older...it > > > > > makes their wives look younger. > > > > > > > > > > all you see is a black hole. > > > > > > > > > > If you put a paper bag over you wife's head you need to put a hole in > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > NASA needs a Black Hole. > > > > > > > > > > They remove the blue and green primary light colors.. > > > > > > > > > > all you left with is red and black. > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > They couldn't get it any more bluuryerrr? > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is the sharp version: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1524978633311256577/photo/1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FEEDING THE MIND OF PEOPLE WITH CRAP LIKE LIGO AND > > > > > > > GRAVITATIONAL WAVES. This was announced today on Western media. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ******************************************* > > > > > > > https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/astronomers-reveal-first-image-black-hole-heart-our-galaxy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astronomers have confirmed the supermassive object at the heart of the Milky Way galaxy is indeed a black hole and captured the first-ever images of it using a worldwide network of telescopes. The images were unveiled on Thursday at *********** multiple press conferences by a team of researchers *********** known as the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Known as Sagittarius A, the object at the center of the Milky Way – “invisible, compact and very massive,†as described in a press release published by the European Southern Observatory – was long suspected to be a black hole. However, the images created through linking up a global network of radio telescopes provide direct proof of this hypothesis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Main points of the "multiple press conferences": > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) The images show a dark central “shadow†surrounded by a bright ring made up of glowing gasses, the light they produce bent by the black hole’s powerful gravity. The object has four million times the mass of the Sun, and is located 27,000 light years away from our planet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Gases are orbiting the black hole at near the speed of light. EHT scientist Chi-kwan Chan likening the process to “trying to take a clear picture of a puppy quickly chasing its tail.†> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) The visuals were recorded by linking together eight radio observatories around the world to form what the researchers described as “a single ‘Earth-sized’ virtual telescope,†which was then used to observe Sagittarius A for hours at a time on multiple nights in 2017. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) Powerful supercomputers and a team of more than 300 researchers from 80 institutes, previously imaged the black hole M87 at the center of the distant Messier 87 galaxy, publishing those findings in 2019. Sagittarius A is much closer, as well as over 1,000 times smaller and less massive. However, it was significantly more difficult to photograph, as it was equivalent to take a picture of a donut on the surface of the Moon from Earth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) Actually, due that gases rotates around the black hole several times per > > > > > > > minute, a composite picture, averaged in time, was required plus the > > > > > > > corrections due to comparisons with the solutions of general relativity > > > > > > > equations, until a satisfactory picture was obtained. The blurred image is > > > > > > > due to the multiple averages, result of heavy post-processing in the last > > > > > > > five years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) Accompanying the photographic findings were six papers published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters covering various aspects of the discovery, from the imaging process to the morphology of black holes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) The main image was produced by averaging together thousands of images created using different computational methods — all of which accurately fit the EHT data. This averaged image retains features more commonly seen in the varied images, and suppresses features that appear infrequently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The images can also be clustered into four groups based on similar features. An averaged, representative image for each of the four clusters is shown in the bottom row. Three of the clusters show a ring structure but, with differently distributed brightness around the ring. The fourth cluster contains images that also fit the data but do not appear ring-like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Institutional Press Releases (in alphabetical order) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > European Southern Observatory > > > > > > > Institute of Advanced Studies > > > > > > > Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie > > > > > > > National Astronomical Observatory of Japan > > > > > > > National Science Foundation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ****************************************** > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The uber-doctore photograph IS NOT about OPTICAL wavelengths, but > > > > > > > RADIO wavelengths, in the microwave region. So, IT'S NOT REAL! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), an array which linked together eight existing RADIO observatories across the planet to form a single “Earth-sized†VIRTUAL telescope. The telescope is named after the “event horizonâ€, the boundary of the black hole beyond which no light can escape. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The collected data, around 2017, was post-processed during 5 YEARS until > > > > > > > the result MATCHED the database of possible solutions of general relativity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is EXACTLY the same process used around LIGO for detecting gravitational > > > > > > > waves. Any signal was compared with hundred of thousand of patterns > > > > > > > stored in supercomputers, which are the result of different solutions of > > > > > > > the equations of GR. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, go and believe whatever you want. But you was warned about this crap. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t60v10$ldkh$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #585519 |
On 5/17/2022 1:27 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3WK6-U0AYV39t?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 I still see a Halloween pumpkin right in the middle. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cf2d78b7-1e9b-4d3d-8a90-286abf60ff6cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585527 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:02:43 PM UTC-3, Clutterfreak wrote: <snip> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3WK6-U0AYV39t?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 > > I still see a Halloween pumpkin right in the middle. > Consider this: - 5 years invested (2017-2022) - 7 observatories in the western hemisphere (difficult to synchronize arrays of radio-telescopes, down to 10 nsec in the network) - 8 hours of data collected, corresponding to MW radiation in the 3-100 Ghz. - At least 1 supercomputer involved in post-processing. - No less than 140 fucking parasites pretending to be astronomers involved. - The whole team of Interstellar movie involved in CGI consulting and works. - No less than 80 million USD in payroll only. Add another 100 millions in instrumentation, PR and shit. And all that you got is A FUCKING GLOWING ORANGE DONUT photo! LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5f348ecf-29eb-4223-8e10-7de6396ac05en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585530 |
El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 16:41:49 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:02:43 PM UTC-3, Clutterfreak wrote: > > <snip> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3WK6-U0AYV39t?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 > > > > I still see a Halloween pumpkin right in the middle. > > > Consider this: > > - 5 years invested (2017-2022) > - 7 observatories in the western hemisphere (difficult to synchronize arrays of radio-telescopes, down to 10 nsec in the network) > - 8 hours of data collected, corresponding to MW radiation in the 3-100 Ghz. > - At least 1 supercomputer involved in post-processing. > - No less than 140 fucking parasites pretending to be astronomers involved. > - The whole team of Interstellar movie involved in CGI consulting and works. > - No less than 80 million USD in payroll only. Add another 100 millions in instrumentation, PR and shit. > > And all that you got is A FUCKING GLOWING ORANGE DONUT photo! > LOL, what a jerk!!! Scientific missions are sometimes quite more longer than 5 years. Take for example the New Horizons mission. New Horizons is the first mission in NASA's New Frontiers mission category, larger and more expensive than the Discovery missions but smaller than the missions of the Flagship Program. The cost of the mission (including spacecraft and instrument development, launch vehicle, mission operations, data analysis, and education/public outreach) is approximately $700 million over 15 years (2001–2016). The goal of the mission is to understand the formation of the Plutonian system, the Kuiper belt, and the transformation of the early Solar System. The spacecraft collected data on the atmospheres, surfaces, interiors, and environments of Pluto and its moons. It will also study other objects in the Kuiper belt. By way of comparison, New Horizons gathered 5,000 times as much data at Pluto as Mariner did at Mars. Some of the questions the mission attempts to answer are: What is Pluto's atmosphere made of and how does it behave? What does its surface look like? Are there large geological structures? How do solar wind particles interact with Pluto's atmosphere? Specifically, the mission's science objectives are to: Map the surface compositions of Pluto and Charon Characterize the geologies and morphologies of Pluto and Charon Characterize the neutral atmosphere of Pluto and its escape rate Search for an atmosphere around Charon Map surface temperatures on Pluto and Charon Search for rings and additional satellites around Pluto Conduct similar investigations of one or more Kuiper belt objects Results of the mission are astounding pictures of Pluto, Charon, Nix and Hydra and a wonderful picture of Arrokoth (a Kuiper object).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2a73c796-c8f9-4042-80fa-31583294de76n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585532 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 6:38:07 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: > El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 16:41:49 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 5:02:43 PM UTC-3, Clutterfreak wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ej3WK6-U0AYV39t?format=jpg&name=4096x4096 > > > > > > I still see a Halloween pumpkin right in the middle. > > > > > Consider this: > > > > - 5 years invested (2017-2022) > > - 7 observatories in the western hemisphere (difficult to synchronize arrays of radio-telescopes, down to 10 nsec in the network) > > - 8 hours of data collected, corresponding to MW radiation in the 3-100 Ghz. > > - At least 1 supercomputer involved in post-processing. > > - No less than 140 fucking parasites pretending to be astronomers involved. > > - The whole team of Interstellar movie involved in CGI consulting and works. > > - No less than 80 million USD in payroll only. Add another 100 millions in instrumentation, PR and shit. > > > > And all that you got is A FUCKING GLOWING ORANGE DONUT photo! > > > LOL, what a jerk!!! > > Scientific missions are sometimes quite more longer than 5 years. Take for example the New Horizons mission. New Horizons is the first mission in NASA's New Frontiers mission category, larger and more expensive than the Discovery missions but smaller than the missions of the Flagship Program. The cost of the mission (including spacecraft and instrument development, launch vehicle, mission operations, data analysis, and education/public outreach) is approximately $700 million over 15 years (2001–2016). > > The goal of the mission is to understand the formation of the Plutonian system, the Kuiper belt, and the transformation of the early Solar System. The spacecraft collected data on the atmospheres, surfaces, interiors, and environments of Pluto and its moons. It will also study other objects in the Kuiper belt. By way of comparison, New Horizons gathered 5,000 times as much data at Pluto as Mariner did at Mars. > > Some of the questions the mission attempts to answer are: What is Pluto's atmosphere made of and how does it behave? What does its surface look like? Are there large geological structures? How do solar wind particles interact with Pluto's atmosphere? > > Specifically, the mission's science objectives are to: > > Map the surface compositions of Pluto and Charon > Characterize the geologies and morphologies of Pluto and Charon > Characterize the neutral atmosphere of Pluto and its escape rate > Search for an atmosphere around Charon > Map surface temperatures on Pluto and Charon > Search for rings and additional satellites around Pluto > Conduct similar investigations of one or more Kuiper belt objects > > Results of the mission are astounding pictures of Pluto, Charon, Nix and Hydra and a wonderful picture of Arrokoth (a Kuiper object). I want to test you, Mr. EE. Detail the following parameters of such mission: - TX power and antenna size of the spacecraft. - Bit rate, modulation and codification schemes used by the spacecraft. - Level of received signal on Earth. - MW region at which transmissions are made toward Earth. - Source of energy for such spacecraft. Don't come with the Pioneer shit. - Level of light shun upon Pluto by the Sun. Don't come with multiwavelength shit. - Technology and algorithms behind the "marvelous" photographs. - Algorithms in use for space navigation to lock in trajectory of the spacecraft, and origin of corrections. - Life expectancy of the spacecraft in ACTIVE mode, keeping links with Earth. If you don't know, the shut up. If you think that you know, don't dare to FAIL on any of the above items.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 18:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bf7519f0-3197-4e14-94a5-a6ecfd18503en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585533 |
El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 17:52:58 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 6:38:07 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: > > Results of the mission are astounding pictures of Pluto, Charon, Nix and Hydra and a wonderful picture of Arrokoth (a Kuiper object). > I want to test you, Mr. EE. > > Detail the following parameters of such mission: > > - TX power and antenna size of the spacecraft. Dish antenna of 2.1 m. Power through RTG of 245.7 W at launch (decaying 3.5 W per year). Communications via X band at 12 W. > - Bit rate, modulation and codification schemes used by the spacecraft. At Pluto distance it transmitted 1 kbps. The free space loss at 4.7 billion km including the antenna gains is around 150 dB. Modulation and coding is BPSK with R=1/6 Turbo coding. > - Level of received signal on Earth. See above > - MW region at which transmissions are made toward Earth. See above > - Source of energy for such spacecraft. Don't come with the Pioneer shit. Radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) > - Level of light shun upon Pluto by the Sun. Don't come with multiwavelength shit. NA > - Technology and algorithms behind the "marvelous" photographs. The spacecraft carries 7 measuring instruments: Long-Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) Solar Wind Around Pluto (SWAP) Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation (PEPSSI) Alice Ralph telescope Venetia Burney Student Dust Counter (VBSDC) > - Algorithms in use for space navigation to lock in trajectory of the spacecraft, and origin of corrections. Normal trajectory corrections (5 of them) > - Life expectancy of the spacecraft in ACTIVE mode, keeping links with Earth. The travel to Pluto took 10 years, arriving to Pluto on July 2015. The spacecraft is still sending data. If you need more information, there are several papers explaining all this in great detail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-17 20:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f58bfd0f-ffe6-481f-8daf-40f2fd3cbdbcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585540 |
On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 10:36:57 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: > El martes, 17 de mayo de 2022 a las 17:52:58 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > > On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 6:38:07 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote: > > > > Results of the mission are astounding pictures of Pluto, Charon, Nix and Hydra and a wonderful picture of Arrokoth (a Kuiper object). > > > I want to test you, Mr. EE. > > > > Detail the following parameters of such mission: > > > > - TX power and antenna size of the spacecraft. > Dish antenna of 2.1 m. Power through RTG of 245.7 W at launch (decaying 3.5 W per year). Communications via X band at 12 W. > > - Bit rate, modulation and codification schemes used by the spacecraft. > At Pluto distance it transmitted 1 kbps. The free space loss at 4.7 billion km including the antenna gains is around 150 dB. Modulation and coding is BPSK with R=1/6 Turbo coding. > > - Level of received signal on Earth. > See above > > - MW region at which transmissions are made toward Earth. > See above > > - Source of energy for such spacecraft. Don't come with the Pioneer shit. > Radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) > > - Level of light shun upon Pluto by the Sun. Don't come with multiwavelength shit. > NA > > - Technology and algorithms behind the "marvelous" photographs. > The spacecraft carries 7 measuring instruments: > Long-Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) > Solar Wind Around Pluto (SWAP) > Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation (PEPSSI) > Alice > Ralph telescope > Venetia Burney Student Dust Counter (VBSDC) > > - Algorithms in use for space navigation to lock in trajectory of the spacecraft, and origin of corrections. > Normal trajectory corrections (5 of them) > > - Life expectancy of the spacecraft in ACTIVE mode, keeping links with Earth. > The travel to Pluto took 10 years, arriving to Pluto on July 2015. The spacecraft is still sending data. > > If you need more information, there are several papers explaining all this in great detail. Good data gathering and posting. You forgot to tell about the codification scheme of data, as you only wrote about the TX coding. I put this link, so Starmaker can guess where the black hole can be located. Maybe, the trajectory was designed to avoid it completely. LOL. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/Mission/Where-is-New-Horizons.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-18 11:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62853654.43A7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #585377 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > (watch how real women scientists are treated in the scientific community) > > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 So, I saw that Netflix title... https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 After seeing a few interviews what I get from it is.. All men Scientists in the scientific community feel that *all* women scientists should be working at Pornhub instead of in their scientific labs, am I right? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-18 12:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <996e3cab-fc76-45be-a02f-09c2fe0ced1bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #585559 |
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:08:59 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > (watch how real women scientists are treated in the scientific community) > > > > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 > So, I saw that Netflix title... > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 > > After seeing a few interviews > what I get from it is.. > > All men Scientists in the scientific community > feel that *all* women scientists > should be working at Pornhub instead of > in their scientific labs, am I right? > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. 17 Famous Female Scientists Who Helped Change the World These STEM superstars literally changed everything. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/17-top-female-scientists-who-have-changed-the-worl/ Amid a global push to get more girls interested in science, engineering, technology, and math, we wanted to take a moment to celebrate those who already are STEM superstars of the past and present. STEM acronym: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics STEM (slang): “Stem” is a combination of “stud” meaning a butch person who is Black or Latinx, and “femme,” meaning a more feminine-leaning lesbian or queen woman/non-binary person. It's basically a racially-specific version of “futch” (a combo of “femme” and “butch”). You must be out of your mind, Starmaker. This is better: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/skarlan/biohazard-suits-are-nsfw Women Scientists Are Tweeting "Sexy" Photos Of Themselves At Work To Shut Down Sexism
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-05-18 14:40 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: BREAKING: First image of supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, |
| Message-ID | <628567E3.6383@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #585560 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 3:08:59 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > (watch how real women scientists are treated in the scientific community) > > > > > > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 > > So, I saw that Netflix title... > > https://www.netflix.com/title/81303549 > > > > After seeing a few interviews > > what I get from it is.. > > > > All men Scientists in the scientific community > > feel that *all* women scientists > > should be working at Pornhub instead of > > in their scientific labs, am I right? > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > 17 Famous Female Scientists Who Helped Change the World > These STEM superstars literally changed everything. > > https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/17-top-female-scientists-who-have-changed-the-worl/ > > Amid a global push to get more girls interested in science, engineering, technology, and math, we wanted to take a moment to celebrate those who already are STEM superstars of the past and present. > > STEM acronym: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics > > STEM (slang): “Stem†is a combination of “stud†meaning a butch person who is Black or Latinx, and “femme,†meaning a more feminine-leaning lesbian or queen woman/non-binary person. It's basically a racially-specific version of “futch†(a combo of “femme†and “butchâ€). > > You must be out of your mind, Starmaker. > > This is better: > > https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/skarlan/biohazard-suits-are-nsfw > > Women Scientists Are Tweeting "Sexy" Photos Of Themselves At Work To Shut Down Sexism Looks like they're going to have to ...BLUR those sexy black hole photos.. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web