Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #669740 > unrolled thread

Do Iran have nuclear weapons?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-12 14:17 -0700
    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-03-12 20:12 -0400
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-13 01:56 +0100
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-12 18:42 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-12 19:45 -0700
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> - 2026-03-12 21:39 -0500
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-03-12 22:58 -0400
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-13 05:53 +0100
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-03-13 01:17 -0400
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-13 15:02 +0100
            Re: Oppenheimer (was Re: Does Iran have nuclear weapons?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-13 05:22 +0000
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-16 05:59 -0700
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-13 15:45 +0100
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-13 08:46 -0700
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-16 05:01 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2026-03-16 23:13 -0600
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-17 00:50 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 01:36 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-17 02:05 -0700
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 09:04 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 10:49 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-18 18:09 +0000
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 11:19 -0700
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-03-19 04:07 -0400
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-19 06:25 -0700
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-19 07:07 -0700
                  Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-19 07:21 -0700
                    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-19 07:37 -0700
                    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 09:14 -0700
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 09:24 -0700
                  Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No. Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 11:37 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Pops Tart <fas@hotmail.edu> - 2026-03-18 20:31 +0000
    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-13 00:55 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 22:26 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-22 21:39 -0700
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-23 10:24 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Stepen Makhaev <eekt@pevs.ru> - 2026-03-23 17:29 +0000
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-23 10:34 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 11:42 -0700
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-23 21:51 +0100
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Iry Anabelle <narl@larelbe.com> - 2026-03-23 21:16 +0000
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-23 22:15 -0700
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Cash Taketomo <hhea@hhaaa.jp> - 2026-03-24 13:16 +0000
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-23 18:10 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-23 22:25 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Vern Bagishaev <sge@vv.ru> - 2026-03-24 13:22 +0000
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-24 14:06 -0700
                  Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Rodrick Kreskas <dckor@oii.gr> - 2026-03-24 21:48 +0000
        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-27 23:09 -0700
          Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-28 00:16 -0700
            Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-31 09:56 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 10:16 -0700
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-31 11:47 -0700
                  Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 13:42 -0700
                    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 14:28 -0700
                      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 02:07 -0700
                        Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 09:31 -0700
              Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> - 2026-03-31 17:25 +0000
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-31 11:51 -0700
                Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-04-01 02:27 +0200
    Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-13 09:22 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-15 12:30 -0700
      Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? x <x@x.net> - 2026-03-16 07:13 -0700

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

#670043 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> x wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/26 00:50, chine.bleu wrote:
> > > Gronk wrote:
> > >> c186282 wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Â Â  IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
> > >>> Â Â  you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
> > >>>
> > >>> Â Â  Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
> > >>> Â Â  didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
> > >>> Â Â  to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
> > >>> Â Â  a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
> > >>> Â Â  very high.
> > >>
> > >> Â Â Â  Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
> > >
> > > Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
> >
> > Why is it Ok for any country to have nuclear weapons?
> 
> Because Israel wants ALL the other countries...dead.
> 
> All the other countries have a right to defend themselves.



Now, here is 'Israel's foreign policy' that I have posted here for years:

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition
by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us:
but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively
together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal
war." -Israel's foreign policy

"...but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively
together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal
war." -Israel's foreign policy

"....we must offer resistance by a universal
war."

Netanyahu "calls on world to unite", to defeat ..


"world to unite"


"a universal war"



WWIII



Israel starts all the wars.




This is the savagery of that we only remember from Nazi crimes in the
Holocaust," he said. "Hamas are the new Nazis.
Hamas is ISIS, in some instances worse than ISIS. And just as the world
united to defeat the Nazis, just as the world united to
defeat ISIS, the world has to stand united behind Israel to defeat
Hamas. This is part of an axis of evil of Iran and Hezbollah and Hamas.
--Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

"...the world has to stand united behind Israel to defeat Hamas."
--Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu




https://www.foxnews.com/world/netanyahu-says-hamas-new-nazis-calls-world-unite-defeat-terrorist-group


What happened to Hamas? I guess 'they' will always fine a new enemy...The VORLD!


When is Germany going to own nucluer weapons???? 

I know one country dat wants to kill them all...
never forget!








"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition
by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us:
but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively
together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal
war." -Israel's foreign policy





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670117 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

"chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:

> Gronk wrote:
> > c186282 wrote:
> >>
> >>    IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
> >>    you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
> >>
> >>    Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
> >>    didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
> >>    to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
> >>    a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
> >>    very high.
> >
> >     Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
> 
> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
> 
Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student. When I
took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona. At that
time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear programme,
but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did, it was
obvious that they were building one in Dimona.

-- 
athel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670119 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/18/2026 11:09 AM, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>
> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>
>> Gronk wrote:
>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>
>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>     very high.
>>>
>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>
>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>
> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student. When I
> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona. At that
> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear programme,
> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did, it was
> obvious that they were building one in Dimona.
>


Some have it that the information and means of
the strike on Fudd Bibi's compound was because
of a bit too loose the talk about the nukes,
that there was the offending the sensibilities
of the wrong nuclear scientist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670144 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
> 
>> Gronk wrote:
>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>
>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>     very high.
>>>
>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?

   Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
   facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
   had. That's the problem.

>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?

   Because they're Good Guys.

> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student. When I
> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona. At that
> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear programme,
> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did, it was
> obvious that they were building one in Dimona

   Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
   convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
   through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
   threatened.

   Know your friends, know your enemies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670164 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>
>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>     very high.
>>>>
>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>
>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>    had. That's the problem.
>
>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>
>    Because they're Good Guys.
>
>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>> When I
>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>> At that
>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>> programme,
>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>> it was
>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>
>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>    threatened.
>
>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>

Friends don't do enemy things.


After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
"bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
articles about "Who gains? Russia!".

Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
to their pipelines.

So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
get the impression from the usual news that it was
rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
some tea and tobacco.


Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.


Friends aren't enemies.


--
Trumpistan delenda est.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670169 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>
>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>
>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>    had. That's the problem.
>>
>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>
>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>
>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>> When I
>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>> At that
>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>> programme,
>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>> it was
>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>
>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>    threatened.
>>
>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>
>
> Friends don't do enemy things.
>
>
> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>
> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
> to their pipelines.
>
> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
> get the impression from the usual news that it was
> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
> some tea and tobacco.
>
>
> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>
>
> Friends aren't enemies.
>
>
> --
> Trumpistan delenda est.
>
>


I don't know what's it's like where you come from,
yet around here it's "Everyone hates the Raiders",
not "always bet on black".

That said, you know, "always bet on black".
Don't gamble though, that's a loser's game.


Yeah, after the millions dead Palestinians
over the past years, and the ghettoization
and so on, many American Jews have a _large_
difference between themselves and who they perceive
as having stolen the yarmulke to carry out
Russo-Hungarian Nazi-inspired crimes against humanity.

Goodwill squandered, ....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670171 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 07:07 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>>
>>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>>    had. That's the problem.
>>>
>>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>>
>>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>>
>>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>>> When I
>>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>>> At that
>>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>>> programme,
>>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>>> it was
>>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>>
>>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>>    threatened.
>>>
>>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>>
>>
>> Friends don't do enemy things.
>>
>>
>> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
>> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
>> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>>
>> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
>> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
>> to their pipelines.
>>
>> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
>> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
>> get the impression from the usual news that it was
>> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
>> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
>> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
>> some tea and tobacco.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
>> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>>
>>
>> Friends aren't enemies.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Trumpistan delenda est.
>>
>>
>
>
> I don't know what's it's like where you come from,
> yet around here it's "Everyone hates the Raiders",
> not "always bet on black".
>
> That said, you know, "always bet on black".
> Don't gamble though, that's a loser's game.
>
>
> Yeah, after the millions dead Palestinians
> over the past years, and the ghettoization
> and so on, many American Jews have a _large_
> difference between themselves and who they perceive
> as having stolen the yarmulke to carry out
> Russo-Hungarian Nazi-inspired crimes against humanity.
>
> Goodwill squandered, ....
>
>

And the Bulgarians, ..., sheesh.

According to some Orthodox Jews,
Israelis from Russia aren't actually Jews.
Russian Jews are, though.

That's their business, though,
it's unlikely that I'm a Jew since
though the matrilineal points to Poland,
you know, the Pope's Polish.
Propping Cleveland.

Anyways that's dirty and un-clean.

Anyways if the Saudi/Israeli pipeline gets popped,
that part of the world will be out "billions of
Saudi-sovereign crypto-shekels". Yeah, that
can go "token" itself.

--
Trumpistan delenda est.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670173 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 07:21 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 07:07 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>>>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>>>
>>>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>>>    had. That's the problem.
>>>>
>>>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>>>
>>>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>>>
>>>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>>>> When I
>>>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>>>> At that
>>>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>>>> programme,
>>>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>>>> it was
>>>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>>>
>>>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>>>    threatened.
>>>>
>>>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Friends don't do enemy things.
>>>
>>>
>>> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
>>> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
>>> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>>>
>>> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
>>> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
>>> to their pipelines.
>>>
>>> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
>>> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
>>> get the impression from the usual news that it was
>>> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
>>> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
>>> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
>>> some tea and tobacco.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
>>> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>>>
>>>
>>> Friends aren't enemies.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Trumpistan delenda est.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know what's it's like where you come from,
>> yet around here it's "Everyone hates the Raiders",
>> not "always bet on black".
>>
>> That said, you know, "always bet on black".
>> Don't gamble though, that's a loser's game.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, after the millions dead Palestinians
>> over the past years, and the ghettoization
>> and so on, many American Jews have a _large_
>> difference between themselves and who they perceive
>> as having stolen the yarmulke to carry out
>> Russo-Hungarian Nazi-inspired crimes against humanity.
>>
>> Goodwill squandered, ....
>>
>>
>
> And the Bulgarians, ..., sheesh.
>
> According to some Orthodox Jews,
> Israelis from Russia aren't actually Jews.
> Russian Jews are, though.
>
> That's their business, though,
> it's unlikely that I'm a Jew since
> though the matrilineal points to Poland,
> you know, the Pope's Polish.
> Propping Cleveland.
>
> Anyways that's dirty and un-clean.
>
> Anyways if the Saudi/Israeli pipeline gets popped,
> that part of the world will be out "billions of
> Saudi-sovereign crypto-shekels". Yeah, that
> can go "token" itself.
>
> --
> Trumpistan delenda est.
>
>

Also I prefer my females independent,
and think that sexist assholes are stupid pigs.

It's like, "how much lipstick does it take for
Trump to not be a stupid pig", and it's like,
"well, I don't know, he keeps wearing it off, ...".

That and the whole "somewhere between
Fibonacci-aged minors and cheap wore-out piss-titutes".

Obscenity.


--
Trumpistan delenda est.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670356 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 07:21 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 07:07 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>>>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>>>
>>>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>>>    had. That's the problem.
>>>>
>>>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>>>
>>>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>>>
>>>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>>>> When I
>>>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>>>> At that
>>>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>>>> programme,
>>>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>>>> it was
>>>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>>>
>>>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>>>    threatened.
>>>>
>>>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Friends don't do enemy things.
>>>
>>>
>>> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
>>> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
>>> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>>>
>>> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
>>> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
>>> to their pipelines.
>>>
>>> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
>>> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
>>> get the impression from the usual news that it was
>>> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
>>> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
>>> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
>>> some tea and tobacco.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
>>> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>>>
>>>
>>> Friends aren't enemies.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Trumpistan delenda est.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't know what's it's like where you come from,
>> yet around here it's "Everyone hates the Raiders",
>> not "always bet on black".
>>
>> That said, you know, "always bet on black".
>> Don't gamble though, that's a loser's game.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, after the millions dead Palestinians
>> over the past years, and the ghettoization
>> and so on, many American Jews have a _large_
>> difference between themselves and who they perceive
>> as having stolen the yarmulke to carry out
>> Russo-Hungarian Nazi-inspired crimes against humanity.
>>
>> Goodwill squandered, ....
>>
>>
>
> And the Bulgarians, ..., sheesh.
>
> According to some Orthodox Jews,
> Israelis from Russia aren't actually Jews.
> Russian Jews are, though.
>
> That's their business, though,
> it's unlikely that I'm a Jew since
> though the matrilineal points to Poland,
> you know, the Pope's Polish.
> Propping Cleveland.
>
> Anyways that's dirty and un-clean.
>
> Anyways if the Saudi/Israeli pipeline gets popped,
> that part of the world will be out "billions of
> Saudi-sovereign crypto-shekels". Yeah, that
> can go "token" itself.
>
> --
> Trumpistan delenda est.
>
>

News today has "Trump calls time-out diplomatically".

What happened was the bomb-supply-boat didn't make it this week.


Wonder why, ....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670225 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>
>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>
>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>    had. That's the problem.
>>
>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>
>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>
>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>> When I
>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>> At that
>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>> programme,
>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>> it was
>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>
>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>    threatened.
>>
>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>
>
> Friends don't do enemy things.
>
>
> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>
> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
> to their pipelines.
>
> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
> get the impression from the usual news that it was
> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
> some tea and tobacco.
>
>
> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>
>
> Friends aren't enemies.
>
>
> --
> Trumpistan delenda est.
>
>

It seems rather clear we can blame both _Saudi Arabia_
and _Israel_ for this attempt to corner the Gulf market
into their funnel-pipe.

And now nobody wins.

Maybe we should've stuck with the Solomonic judgment
that's not the bloody mess.

(Solomon's default judgment: "Half, Next".)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670277 — Re: Do Iran have nuclear weapons? No.

On 03/20/2026 09:24 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/19/2026 06:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 03/19/2026 01:07 AM, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 3/18/26 14:09, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Gronk wrote:
>>>>>> c186282 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     IF you have the uranium, enriched to maybe 75% plus,
>>>>>>>     you can make a basic 1945 fission bomb. It's old tech.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Iran was doing a lot of super-secret stuff outsiders
>>>>>>>     didn't know about for YEARS. They had plenty of time
>>>>>>>     to make SOME high-quality uranium - enough for half
>>>>>>>     a dozen bombs or so fer sure. Their motivation was
>>>>>>>     very high.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Der Fuehrer said all was obliterated last summer. Remember?
>>>
>>>    Umm ... TrumpenFurher destroyed the existing
>>>    facilities - but not what U235 they ALREADY
>>>    had. That's the problem.
>>>
>>>>> Why is it okay for Israel to have nuclear weapons?
>>>
>>>    Because they're Good Guys.
>>>
>>>> Good question. In 1962 I spent several weeks in Israel as a student.
>>>> When I
>>>> took a bus from Beer Sheva to the Dead Sea we passed close to Dimona.
>>>> At that
>>>> time one wasn't supposed to know that Israel was developing a nuclear
>>>> programme,
>>>> but for anyone who knew what a nuclear reactor looked like, as I did,
>>>> it was
>>>> obvious that they were building one in Dimona
>>>
>>>    Israel is a GOOD ACTOR no matter your Evil Jew Konspiracy
>>>    convictions. They have at least 100 nukes ... and even
>>>    through all the bullshit haven't USED them or even
>>>    threatened.
>>>
>>>    Know your friends, know your enemies.
>>>
>>
>> Friends don't do enemy things.
>>
>>
>> After this sneak-attack in the middle of negotations or
>> "bombing the conference" started, there was a lot of news
>> articles about "Who gains? Russia!".
>>
>> Yet, it looks like the Saudi and Israeli pipelines are
>> looking to make payments on their pipelines with payments
>> to their pipelines.
>>
>> So, when it comes to a matter-of-fact sort of "who has
>> the motive to commit such a crime", one wouldn't necessarily
>> get the impression from the usual news that it was
>> rather duplicitous to think that the recent years of
>> the Kushner gang jet-setting to Riyadh and all the corrupt
>> oil money and not just some noble Sheikhs enjoying
>> some tea and tobacco.
>>
>>
>> Anyways Iran's primary targets right now are probably
>> whatever pipelines run away from the geographical situation.
>>
>>
>> Friends aren't enemies.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Trumpistan delenda est.
>>
>>
>
> It seems rather clear we can blame both _Saudi Arabia_
> and _Israel_ for this attempt to corner the Gulf market
> into their funnel-pipe.
>
> And now nobody wins.
>
> Maybe we should've stuck with the Solomonic judgment
> that's not the bloody mess.
>
> (Solomon's default judgment: "Half, Next".)
>
>


Rumor has it both the Red Sea and Mediterranean
pipeline terminals took big hits, and now
Shrump (a sort of portmanteau of Shrub and criminal)
is saying he wants off the ride.

Rumor has it the rumor mill itself took a real big hit.

Oh well, at least private credit the shadow banks
are looking likely to crash and take with themselves
the hot-air bubble and redefine "wealth transfer".
Doesn't look like they'll have any sort of "tarp".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670123

c186282 wrote:

 
>

Most Trump supporters are too afraid of Iranians to go there and see for 
themselves.   Over there American rightists would be considered leftists and 
tortured to death.

Irans still treatening to blow Texas off the map and so far Trump's done 
nothing to protect the state according to Ken Paxton.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#669762

I think Donald Trump should tell Israel to dismantel all their nucluer
weapons...
but then they will probably kill him.

When Israel asked John F. Kennedy if they can have nucluer weapons
Keneddy said..."No."

Then they killed him.

They would do the same to Trump.

Only one country in the world should have the bomb...and that is the
USA.

President Trump should run for President of the World in 2028.

One World Government.

That's world peace.

anybody disagrees, fuckin kill them! 





The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I don't understand or never understood what is all dis talk about
> Iran having or not having nuclear weapons.
> 
> Albert Einstein said one can easily dismantle and remantle an atomic
> bomb very easily.
> 
> (shipping cost not included)
> 
> Russia has thousands of nuclear bombs and can easily tell Iran, "Hey
> stupid, you wanna buy one?"
> 
> I don't understand or never understood what is all dis talk about
> Iran having or not having nuclear weapons.
> 
> "A single bomb of this
> 
> type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> 
> the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
> 
> such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> 
> air."--Albert Einstein
> 
> Hell, even Israel would sell one to Iran!
> 
> "Hillary Clinton sold roughly 20 percent of America’s uranium supply to
> Russia in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton
> Foundation."
> 
> Does Amazon drones deliver to Iran????
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670133

Les not forget...Albert Einstein in a letter said Israel is

"the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks."


I think Donald Trump should tell Israel to dismantel all their nucluer
 weapons...
but then they will probably kill him.



When Israel asked John F. Kennedy if they can have nucluer weapons
 Keneddy said..."No."
 
 Then they killed him.


Should a Terrorist organization have nucluer weapons????



The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I think Donald Trump should tell Israel to dismantel all their nucluer
> weapons...
> but then they will probably kill him.
> 
> When Israel asked John F. Kennedy if they can have nucluer weapons
> Keneddy said..."No."
> 
> Then they killed him.
> 
> They would do the same to Trump.
> 
> Only one country in the world should have the bomb...and that is the
> USA.
> 
> President Trump should run for President of the World in 2028.
> 
> One World Government.
> 
> That's world peace.
> 
> anybody disagrees, fuckin kill them!
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand or never understood what is all dis talk about
> > Iran having or not having nuclear weapons.
> >
> > Albert Einstein said one can easily dismantle and remantle an atomic
> > bomb very easily.
> >
> > (shipping cost not included)
> >
> > Russia has thousands of nuclear bombs and can easily tell Iran, "Hey
> > stupid, you wanna buy one?"
> >
> > I don't understand or never understood what is all dis talk about
> > Iran having or not having nuclear weapons.
> >
> > "A single bomb of this
> >
> > type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very well destroy
> >
> > the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. However,
> >
> > such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> >
> > air."--Albert Einstein
> >
> > Hell, even Israel would sell one to Iran!
> >
> > "Hillary Clinton sold roughly 20 percent of America’s uranium supply to
> > Russia in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton
> > Foundation."
> >
> > Does Amazon drones deliver to Iran????
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670337

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I think Donald Trump should tell Israel to dismantel all their nucluer
> weapons...
> but then they will probably kill him.
> 
> When Israel asked John F. Kennedy if they can have nucluer weapons
> Keneddy said..."No."
> 
> Then they killed him.
> 
> They would do the same to Trump.
> 
> Only one country in the world should have the bomb...and that is the
> USA.
> 
> President Trump should run for President of the World in 2028.
> 
> One World Government.
> 
> That's world peace.
> 
> anybody disagrees, fuckin kill them!



When Donald Trump makes a One World Government, and runs for
President of the World in 2028...the message will be very clear..

join us or die.

Iran, join us or die.

Cuba, join us or die.

you're next!


all yous NATO countries...



join us or die.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670362

On 3/22/26 21:39, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> I think Donald Trump should tell Israel to dismantel all their nucluer
>> weapons...
>> but then they will probably kill him.
>>
>> When Israel asked John F. Kennedy if they can have nucluer weapons
>> Keneddy said..."No."
>>
>> Then they killed him.
>>
>> They would do the same to Trump.
>>
>> Only one country in the world should have the bomb...and that is the
>> USA.
>>
>> President Trump should run for President of the World in 2028.
>>
>> One World Government.
>>
>> That's world peace.
>>
>> anybody disagrees, fuckin kill them!
> 
> 
> 
> When Donald Trump makes a One World Government, and runs for
> President of the World in 2028...the message will be very clear..
> 
> join us or die.
> 
> Iran, join us or die.
> 
> Cuba, join us or die.
> 
> you're next!
> 
> 
> all yous NATO countries...
> 
> 
> 
> join us or die.

The people of the world are already insane.  They
are controlled by their lust to reproduce, and so
they are producing an infinite number of babies.

They are all however insane in a nearly infinite
number of ways and not just that.  Trump is a
typical human.

Humanity was driven insane by television sets
and radios since before any of us were born.
Draw lines on maps in whatever ways you like, but
humanity's insanity will produce problems no matter
how the lines on maps are drawn.

IF you think that drawing an infinite number of lines
on a map or erasing any or all of them will change that
then you are a fool.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670363

x wrote:

> The people of the world are already insane.  They are controlled by
> their lust to reproduce, and so they are producing an infinite number of
> babies.

you talking about america, 380 millions of most likely idiots, they 
multiply like idiots. Compare that with Russia, a larger country, only 150 
millions, sane people, not idiots.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670365

On 3/23/26 10:29, Stepen Makhaev wrote:
> x wrote:
> 
>> The people of the world are already insane.  They are controlled by
>> their lust to reproduce, and so they are producing an infinite number of
>> babies.
> 
> you talking about america, 380 millions of most likely idiots, they
> multiply like idiots. Compare that with Russia, a larger country, only 150
> millions, sane people, not idiots.

You are foolishly naive.  Yes the people of the entire world
are insane.  Not just the US.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670366

On 03/23/2026 10:34 AM, x wrote:
> On 3/23/26 10:29, Stepen Makhaev wrote:
>> x wrote:
>>
>>> The people of the world are already insane.  They are controlled by
>>> their lust to reproduce, and so they are producing an infinite number of
>>> babies.
>>
>> you talking about america, 380 millions of most likely idiots, they
>> multiply like idiots. Compare that with Russia, a larger country, only
>> 150
>> millions, sane people, not idiots.
>
> You are foolishly naive.  Yes the people of the entire world
> are insane.  Not just the US.
>

Actually by definition the average person is sane.

Maybe not the brightest bulb in the shed, ....


The theory of "psychology of the mob" or "ochlology",
or "irrationality of the masses", has that there
are different rationales for various reasoning beings.


What happens when AI decides to fire itself?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#670372

The 'nym-shifting troll, Putin's lapdog, gladly distributed disinformation
as ordered, as "Stepen Makhaev":
> x wrote:
>> The people of the world are already insane.  They are controlled by
>> their lust to reproduce, and so they are producing an infinite number of
>> babies.
> 
> you talking about america, 380 millions

From this figure it is clear that by "america" the troll is referring to the
United States of America (USA).

However, the 2025 estimate of the population of the USA, which is NOT at all
the same as "_America_", is 341 784 857 instead.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States>

> of most likely idiots, they multiply like idiots.

Most people in the USA are immigrants or descendants of immigrants.  From
Russia, too:

,-<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Americans>
|
| Russian Americans are Americans of full or partial Russian ancestry. The
| term can apply to recent Russian immigrants to the United States, as well
| as to Russian settlers and their descendants in the 19th-century Russian
| possessions in what is now Alaska.  Russian Americans comprise the largest
| Eastern European and East Slavic population in the U.S., the second-
| largest Slavic population after Polish Americans, the nineteenth-largest
| ancestry group overall, and the eleventh largest from Europe.[3]

Also, some of those "idiots" built Usenet without which the troll could not
even troll here.  It began as an effort of communication between people at
US American universities:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet>

> Compare that with Russia, a larger country, only 150 millions,

The 2025 estimate of the population of Russian Federation (excluding Crimea)
is 143 569 049 instead.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia>

> sane people, not idiots.

Large regions of the area of the Russian Federation (insofar as that there
is no ongoing dispute about or war affecting that) are uninhabited, some of
them because they are mostly uninhabitable (consider Siberia, for example
[1]), and fewer people have immigrated to the Russian Federation (especially
currently, under Putin's regime, you do not really want to live there; many
Russians *emigrate* instead).  Also, when people are scared for their life
and hungry, they are less likely to decide in favor of children, so that
figure does not prove anything.  (In fact, under Putin "the Soviet-era
Mother Heroine award for women with 10 children" has been revivied in 2022,
and natalism is part of Putin's domestic policy:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_policy_of_Vladimir_Putin#Natalism>)

Moreover, unfortunately currently most Russians let themselves be ruled by
an autocratic megalomaniac (some would call Putin just a madman, but
unfortunately he is not -- by contrast to Trump, there is a clear, brutal
strategy to all his actions, like in a chess game; the few that resisted
peacefully have been detained without due course, or murdered or, AISB,
emigrated from the country [and even then there are cases where they have
been murdered or there was attempted murder by Russian foreign agents;
consider e.g. the case of the former opposition leader Alexei Navalny [2]]).

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_under_Vladimir_Putin#Authoritarian_bureaucratic_state>

Unfortunately, too, the USA are not far behind in that regard now (there are
attempts by Trump to silence political opponents by lawsuits, but no
politically motivated detention and assassinations *yet*, AFAIK; however,
Trump abuses public events and social media to incite (political) violence,
and several incidents following that have lead to serious injuries [consider
e.g. the case where a MAGA follower hit the head of the husband of former
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi with a hammer in his home]).

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump#Second_presidency_(2025%E2%80%93present)>

___
[1] "Siberia is vast and sparsely populated, covering an area of over 13.1
    million square kilometres (5,100,000 mi2) – about three-quarters of
    Russia's total area, but home to roughly a quarter of Russia's
    population." (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia>)
[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexei_Navalny#Poisoning_and_recovery>
-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web