Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #664051 > unrolled thread

New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-10 18:55 +0000
    Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-10 22:25 +0000
    Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-06-11 11:35 +0200
      Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-06-11 17:49 +0200
        Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 03:00 +0000
          Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-12 20:42 +0000
        Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-12 03:04 +0000
        Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-12 22:38 +0000
      Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-12 22:12 +0000
      Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-12 22:22 +0000
        Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-13 10:24 +0200
          Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-13 20:59 +0200
            Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-13 12:13 -0700
              Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:19 +0200
            Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-14 09:17 +0200
              Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-06-14 10:36 +0200
                Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-06-15 10:10 +0200
      Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-12 23:23 +0000
      Re: New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-06-13 00:32 +0000

#664051 — New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity

Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

"Considering Einstein’s relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#664056

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:55:38 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>
> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
> Relativity"
> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>
> "Considering Einstein’s relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
> top."

Wonderful! Out with the depravity of relativity!

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664068

LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
> 
> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
> Relativity"
> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
> 
> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
> top."

Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

Jan

-- 
<https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/AIVP/issue/view/551>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664079

On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>> 
>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>> Relativity"
>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>> 
>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>> top."
> 
> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself 
as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red 
flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious 
journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some 
respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664094

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>
>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>> Relativity"
>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>
>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>> top."
>>
>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.

Sad.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664115

On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 3:00:26 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>
>> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>>
>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>>
>>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>>> Relativity"
>>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>>
>>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>>> top."
>>>
>>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>>
>> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
>> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
>> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
>> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
>> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
>
> And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
> quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.
>
> Sad.
>
> WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
>
> Bertietaylor
>
> --
Yes, the relativists commenting have no clue about the retarding
political and social influences holding back science such as peer
review.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664095

"So I said, fuck 'em, fuck 'em all.
With THOSE jerks I shall NOT play ball."

Woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Rotten eggs for relativists!

Bertietaylor

--

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664120

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

> On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>>
>>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>>> Relativity"
>>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>>
>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>> top."
>>
>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
> as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
> flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
> journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
> respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
Peer review is a guarantee that it was carried out in a dark back room
in secret.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664118

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>
>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>> Relativity"
>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>
>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>> top."
>
> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> Jan
Are you aware that Aristotelian science was a political and religious
dogma enforced by control over publications until the printing press?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664119

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>
>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>> Relativity"
>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>
>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>> top."
>
> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> Jan
Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
Germany.
In 1616, Galileo was warned not to defend the heliocentric theory. In
1633, he was placed on trial for heresy and was forced to publicly
recant his belief in the heliocentric model.
Do you think modern scientific establishments are any less selfish than
the Church was?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664135

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 00:22 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
...
>>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>>> top."
>>
>> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

I did, actually, but not at all of Einstein's papers.

My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' 
contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck, 
because Planck was a world class physicist.

Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as 
'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)

I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually 
some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.

Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a 
different believe system (other than Judaism).

>> Jan
> Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
> Germany.

As far as I know, the printing press was known before.

Gutenberg invented a scheme to use single reusable printing letters.

...

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664151

Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
> 
> My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' 
> contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck, 
> because Planck was a world class physicist.
> 
> Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as 
> 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)
> 
> I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
> 
> Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually 
> some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
> 
> Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a 
> different believe system (other than Judaism).
> 

Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?

That would make sense, since 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
is so ridiculous that it can only be written to make the Jew Einstein
look stupid.

-- 
Paul  :-J

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664152

Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> 
> Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
> >
> > My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
> > contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck,
> > because Planck was a world class physicist.
> >
> > Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
> > 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)
> >
> > I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
> >
> > Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
> > some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
> >
> > Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
> > different believe system (other than Judaism).
> >
> 
> Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
> 
> That would make sense, since 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
> is so ridiculous that it can only be written to make the Jew Einstein
> look stupid.



Or her name was Adolf Hitler...since Einstein's wife wrote part of
(if not most all of it) 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies', and
both Einstein's wife and Aldolp Hitler were both from Austria-Hungry.

Does she have a ...mustache?  


Didn't Einstein gave her money for her part in 'On the electrodynamics
of moving bodies'????







> 
> --
> Paul  :-J
> 
> https://paulba.no/

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664171

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 21:13 schrieb The Starmaker:
> Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>
>> Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>
>>> My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
>>> contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck,
>>> because Planck was a world class physicist.
>>>
>>> Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
>>> 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)
>>>
>>> I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
>>>
>>> Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
>>> some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
>>>
>>> Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
>>> different believe system (other than Judaism).
>>>
>>
>> Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
>>
>> That would make sense, since 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
>> is so ridiculous that it can only be written to make the Jew Einstein
>> look stupid.
> 
> 
> 
> Or her name was Adolf Hitler...since Einstein's wife wrote part of
> (if not most all of it) 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies', and
> both Einstein's wife and Aldolp Hitler were both from Austria-Hungry.
> 
> Does she have a ...mustache?
> 
> 
Well, possibly Einstein's wife had a few more feature, which are usually 
restricted to males.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664170

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:59 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
> Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>
>> My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' 
>> contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by 
>> Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
>>
>> Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as 
>> 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation 
>> agent'.)
>>
>> I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
>>
>> Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually 
>> some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
>>
>> Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a 
>> different believe system (other than Judaism).
>>
> 
> Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?

Most likely not.

But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:

There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg 
Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.

To extend this, I had searched for an Englishmen, who would fit and 
found 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

The reason for this guy are a little complicated.

But mainly my assumption is based on the relation of other Huxleys to 
Naziism, which at that time was called 'Eugenics' in English.

Head of 'Eugenics' was Julian Huxley, who was also an agent in 
Churchills naval secret service.

They were both grandsons of Thomas Henry Huxley and that was 'Darwin's 
bulldog' ('inventor' of racism).

The relation of Hitler to Churchill was Hitler's girlfriend Unity 
Valkyrie Mitford, who was Churchill's niece.

The relation between Hitler and the Huxleys was a schoolmate of the real 
Hitler named Ludwig Wittgenstein, who was a member of the 'apostles' of 
Cambridge together with Aldous Huxley.


...


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664174

Den 14.06.2025 09:17, skrev Thomas Heger:
> Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:59 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
>> Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>>
>>> My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' 
>>> contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by 
>>> Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
>>>
>>> Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as 
>>> 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation 
>>> agent'.)
>>>
>>> I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
>>>
>>> Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually 
>>> some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
>>>
>>> Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a 
>>> different believe system (other than Judaism).
>>>
>>
>> Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?

> 
> Most likely not.

But not impossible?

> 
> But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:
> 
> There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg 
> Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.

I find it very reasonable that you think so.


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664219

Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:36 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:

>>>> My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' 
>>>> contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by 
>>>> Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as 
>>>> 'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation 
>>>> agent'.)
>>>>
>>>> I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
>>>>
>>>> Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was 
>>>> actually some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from 
>>>> birth.
>>>>
>>>> Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a 
>>>> different believe system (other than Judaism).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
> 
>>
>> Most likely not.
> 
> But not impossible?

Sure, but 'Donald Duck' would also be possible.

>>
>> But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:
>>
>> There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg 
>> Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.
> 
> I find it very reasonable that you think so.
> 
You might be surprised, but Germans still think about Naziism and WWII.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664122

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>
>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>> Relativity"
>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>
>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>> top."
>
> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> Jan
Would you like to explain how relativity can claim the equivalence of
inertial and gravitational mass while claiming the mass velocity
relationship? Do they not contradict?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#664123

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
>> Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
>>
>> Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
>> Relativity"
>> European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
>>
>> "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
>> shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
>> misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
>> top."
>
> Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
>
> Jan
They are mutually exclusive making relativity self-contradictory
nonsense.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web